Search (3917 results, page 1 of 196)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Heckner, M.: Tagging, rating, posting : studying forms of user contribution for web-based information management and information retrieval (2009) 0.51
    0.5069528 = product of:
      0.7604292 = sum of:
        0.16807395 = weight(_text_:tagging in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16807395 = score(doc=2931,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.79889125 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
        0.13592258 = weight(_text_:filter in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13592258 = score(doc=2931,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24899386 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.987357 = idf(docFreq=110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.5458873 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.987357 = idf(docFreq=110, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
        0.0663011 = weight(_text_:web in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0663011 = score(doc=2931,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.5701118 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
        0.11433911 = weight(_text_:log in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11433911 = score(doc=2931,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22837062 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.5006735 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
        0.058166526 = weight(_text_:world in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058166526 = score(doc=2931,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.42466965 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
        0.07729241 = weight(_text_:wide in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07729241 = score(doc=2931,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.48953426 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
        0.0663011 = weight(_text_:web in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0663011 = score(doc=2931,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.5701118 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
        0.07403238 = product of:
          0.14806476 = sum of:
            0.14806476 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2931) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14806476 = score(doc=2931,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035634913 = queryNorm
                0.71642053 = fieldWeight in 2931, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2931)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.6666667 = coord(8/12)
    
    Abstract
    Die Entstehung von Social Software ermöglicht es Nutzern, in großem Umfang im Netz zu publizieren. Bisher liegen aber nur wenige empirische Befunde zu funktionalen Eigenschaften sowie Qualitätsaspekten von Nutzerbeiträgen im Kontext von Informationsmanagement und Information Retrieval vor. Diese Arbeit diskutiert grundlegende Partizipationsformen, präsentiert empirische Studien über Social Tagging, Blogbeiträge sowie Relevanzbeurteilungen und entwickelt Design und Implementierung einer "sozialen" Informationsarchitektur für ein partizipatives Onlinehilfesystem.
    Content
    The Web of User Contribution - Foundations and Principles of the Social Web - Social Tagging - Rating and Filtering of Digital Resources Empirical Analysisof User Contributions - The Functional and Linguistic Structure of Tags - A Comparative Analysis of Tags for Different Digital Resource Types - Exploring Relevance Assessments in Social IR Systems - Exploring User Contribution Within a Higher Education Scenario - Summary of Empirical Results and Implications for Designing Social Information Systems User Contribution for a Participative Information System - Social Information Architecture for an Online Help System
    Object
    Web 2.0
    RSWK
    World Wide Web 2.0 / Benutzer / Online-Publizieren / Information Retrieval / Soziale Software / Hilfesystem
    Social Tagging / Filter / Web log / World Wide Web 2.0
    Subject
    World Wide Web 2.0 / Benutzer / Online-Publizieren / Information Retrieval / Soziale Software / Hilfesystem
    Social Tagging / Filter / Web log / World Wide Web 2.0
    Theme
    Social tagging
  2. Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004) 0.37
    0.36795494 = product of:
      0.6307799 = sum of:
        0.056597687 = product of:
          0.16979305 = sum of:
            0.16979305 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16979305 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035634913 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.16979305 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16979305 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.16979305 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16979305 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.025159499 = weight(_text_:web in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025159499 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.16979305 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16979305 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.025159499 = weight(_text_:web in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025159499 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
        0.014484116 = product of:
          0.028968232 = sum of:
            0.028968232 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028968232 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12478739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035634913 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5833333 = coord(7/12)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
    Date
    8. 1.2013 10:22:32
  3. Alby, T.: Web 2.0 : Konzepte, Anwendungen, Technologien; [ajax, api, atom, blog, folksonomy, feeds, long tail, mashup, permalink, podcast, rich user experience, rss, social software, tagging] (2007) 0.26
    0.2586185 = product of:
      0.44334602 = sum of:
        0.04116954 = weight(_text_:tagging in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04116954 = score(doc=296,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.19568759 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
        0.07956132 = weight(_text_:web in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07956132 = score(doc=296,freq=80.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.6841342 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
              8.944272 = tf(freq=80.0), with freq of:
                80.0 = termFreq=80.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
        0.06860346 = weight(_text_:log in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06860346 = score(doc=296,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.22837062 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.30040407 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
        0.034899916 = weight(_text_:world in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034899916 = score(doc=296,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
        0.046375446 = weight(_text_:wide in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046375446 = score(doc=296,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
        0.07956132 = weight(_text_:web in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07956132 = score(doc=296,freq=80.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.6841342 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
              8.944272 = tf(freq=80.0), with freq of:
                80.0 = termFreq=80.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
        0.09317499 = product of:
          0.18634997 = sum of:
            0.18634997 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.18634997 = score(doc=296,freq=44.0), product of:
                0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035634913 = queryNorm
                0.90166587 = fieldWeight in 296, product of:
                  6.6332498 = tf(freq=44.0), with freq of:
                    44.0 = termFreq=44.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5833333 = coord(7/12)
    
    Abstract
    Dem neuen Web mal auf die Finger geschaut -- Tom Alby hat sich bereits mit seinem Suchmaschinenoptimierung-Buch einen Namen gemacht und setzt dem Erfolg seines ersten Buches nun mit Web 2.0. Konzepte, Anwendungen, Technologien noch einen drauf. Wie schon bei der Optimierung für Suchmaschinen geht er auch bei seinem Blick auf das Phänomen Web 2.0 ganzheitlich und umfassend an die Arbeit: Ideen, Technik, Umsetzungen, Beispiele, Erfolge, Probleme, Ausblicke und Interviews mit den Machern. Ein Blitzlichtfoto im dunklen Web-Dschungel. Endlich geht es dem Web wieder gut. Alle freuen sich. Die Verlierer werden die Sieger sein. Jetzt wird alles anders. Das Blablabla in den Medien klingt ähnlich wie schon zu Zeiten des Web 1.0. Und doch ist es anders. Was sich geändert hat, zeigt sich jedoch meist erst auf den zweiten Blick -- Alby hat diese Einblicke zusammen getragen und zeigt den aktuellen Stand. Ohne Wortblasen, an Beispielen mit Hintergrund. Nach einem Blick auf die Historie von der New Economy zum Web 2.0 stürzt sich Alby auf das bekannteste Web 2.0-Beispiel: den Blog. Alsdann durchleuchtet er Podcasts, Social Software wie FlickR oder Skype, Folksonomy (wo bleibt das Geld), die Plattformrepräsentanten wie Google, die Technik im Hintergrund von AJAX bis Ruby, Business-Modelle und der Blick Richtung 3.0. Zuletzt dann Interviews mit den Vorreitern der Szene: von Johnny Haeusler bis Jörg Petermann. In Web 2.0. Konzepte, Anwendungen, Technologienkann man pieksen wie man will, es platzt nicht. Das fundierte Über- und Einblicksbuch ist jedem Journalisten, Manager, Trendforscher und Webaktivisten zu empfehlen, denn wer nicht weiß, was Alby weiß, sollte zum Thema Web 2.0 lieber schweigen.
    Classification
    ST 252 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Web-Programmierung, allgemein
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitt VÖB 60(2007) H.3, S.85-86 (M. Buzinkay): "Ein aktuelles Thema der Informationsbranche ist Web 2.0. Für die einen Hype, für andere Web-Realität, ist das Web 2.0 seit wenigen Jahren das "neue Web". Der Autor, Tom Alby, versucht daher im ersten Kapitel auch einen Unterschied zum Vorgänger-Web aufzubauen: Was ist so anders im Web 2.0? In weiterer Folge handelt Alby alle Themen ab, die mit Web 2.0 in Verbindung gebracht werden: Blogging, Podcasting, Social Software, Folksonomies, das Web als Plattform und diverse Web 2.0 typische Technologien. Ein Ausblick auf das Web 3.0 darf auch nicht fehlen. Das Buch liefert hier die notwendigen Einführungen und "Brücken", um auch als Laie zumindest ansatzweise Verständnis für diese neuen Entwicklungen aufzubringen. Daher ist es nur konsequent und sehr passend, dass Alby neben seinem technischen Fachjargon auch leicht verständliche Einführungsbeispiele bereithält. Denn es geht Alby weniger um Technologie und Tools (diese werden aber auch behandelt, eben beispielhaft), sondern vor allem um Konzepte: Was will das Web 2.0 überhaupt und was macht seinen Erfolg aus? Das Buch ist einfach zu lesen, mit zahlreichen Illustrationen bebildert und listet eine Unmenge an online Quellen für eine weitere Vertiefung auf. Doch mit Büchern über das Web ist es genauso wie dem Web selbst: die Halbwertszeit ist sehr kurz. Das gilt insbesondere für die Technik und für mögliche Dienste. Alby hat diesen technischen Zweig der Web 2.0-Geschichte so umfangreich wie für das Verständnis nötig, aus Gründen der Aktualität aber so gering wie möglich ausfallen lassen. Und das ist gut so: dieses Buch können Sie getrost auch in drei Jahren in die Hand nehmen. Es wird zwar andere Dienste geben als im Buch angegeben, und manche Links werden vielleicht nicht mehr funktionieren, die Prinzipien des Web 2.0 bleiben aber dieselben. Sollten Sie sich geändert haben, dann haben wir schon Web 2.x oder gar Web 3.0. Aber das ist eine andere Geschichte, die uns vielleicht Tom Alby zur angemessenen Zeit weitergeben möchte. Ein Bonus, wie ich finde, sind die zahlreichen Interviews, die Tom Alby mit bekannten deutschen Web 2.0 Aushängeschildern geführt hat. Sie geben einen guten Einblick, welchen Stellenwert Web 2.0 in der Zwischenzeit gewonnen hat. Nicht nur in einer Nische von Web-Freaks, sondern in der Welt der Kommunikation. Und das sind wir."
