Search (478 results, page 1 of 24)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.57
    0.56662905 = product of:
      0.8094701 = sum of:
        0.2187202 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2187202 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.291877 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.2187202 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2187202 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.291877 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.016204696 = product of:
          0.032409392 = sum of:
            0.032409392 = weight(_text_:web in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032409392 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.2187202 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2187202 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.291877 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.04495658 = weight(_text_:world in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04495658 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1323281 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.33973572 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.05973887 = weight(_text_:wide in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05973887 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15254007 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
        0.032409392 = weight(_text_:web in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032409392 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.7 = coord(7/10)
    
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  2. Stuart, D.: Web metrics for library and information professionals (2014) 0.09
    0.09358569 = product of:
      0.23396423 = sum of:
        0.045395304 = product of:
          0.09079061 = sum of:
            0.09079061 = weight(_text_:web in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09079061 = score(doc=2274,freq=82.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.808072 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
                  9.055386 = tf(freq=82.0), with freq of:
                    82.0 = termFreq=82.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.039337005 = weight(_text_:world in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039337005 = score(doc=2274,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.1323281 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
        0.05844133 = weight(_text_:wide in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05844133 = score(doc=2274,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.15254007 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.38312116 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
        0.09079061 = weight(_text_:web in 2274) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09079061 = score(doc=2274,freq=82.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.808072 = fieldWeight in 2274, product of:
              9.055386 = tf(freq=82.0), with freq of:
                82.0 = termFreq=82.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2274)
      0.4 = coord(4/10)
    
    Abstract
    This is a practical guide to using web metrics to measure impact and demonstrate value. The web provides an opportunity to collect a host of different metrics, from those associated with social media accounts and websites to more traditional research outputs. This book is a clear guide for library and information professionals as to what web metrics are available and how to assess and use them to make informed decisions and demonstrate value. As individuals and organizations increasingly use the web in addition to traditional publishing avenues and formats, this book provides the tools to unlock web metrics and evaluate the impact of this content. The key topics covered include: bibliometrics, webometrics and web metrics; data collection tools; evaluating impact on the web; evaluating social media impact; investigating relationships between actors; exploring traditional publications in a new environment; web metrics and the web of data; the future of web metrics and the library and information professional. The book will provide a practical introduction to web metrics for a wide range of library and information professionals, from the bibliometrician wanting to demonstrate the wider impact of a researcher's work than can be demonstrated through traditional citations databases, to the reference librarian wanting to measure how successfully they are engaging with their users on Twitter. It will be a valuable tool for anyone who wants to not only understand the impact of content, but demonstrate this impact to others within the organization and beyond.
    Content
    1. Introduction. MetricsIndicators -- Web metrics and Ranganathan's laws of library science -- Web metrics for the library and information professional -- The aim of this book -- The structure of the rest of this book -- 2. Bibliometrics, webometrics and web metrics. Web metrics -- Information science metrics -- Web analytics -- Relational and evaluative metrics -- Evaluative web metrics -- Relational web metrics -- Validating the results -- 3. Data collection tools. The anatomy of a URL, web links and the structure of the web -- Search engines 1.0 -- Web crawlers -- Search engines 2.0 -- Post search engine 2.0: fragmentation -- 4. Evaluating impact on the web. Websites -- Blogs -- Wikis -- Internal metrics -- External metrics -- A systematic approach to content analysis -- 5. Evaluating social media impact. Aspects of social network sites -- Typology of social network sites -- Research and tools for specific sites and services -- Other social network sites -- URL shorteners: web analytic links on any site -- General social media impact -- Sentiment analysis -- 6. Investigating relationships between actors. Social network analysis methods -- Sources for relational network analysis -- 7. Exploring traditional publications in a new environment. More bibliographic items -- Full text analysis -- Greater context -- 8. Web metrics and the web of data. The web of data -- Building the semantic web -- Implications of the web of data for web metrics -- Investigating the web of data today -- SPARQL -- Sindice -- LDSpider: an RDF web crawler -- 9. The future of web metrics and the library and information professional. How far we have come -- The future of web metrics -- The future of the library and information professional and web metrics.
    RSWK
    Bibliothek / World Wide Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Analyse / Statistik
    Bibliometrie / Semantic Web / Soziale Software
    Subject
    Bibliothek / World Wide Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Analyse / Statistik
    Bibliometrie / Semantic Web / Soziale Software
  3. Cothey, V.: Web-crawling reliability (2004) 0.08
    0.08166069 = product of:
      0.20415172 = sum of:
        0.0375144 = product of:
          0.0750288 = sum of:
            0.0750288 = weight(_text_:web in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0750288 = score(doc=3089,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.6677857 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.039337005 = weight(_text_:world in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039337005 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1323281 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
        0.052271515 = weight(_text_:wide in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052271515 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15254007 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
        0.0750288 = weight(_text_:web in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0750288 = score(doc=3089,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.6677857 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
      0.4 = coord(4/10)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, I investigate the reliability, in the social science sense, of collecting informetric data about the World Wide Web by Web crawling. The investigation includes a critical examination of the practice of Web crawling and contrasts the results of content crawling with the results of link crawling. It is shown that Web crawling by search engines is intentionally biased and selective. I also report the results of a [arge-scale experimental simulation of Web crawling that illustrates the effects of different crawling policies an data collection. It is concluded that the reliability of Web crawling as a data collection technique is improved by fuller reporting of relevant crawling policies.
  4. fwt: Webseiten liegen im Schnitt nur 19 Klicks auseinander (2001) 0.07
    0.07396581 = product of:
      0.18491451 = sum of:
        0.02105052 = product of:
          0.04210104 = sum of:
            0.04210104 = weight(_text_:web in 5962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04210104 = score(doc=5962,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 5962, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5962)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.05840031 = weight(_text_:world in 5962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05840031 = score(doc=5962,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.1323281 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.44132966 = fieldWeight in 5962, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5962)
        0.06336264 = weight(_text_:wide in 5962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06336264 = score(doc=5962,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15254007 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.4153836 = fieldWeight in 5962, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5962)
        0.04210104 = weight(_text_:web in 5962) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04210104 = score(doc=5962,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 5962, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5962)
      0.4 = coord(4/10)
    
    Abstract
    "Dokumente im World Wide Web liegen durchschnittlich 19 Mausklicks voneinander entfernt - angesichts von schätzungsweise mehr als einer Milliarde Seiten erstaunlich nahe. Albert-Lazlo Barabai vom Institut für Physik der University von Notre Dame (US-Staat Indiana) stellt seine Studie in der britischen Fachzeitschrift Physics World (Juli 2001, S. 33) vor. Der Statistiker konstruierte im Rechner zunächst Modelle von großen Computernetzwerken. Grundlage für diese Abbilder war die Analyse eines kleinen Teils der Verbindungen im Web, die der Wissenschaftler automatisch von einem Programm hatte prüfen lassen. Um seine Ergebnisse zu erklären, vergleicht Barabai das World Wide Web mit den Verbindungen internationaler Fluglinien. Dort gebe es zahlreiche Flughäfen, die meist nur mit anderen Flugplätzen in ihrer näheren Umgebung in Verbindung stünden. Diese kleineren Verteiler stehen ihrerseits mit einigen wenigen großen Airports wie Frankfurt, New York oder Hongkong in Verbindung. Ähnlich sei es im Netz, wo wenige große Server die Verteilung großer Datenmengen übernähmen und weite Entfernungen überbrückten. Damit seien die Online-Wege vergleichsweise kurz. Die Untersuchung spiegelt allerdings die Situation des Jahres 1999 wider. Seinerzeit gab es vermutlich 800 Millionen Knoten."
  5. Larson, R.R.: Bibliometrics of the World Wide Web : an exploratory analysis of the intellectual structure of cyberspace (1996) 0.07
    0.07067328 = product of:
      0.17668319 = sum of:
        0.028358221 = product of:
          0.056716442 = sum of:
            0.056716442 = weight(_text_:web in 7334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056716442 = score(doc=7334,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 7334, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7334)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.039337005 = weight(_text_:world in 7334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039337005 = score(doc=7334,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1323281 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 7334, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7334)
        0.052271515 = weight(_text_:wide in 7334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052271515 = score(doc=7334,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15254007 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 7334, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7334)
        0.056716442 = weight(_text_:web in 7334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056716442 = score(doc=7334,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 7334, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7334)
      0.4 = coord(4/10)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the explosive growth and the bibliometrics of the WWW based on both analysis of over 30 GBytes of WWW pages collected by the Inktomi Web Crawler and on the use of the DEC AltaVista search engine for cocitation analysis of a set of Earth Science related WWW sites. Examines the statistical characteristics of web documents and their links, and the characteristics of highly cited web documents
  6. Thelwall, M.: Webometrics (2009) 0.07
    0.06999488 = product of:
      0.1749872 = sum of:
        0.0321552 = product of:
          0.0643104 = sum of:
            0.0643104 = weight(_text_:web in 3906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0643104 = score(doc=3906,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.57238775 = fieldWeight in 3906, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3906)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.033717435 = weight(_text_:world in 3906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033717435 = score(doc=3906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1323281 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 3906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3906)
        0.044804152 = weight(_text_:wide in 3906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044804152 = score(doc=3906,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15254007 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 3906, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3906)
        0.0643104 = weight(_text_:web in 3906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0643104 = score(doc=3906,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.57238775 = fieldWeight in 3906, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3906)
      0.4 = coord(4/10)
    
    Abstract
    Webometrics is an information science field concerned with measuring aspects of the World Wide Web (WWW) for a variety of information science research goals. It came into existence about five years after the Web was formed and has since grown to become a significant aspect of information science, at least in terms of published research. Although some webometrics research has focused on the structure or evolution of the Web itself or the performance of commercial search engines, most has used data from the Web to shed light on information provision or online communication in various contexts. Most prominently, techniques have been developed to track, map, and assess Web-based informal scholarly communication, for example, in terms of the hyperlinks between academic Web sites or the online impact of digital repositories. In addition, a range of nonacademic issues and groups of Web users have also been analyzed.
  7. González-Alcaide, G.; Castelló-Cogollos, L.; Navarro-Molina, C.; Aleixandre-Benavent, R.; Valderrama-Zurián, J.C.: Library and information science research areas : analysis of journal articles in LISA (2008) 0.07
    0.06504373 = product of:
      0.16260932 = sum of:
        0.017187675 = product of:
          0.03437535 = sum of:
            0.03437535 = weight(_text_:web in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03437535 = score(doc=1347,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.047683652 = weight(_text_:world in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047683652 = score(doc=1347,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1323281 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.36034414 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
        0.06336264 = weight(_text_:wide in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06336264 = score(doc=1347,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15254007 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.4153836 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
        0.03437535 = weight(_text_:web in 1347) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03437535 = score(doc=1347,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 1347, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1347)
      0.4 = coord(4/10)
    
    Abstract
    The main fields of research in Library Science and Documentation are identified by quantifying the frequency of appearance and the analysis of co-occurrence of the descriptors assigned to 11,273 indexed works in the Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) database for the 2004-2005 period. The analysis made has enabled three major core research areas to be identified: World Wide Web, Libraries and Education. There are a further 12 areas of research with specific development, one connected with the library sphere and another 11 connected with the World Wide Web and Internet: Networks, Computer Security, Information technologies, Electronic Resources, Electronic Publications, Bibliometrics, Electronic Commerce, Computer applications, Medicine, Searches and Online Information retrieval.
  8. Bar-Ilan, J.; Peritz, B.C.: ¬A method for measuring the evolution of a topic on the Web : the case of "informetrics" (2009) 0.06
    0.06054922 = product of:
      0.15137304 = sum of:
        0.028646128 = product of:
          0.057292257 = sum of:
            0.057292257 = weight(_text_:web in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057292257 = score(doc=3089,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.028097862 = weight(_text_:world in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028097862 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1323281 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
        0.037336797 = weight(_text_:wide in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037336797 = score(doc=3089,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15254007 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
        0.057292257 = weight(_text_:web in 3089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057292257 = score(doc=3089,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 3089, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3089)
      0.4 = coord(4/10)
    
    Abstract
    The universe of information has been enriched by the creation of the World Wide Web, which has become an indispensible source for research. Since this source is growing at an enormous speed, an in-depth look of its performance to create a method for its evaluation has become necessary; however, growth is not the only process that influences the evolution of the Web. During their lifetime, Web pages may change their content and links to/from other Web pages, be duplicated or moved to a different URL, be removed from the Web either temporarily or permanently, and be temporarily inaccessible due to server and/or communication failures. To obtain a better understanding of these processes, we developed a method for tracking topics on the Web for long periods of time, without the need to employ a crawler and relying only on publicly available resources. The multiple data-collection methods used allow us to discover new pages related to the topic, to identify changes to existing pages, and to detect previously existing pages that have been removed or whose content is not relevant anymore to the specified topic. The method is demonstrated through monitoring Web pages that contain the term informetrics for a period of 8 years. The data-collection method also allowed us to analyze the dynamic changes in search engine coverage, illustrated here on Google - the search engine used for the longest period of time for data collection in this project.
  9. Zhao, D.; Strotmann, A.: Information science during the first decade of the web : an enriched author cocitation analysis (2008) 0.06
    0.05666926 = product of:
      0.14167315 = sum of:
        0.02105052 = product of:
          0.04210104 = sum of:
            0.04210104 = weight(_text_:web in 1720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04210104 = score(doc=1720,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 1720, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1720)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.033717435 = weight(_text_:world in 1720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033717435 = score(doc=1720,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1323281 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 1720, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1720)
        0.044804152 = weight(_text_:wide in 1720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044804152 = score(doc=1720,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15254007 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 1720, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1720)
        0.04210104 = weight(_text_:web in 1720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04210104 = score(doc=1720,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 1720, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1720)
      0.4 = coord(4/10)
    
    Abstract
    Using an enriched author cocitation analysis (ACA), we map information science (IS) for 1996-2005, a decade of explosive development of the World Wide Web, to examine its development since the landmark study by White and McCain (1998). The Web, we find, has had a profound impact on IS, driving the creation of new disciplines and revitalization or obsolescence of old, and most importantly, bridging the chasm between the literatures and retrieval IS camps. Simultaneously, the development of IS towards cognitive aspects has intensified. Our study enriches classic ACA in that it employs both orthogonal and oblique rotations in the factor analysis (FA), and reports both pattern and structure matrices for the latter, thus enabling a comparison between these several FA methods in ACA. Each method provides interesting information not available from the others, we find, especially when results are also visualized in the novel manner we introduce here.
  10. Menczer, F.: Lexical and semantic clustering by Web links (2004) 0.06
    0.055838656 = product of:
      0.13959664 = sum of:
        0.0321552 = product of:
          0.0643104 = sum of:
            0.0643104 = weight(_text_:web in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0643104 = score(doc=3090,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.57238775 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.033717435 = weight(_text_:world in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033717435 = score(doc=3090,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1323281 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
        0.0643104 = weight(_text_:web in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0643104 = score(doc=3090,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.57238775 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
        0.0094135925 = product of:
          0.028240776 = sum of:
            0.028240776 = weight(_text_:29 in 3090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028240776 = score(doc=3090,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12110529 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3090, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3090)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(4/10)
    
    Abstract
    Recent Web-searching and -mining tools are combining text and link analysis to improve ranking and crawling algorithms. The central assumption behind such approaches is that there is a correiation between the graph structure of the Web and the text and meaning of pages. Here I formalize and empirically evaluate two general conjectures drawing connections from link information to lexical and semantic Web content. The link-content conjecture states that a page is similar to the pages that link to it, and the link-cluster conjecture that pages about the same topic are clustered together. These conjectures are offen simply assumed to hold, and Web search tools are built an such assumptions. The present quantitative confirmation sheds light an the connection between the success of the latest Web-mining techniques and the small world topology of the Web, with encouraging implications for the design of better crawling algorithms.
    Date
    9. 1.2005 19:20:29
  11. Almind, T.C.; Ingwersen, P.: Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web : methodological approaches to 'Webometrics' (1997) 0.05
    0.053658344 = product of:
      0.13414586 = sum of:
        0.0141791105 = product of:
          0.028358221 = sum of:
            0.028358221 = weight(_text_:web in 4711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028358221 = score(doc=4711,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4711, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4711)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.039337005 = weight(_text_:world in 4711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039337005 = score(doc=4711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1323281 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 4711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4711)
        0.052271515 = weight(_text_:wide in 4711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052271515 = score(doc=4711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15254007 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.342674 = fieldWeight in 4711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4711)
        0.028358221 = weight(_text_:web in 4711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028358221 = score(doc=4711,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4711, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4711)
      0.4 = coord(4/10)
    
  12. Bar-Ilan, J.; Peritz, B.C.: Informetric theories and methods for exploring the Internet : an analytical survey of recent research literature (2002) 0.05
    0.045992862 = product of:
      0.11498215 = sum of:
        0.012153522 = product of:
          0.024307044 = sum of:
            0.024307044 = weight(_text_:web in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024307044 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.033717435 = weight(_text_:world in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033717435 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1323281 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
        0.044804152 = weight(_text_:wide in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044804152 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15254007 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
        0.024307044 = weight(_text_:web in 813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024307044 = score(doc=813,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 813, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=813)
      0.4 = coord(4/10)
    
    Abstract
    The Internet, and more specifically the World Wide Web, is quickly becoming one of our main information sources. Systematic evaluation and analysis can help us understand how this medium works, grows, and changes, and how it influences our lives and research. New approaches in informetrics can provide an appropriate means towards achieving the above goals, and towards establishing a sound theory. This paper presents a selective review of research based on the Internet, using bibliometric and informetric methods and tools. Some of these studies clearly show the applicability of bibliometric laws to the Internet, while others establish new definitions and methods based on the respective definitions for printed sources. Both informetrics and Internet research can gain from these additional methods.
  13. Crespo, J.A.; Herranz, N.; Li, Y.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: ¬The effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices at the web of science subject category level (2014) 0.04
    0.04038293 = product of:
      0.10095732 = sum of:
        0.0175421 = product of:
          0.0350842 = sum of:
            0.0350842 = weight(_text_:web in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0350842 = score(doc=1291,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.037336797 = weight(_text_:wide in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037336797 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15254007 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
        0.0350842 = weight(_text_:web in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0350842 = score(doc=1291,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
        0.010994226 = product of:
          0.032982677 = sum of:
            0.032982677 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032982677 = score(doc=1291,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12055935 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(4/10)
    
    Abstract
    This article studies the impact of differences in citation practices at the subfield, or Web of Science subject category level, using the model introduced in Crespo, Li, and Ruiz-Castillo (2013a), according to which the number of citations received by an article depends on its underlying scientific influence and the field to which it belongs. We use the same Thomson Reuters data set of about 4.4 million articles used in Crespo et al. (2013a) to analyze 22 broad fields. The main results are the following: First, when the classification system goes from 22 fields to 219 subfields the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices increases from ?14% at the field level to 18% at the subfield level. Second, we estimate a set of exchange rates (ERs) over a wide [660, 978] citation quantile interval to express the citation counts of articles into the equivalent counts in the all-sciences case. In the fractional case, for example, we find that in 187 of 219 subfields the ERs are reliable in the sense that the coefficient of variation is smaller than or equal to 0.10. Third, in the fractional case the normalization of the raw data using the ERs (or subfield mean citations) as normalization factors reduces the importance of the differences in citation practices from 18% to 3.8% (3.4%) of overall citation inequality. Fourth, the results in the fractional case are essentially replicated when we adopt a multiplicative approach.
    Object
    Web of Science
  14. Romero-Frías, E.; Vaughan, L.: European political trends viewed through patterns of Web linking (2010) 0.04
    0.04002565 = product of:
      0.13341883 = sum of:
        0.032027345 = product of:
          0.06405469 = sum of:
            0.06405469 = weight(_text_:web in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06405469 = score(doc=4002,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.5701118 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.037336797 = weight(_text_:wide in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037336797 = score(doc=4002,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15254007 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
        0.06405469 = weight(_text_:web in 4002) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06405469 = score(doc=4002,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.5701118 = fieldWeight in 4002, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4002)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    This study explored the feasibility of using Web hyperlink data to study European political Web sites. Ninety-six European Union (EU) political parties belonging to a wide range of ideological, historical, and linguistic backgrounds were included in the study. Various types of data on Web links to party Web sites were collected. The Web colink data were visualized using multidimensional scaling (MDS), while the inlink data were analyzed with a 2-way analysis of variance test. The results showed that Web hyperlink data did reflect some political patterns in the EU. The MDS maps showed clusters of political parties along ideological, historical, linguistic, and social lines. Statistical analysis based on inlink counts further confirmed that there was a significant difference along the line of the political history of a country, such that left-wing parties in the former communist countries received considerably fewer inlinks to their Web sites than left-wing parties in countries without a history of communism did. The study demonstrated the possibility of using Web hyperlink data to gain insights into political situations in the EU. This suggests the richness of Web hyperlink data and its potential in studying social-political phenomena.
  15. Thelwall, M.; Harries, G.: Do the Web Sites of Higher Rated Scholars Have Significantly More Online Impact? (2004) 0.04
    0.038546465 = product of:
      0.12848821 = sum of:
        0.030383805 = product of:
          0.06076761 = sum of:
            0.06076761 = weight(_text_:web in 2123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06076761 = score(doc=2123,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.5408555 = fieldWeight in 2123, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2123)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.037336797 = weight(_text_:wide in 2123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037336797 = score(doc=2123,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15254007 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 2123, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2123)
        0.06076761 = weight(_text_:web in 2123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06076761 = score(doc=2123,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.5408555 = fieldWeight in 2123, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2123)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    The quality and impact of academic Web sites is of interest to many audiences, including the scholars who use them and Web educators who need to identify best practice. Several large-scale European Union research projects have been funded to build new indicators for online scientific activity, reflecting recognition of the importance of the Web for scholarly communication. In this paper we address the key question of whether higher rated scholars produce higher impact Web sites, using the United Kingdom as a case study and measuring scholars' quality in terms of university-wide average research ratings. Methodological issues concerning the measurement of the online impact are discussed, leading to the adoption of counts of links to a university's constituent single domain Web sites from an aggregated counting metric. The findings suggest that universities with higher rated scholars produce significantly more Web content but with a similar average online impact. Higher rated scholars therefore attract more total links from their peers, but only by being more prolific, refuting earlier suggestions. It can be surmised that general Web publications are very different from scholarly journal articles and conference papers, for which scholarly quality does associate with citation impact. This has important implications for the construction of new Web indicators, for example that online impact should not be used to assess the quality of small groups of scholars, even within a single discipline.
  16. Hassler, M.: Web analytics : Metriken auswerten, Besucherverhalten verstehen, Website optimieren ; [Metriken analysieren und interpretieren ; Besucherverhalten verstehen und auswerten ; Website-Ziele definieren, Webauftritt optimieren und den Erfolg steigern] (2009) 0.04
    0.037464105 = product of:
      0.12488034 = sum of:
        0.045300294 = weight(_text_:gestaltung in 3586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045300294 = score(doc=3586,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2008246 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8332562 = idf(docFreq=351, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.22557144 = fieldWeight in 3586, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8332562 = idf(docFreq=351, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3586)
        0.026526684 = product of:
          0.053053368 = sum of:
            0.053053368 = weight(_text_:web in 3586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.053053368 = score(doc=3586,freq=28.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.47219574 = fieldWeight in 3586, product of:
                  5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                    28.0 = termFreq=28.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3586)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.053053368 = weight(_text_:web in 3586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053053368 = score(doc=3586,freq=28.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.47219574 = fieldWeight in 3586, product of:
              5.2915025 = tf(freq=28.0), with freq of:
                28.0 = termFreq=28.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3586)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    Web Analytics bezeichnet die Sammlung, Analyse und Auswertung von Daten der Website-Nutzung mit dem Ziel, diese Informationen zum besseren Verständnis des Besucherverhaltens sowie zur Optimierung der Website zu nutzen. Je nach Ziel der eigenen Website - z.B. die Vermittlung eines Markenwerts oder die Vermehrung von Kontaktanfragen, Bestellungen oder Newsletter-Abonnements - können Sie anhand von Web Analytics herausfinden, wo sich Schwachstellen Ihrer Website befinden und wie Sie Ihre eigenen Ziele durch entsprechende Optimierungen besser erreichen. Dabei ist Web Analytics nicht nur für Website-Betreiber und IT-Abteilungen interessant, sondern wird insbesondere auch mehr und mehr für Marketing und Management nutzbar. Mit diesem Buch lernen Sie, wie Sie die Nutzung Ihrer Website analysieren. Sie können z. B. untersuchen, welche Traffic-Quelle am meisten Umsatz bringt oder welche Bereiche der Website besonders häufig genutzt werden und vieles mehr. Auf diese Weise werden Sie Ihre Besucher, ihr Verhalten und ihre Motivation besser kennen lernen, Ihre Website darauf abstimmen und somit Ihren Erfolg steigern können. Um aus Web Analytics einen wirklichen Mehrwert ziehen zu können, benötigen Sie fundiertes Wissen. Marco Hassler gibt Ihnen in seinem Buch einen umfassenden Einblick in Web Analytics. Er zeigt Ihnen detailliert, wie das Verhalten der Besucher analysiert wird und welche Metriken Sie wann sinnvoll anwenden können. Im letzten Teil des Buches zeigt Ihnen der Autor, wie Sie Ihre Auswertungsergebnisse dafür nutzen, über Conversion-Messungen die Website auf ihre Ziele hin zu optimieren. Ziel dieses Buches ist es, konkrete Web-Analytics-Kenntnisse zu vermitteln und wertvolle praxisorientierte Tipps zu geben. Dazu schlägt das Buch die Brücke zu tangierenden Themenbereichen wie Usability, User-Centered-Design, Online Branding, Online-Marketing oder Suchmaschinenoptimierung. Marco Hassler gibt Ihnen klare Hinweise und Anleitungen, wie Sie Ihre Ziele erreichen.
    Footnote
    Rez. in Mitt. VÖB 63(2010) H.1/2, S.147-148 (M. Buzinkay): "Webseiten-Gestaltung und Webseiten-Analyse gehen Hand in Hand. Leider wird das Letztere selten wenn überhaupt berücksichtigt. Zu Unrecht, denn die Analyse der eigenen Maßnahmen ist zur Korrektur und Optimierung entscheidend. Auch wenn die Einsicht greift, dass die Analyse von Webseiten wichtig wäre, ist es oft ein weiter Weg zur Realisierung. Warum? Analyse heißt kontinuierlicher Aufwand, und viele sind nicht bereit beziehungsweise haben nicht die zeitlichen Ressourcen dazu. Ist man einmal zu der Überzeugung gelangt, dass man seine Web-Aktivitäten dennoch optimieren, wenn nicht schon mal gelegentlich hinterfragen sollte, dann lohnt es sich, Marco Hasslers "Web Analytics" in die Hand zu nehmen. Es ist definitiv kein Buch für einen einzigen Lese-Abend, sondern ein Band, mit welchem gearbeitet werden muss. D.h. auch hier: Web-Analyse bedeutet Arbeit und intensive Auseinandersetzung (ein Umstand, den viele nicht verstehen und akzeptieren wollen). Das Buch ist sehr dicht und bleibt trotzdem übersichtlich. Die Gliederung der Themen - von den Grundlagen der Datensammlung, über die Definition von Metriken, hin zur Optimierung von Seiten und schließlich bis zur Arbeit mit Web Analyse Werkzeugen - liefert einen roten Faden, der schön von einem Thema auf das nächste aufbaut. Dadurch fällt es auch leicht, ein eigenes Projekt begleitend zur Buchlektüre Schritt für Schritt aufzubauen. Zahlreiche Screenshots und Illustrationen erleichtern zudem das Verstehen der Zusammenhänge und Erklärungen im Text. Das Buch überzeugt aber auch durch seine Tiefe (bis auf das Kapitel, wo es um die Zusammenstellung von Personas geht) und den angenehm zu lesenden Schreibstil. Von mir kommt eine dringende Empfehlung an alle, die sich mit Online Marketing im Allgemeinen, mit Erfolgskontrolle von Websites und Web-Aktivitäten im Speziellen auseindersetzen."
    RSWK
    Electronic Commerce / Web Site / Verbesserung / Kennzahl
    Subject
    Electronic Commerce / Web Site / Verbesserung / Kennzahl
  17. Thelwall, M.; Vaughan, L.: Webometrics : an introduction to the special issue (2004) 0.03
    0.03250589 = product of:
      0.10835296 = sum of:
        0.016204696 = product of:
          0.032409392 = sum of:
            0.032409392 = weight(_text_:web in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032409392 = score(doc=2908,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.05973887 = weight(_text_:wide in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05973887 = score(doc=2908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15254007 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
        0.032409392 = weight(_text_:web in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032409392 = score(doc=2908,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    Webometrics, the quantitative study of Web phenomena, is a field encompassing contributions from information science, computer science, and statistical physics. Its methodology draws especially from bibliometrics. This special issue presents contributions that both push for ward the field and illustrate a wide range of webometric approaches.
  18. Thelwall, M.; Li, X.; Barjak, F.; Robinson, S.: Assessing the international web connectivity of research groups (2008) 0.03
    0.03158312 = product of:
      0.10527706 = sum of:
        0.022646753 = product of:
          0.045293506 = sum of:
            0.045293506 = weight(_text_:web in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045293506 = score(doc=1401,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.40312994 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.037336797 = weight(_text_:wide in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037336797 = score(doc=1401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15254007 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
        0.045293506 = weight(_text_:web in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045293506 = score(doc=1401,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.40312994 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to claim that it is useful to assess the web connectivity of research groups, describe hyperlink-based techniques to achieve this and present brief details of European life sciences research groups as a case study. Design/methodology/approach - A commercial search engine was harnessed to deliver hyperlink data via its automatic query submission interface. A special purpose link analysis tool, LexiURL, then summarised and graphed the link data in appropriate ways. Findings - Webometrics can provide a wide range of descriptive information about the international connectivity of research groups. Research limitations/implications - Only one field was analysed, data was taken from only one search engine, and the results were not validated. Practical implications - Web connectivity seems to be particularly important for attracting overseas job applicants and to promote research achievements and capabilities, and hence we contend that it can be useful for national and international governments to use webometrics to ensure that the web is being used effectively by research groups. Originality/value - This is the first paper to make a case for the value of using a range of webometric techniques to evaluate the web presences of research groups within a field, and possibly the first "applied" webometrics study produced for an external contract.
  19. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007) 0.03
    0.031156838 = product of:
      0.103856124 = sum of:
        0.032027345 = product of:
          0.06405469 = sum of:
            0.06405469 = weight(_text_:web in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06405469 = score(doc=586,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.5701118 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.06405469 = weight(_text_:web in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06405469 = score(doc=586,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.5701118 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
        0.0077740923 = product of:
          0.023322277 = sum of:
            0.023322277 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023322277 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12055935 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
  20. Vaughan, L.; Thelwall, M.: Scholarly use of the Web : what are the key inducers of links to journal Web sites? (2003) 0.03
    0.029698823 = product of:
      0.09899607 = sum of:
        0.030383805 = product of:
          0.06076761 = sum of:
            0.06076761 = weight(_text_:web in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06076761 = score(doc=1236,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.5408555 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.06076761 = weight(_text_:web in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06076761 = score(doc=1236,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.11235461 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03442753 = queryNorm
            0.5408555 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
        0.00784466 = product of:
          0.023533981 = sum of:
            0.023533981 = weight(_text_:29 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023533981 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12110529 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03442753 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    Web links have been studied by information scientists for at least six years but it is only in the past two that clear evidence has emerged to show that counts of links to scholarly Web spaces (universities and departments) can correlate significantly with research measures, giving some credence to their use for the investigation of scholarly communication. This paper reports an a study to investigate the factors that influence the creation of links to journal Web sites. An empirical approach is used: collecting data and testing for significant patterns. The specific questions addressed are whether site age and site content are inducers of links to a journal's Web site as measured by the ratio of link counts to Journal Impact Factors, two variables previously discovered to be related. A new methodology for data collection is also introduced that uses the Internet Archive to obtain an earliest known creation date for Web sites. The results show that both site age and site content are significant factors for the disciplines studied: library and information science, and law. Comparisons between the two fields also show disciplinary differences in Web site characteristics. Scholars and publishers should be particularly aware that richer content an a journal's Web site tends to generate links and thus the traffic to the site.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.1, S.29-38

Years

Languages

  • e 446
  • d 28
  • ro 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 463
  • el 10
  • m 9
  • s 3
  • r 2
  • b 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…