Search (570 results, page 1 of 29)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  1. Genereux, C.: Building connections : a review of the serials literature 2004 through 2005 (2007) 0.08 
    0.08091712 = product of:
  0.16183424 = sum of:
    0.062582366 = weight(_text_:open in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062582366 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.2985229 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
    0.09925188 = sum of:
      0.06140768 = weight(_text_:access in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06140768 = score(doc=2548,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.38917357 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
      0.037844196 = weight(_text_:22 in 2548) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037844196 = score(doc=2548,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2548, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2548)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This review of 2004 and 2005 serials literature covers the themes of cost, management, and access. Interwoven through the serials literature of these two years are the importance of collaboration, communication, and linkages between scholars, publishers, subscription agents and other intermediaries, and librarians. The emphasis in the literature is on electronic serials and their impact on publishing, libraries, and vendors. In response to the crisis of escalating journal prices and libraries' dissatisfaction with the Big Deal licensing agreements, Open Access journals and publishing models were promoted. Libraries subscribed to or licensed increasing numbers of electronic serials. As a result, libraries sought ways to better manage licensing and subscription data (not handled by traditional integrated library systems) by implementing electronic resources management systems. In order to provide users with better, faster, and more current information on and access to electronic serials, libraries implemented tools and services to provide A-Z title lists, title by title coverage data, MARC records, and OpenURL link resolvers.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Danskin, A.: Linked and open data : RDA and bibliographic control (2012) 0.07 
    0.0714458 = product of:
  0.1428916 = sum of:
    0.12516473 = weight(_text_:open in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12516473 = score(doc=304,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.5970458 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
    0.01772687 = product of:
      0.03545374 = sum of:
        0.03545374 = weight(_text_:access in 304) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03545374 = score(doc=304,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 304, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=304)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    RDA: Resource Description and Access is a new cataloguing standard which will replace the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd edition, which has been widely used in libraries since 1981. RDA, like AACR2, is a content standard providing guidance and instruction on how to identify and record attributes or properties of resources which are significant for discovery. However, RDA is also an implementation of the FRBR and FRAD models. The RDA element set and vocabularies are being published on the Open Metadata Registry as linked open data. RDA provides a rich vocabulary for the description of resources and for expressing relationships between them. This paper describes what RDA offers and considers the challenges and potential of linked open data in the broader framework of bibliographic control.
  3. Calhoun, K.: Supporting digital scholarship : bibliographic control, library co-operatives and open access repositories (2013) 0.07 
    0.06625174 = product of:
  0.13250348 = sum of:
    0.103255644 = weight(_text_:open in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.103255644 = score(doc=1482,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.49253768 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
    0.029247843 = product of:
      0.058495685 = sum of:
        0.058495685 = weight(_text_:access in 1482) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058495685 = score(doc=1482,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.3707187 = fieldWeight in 1482, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1482)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Research libraries have entered an era of discontinuous change-a time when the cumulated assets of the past do not guarantee future success. Bibliographic control, cooperative cataloguing systems and library catalogues have been key assets in the research library service framework for supporting scholarship. This chapter examines these assets in the context of changing library collections, new metadata sources and methods, open access repositories, digital scholarship and the purposes of research libraries. Advocating a fundamental rethinking of the research library service framework, the chapter concludes with a call for research libraries to collectively consider new approaches that could strengthen their roles as essential contributors to emergent, network-level scholarly research infrastructures.
  4. Schreur, P.E.: ¬The use of Linked Data and artificial intelligence as key elements in the transformation of technical services (2020) 0.05 
    0.051130302 = product of:
  0.102260605 = sum of:
    0.07301276 = weight(_text_:open in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07301276 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.3482767 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
    0.029247843 = product of:
      0.058495685 = sum of:
        0.058495685 = weight(_text_:access in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058495685 = score(doc=125,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.3707187 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Library Technical Services have benefited from numerous stimuli. Although initially looked at with suspicion, transitions such as the move from catalog cards to the MARC formats have proven enormously helpful to libraries and their patrons. Linked data and Artificial Intelligence (AI) hold the same promise. Through the conversion of metadata surrogates (cataloging) to linked open data, libraries can represent their resources on the Semantic Web. But in order to provide some form of controlled access to unstructured data, libraries must reach beyond traditional cataloging to new tools such as AI to provide consistent access to a growing world of full-text resources.