    LCSH
    Web log / World Wide Web 2.0 / Podcasting / Soziale Software (GBV)
    Object
    Web 2.0
    RSWK
    World Wide Web 2.0
    RVK
    ST 252 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Web-Programmierung, allgemein
    Subject
    World Wide Web 2.0
    Web log / World Wide Web 2.0 / Podcasting / Soziale Software (GBV)
  4. Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008) 0.25
    0.25154528 = product of:
      0.7546358 = sum of:
        0.075463586 = product of:
          0.22639075 = sum of:
            0.22639075 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22639075 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035634913 = queryNorm
                0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22639075 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22639075 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
        0.22639075 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22639075 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
        0.22639075 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22639075 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
      0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
    
    Content
    Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
  5. Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005) 0.22
    0.22010213 = product of:
      0.6603064 = sum of:
        0.06603064 = product of:
          0.19809191 = sum of:
            0.19809191 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19809191 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035634913 = queryNorm
                0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.19809191 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19809191 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.19809191 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19809191 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
        0.19809191 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.19809191 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
      0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
    
    Content
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
  6. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.21
    0.21237956 = product of:
      0.42475912 = sum of:
        0.037731793 = product of:
          0.113195375 = sum of:
            0.113195375 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.113195375 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035634913 = queryNorm
                0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.113195375 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.113195375 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.113195375 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.113195375 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.023720603 = weight(_text_:web in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023720603 = score(doc=701,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.113195375 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.113195375 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.023720603 = weight(_text_:web in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023720603 = score(doc=701,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  7. Web-2.0-Dienste als Ergänzung zu algorithmischen Suchmaschinen (2008) 0.19
    0.1893054 = product of:
      0.3786108 = sum of:
        0.08233908 = weight(_text_:tagging in 4323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08233908 = score(doc=4323,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.39137518 = fieldWeight in 4323, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4323)
        0.056258354 = weight(_text_:web in 4323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056258354 = score(doc=4323,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.48375595 = fieldWeight in 4323, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4323)
        0.049355935 = weight(_text_:world in 4323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049355935 = score(doc=4323,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.36034414 = fieldWeight in 4323, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4323)
        0.06558479 = weight(_text_:wide in 4323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06558479 = score(doc=4323,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.4153836 = fieldWeight in 4323, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4323)
        0.056258354 = weight(_text_:web in 4323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056258354 = score(doc=4323,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.48375595 = fieldWeight in 4323, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4323)
        0.06881429 = product of:
          0.13762859 = sum of:
            0.13762859 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.13762859 = score(doc=4323,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035634913 = queryNorm
                0.66592443 = fieldWeight in 4323, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Mit sozialen Suchdiensten - wie z. B. Yahoo Clever, Lycos iQ oder Mister Wong - ist eine Ergänzung und teilweise sogar eine Konkurrenz zu den bisherigen Ansätzen in der Web-Suche entstanden. Während Google und Co. automatisch generierte Trefferlisten bieten, binden soziale Suchdienste die Anwender zu Generierung der Suchergebnisse in den Suchprozess ein. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird in diesem Buch der Frage nachgegangen, inwieweit soziale Suchdienste mit traditionellen Suchmaschinen konkurrieren oder diese qualitativ ergänzen können. Der vorliegende Band beleuchtet die hier aufgeworfene Fragestellung aus verschiedenen Perspektiven, um auf die Bedeutung von sozialen Suchdiensten zu schließen.
    Issue
    Ergebnisse des Fachprojektes "Einbindung von Frage-Antwort-Diensten in die Web-Suche" am Department Information der Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften Hamburg (WS 2007/2008).
    RSWK
    World Wide Web 2.0 / Suchmaschine
    Subject
    World Wide Web 2.0 / Suchmaschine
    Theme
    Social tagging
  8. Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009) 0.19
    0.18865895 = product of:
      0.56597686 = sum of:
        0.056597687 = product of:
          0.16979305 = sum of:
            0.16979305 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16979305 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035634913 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.16979305 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16979305 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.16979305 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16979305 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
        0.16979305 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16979305 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
      0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
    
    Footnote
    Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
  9. Ding, Y.; Jacob, E.K.; Zhang, Z.; Foo, S.; Yan, E.; George, N.L.; Guo, L.: Perspectives on social tagging (2009) 0.18
    0.17872109 = product of:
      0.4289306 = sum of:
        0.24701725 = weight(_text_:tagging in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24701725 = score(doc=3290,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            1.1741256 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
        0.050318997 = weight(_text_:web in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050318997 = score(doc=3290,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
        0.034899916 = weight(_text_:world in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034899916 = score(doc=3290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
        0.046375446 = weight(_text_:wide in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046375446 = score(doc=3290,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
        0.050318997 = weight(_text_:web in 3290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050318997 = score(doc=3290,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 3290, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3290)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    Social tagging is one of the major phenomena transforming the World Wide Web from a static platform into an actively shared information space. This paper addresses various aspects of social tagging, including different views on the nature of social tagging, how to make use of social tags, and how to bridge social tagging with other Web functionalities; it discusses the use of facets to facilitate browsing and searching of tagging data; and it presents an analogy between bibliometrics and tagometrics, arguing that established bibliometric methodologies can be applied to analyze tagging behavior on the Web. Based on the Upper Tag Ontology (UTO), a Web crawler was built to harvest tag data from Delicious, Flickr, and YouTube in September 2007. In total, 1.8 million objects, including bookmarks, photos, and videos, 3.1 million taggers, and 12.1 million tags were collected and analyzed. Some tagging patterns and variations are identified and discussed.
    Theme
    Social tagging
  10. Rosenfeld, L.; Morville, P.: Information architecture for the World Wide Web : designing large-scale Web sites (2007) 0.17
    0.17433682 = product of:
      0.41840836 = sum of:
        0.096079424 = weight(_text_:web in 5135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.096079424 = score(doc=5135,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.8261705 = fieldWeight in 5135, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5135)
        0.091969356 = weight(_text_:world in 5135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.091969356 = score(doc=5135,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.6714617 = fieldWeight in 5135, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5135)
        0.12221005 = weight(_text_:wide in 5135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.12221005 = score(doc=5135,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.7740217 = fieldWeight in 5135, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5135)
        0.096079424 = weight(_text_:web in 5135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.096079424 = score(doc=5135,freq=42.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.8261705 = fieldWeight in 5135, product of:
              6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                42.0 = termFreq=42.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5135)
        0.012070097 = product of:
          0.024140194 = sum of:
            0.024140194 = weight(_text_:22 in 5135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024140194 = score(doc=5135,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12478739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035634913 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5135, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5135)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    The scale of web site design has grown so that what was once comparable to decorating a room is now comparable to designing buildings or even cities. Designing sites so that people can find their way around is an ever-growing challenge as sites contain more and more information. In the past, Information Architecture for the World Wide Web has helped developers and designers establish consistent and usable structures for their sites and their information. This edition of the classic primer on web site design and navigation is updated with recent examples, new scenarios, and new information on best practices. Readers will learn how to present large volumes of information to visitors who need to find what they're looking for quickly. With topics that range from aesthetics to mechanics, this valuable book explains how to create interfaces that users can understand easily.
    Classification
    ST 252 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Web-Programmierung, allgemein
    Date
    22. 3.2008 16:18:27
    LCSH
    Web sites / Design
    RSWK
    World Wide Web / Web-Seite / Gestaltung
    World Wide Web / Server
    Softwarearchitektur / Gestaltung / Web-Seite / World Wide Web (GBV)
    Informationsmanagement / World Wide Web (GBV)
    RVK
    ST 252 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Web-Programmierung, allgemein
    Subject
    World Wide Web / Web-Seite / Gestaltung
    World Wide Web / Server
    Softwarearchitektur / Gestaltung / Web-Seite / World Wide Web (GBV)
    Informationsmanagement / World Wide Web (GBV)
    Web sites / Design
  11. Social information retrieval systems : emerging technologies and applications for searching the Web effectively (2008) 0.17
    0.16557719 = product of:
      0.33115438 = sum of:
        0.054892723 = weight(_text_:tagging in 4127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054892723 = score(doc=4127,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.2609168 = fieldWeight in 4127, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4127)
        0.053040884 = weight(_text_:web in 4127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053040884 = score(doc=4127,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.45608947 = fieldWeight in 4127, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4127)
        0.056991324 = weight(_text_:world in 4127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056991324 = score(doc=4127,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.41608956 = fieldWeight in 4127, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4127)
        0.07573079 = weight(_text_:wide in 4127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07573079 = score(doc=4127,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.47964367 = fieldWeight in 4127, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4127)
        0.053040884 = weight(_text_:web in 4127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053040884 = score(doc=4127,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.45608947 = fieldWeight in 4127, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4127)
        0.037457753 = product of:
          0.074915506 = sum of:
            0.074915506 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4127) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.074915506 = score(doc=4127,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035634913 = queryNorm
                0.36248332 = fieldWeight in 4127, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4127)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    This book provides relevant content in the areas of information retrieval systems, services, and research; covering topics such as social tagging, collaborative querying, social network analysis, subjective relevance judgments, and collaborative filtering. Answering the increasing demand for authoritative resources on Internet technologies, this will make an indispensable addition to any library collection
    Content
    Inhalt Collaborating to search effectively in different searcher modes through cues and specialty search / Naresh Kumar Agarwal and Danny C.C. Poo -- Collaborative querying using a hybrid content and results-based approach / Chandrani Sinha Ray ... [et al.] -- Collaborative classification for group-oriented organization of search results / Keiichi Nakata and Amrish Singh -- A case study of use-centered descriptions : archival descriptions of what can be done with a collection / Richard Butterworth -- Metadata for social recommendations : storing, sharing, and reusing evaluations of learning resources / Riina Vuorikari, Nikos Manouselis, and Erik Duval -- Social network models for enhancing reference-based search engine rankings / Nikolaos Korfiatis ... [et al.] -- From PageRank to social rank : authority-based retrieval in social information spaces / Sebastian Marius Kirsch ... [et al.] -- Adaptive peer-to-peer social networks for distributed content-based Web search / Le-Shin Wu ... [et al.] -- The ethics of social information retrieval / Brendan Luyt and Chu Keong Lee -- The social context of knowledge / Daniel Memmi -- Social information seeking in digital libraries / George Buchanan and Annika Hinze -- Relevant intra-actions in networked environments / Theresa Dirndorfer Anderson -- Publication and citation analysis as a tool for information retrieval / Ronald Rousseau -- Personalized information retrieval in a semantic-based learning environment / Antonella Carbonaro and Rodolfo Ferrini -- Multi-agent tourism system (MATS) / Soe Yu Maw and Myo-Myo Naing -- Hybrid recommendation systems : a case study on the movies domain / Konstantinos Markellos ... [et al.].
    LCSH
    Web search engines
    World Wide Web / Subject access
    RSWK
    World Wide Web 2.0
    Information Retrieval / World Wide Web / Suchmaschine
    Subject
    Web search engines
    World Wide Web / Subject access
    World Wide Web 2.0
    Information Retrieval / World Wide Web / Suchmaschine
  12. Alby, T.: Web 2.0 : Konzepte, Anwendungen, Technologien; [ajax, api, atom, blog, folksonomy, feeds, long tail, mashup, permalink, podcast, rich user experience, rss, social software, tagging] (2007) 0.16
    0.1644838 = product of:
      0.3289676 = sum of:
        0.04116954 = weight(_text_:tagging in 1273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04116954 = score(doc=1273,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.19568759 = fieldWeight in 1273, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1273)
        0.06656578 = weight(_text_:web in 1273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06656578 = score(doc=1273,freq=56.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.57238775 = fieldWeight in 1273, product of:
              7.483315 = tf(freq=56.0), with freq of:
                56.0 = termFreq=56.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1273)
        0.030224215 = weight(_text_:world in 1273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030224215 = score(doc=1273,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.22066483 = fieldWeight in 1273, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1273)
        0.04016232 = weight(_text_:wide in 1273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04016232 = score(doc=1273,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.2543695 = fieldWeight in 1273, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1273)
        0.06656578 = weight(_text_:web in 1273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06656578 = score(doc=1273,freq=56.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.57238775 = fieldWeight in 1273, product of:
              7.483315 = tf(freq=56.0), with freq of:
                56.0 = termFreq=56.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1273)
        0.084279954 = product of:
          0.16855991 = sum of:
            0.16855991 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 1273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16855991 = score(doc=1273,freq=36.0), product of:
                0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035634913 = queryNorm
                0.8155875 = fieldWeight in 1273, product of:
                  6.0 = tf(freq=36.0), with freq of:
                    36.0 = termFreq=36.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1273)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Dem neuen Web mal auf die Finger geschaut -- Tom Alby hat sich bereits mit seinem Suchmaschinenoptimierung-Buch einen Namen gemacht und setzt dem Erfolg seines ersten Buches nun mit Web 2.0. Konzepte, Anwendungen, Technologien noch einen drauf. Wie schon bei der Optimierung für Suchmaschinen geht er auch bei seinem Blick auf das Phänomen Web 2.0 ganzheitlich und umfassend an die Arbeit: Ideen, Technik, Umsetzungen, Beispiele, Erfolge, Probleme, Ausblicke und Interviews mit den Machern. Ein Blitzlichtfoto im dunklen Web-Dschungel. Endlich geht es dem Web wieder gut. Alle freuen sich. Die Verlierer werden die Sieger sein. Jetzt wird alles anders. Das Blablabla in den Medien klingt ähnlich wie schon zu Zeiten des Web 1.0. Und doch ist es anders. Was sich geändert hat, zeigt sich jedoch meist erst auf den zweiten Blick -- Alby hat diese Einblicke zusammen getragen und zeigt den aktuellen Stand. Ohne Wortblasen, an Beispielen mit Hintergrund. Nach einem Blick auf die Historie von der New Economy zum Web 2.0 stürzt sich Alby auf das bekannteste Web 2.0-Beispiel: den Blog. Alsdann durchleuchtet er Podcasts, Social Software wie FlickR oder Skype, Folksonomy (wo bleibt das Geld), die Plattformrepräsentanten wie Google, die Technik im Hintergrund von AJAX bis Ruby, Business-Modelle und der Blick Richtung 3.0. Zuletzt dann Interviews mit den Vorreitern der Szene: von Johnny Haeusler bis Jörg Petermann. In Web 2.0. Konzepte, Anwendungen, Technologienkann man pieksen wie man will, es platzt nicht. Das fundierte Über- und Einblicksbuch ist jedem Journalisten, Manager, Trendforscher und Webaktivisten zu empfehlen, denn wer nicht weiß, was Alby weiß, sollte zum Thema Web 2.0 lieber schweigen.
    Classification
    ST 252 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Web-Programmierung, allgemein
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 58(2007) H.3, S.187 (W. Ratzek): "So ist das mit den Trends. Viele versuchen sich als Trendsetter - und scheitern. Andere suchen nur einen werbewirksamen Titel für eine Veranstaltung, wie das der Verleger Tim O'Reilly 2004 tat, und lösen damit einen Hype aus - wie das neudeutsch heißt. Aber so ganz zufällig war O'Reillys Wortschöpfung "Web 2.0" nicht. Nach dem Platzen der New-Economy-Blase sollten Fachleute auf einer Tagung diskutieren, wie es nun mit der Internetwirtschaft weiter gehen sollte. In nur kurzer Zeit entwickelte sich das "Web 2.0" zum Inbegriff einer neuen Bewegung, der nicht nur IT-Enthusiasten angehören. Denn das "join-in-Web" (das Mitmach-Web), wie das Web 2.0 auch bezeichnet wird, bietet auch IT-Ungeübten die Möglichkeit, im Netz-der-Netz mit eigenen Inhalten, also "user generated content", präsent zu sein. Den Schlüssel zum World Wide Web erhalten sie durch "Social Software". Selbstverständlich geht Tom Alby auch ausführlich auf die Schlüsselbegriffe ein, die sich um das Web 2.0 ranken. Dazu gehören die einer breiten Nutzerschicht bekannten Anwendungen wie Blogs, RSS oder Wikis, wie auch die weniger bekannte Technologien und Entwicklungskonzepte, wie Ajax (Asynchronous JavaScript and XML), Ruby/ Ruby on Rails. In zehn Kapiteln führt Tom Alby in Konzepte, Anwendungen und Geschäftsmodelle des Web 2.0 ein. Neben technischen Aspekten geht er auch auf die soziologischen und psychologischen Aspekte ein, wenn er beispielsweise fragt "Was motiviert die Benutzer, sich in Social SoftwarePlattformen einzubringen?" (S. 108) Die Antwort leuchtet ein: "Zunächst einmal ist da die Erwartung der Benutzer, etwas für das Gegebene zurückzubekommen: Wer sein Profil mit vielen Informationen bestückt, der hat auch eine Chance, dass das Profil von anderen angesehen und eventuell Kontakt aufgenommen wird. Wer bei Wikipedia sein Wissen einbringt, der weiß auf der anderen Seite, dass er von den Beiträgen anderer profitieren kann. Dies kann auch zu einem wirklichen Gemeinschaftsgefühl führen (...) Auch ein gewisser Stolz, Teil dieser Gemeinschaft zu sein, mag dazu gehören." (S. 108.f) Tom Albys "Web 2.0" zeichnet sich auch durch die vielen Anwendungsbeispielen aus. Ergänzt werden diese durch fünf Interviews mit Praktikern wie Johnny Haeusler von Spreeblick.de oder Vasco Sommer-Nunes und Florian Wilken von blog.de. Ein umfangreiches Glossar und ein umfangreiches Stichwortverzeichnis erleichtern die Handhabbarkeit. Getreu dem" Join-in-Web" gibt es auch ein Blog (http://web20_buch.alby.de/) zum Buch, um mit dem Autor in Kontakt zu treten. Ein weiteres Plus ist die leichte Lesbarkeit, die es auch dem Nicht-Informatiker ermöglicht, die technischen Zusammenhänge zu verstehen. Wer mehr über Folksonomy, Ruby on Rails, Ajax oder Long Tail wissen möchte, dem sei Tom Albys "Web 2.0" sehr empfohlen. Dem IT-Profi wird "Web 2.0" nicht sehr viel Neues bieten, aber für Agenturen, Designer, Webentwickler, Studierende, Bibliothekarlnnen bietet dieses engagiert geschriebene Buch viel Nützliches."
    Object
    Web 2.0
    RSWK
    World Wide Web 2.0
    RVK
    ST 252 Informatik / Monographien / Software und -entwicklung / Web-Programmierung, allgemein
    Subject
    World Wide Web 2.0
  13. Peters, I.: Folksonomies : indexing and retrieval in Web 2.0 (2009) 0.16
    0.15937673 = product of:
      0.31875345 = sum of:
        0.09507699 = weight(_text_:tagging in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09507699 = score(doc=4203,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.4519212 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
        0.04108529 = weight(_text_:web in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04108529 = score(doc=4203,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.35328537 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
        0.032903954 = weight(_text_:world in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032903954 = score(doc=4203,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.24022943 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
        0.043723192 = weight(_text_:wide in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.043723192 = score(doc=4203,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.2769224 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
        0.04108529 = weight(_text_:web in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04108529 = score(doc=4203,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.35328537 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
        0.06487873 = product of:
          0.12975746 = sum of:
            0.12975746 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4203) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12975746 = score(doc=4203,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035634913 = queryNorm
                0.6278395 = fieldWeight in 4203, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4203)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Kollaborative Informationsdienste im Web 2.0 werden von den Internetnutzern nicht nur dazu genutzt, digitale Informationsressourcen zu produzieren, sondern auch, um sie inhaltlich mit eigenen Schlagworten, sog. Tags, zu erschließen. Dabei müssen die Nutzer nicht wie bei Bibliothekskatalogen auf Regeln achten. Die Menge an nutzergenerierten Tags innerhalb eines Kollaborativen Informationsdienstes wird als Folksonomy bezeichnet. Die Folksonomies dienen den Nutzern zum Wiederauffinden eigener Ressourcen und für die Recherche nach fremden Ressourcen. Das Buch beschäftigt sich mit Kollaborativen Informationsdiensten, Folksonomies als Methode der Wissensrepräsentation und als Werkzeug des Information Retrievals.
    Footnote
    Zugl.: Düsseldorf, Univ., Diss., 2009 u.d.T.: Peters, Isabella: Folksonomies in Wissensrepräsentation und Information Retrieval Rez. in: IWP - Information Wissenschaft & Praxis, 61(2010) Heft 8, S.469-470 (U. Spree): "... Nachdem sich die Rezensentin durch 418 Seiten Text hindurch gelesen hat, bleibt sie unentschieden, wie der auffällige Einsatz langer Zitate (im Durchschnitt drei Zitate, die länger als vier kleingedruckte Zeilen sind, pro Seite) zu bewerten ist, zumal die Zitate nicht selten rein illustrativen Charakter haben bzw. Isabella Peters noch einmal zitiert, was sie bereits in eigenen Worten ausgedrückt hat. Redundanz und Verlängerung der Lesezeit halten sich hier die Waage mit der Möglichkeit, dass sich die Leserin einen unmittelbaren Eindruck von Sprache und Duktus der zitierten Literatur verschaffen kann. Eindeutig unschön ist das Beenden eines Gedankens oder einer Argumentation durch ein Zitat (z. B. S. 170). Im deutschen Original entstehen auf diese Weise die für deutsche wissenschaftliche Qualifikationsarbeiten typischen denglischen Texte. Für alle, die sich für Wissensrepräsentation, Information Retrieval und kollaborative Informationsdienste interessieren, ist "Folksonomies : Indexing and Retrieval in Web 2.0" trotz der angeführten kleinen Mängel zur Lektüre und Anschaffung - wegen seines beinahe enzyklopädischen Charakters auch als Nachschlage- oder Referenzwerk geeignet - unbedingt zu empfehlen. Abschließend möchte ich mich in einem Punkt der Produktinfo von de Gruyter uneingeschränkt anschließen: ein "Grundlagenwerk für Folksonomies".
    Object
    Web 2.0
    RSWK
    Social Tagging
    World Wide Web 2.0
    Subject
    Social Tagging
    World Wide Web 2.0
    Theme
    Social tagging
  14. Cothey, V.: ¬A longitudinal study of World Wide Web users' information-searching behavior (2002) 0.16
    0.1584153 = product of:
      0.38019672 = sum of:
        0.077660084 = weight(_text_:web in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077660084 = score(doc=245,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.6677857 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
        0.11318995 = weight(_text_:log in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11318995 = score(doc=245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22837062 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.49564147 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
        0.057581924 = weight(_text_:world in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057581924 = score(doc=245,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.4204015 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
        0.05410469 = weight(_text_:wide in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05410469 = score(doc=245,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
        0.077660084 = weight(_text_:web in 245) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.077660084 = score(doc=245,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.6677857 = fieldWeight in 245, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=245)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    A study of the "real world" Web information searching behavior of 206 college students over a 10-month period showed that, contrary to expectations, the users adopted a more passive or browsing approach to Web information searching and became more eclectic in their selection of Web hosts as they gained experience. The study used a longitudinal transaction log analysis of the URLs accessed during 5,431 user days of Web information searching to detect changes in information searching behavior associated with increased experience of using the Web. The findings have implications for the design of future Web information retrieval tools
  15. Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001) 0.16
    0.1572158 = product of:
      0.47164738 = sum of:
        0.04716474 = product of:
          0.14149421 = sum of:
            0.14149421 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14149421 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035634913 = queryNorm
                0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.14149421 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14149421 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.14149421 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14149421 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.14149421 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14149421 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.30211318 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
    
    Source
    Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
  16. Keen, A.: ¬Die Stunde der Stümper : wie wir im Internet unsere Kultur zerstören (2008) 0.15
    0.1495759 = product of:
      0.35898218 = sum of:
        0.04437719 = weight(_text_:web in 2667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04437719 = score(doc=2667,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.38159183 = fieldWeight in 2667, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2667)
        0.052025724 = weight(_text_:world in 2667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052025724 = score(doc=2667,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.37983608 = fieldWeight in 2667, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2667)
        0.06913244 = weight(_text_:wide in 2667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06913244 = score(doc=2667,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.43785277 = fieldWeight in 2667, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2667)
        0.04437719 = weight(_text_:web in 2667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04437719 = score(doc=2667,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.38159183 = fieldWeight in 2667, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2667)
        0.14906962 = sum of:
          0.12975746 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.12975746 = score(doc=2667,freq=12.0), product of:
              0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035634913 = queryNorm
              0.6278395 = fieldWeight in 2667, product of:
                3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                  12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2667)
          0.019312155 = weight(_text_:22 in 2667) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019312155 = score(doc=2667,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12478739 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.035634913 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 2667, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2667)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    Das Internet und besonders das Web 2.0 sind ein Segen für die Meinungsfreiheit, so heißt es: Endlich können alle bestimmen, worüber diskutiert wird - nicht nur wenige Experten, Top-Journalisten und wortgewaltige Autoren, die das Meinungsmonopol für sich beanspruchen. Doch was haben wir uns da eingehandelt? Forumsbeiträge, die vor Dummheit und falschen Fakten strotzen, und an Idiotie kaum zu überbietende Videoclips bei YouTube. Es kommt noch schlimmer: - Politische Splitterparteien und verschrobene Wirrköpfe maskieren sich immer häufiger als harmlose Blogger, um demokratiefeindliche Hetzkampagnen zu verbreiten. Betroffene können sich kaum dagegen wehren. - Unternehmen betreiben auf subtile Weise "virales Marketing", um ihre Produkte von vermeintlich begeisterten Kunden empfehlen zu lassen. - Clevere Lobbyisten mischen sich unter falscher Identität in Diskussionen ein, um ihre fragwürdigen Interessen durchzusetzen. Wir befinden uns auf einem gefährlichen Irrweg, sagt Andrew Keen: Wo Halbwissen und blanke Lügen herrschen statt verlässlicher Information, da fehlt auch die Basis für vernünftige und tragfähige politische Entscheidungen, da ist unsere Kultur in ihren Grundfesten erschüttert. Ein scharf formuliertes Plädoyer gegen die absurden Auswüchse der großen Verdummungsmaschine, die sich Internet nennt.
    Date
    22. 2.2009 12:33:37
    Footnote
    Rez. in: FR, Nr.289 vom 10.12.2008, S.36: "Das Internet: Unser Fluch? - Schon Internet-Pionier Nicholas Negroponte erklärte das World Wide Web zu einem riesigen Müllhaufen, und dieser Befund dürfte durch die Entwicklung des Netzes eher bestätigt worden sein. Aber wie das so ist mit dem Müll: Für die einen ist es Abfall, andere suchen und finden meistens etwas, das sich zur Wiederverwer- tung eignet. Das muss Andrew Keen entgangen sein, obwohl der IT-Unternehmer (audiocafe.com), sich in der Materie auskennt. Aber das hindert ihn nicht, sich mit geradezu pietistischem Eifer wider den neu-bösen Feind zu wenden: den Blogger. Keen sieht im durch soziale Netzwerke und demokratische Teilhabe geprägten Web 2.0 nicht nur den "Kult des Amateurs" (so der Originaltitel, korrekt übersetzt), sondern sogar die "Vernichtung unserer Kultur". So richtig der eine oder andere Befund sein mag - etwa die Selbstbezüglichkeit vieler Slogger - er wird nicht richtiger durch penetrante Wiederholung. Falsch aber ist eine Behauptung wie die, dass Einträge bei Wikipedia (noch ein Lieblingsfeind Keens) nicht redigiert würden. Da hat sich einer in sein Bedürfnis nach werbewirksamer Polemik verrannt". Vgl. auch: http://www.faz.net/s/Rub117C535CDF414415BB243B181B8B60AE/Doc~E7A6DAB48D2D745FC9054DBF8D9FD8C4F~ATpl~Ecommon~Scontent.html.
    RSWK
    Informationsgesellschaft / Soziokultureller Wandel / Internet / World Wide Web 2.0 / User Generated Content / Geltungsbedürfnis
    World Wide Web 2.0 / Kritik (GBV)
    Subject
    Informationsgesellschaft / Soziokultureller Wandel / Internet / World Wide Web 2.0 / User Generated Content / Geltungsbedürfnis
    World Wide Web 2.0 / Kritik (GBV)
  17. Stocker, A.; Tochtermann, K.: Anwendungen und Technologien des Web 2.0: Ein Überblick (2009) 0.15
    0.14720008 = product of:
      0.3532802 = sum of:
        0.083444625 = weight(_text_:web in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083444625 = score(doc=4858,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.717526 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
        0.034899916 = weight(_text_:world in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034899916 = score(doc=4858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
        0.046375446 = weight(_text_:wide in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046375446 = score(doc=4858,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
        0.083444625 = weight(_text_:web in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.083444625 = score(doc=4858,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.717526 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
        0.10511556 = product of:
          0.21023113 = sum of:
            0.21023113 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 4858) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.21023113 = score(doc=4858,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035634913 = queryNorm
                1.0172163 = fieldWeight in 4858, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4858)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Abstract
    Das World Wide Web (im Folgenden kurz als Web bezeichnet) verwandelt sich seit einigen Jahren von einem Medium der passiven Konsumenten von Inhalten hin zu einem Netz für aktive User, die Weblogs schreiben, in Foren diskutieren oder Podcasts veröffentlichen. Diese User der zweiten Generation gebrauchen das Web zum Gedankenaustausch und knüpfen als Knoten in virtuellen sozialen Netzwerken Beziehungen zu Gleichgesinnten, mit denen sie sich zu virtuellen Communities formieren. Folglich definiert sich die soziale Komponente des Web 2.0 über ein verändertes Verhalten seiner User. Web-2.0-Plattformen sind jedoch vielmehr sozio-technische Artefakte und basieren auf speziellen Anwendungen und Technologien. Erst die technologische Komponente des Web 2.0 ermöglicht, dass die sozialen Prozesse der User unterstützt werden. Der folgende Grundlagenbeitrag stellt wesentliche Anwendungen und Technologien des Web 2.0 vor.
    Object
    Web 2.0
    Source
    Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
  18. Morrison, P.J.: Tagging and searching : search retrieval effectiveness of folksonomies on the World Wide Web (2008) 0.14
    0.13936827 = product of:
      0.27873653 = sum of:
        0.08233908 = weight(_text_:tagging in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08233908 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.39137518 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
        0.050318997 = weight(_text_:web in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050318997 = score(doc=2109,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
        0.034899916 = weight(_text_:world in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034899916 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
        0.046375446 = weight(_text_:wide in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046375446 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
        0.050318997 = weight(_text_:web in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050318997 = score(doc=2109,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
        0.014484116 = product of:
          0.028968232 = sum of:
            0.028968232 = weight(_text_:22 in 2109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028968232 = score(doc=2109,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12478739 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035634913 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2109, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2109)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(6/12)
    
    Abstract
    Many Web sites have begun allowing users to submit items to a collection and tag them with keywords. The folksonomies built from these tags are an interesting topic that has seen little empirical research. This study compared the search information retrieval (IR) performance of folksonomies from social bookmarking Web sites against search engines and subject directories. Thirty-four participants created 103 queries for various information needs. Results from each IR system were collected and participants judged relevance. Folksonomy search results overlapped with those from the other systems, and documents found by both search engines and folksonomies were significantly more likely to be judged relevant than those returned by any single IR system type. The search engines in the study had the highest precision and recall, but the folksonomies fared surprisingly well. Del.icio.us was statistically indistinguishable from the directories in many cases. Overall the directories were more precise than the folksonomies but they had similar recall scores. Better query handling may enhance folksonomy IR performance further. The folksonomies studied were promising, and may be able to improve Web search performance.
    Date
    1. 8.2008 12:39:22
  19. Casey, M.E.; Savastinuk, L.C.: Library 2.0 : a guide to participatory library service (2007) 0.13
    0.13365208 = product of:
      0.320765 = sum of:
        0.04151106 = weight(_text_:web in 8086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04151106 = score(doc=8086,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 8086, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8086)
        0.057581924 = weight(_text_:world in 8086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057581924 = score(doc=8086,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13696888 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.4204015 = fieldWeight in 8086, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8086)
        0.076515585 = weight(_text_:wide in 8086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.076515585 = score(doc=8086,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1578897 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.4846142 = fieldWeight in 8086, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8086)
        0.04151106 = weight(_text_:web in 8086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04151106 = score(doc=8086,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 8086, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8086)
        0.10364535 = product of:
          0.2072907 = sum of:
            0.2072907 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 8086) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.2072907 = score(doc=8086,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035634913 = queryNorm
                1.0029888 = fieldWeight in 8086, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8086)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Brand library 2.0 - The essential ingredients - Finding the road to library 2.0 - A framework for change - Participatory service and the long tail - Incorporating technology - Buy-in : getting everyone on board - Maintaining the momentum - Final considerations
    RSWK
    Bibliothek / World Wide Web 2.0
    Subject
    Bibliothek / World Wide Web 2.0
  20. Derntl, M.; Hampel, T.; Motschnig, R.; Pitner, T.: Social Tagging und Inclusive Universal Access (2008) 0.13
    0.13347878 = product of:
      0.4004363 = sum of:
        0.27308786 = weight(_text_:tagging in 2864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.27308786 = score(doc=2864,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.21038401 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            1.2980448 = fieldWeight in 2864, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              5.9038734 = idf(docFreq=327, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2864)
        0.035580907 = weight(_text_:web in 2864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035580907 = score(doc=2864,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 2864, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2864)
        0.035580907 = weight(_text_:web in 2864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035580907 = score(doc=2864,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11629491 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035634913 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 2864, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2864)
        0.056186635 = product of:
          0.11237327 = sum of:
            0.11237327 = weight(_text_:2.0 in 2864) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.11237327 = score(doc=2864,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20667298 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035634913 = queryNorm
                0.543725 = fieldWeight in 2864, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.799733 = idf(docFreq=363, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2864)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.33333334 = coord(4/12)
    
    Abstract
    Der vorliegende Artikel beleuchtet und bewertet Social Tagging als aktuelles Phänomen des Web 2.0 im Kontext bekannter Techniken der semantischen Datenorganisation. Tagging wird in einen Raum verwandter Ordnungs- und Strukturierungsansätze eingeordnet, um die fundamentalen Grundlagen des Social Tagging zu identifizieren und zuzuweisen. Dabei wird Tagging anhand des Inclusive Universal Access Paradigmas bewertet, das technische als auch menschlich-soziale Kriterien für die inklusive und barrierefreie Bereitstellung und Nutzung von Diensten definiert. Anhand dieser Bewertung werden fundamentale Prinzipien des "Inclusive Social Tagging" hergeleitet, die der Charakterisierung und Bewertung gängiger Tagging-Funktionalitäten in verbreiteten Web-2.0-Diensten dienen. Aus der Bewertung werden insbesondere Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten von Social Tagging und unterstützenden Diensten erkennbar.
    Footnote
    Beitrag der Tagung "Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation" am 21.-22.02.2008 am Institut für Wissensmedien (IWM) in Tübingen.
    Source
    Good tags - bad tags: Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation. Hrsg.: B. Gaiser, u.a
    Theme
    Social tagging

Languages

Types

  • a 3149
  • m 460
  • el 319
  • s 158
  • x 54
  • b 29
  • i 26
  • r 17
  • n 14
  • p 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications