Search (13 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Stock, W.G."
  1. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Klassifikation und terminologische Kontrolle : Yahoo!, Open Directory und Oingo im Vergleich (2000) 0.04
    0.03613195 = product of:
      0.1445278 = sum of:
        0.1445278 = weight(_text_:open in 5496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1445278 = score(doc=5496,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.68940914 = fieldWeight in 5496, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5496)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In Password 11/2000 wurden durch einen Retrievaltest die qualitativ führenden Suchwerkzeuge im Internet bestimmt. In den nächsten Teilen unseres State of the Art - Berichts über Retrievalsysteme im World Wide Weh beschreiben wir einzelne interessante Ansätze der Technik der TopSuchwerkzeuge. Den Anfang machen die klassifikatorischen Verzeichnisse Yahoo! und das Open Directory-Projekt sowie das System Oingo, das im Rahmen eines "semantischen Retrievals" das Homonym- und Synonymproblem angeht
    Object
    Open Directory
  2. Fietkiewicz, K.J.; Stock, W.G.: Jedem seine eigene "Truman Show" : YouNow, Periscope, Ustream und ihre Nutzer - "Social Live"-Streaming Services (2017) 0.02
    0.01825319 = product of:
      0.07301276 = sum of:
        0.07301276 = weight(_text_:open in 3770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07301276 = score(doc=3770,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.3482767 = fieldWeight in 3770, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3770)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Open Password. 2017, Nr.234 vom 01.08.2017 [http://www.password-online.de/?wysija-page=1&controller=email&action=view&email_id=295&wysijap=subscriptions&user_id=1045]
  3. Stock, W.G.: Informational cities : analysis and construction of cities in the knowledge society (2011) 0.02
    0.015270403 = product of:
      0.06108161 = sum of:
        0.06108161 = sum of:
          0.029544784 = weight(_text_:access in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.029544784 = score(doc=4452,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046553567 = queryNorm
              0.18724121 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
          0.03153683 = weight(_text_:22 in 4452) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03153683 = score(doc=4452,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046553567 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4452, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4452)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Informational cities are prototypical cities of the knowledge society. If they are informational world cities, they are new centers of power. According to Manuel Castells (1989), in those cities space of flows (flows of money, power, and information) tend to override space of places. Information and communication technology infrastructures, cognitive infrastructures (as groundwork of knowledge cities and creative cities), and city-level knowledge management are of great importance. Digital libraries provide access to the global explicit knowledge. The informational city consists of creative clusters and spaces for personal contacts to stimulate sharing of implicit information. In such cities, we can observe job polarization in favor of well-trained employees. The corporate structure of informational cities is made up of financial services, knowledge-intensive high-tech industrial enterprises, companies of the information economy, and further creative and knowledge-intensive service enterprises. Weak location factors are facilities for culture, recreational activities, and consumption. Political willingness to create an informational city and e-governance activities are crucial aspects for the development of such cities. This conceptual article frames indicators which are able to mark the degree of "informativeness" of a city. Finally, based upon findings of network economy, we try to explain why certain cities master the transition to informational cities and others (lagging to relative insignificance) do not. The article connects findings of information science and of urbanistics and urban planning.
    Date
    3. 7.2011 19:22:49
  4. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsinformatik : Fundierung, Gegenstand und Methoden (1980) 0.01
    0.012614732 = product of:
      0.050458927 = sum of:
        0.050458927 = product of:
          0.10091785 = sum of:
            0.10091785 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10091785 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Ratio. 22(1980), S.155-164
  5. Stock, W.G.: Informationsmangel trotz Überfluß : Informationsgesellschaft verlangt neue Berufe und Berufsbilder (1995) 0.01
    0.012614732 = product of:
      0.050458927 = sum of:
        0.050458927 = product of:
          0.10091785 = sum of:
            0.10091785 = weight(_text_:22 in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10091785 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Insider. 1995, Nr.4, Juli, S.19-22
  6. Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Recherchieren im Internet (2004) 0.01
    0.012614732 = product of:
      0.050458927 = sum of:
        0.050458927 = product of:
          0.10091785 = sum of:
            0.10091785 = weight(_text_:22 in 4686) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10091785 = score(doc=4686,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4686, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4686)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    27.11.2005 18:04:22
  7. Stock, W.G.: Endnutzersystem für internationale Geschäftsinformationen (1998) 0.01
    0.01103789 = product of:
      0.04415156 = sum of:
        0.04415156 = product of:
          0.08830312 = sum of:
            0.08830312 = weight(_text_:22 in 2407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08830312 = score(doc=2407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 2407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Password. 1998, H.10, S.22-28
  8. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.01
    0.007884207 = product of:
      0.03153683 = sum of:
        0.03153683 = product of:
          0.06307366 = sum of:
            0.06307366 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06307366 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  9. Linde, F.; Stock, W.G.: Informationsmarkt : Informationen im I-Commerce anbieten und nachfragen (2011) 0.01
    0.006307366 = product of:
      0.025229463 = sum of:
        0.025229463 = product of:
          0.050458927 = sum of:
            0.050458927 = weight(_text_:22 in 291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050458927 = score(doc=291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    23. 9.2010 11:15:22
  10. Schumann, L.; Stock, W.G.: ¬Ein umfassendes ganzheitliches Modell für Evaluation und Akzeptanzanalysen von Informationsdiensten : Das Information Service Evaluation (ISE) Modell (2014) 0.01
    0.005518945 = product of:
      0.02207578 = sum of:
        0.02207578 = product of:
          0.04415156 = sum of:
            0.04415156 = weight(_text_:22 in 1492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04415156 = score(doc=1492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1492)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2014 18:56:46
  11. Stock, W.G.: Qualitätskriterien von Suchmaschinen : Checkliste für Retrievalsysteme (2000) 0.00
    0.0039421036 = product of:
      0.015768414 = sum of:
        0.015768414 = product of:
          0.03153683 = sum of:
            0.03153683 = weight(_text_:22 in 5773) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03153683 = score(doc=5773,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5773, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5773)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Password. 2000, H.5, S.22-31
  12. Stock, W.G.: Hochschulmanagement, Information Appliances, Fairness als Grundsatz : Information und Mobilität (2002) 0.00
    0.0039421036 = product of:
      0.015768414 = sum of:
        0.015768414 = product of:
          0.03153683 = sum of:
            0.03153683 = weight(_text_:22 in 1364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03153683 = score(doc=1364,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1364, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1364)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 19:39:36
  13. Stock, W.G.; Weber, S.: Facets of informetrics : Preface (2006) 0.00
    0.0029544784 = product of:
      0.0118179135 = sum of:
        0.0118179135 = product of:
          0.023635827 = sum of:
            0.023635827 = weight(_text_:access in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023635827 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.14979297 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    According to Jean M. Tague-Sutcliffe "informetrics" is "the study of the quantitative aspects of information in any form, not just records or bibliographies, and in any social group, not just scientists" (Tague-Sutcliffe, 1992, 1). Leo Egghe also defines "informetrics" in a very broad sense. "(W)e will use the term' informetrics' as the broad term comprising all-metrics studies related to information science, including bibliometrics (bibliographies, libraries,...), scientometrics (science policy, citation analysis, research evaluation,...), webometrics (metrics of the web, the Internet or other social networks such as citation or collaboration networks), ..." (Egghe, 2005b,1311). According to Concepcion S. Wilson "informetrics" is "the quantitative study of collections of moderatesized units of potentially informative text, directed to the scientific understanding of information processes at the social level" (Wilson, 1999, 211). We should add to Wilson's units of text also digital collections of images, videos, spoken documents and music. Dietmar Wolfram divides "informetrics" into two aspects, "system-based characteristics that arise from the documentary content of IR systems and how they are indexed, and usage-based characteristics that arise how users interact with system content and the system interfaces that provide access to the content" (Wolfram, 2003, 6). We would like to follow Tague-Sutcliffe, Egghe, Wilson and Wolfram (and others, for example Björneborn & Ingwersen, 2004) and call this broad research of empirical information science "informetrics". Informetrics includes therefore all quantitative studies in information science. If a scientist performs scientific investigations empirically, e.g. on information users' behavior, on scientific impact of academic journals, on the development of the patent application activity of a company, on links of Web pages, on the temporal distribution of blog postings discussing a given topic, on availability, recall and precision of retrieval systems, on usability of Web sites, and so on, he or she contributes to informetrics. We see three subject areas in information science in which such quantitative research takes place, - information users and information usage, - evaluation of information systems, - information itself, Following Wolfram's article, we divide his system-based characteristics into the "information itself "-category and the "information system"-category. Figure 1 is a simplistic graph of subjects and research areas of informetrics as an empirical information science.