  5. Pampel, H.; Fenner, M.: ORCID - Offener Standard zur Vernetzung von Forschenden (2016) 0.05 
    0.047630534 = product of:
  0.09526107 = sum of:
    0.08344315 = weight(_text_:open in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08344315 = score(doc=2839,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.39803052 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
    0.0118179135 = product of:
      0.023635827 = sum of:
        0.023635827 = weight(_text_:access in 2839) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023635827 = score(doc=2839,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.14979297 = fieldWeight in 2839, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2839)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Das internationale ORCID-Konsortium vernetzt Publizierende mit ihren Aufsätzen und Forschungsdaten über eine eindeutige ID. Weltweit besitzen bereits über 2 Millionen Forschende eine solche Kennung. Um ORCID in Deutschland zu fördern, wurde das Projektvorhaben "ORCID DE - Förderung der Open Researcher and Contributor ID in Deutschland" gebildet. Die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) hat die Förderung des auf drei Jahre angelegten Projekts im Februar 2016 bewilligt. Durch die Integration in über 230 digitale Informationsinfrastrukturen erleichtert die Open Researcher and Contributor ID, kurz ORCID, die Pflege der Publikationsliste für Forscherinnen und Forscher. Die Idee dahinter ist folgende: Jede Person, die im wissenschaftlichen Arbeitsprozess einen Beitrag leistet, kann sich über die eindeutige ORCID-Kennung mit ihren Publikationen, Forschungsdaten und anderen Produkten des Forschungsprozesses (zum Beispiel Software) eindeutig vernetzen. Damit werden diese Objekte sichtbar und technisch verlässlich mit ihren Erschafferinnen und Erschaffern verbunden. ORCID bietet das Potenzial, bisher verteilte Informationen standardisiert zusammenzuführen und damit einen Überblick auf die Forschungsleistung von Forschenden zu ermöglichen. Durch die Offenheit des Systems und des großen internationalen Konsortiums ist ORCID auf dem Weg, ein langfristig gültiger Identifikator im wissenschaftlichen Alltag zu werden.
    Ziel des DFG-Projekts ORCID DE ist es, die vielerorts erwogene Implementierung der ORCID an Hochschulen und außeruniversitären Forschungseinrichtungen durch einen übergreifenden Ansatz nachhaltig zu unterstützen. Dabei stehen organisatorische, technische und rechtliche Fragen gleichermaßen im Fokus. Neben der Schaffung einer zentralen Anlaufstelle für Hochschulen und außeruniversitäre Forschungseinrichtungen sind die Vernetzung und Verbreitung der ORCID im Bereich von Open-Access-Repositorien und -Publikationdiensten sowie die Verzahnung mit der Gemeinsame Normdatei (GND) wesentliche Aspekte des Projekts. Projektpartner von ORCID DE sind das Helmholtz Open Science Koordinationsbüro am Deutschen GeoForschungsZentrum GFZ, die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek und die Universitätsbibliothek Bielefeld. Das Projekt wurde durch die Deutsche Initiative für Netzwerkinformation (DINI) initiiert.
  6. Taylor, S.; Jacobi, K.; Knight, E.; Foster, D.: Cataloging in a remote location : a case study of international collaboration in the Galapagos Islands (2013) 0.05 
    0.046847057 = product of:
  0.09369411 = sum of:
    0.07301276 = weight(_text_:open in 1943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07301276 = score(doc=1943,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.3482767 = fieldWeight in 1943, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1943)
    0.02068135 = product of:
      0.0413627 = sum of:
        0.0413627 = weight(_text_:access in 1943) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0413627 = score(doc=1943,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.2621377 = fieldWeight in 1943, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1943)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The Corley Smith Library is a small, special library located at the Charles Darwin Research Station in the Galapagos Islands. Currently, the library is managed by international volunteer librarians in collaboration with Station staff and local volunteers. Recently the library migrated its online public access catalog to Koha. We describe the process of selecting an open-source integrated library system and implementing Koha. Cataloging in this remote location presents challenges related to technology, staff expertise, language, local practices, and obtaining supplies. We define the strategies to address these issues, including long-term goals of copy cataloging with Z39.50 and remote cataloging by volunteer librarians.
  7. Leroy, S.Y.; Thomas, S.L.: Impact of Web access on cataloging (2004) 0.05 
    0.046643104 = product of:
  0.09328621 = sum of:
    0.062582366 = weight(_text_:open in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062582366 = score(doc=5656,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.2985229 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
    0.03070384 = product of:
      0.06140768 = sum of:
        0.06140768 = weight(_text_:access in 5656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06140768 = score(doc=5656,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.38917357 = fieldWeight in 5656, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5656)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Catalogers in larger libraries have web access on their desktops, which puts many resources just a click away. Cataloging tools and documentation are available through web browser interfaces. Many library online catalogs are accessible for searching class numbers and other cataloging information. Web sites of publishers, governmental agencies, and individual authors abound, providing a wealth of information. Having this information readily available has had an impact on cataloging. The ability to have more than one open window on the desktop enables catalogers to copy and paste cataloging information from multiple sources. Web resources provide critical information about the context for the item in hand, resulting in better cataloging records and more accurate access points. This article discusses and gives examples of ways that information found on the web can be used to facilitate cataloging processes.
  8. Fenner, M.; Hartmann, S.; Müller, U.; Pampel, H.; Reimer, T.; Scholze, F.; Summann, F.: Autorenidentifikation für wissenschaftliche Publikationen : Bericht über den Workshop der DINI-AG Elektronisches Publizieren auf dem 6. Bibliothekskongress (2016) 0.04 
    0.04426321 = product of:
  0.08852642 = sum of:
    0.07375403 = weight(_text_:open in 3309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07375403 = score(doc=3309,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.3518126 = fieldWeight in 3309, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3309)
    0.014772392 = product of:
      0.029544784 = sum of:
        0.029544784 = weight(_text_:access in 3309) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029544784 = score(doc=3309,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.18724121 = fieldWeight in 3309, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3309)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Identifikationssysteme für Autorinnen und Autoren spielen für das wissenschaftliche Publizieren eine zentrale Rolle. Sie erlauben die eindeutige Zuordnung von Publikationen zu ihren Urheberinnen und Urhebern, ermöglichen - auch auf übergreifenden Plattformen - gezielte Rechercheeinstiege und unterstützen die semantische Verknüpfung im Netz. Darüber hinaus können Autorenidentifikationssysteme zur einfachen Pflege von Publikationslisten und für die Forschungsevaluation genutzt werden. Neben zahlreichen proprietären Systemen von Verlagen und Datenbankbetreibern widmet sich im Wissenschaftsbereich die global agierende Initiative ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributer ID) der Vergabe einer eindeutigen ID für Forschende. Im deutschen Bibliothekswesen kommt zur Erschließung mit Personenbezug vor allem der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) entscheidende Bedeutung zu. In den Open-Access-Repositorien deutscher Hochschulen und Forschungseinrichtungen hat sich die Verwendung übergreifender Autorenidentifikationssystemen dagegen bislang kaum durchgesetzt. Im Rahmen des 6. Bibliothekskongresses veranstaltete die AG Elektronisches Publizieren der Deutschen Initiative für Netzwerkinformation (DINI) am 15.03.2016 einen Workshop zu diesem Themenfeld. Die Referentinnen und Referenten haben das Thema Autorenidentifikation und deren Anwendungsszenarien aus unterschiedlichen Blickwinkeln beleuchtet. Der vorliegende Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über die Themen des Workshops.
  9. Koster, L.: Persistent identifiers for heritage objects (2020) 0.04 
    0.04426321 = product of:
  0.08852642 = sum of:
    0.07375403 = weight(_text_:open in 5718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07375403 = score(doc=5718,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.3518126 = fieldWeight in 5718, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5718)
    0.014772392 = product of:
      0.029544784 = sum of:
        0.029544784 = weight(_text_:access in 5718) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029544784 = score(doc=5718,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.18724121 = fieldWeight in 5718, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5718)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Persistent identifiers (PID's) are essential for getting access and referring to library, archive and museum (LAM) collection objects in a sustainable and unambiguous way, both internally and externally. Heritage institutions need a universal policy for the use of PID's in order to have an efficient digital infrastructure at their disposal and to achieve optimal interoperability, leading to open data, open collections and efficient resource management. Here the discussion is limited to PID's that institutions can assign to objects they own or administer themselves. PID's for people, subjects etc. can be used by heritage institutions, but are generally managed by other parties. The first part of this article consists of a general theoretical description of persistent identifiers. First of all, I discuss the questions of what persistent identifiers are and what they are not, and what is needed to administer and use them. The most commonly used existing PID systems are briefly characterized. Then I discuss the types of objects PID's can be assigned to. This section concludes with an overview of the requirements that apply if PIDs should also be used for linked data. The second part examines current infrastructural practices, and existing PID systems and their advantages and shortcomings. Based on these practical issues and the pros and cons of existing PID systems a list of requirements for PID systems is presented which is used to address a number of practical considerations. This section concludes with a number of recommendations.
  10. Han, M.-J.K.; Ream-Sotomayor, N.E.; Lampron, P.; Kudeki, D.: "Making Metadata Maker" (2016) 0.04 
    0.043825973 = product of:
  0.087651946 = sum of:
    0.062582366 = weight(_text_:open in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062582366 = score(doc=2883,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.2985229 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
    0.02506958 = product of:
      0.05013916 = sum of:
        0.05013916 = weight(_text_:access in 2883) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05013916 = score(doc=2883,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.31775886 = fieldWeight in 2883, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2883)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Cataloging and metadata operations in academic libraries are focusing on original cataloging of their unique and hidden collections that have not been available to users because of a lack of metadata. However, creating MARC format metadata is an expensive process; libraries need professional catalogers with appropriate experience and knowledge or must train staff to do the work. To improve the cataloging and metadata creation workflow, the University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign Library developed a web application, Metadata Maker, which allows anyone to create metadata in four different formats, including MARC21 for an online public access catalog, regardless of their familiarity with metadata standards or systems that utilize the metadata. Released as an open source application, Metadata Maker supports diacritics and Unicode non-Roman language encoding, and creates metadata records that ensure discovery and access of unique library collections.
  11. Weibel, S.; Pearce, J.: ¬The changing landscape of networked resource description (1996) 0.04 
    0.040154617 = product of:
  0.080309235 = sum of:
    0.062582366 = weight(_text_:open in 5533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.062582366 = score(doc=5533,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.2985229 = fieldWeight in 5533, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5533)
    0.01772687 = product of:
      0.03545374 = sum of:
        0.03545374 = weight(_text_:access in 5533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03545374 = score(doc=5533,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.22468945 = fieldWeight in 5533, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5533)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Reports on work undertaken by OCLC in the development of a core bibliographic description, for records and resources available on the Internet, sufficiently simple so as to be suitable for use by authors not schooled in conventional cataloguing. Referes particularly to the Dublin Core of 13 data elements designed to provide a description scheme to be included directly in WWW documents and to promote self describing documents on the net. Notes the work of the National Document and Information Service (NDIS) Project, and other, similar projects; including the Open Information Locator Project (http://www.dstc.edu.au/RDU/reports/oil/adl96.ps). Summarizes the work of the ALCTS Task Force on Bibliographic Access in the Electronic Environment in defining the problems and solutions associated with bibliographic control of electronic collections (http://www.lib.virginia.edu/alcts). Concludes with an update on the Internet Engineering Task Force Meeting, regarding: HTTP; HTML; Uniform Resource Names (URN) and Uniform Resource Characteristics (URC) (http://purl.oclc.org); and Platform for Internet Content Selection (PICS) (http://www.w3.org/pub/www.pics)
  12. Mandel, C.A.; Wolven, R.: Intellectual access to digital documents : joining proven principles with new technologies (1996) 0.03 
    0.031719238 = product of:
  0.12687695 = sum of:
    0.12687695 = sum of:
      0.0827254 = weight(_text_:access in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0827254 = score(doc=6740,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.5242754 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
      0.04415156 = weight(_text_:22 in 6740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04415156 = score(doc=6740,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6740, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6740)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Considers the relevance of Cutter's principles of bibliographic access to Internet accessible digital materials and explores new methods for applying these principles in the context of new information technologies. Examines the value for retrieval of collecting authors' names, identifying authors' roles, collocating works and versions, and providing subject access through classification and controlled vocabularies for digital resources available through the WWW. Identifies emerging technologies and techniques that may be used in lieu of or as a supplement to traditional cataloguing to achieve these functions in organizing access to Internet resources
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4
  13. Marín-Arraiza, P.: ORCID in the Open Science scenario : opportunities for academic libraries (2019) 0.03 
    0.031615455 = product of:
  0.12646182 = sum of:
    0.12646182 = weight(_text_:open in 5704) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12646182 = score(doc=5704,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.603233 = fieldWeight in 5704, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5704)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The persistent identification of authors and contributors plays a decisive role within the Open Science landscape. The increasing number of published research products and new open publishing models and infrastructures requires author identification which goes beyond fields or infrastructures and guarantees interoperability. ORCID iD is presented as a persistent identifier for researchers in this context. As information managers and organisers, many academic libraries have taken the lead in offering ORCID-related services and implementing it in their systems. This paper scans the implementation models across Europe and the actions carried out by libraries. Finally, it also depicts perspectives for integration in the Austrian library and research context.
  14. Münnich, M-: ¬Die 64. IFLA General Conference in Amsterdam : Bericht über die Arbeit der Section on Cataloguing, deren Arbeitsgruppen bzw.Projekte und des Open Programme, sowie zwei Workshops (1998) 0.03 
    0.031291183 = product of:
  0.12516473 = sum of:
    0.12516473 = weight(_text_:open in 2126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12516473 = score(doc=2126,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.5970458 = fieldWeight in 2126, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2126)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
  15. Ho, J.: Cataloging practices and access methods for videos at arl and public libraries in the United States (2004) 0.03 
    0.031171942 = product of:
  0.12468777 = sum of:
    0.12468777 = sum of:
      0.08684357 = weight(_text_:access in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.08684357 = score(doc=134,freq=12.0), product of:
          0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.5503745 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
            3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
              12.0 = termFreq=12.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
      0.037844196 = weight(_text_:22 in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037844196 = score(doc=134,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Libraries may vary in the level and fullness of cataloging they give to video recordings and in the methods they use to provide access to them. This paper reports the results of a survey exploring the level of cataloging and access methods applied to videos, the degree to which catalogers view screen credits, and how often various credit information is included and used to create access points in catalog records in selected U. S. public and Association of Research Libraries member libraries. Resources for cataloging videos also were examined. Results showed that most libraries cataloged videos at the full level and provided access points to similar types of information in catalog records. Academic librarians reported viewing videos and providing access points to certain information to a greater extent than public librarians did. This study offers a general picture of the credit information libraries include or omit in video catalog records.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  16. Burrows, T.: ¬The virtual catalogue : bibliographic access for the virtual library (1993) 0.03 
    0.029327784 = product of:
  0.117311135 = sum of:
    0.117311135 = sum of:
      0.06685221 = weight(_text_:access in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06685221 = score(doc=5286,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.4236785 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
      0.050458927 = weight(_text_:22 in 5286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050458927 = score(doc=5286,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5286, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5286)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Proposes a new model for bibliographic access, the virtual catalogue, to serve the virtual library. Suggests the use of current software and networks to build links between bibliographic databases of all kinds, including full text, to enable the user to search a specified subset of databases. Suggests that local data be limited to holdings information linked to, but separate from, bibliographic databases both local and remote
    Date
    8.10.2000 14:47:22
  17. Madison, O.M.A.: Utilizing the FRBR framework in designing user-focused digital content and access systems (2006) 0.03 
    0.029327784 = product of:
  0.117311135 = sum of:
    0.117311135 = sum of:
      0.06685221 = weight(_text_:access in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06685221 = score(doc=1085,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.4236785 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
      0.050458927 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.050458927 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the rapidly expanding environment of emerging electronic content and the importance of librarians to partner with new research and teaching communities in meeting users' needs to find, identify, select, and obtain the information and resources they need. The methodology and framework of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records could serve as a useful tool in building expanded access and content systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  18. Agnese Galeffi, A.; Bertolini, M.V.; Bothmann, R.L.; Rodríguez, E.E.; McGarry, D.: Statement of International Cataloguing Principles (ICP) 2016 (2016) 0.03 
    0.029217314 = product of:
  0.058434628 = sum of:
    0.041721575 = weight(_text_:open in 3284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041721575 = score(doc=3284,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.19901526 = fieldWeight in 3284, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3284)
    0.016713053 = product of:
      0.033426106 = sum of:
        0.033426106 = weight(_text_:access in 3284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033426106 = score(doc=3284,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.21183924 = fieldWeight in 3284, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3284)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The original Statement of Principles - commonly known as the "Paris Principles" - was approved by the International Conference on Cataloguing Principles in 1961. Its goal of serving as a basis for international standardization in cataloguing has certainly been achieved: most of the cataloguing codes that were developed worldwide since that time have followed the Principles strictly or at least to a high degree. More than fifty years later, having a common set of international cataloguing principles is still necessary as cataloguers and users around the world use online catalogues as search and discovery systems. At the beginning of the 21st century, IFLA produced a new statement of principles (published in 2009) applicable to online library catalogues and beyond. The current version has been reviewed and updated in 2014 and 2015, and approved in 2016. The 2009 Statement of Principles replaced and explicitly broadened the scope of the Paris Principles from just textual resources to all types of resources, and from just the choice and form of entry to all aspects of bibliographic and authority data used in library catalogues. It included not only principles and objectives, but also guiding rules that should be included in cataloguing codes internationally, as well as guidance on search and retrieval capabilities. This 2016 edition takes into consideration new categories of users, the open access environment, the interoperability and the accessibility of data, features of discovery tools and the significant change of user behaviour in general. This statement builds on the great cataloguing traditions of the world, as well as on the conceptual models in the IFLA Functional Requirements family.
    Content
    This statement covers: - Scope - General Principles - Entities, Attributes, and Relationships - Bibliographic Description - Access Points - Objectives and Functions of the Catalogue - Foundations for Search Capabilities Vgl. auch: http://www.ifla.org/publications/node/11015.
  19. Pappas, E.: ¬An analysis of eight RLIN-members' authority controlled access points for purposes of speeding copy cataloging work flow (1996) 0.03 
    0.02718792 = product of:
  0.10875168 = sum of:
    0.10875168 = sum of:
      0.07090748 = weight(_text_:access in 5530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07090748 = score(doc=5530,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.4493789 = fieldWeight in 5530, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5530)
      0.037844196 = weight(_text_:22 in 5530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.037844196 = score(doc=5530,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046553567 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5530, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5530)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The authority controlled headings in a random sample of cataloguing records from RLIN member libraries were examined to determine the extent to which they either matched the forms a sestablished in RLIN's online authority files or, in cases where no headings existed in the files, had been formulated according to AACR2R principles and LoC guidelines. The study analzed all of the authority controlled access points in the records sample to determine the extent to ehich these access points matched the LoC Name Authority File (LoC NAF) and LoC Subject Authority File (LoC SAF) entries; it sought to determine which types of errors occured most frequently in instances where access points did not match the NAF and SAF files; and used the results of this analysis to add data to a list of preferred libraries kept by the Monograph Cataligng Section of the New York Public Library and used to increase the speed and efficiency of its copy cataloguing work flow
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) no.1, S.29-47
  20. Fuchs, C.; Pampel, H.; Vierkant, P.: ORCID in Deutschland : Ergebnisse einer Bestandsaufnahme im Jahr 2016 (2017) 0.03 
    0.02709896 = product of:
  0.10839584 = sum of:
    0.10839584 = weight(_text_:open in 3857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10839584 = score(doc=3857,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046553567 = queryNorm
        0.5170568 = fieldWeight in 3857, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3857)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Die Open Researcher and Contributor ID, kurz ORCID, ist eine eindeutige Kennung für Forscherinnen und Forscher und ermöglicht die Verbindung zwischen Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschaftlern mit ihren Aufsätzen, Forschungsdaten und weiteren Produkten des wissenschaftlichen Schaffens. Im Rahmen des dreijährigen DFG-Projektes "ORCID DE - Förderung der Open Researcher and Contributor ID in Deutschland" wird die vielerorts erwogene Implementierung der ORCID an Hochschulen und außeruniversitären Forschungseinrichtungen gefördert. Der vorliegende Beitrag bietet einen umfassenden Überblick über die Ergebnisse der im Rahmen des Projekts durchgeführten Umfrage zum Stand der Implementierung von ORCID an wissenschaftlichen Einrichtungen in Deutschland. Die Umfrage wurde im Zeitraum vom 13.07.2016 bis 03.08.2016 durchgeführt und bietet zahlreiche Erkenntnisse sowohl über den Stand der Implementierung von ORCID an wissenschaftlichen Einrichtungen in Deutschland als auch über bestehende technische, rechtliche und organisatorische Hürden bei der Implementierung des Dienstes.
    Content
    https://www.o-bib.de/article/view/2017H2S35-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5282/o-bib/2017H2S35-55. Vgl. auch das Positionspapier "Autorenidentifikation anhand der Open Researcher and Contributor ID" unter: https://doi.org/10.18452/19528.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 477
  • d 72
  • i 8
  • f 3
  • sp 2
  • a 1
  • nl 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 507
  • el 42
  • m 38
  • b 15
  • s 13
  • r 6
  • n 4
  • ag 2
  • x 2
  • ? 1
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications