Search (37 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  1. Casale, M.: Full text retrieval for the Web (1996) 0.05
    0.046847057 = product of:
      0.09369411 = sum of:
        0.07301276 = weight(_text_:open in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07301276 = score(doc=6757,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.3482767 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
        0.02068135 = product of:
          0.0413627 = sum of:
            0.0413627 = weight(_text_:access in 6757) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0413627 = score(doc=6757,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 6757, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6757)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews developments and improvements in techniques for searching the WWW that have been made access to full text databases a practical proposition (full text retrieval (FTR)). Reports results of interviews with 8 full text database vendors offering FTR via the WWW: Dataware (http://www.dataware.com); Excalibur (http://www.excalib.com); Fulcrum (http://www.fulcrum.com); Muscat (http://www.muscat.co.uk); Open Text (http://www.opentext.com); Personal Library Software (PLS) (http://www.pls.com); Verity (http://www.verity.com); and ZyLab (ZyIndex and ZyImage) (http://www.zylab.com). Compares the prices of the systems and lists the questions that publishers should ask before making a choice of systems for handling FTR on the Web
  2. Hauke, P.; Rumler, J.; Hötzeldt, A.: Open Access - nutzerfreundlich!? (2010) 0.05
    0.046847057 = product of:
      0.09369411 = sum of:
        0.07301276 = weight(_text_:open in 4209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07301276 = score(doc=4209,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.3482767 = fieldWeight in 4209, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4209)
        0.02068135 = product of:
          0.0413627 = sum of:
            0.0413627 = weight(_text_:access in 4209) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0413627 = score(doc=4209,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 4209, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4209)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
  3. Jayakanth, F.; Aswath, L.: ¬A PFT-based approach to make CDS/ISIS data based OAI-compliant (2006) 0.04
    0.03886925 = product of:
      0.0777385 = sum of:
        0.05215197 = weight(_text_:open in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05215197 = score(doc=1495,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.24876907 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
        0.025586532 = product of:
          0.051173065 = sum of:
            0.051173065 = weight(_text_:access in 1495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051173065 = score(doc=1495,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.3243113 = fieldWeight in 1495, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1495)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    CDS/ISIS is a powerful and popular software package for managing computerized bibliographic data. It is developed and maintained by UNESCO since 1985. It is free software available in binary form for MS-DOS, MS-Windows, Unix, and Unix-based operating systems like Linux. It is used by many libraries and organizations in many countries to maintain their Online Public Access Catalogues (OPACs) and other bibliographic databases. With the advent of the Internet and Web technologies, publishing the content of databases on the Web provides a round the clock access to the content from any PC with Internet access. Some CDS-ISIS databases are published on the Web, but many are still on standalone systems or on local area networks. Interoperability is the key for the efficient dissemination of information to end-users. The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) provides a technical framework for interoperability of OAI-compliant digital libraries (UNESCO. 2004). However, CDS/ISIS databases are not OAI-compliant. In this paper, we describe a simple approach, to make CDS/ISIS OAI-compliant. It is based on printing CDS/ISIS records in an OAI static repository format.
  4. Kim, T.C.-w.K.; Zumstein, P.: Semiautomatische Katalogisierung und Normdatenverknüpfung mit Zotero im Index Theologicus (2016) 0.02
    0.020860787 = product of:
      0.08344315 = sum of:
        0.08344315 = weight(_text_:open in 3064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08344315 = score(doc=3064,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.39803052 = fieldWeight in 3064, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3064)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Im Folgenden soll aufgezeigt werden, wie derzeit das Literaturverwaltungsprogramm Zotero innerhalb des Index Theologicus genutzt wird, um unselbstständige Literatur in einem bibliothekarischen Katalogisierungssystem zu erfassen. Die modulare und flexible Architektur der Open Source Software erlaubt es, die bereits kollaborativ zusammengetragene Programmierarbeit zur Datenextraktion mitzunutzen. Das vorgestellte semiautomatische Verfahren bringt auch bei der Verknüpfung von Normdaten erhebliche Vorteile für die Medienbearbeitung.
  5. Hussain, K.H.; Rajeev, J.S.: ¬The changing language technology and CDS/ ISIS : UNICODE and the emergence of OTF (2006) 0.01
    0.013037993 = product of:
      0.05215197 = sum of:
        0.05215197 = weight(_text_:open in 1496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05215197 = score(doc=1496,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.24876907 = fieldWeight in 1496, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1496)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Language technology is undergoing a great change and within a few years languages of the world will embark on OTF (Open Type Font) Technology. Major operating systems have already started embedding Asian languages using OTF. Being a major bibliographic DBMS, CDS/ISIS cannot ignore these developments that have taken place in text processing. This paper looks at the ideas behind Unicode and OTF and examines future developments of multilingual information systems. The Unicode is a minimalist encoding which includes currently all major scripts in use and allows easy migration from an existing encoding scheme to it. Indic language computing will be tremendously benefited from the development of OTF in compliance with Unicode. CDS/ISIS should be made Unicode compliant by utilizing the shaping and encoding engine on various operating systems so that it can be effectively utilized to develop and distribute local information systems using vernacular scripts. The source code of CDS/ISIS may be made available under a free software license, allowing the evolution of the package in a free and socially useful manner.
  6. Kelly, J.A.: Downloading information using bibliographic management software (1997) 0.01
    0.012614732 = product of:
      0.050458927 = sum of:
        0.050458927 = product of:
          0.10091785 = sum of:
            0.10091785 = weight(_text_:22 in 3254) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10091785 = score(doc=3254,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 3254, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3254)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.59, [=Suppl.22]
  7. EndNote X (2006) 0.01
    0.010430394 = product of:
      0.041721575 = sum of:
        0.041721575 = weight(_text_:open in 3590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041721575 = score(doc=3590,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.19901526 = fieldWeight in 3590, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3590)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungen VOEB 59(2006) H.4, S.81-88 (O. Oberhauser): ""Endnoten" erfüllen bekanntlich denselben Zweck wie Fußnoten, werden jedoch an das Ende des Werkes (Artikels, Kapitel, Buch usw.) gestellt, um die Textseiten nicht mit Zitaten und Anmerkungen zu überfrachten. EndNote hingegen ist ein Literaturverwaltungsprogramm für Windows und MacOSX, dessen Name sicher nicht ohne Grund gewählt wurde, zumal der Hauptzweck dieser Software darin besteht, die Erstellung von Literaturverzeichnissen und Zitaten beim Abfassen von wissenschaftlichen Arbeiten zu unterstützen. Solche Programme zur Literaturverwaltung, auch Bibliographieprogramme genannt, gibt es heute in großer Zahl. Viele sind kommerzielle Softwareprodukte, andere kostenlose oder auch Open Source-Programme. EndNote, ein Produkt von Thomson ISI ResearchSoft,' zählt zur ersteren Gattung und wird in unseren Breiten von der Adept Scientific GmbH (Frankfurt am Main)' vertrieben. Mit einem Preis von ungefähr 200 Euro - genauere Angaben müssen aufgrund wechselnder Aktionen der Homepage entnommen werden - liegt das Programm eher im oberen Bereich der Produktgruppe; de facto wird dies aber durch günstigere Studentenversionen, vor allem aber auch durch Campuslizenzen für die Angehörigen der meisten österreichischen Universitäten durchaus nach unten relativiert. EndNote ist schon seit langem ein Begriff, das Produkt gilt bereits als "Klassiker" unter den Literaturverwaltungsprogrammen und ist derzeit in Version X (bzw. X.0.2 nach einem rezenten Patch-Update) auf dem Markt. Schon vor etlichen Jahren konnte man einer immer noch lesenswerten Broschüre entnehmen, dass ein Bibliographieprogramm - grob gesprochen - zumindest folgende Aufgaben unterstützen müsse: (a) Eingabe von Literaturzitaten ("references"), (b) Editieren von Literaturzitaten, (c) Suche bzw. Wiederauffinden von Literaturzitaten, (d) Erstellung von Literaturverzeichnissen und (e) Unterstützung von Qualität und Integrität der Datensammlung. Diese Anforderungen gelten immer noch, wobei heute die Punkte (a) und (b) vor allem durch das seitdem hinzugekommene World Wide Web beeinflusst werden, während für Punkt (d) inzwischen auch noch die Anforderung einer Verknüpfung mit Textverarbeitungsprogrammen entstanden ist (Eingabe von Platzhaltern fürvorläufige Zitate, die später durch die endgültige Form ersetzt werden). Im folgenden soll das von mir selbst nach vielen Jahren des Verwendens bzw. Ausprobierens anderer Programme vor knapp einem Jahr für die persönliche Literaturverwaltung ausgewählte Produkt EndNote (Windows-Version) im Hinblick auf diese Kriterien näher beschrieben und beurteilt werden.
  8. EndNote X7 : bibliographies made easy [= Version 17] (2013) 0.01
    0.009461049 = product of:
      0.037844196 = sum of:
        0.037844196 = product of:
          0.07568839 = sum of:
            0.07568839 = weight(_text_:22 in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07568839 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    17. 9.2018 18:19:22
  9. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Microcomputer-based automated library systems : new series (1993) 0.01
    0.007884207 = product of:
      0.03153683 = sum of:
        0.03153683 = product of:
          0.06307366 = sum of:
            0.06307366 = weight(_text_:22 in 3073) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06307366 = score(doc=3073,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3073, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3073)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  10. Matthews, J.R.; Parker, M.R.: Microcomputer-based automated library systems : new series (1993) 0.01
    0.007884207 = product of:
      0.03153683 = sum of:
        0.03153683 = product of:
          0.06307366 = sum of:
            0.06307366 = weight(_text_:22 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06307366 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.11.1995 20:53:22
  11. Freese, E.; Göbel, E.: Literaturdokumentation mit LIDOS und Archivierung am Beispiel des Spezialarchives Arbeit und Gesundheit : Handlungsanleitung (1998) 0.01
    0.007884207 = product of:
      0.03153683 = sum of:
        0.03153683 = product of:
          0.06307366 = sum of:
            0.06307366 = weight(_text_:22 in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06307366 = score(doc=8,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    17. 7.2002 15:38:22
  12. East, J.W.: Z39.50 and personal bibliographic software (2003) 0.01
    0.0073119607 = product of:
      0.029247843 = sum of:
        0.029247843 = product of:
          0.058495685 = sum of:
            0.058495685 = weight(_text_:access in 4783) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058495685 = score(doc=4783,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.3707187 = fieldWeight in 4783, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4783)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Many thousands of researchers are now using personal bibliographic managers such as Reference Manager, EndNote and ProCite to access bibliographic databases via the Z39.50 protocol. With the EndNote software as an example, this paper demonstrates how researchers are using a standard search interface to access diverse databases and download references into their personal databases. There follows an overview of problems involved in searching the Z39.50 servers of some standard library automation systems (Innovative Interfaces, GEAC, SIRSI, Endeavour) and of two vendors of non-OPAC databases (Research Libraries Group and SilverPlatter). The paper concludes with some suggestions as to how the library community can contribute to improving the effectiveness of Z39.50 as a research tool.
  13. Wurangian, N.: Using the OCLC Cataloging Micro Enhancer to produce a bibliography list (1993) 0.01
    0.006307366 = product of:
      0.025229463 = sum of:
        0.025229463 = product of:
          0.050458927 = sum of:
            0.050458927 = weight(_text_:22 in 5055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050458927 = score(doc=5055,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5055, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5055)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    OCLC systems and services. 9(1993) no.1, S.22-24
  14. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.01
    0.006307366 = product of:
      0.025229463 = sum of:
        0.025229463 = product of:
          0.050458927 = sum of:
            0.050458927 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050458927 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  15. Bellarby, L.: ¬A comparison of two personal bibliographic software packages : EndNote and Pro-Cite (1993) 0.01
    0.006307366 = product of:
      0.025229463 = sum of:
        0.025229463 = product of:
          0.050458927 = sum of:
            0.050458927 = weight(_text_:22 in 561) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050458927 = score(doc=561,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 561, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=561)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Law librarian. 24(1993) no.1, S.22-23
  16. Knauth, M.: Bibliographies made easy : a look at PRO-CITE (1989) 0.01
    0.006307366 = product of:
      0.025229463 = sum of:
        0.025229463 = product of:
          0.050458927 = sum of:
            0.050458927 = weight(_text_:22 in 2830) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050458927 = score(doc=2830,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2830, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2830)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Computers in libraries. 9(1989) no.4, S.22-24
  17. Brandt, D.S.: Ovid searching software (1996) 0.01
    0.006307366 = product of:
      0.025229463 = sum of:
        0.025229463 = product of:
          0.050458927 = sum of:
            0.050458927 = weight(_text_:22 in 6754) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050458927 = score(doc=6754,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6754, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6754)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15
  18. Boeder, R.: Database applications for libraries : an introduction (1996) 0.01
    0.006307366 = product of:
      0.025229463 = sum of:
        0.025229463 = product of:
          0.050458927 = sum of:
            0.050458927 = weight(_text_:22 in 340) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050458927 = score(doc=340,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 340, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=340)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Colorado libraries. 22(1996) no.1, S.25-28
  19. Kiem, C.M.; Middleton, M.: ¬An evaluation of textual storage and retrieval software : CDS/ISIS and InMagic (1998) 0.01
    0.006307366 = product of:
      0.025229463 = sum of:
        0.025229463 = product of:
          0.050458927 = sum of:
            0.050458927 = weight(_text_:22 in 1974) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050458927 = score(doc=1974,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1974, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1974)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 2.1999 13:54:49
  20. Kirkwood, H.P.: Ovid Web Gateway (1998) 0.01
    0.006307366 = product of:
      0.025229463 = sum of:
        0.025229463 = product of:
          0.050458927 = sum of:
            0.050458927 = weight(_text_:22 in 2878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050458927 = score(doc=2878,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2878, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2878)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    6. 3.1997 16:22:15