Search (41 results, page 1 of 3)

  • × theme_ss:"Kataloganreicherung"
  1. Hauke, P.; Hötzeldt, A.; Rumler, J.: Kataloganreicherung?! : Vom Zugang zu Open-Access-Publikationen über Bibliothekskataloge am Beispiel hybrider Publikationen (2010) 0.08
    0.07571627 = product of:
      0.15143254 = sum of:
        0.118006445 = weight(_text_:open in 4580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.118006445 = score(doc=4580,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.5629002 = fieldWeight in 4580, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4580)
        0.033426106 = product of:
          0.06685221 = sum of:
            0.06685221 = weight(_text_:access in 4580) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06685221 = score(doc=4580,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.4236785 = fieldWeight in 4580, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4580)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Der Nachweis wissenschaftlicher Open-Access-Publikationen in Bibliothekskatalogen im Sinne der Kataloganreicherung stellt Bibliotheken vor zahlreiche Fragen. Am Beispiel von hybriden Publikationen (parallele Druck- und frei verfügbare elektronische Ausgabe) wird gezeigt, wie Bibliotheken gegenwärtig damit umgehen. Bisher gibt es keine einheitliche Richtlinie, und so verfährt jede Bibliothek bzw. jeder Verbund anders. In weit reichenden nationalen Recherchen haben die Autorinnen die unterschiedlichen Handhabungen analysiert und kritisch bewertet.
  2. Lam, V.-T.: Enhancing subject access to monographs in Online Public Access Catalogs : table of contents added to bibliographic records (2000) 0.03
    0.032911494 = product of:
      0.13164598 = sum of:
        0.13164598 = sum of:
          0.09380178 = weight(_text_:access in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.09380178 = score(doc=1187,freq=14.0), product of:
              0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046553567 = queryNorm
              0.5944724 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
                3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                  14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
          0.037844196 = weight(_text_:22 in 1187) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.037844196 = score(doc=1187,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046553567 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1187, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1187)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access to monographs through online public access catalogs (OPACs) has always been a major concern for large research and/or academic libraries. Academic library practice of providing subject access to monographs has proven inadequate, especially in the case of composite works. Many techniques have been proposed to enhance subject treatment of monographs in OPACs. This article briefly reviews these efforts in the past and presents the case of adding Tables of Contents as one of the Most useful and probably also one of the Most costeffective ways of improving subject access to Monographs in an academic environment.
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Source
    Saving the time of the library user through subject access innovation: Papers in honor of Pauline Atherton Cochrane. Ed.: W.J. Wheeler
  3. Barnes, S.; McCue, J.: Linking library records to bibliographic databases : an analysis of common data elements in BIOSIS, Agricola, and the OPAC (1991) 0.01
    0.014663892 = product of:
      0.058655567 = sum of:
        0.058655567 = sum of:
          0.033426106 = weight(_text_:access in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033426106 = score(doc=520,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046553567 = queryNorm
              0.21183924 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
          0.025229463 = weight(_text_:22 in 520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025229463 = score(doc=520,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046553567 = queryNorm
              0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 520, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=520)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Myriad new information resources are available to contemporary library users. While print remains the foundation of most collections, libraries are also beginning to provide access to an array of bibliographic, numeric, and full-text databases. As more and more information is produced in electronic form and presented at computer workstations, the library catalog is being given an expanded role. The expanded catalog will play a crucial part in organizing information in electronic libraries, and in providing navigational assistance to library users. Like the traditional card catalog, the expanded catalog will not only lead to specific items or groups of sources, but also will provide connections to related materials. These connections will uses standard data elements to link the results of a search in one database with related material in another. For example, links will show local library holdings of sources in citation databases. Cornell University's Mann Library serves the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, the College of Human Ecology, and the Division of Biological Sciences. As part of electronic library development, Mann staff have been analyzing issues involved in making it possible for Agricola and BIOSIS users to see, automatically, which of their retrieved citations are from sources available in the Cornell libraries. Samples of citations from Agricola and BIOSIS were drawn, and data elements present in these records were compared with bibliographic records of the library's holdings. In some cases, links would be provided by ISSNs. The study shows, however, that the presence of standard identifiers such as ISSN, USBN, or CODEN cannot be assumed, and other linking algorithms must be developed. This article presents study results, provides an overview of several linking systems, and identifies some of the difficulties caused by lack of standardization between different bibliographic databases. It is clear that the concept of an expanded catalog will require not only links between information resources but agreements among information professionals on standard data elements.
    Date
    8. 1.2007 17:22:25
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Enhancing Access to Information: Designing Catalogs for the 21st Century
  4. ¬The subject enhancement of OPAC records and the need for multilingual access (1993) 0.01
    0.012793266 = product of:
      0.051173065 = sum of:
        0.051173065 = product of:
          0.10234613 = sum of:
            0.10234613 = weight(_text_:access in 4259) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10234613 = score(doc=4259,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.6486226 = fieldWeight in 4259, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4259)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Considers the potential of providing enhanced content indexing of document records either by natural language or PRECIS controlled vocabulary in order to provide more effective subject access to OPACs. Considers multilingual access OPACs. Controlled vocabulary is the best option for the latter in the short terms
  5. Hirshon, A.: Users Council explores expanding access to monographs (1990) 0.01
    0.0118179135 = product of:
      0.047271654 = sum of:
        0.047271654 = product of:
          0.09454331 = sum of:
            0.09454331 = weight(_text_:access in 391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09454331 = score(doc=391,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.5991719 = fieldWeight in 391, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=391)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  6. Bett, C.E.: ¬The Subject Access Project : a comparison with PRECIS (1979) 0.01
    0.0118179135 = product of:
      0.047271654 = sum of:
        0.047271654 = product of:
          0.09454331 = sum of:
            0.09454331 = weight(_text_:access in 829) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09454331 = score(doc=829,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.5991719 = fieldWeight in 829, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=829)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  7. Mandel, C.A.; Herschman, J.: Online subject access : enhancing the library catalog (1983) 0.01
    0.0118179135 = product of:
      0.047271654 = sum of:
        0.047271654 = product of:
          0.09454331 = sum of:
            0.09454331 = weight(_text_:access in 1407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09454331 = score(doc=1407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.5991719 = fieldWeight in 1407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  8. Van Orden, R.: Content-enriched access to electronic information : summaries of selected research (1991) 0.01
    0.0118179135 = product of:
      0.047271654 = sum of:
        0.047271654 = product of:
          0.09454331 = sum of:
            0.09454331 = weight(_text_:access in 2195) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09454331 = score(doc=2195,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.5991719 = fieldWeight in 2195, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2195)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  9. Markey, K.: ¬The process of subject searching in the online catalog : final report of the Subject Access Project (1983) 0.01
    0.0118179135 = product of:
      0.047271654 = sum of:
        0.047271654 = product of:
          0.09454331 = sum of:
            0.09454331 = weight(_text_:access in 2803) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09454331 = score(doc=2803,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.5991719 = fieldWeight in 2803, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2803)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  10. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Means to improve subject access and representation in modern information retrieval (1988) 0.01
    0.0118179135 = product of:
      0.047271654 = sum of:
        0.047271654 = product of:
          0.09454331 = sum of:
            0.09454331 = weight(_text_:access in 4430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09454331 = score(doc=4430,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.5991719 = fieldWeight in 4430, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4430)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  11. Pienaar, R.E.: Enhancement of subject access in online public access catalogues (OPACs) (1989) 0.01
    0.011725223 = product of:
      0.04690089 = sum of:
        0.04690089 = product of:
          0.09380178 = sum of:
            0.09380178 = weight(_text_:access in 2863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09380178 = score(doc=2863,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.5944724 = fieldWeight in 2863, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2863)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Subject access plays an important part when plans are made for an on-line public access catalogue (OPAC). Therefore, current subject searching facilities in OPACs should be accessed carefully. These facilities include, amongst other things, phrase searching, keyword searching and class number retrieval. Users reaction have been instrumental in identifying certain shortcomings in subject access to OPACs. Points out certain shortcomings in subject access, as shown by a number of research projects undertaken during the past decade. Highlights aspects which could, in future, improve subject access in OPACs. This could be achieved by either enhancing content representation in the records within the OPAC data base or by enhancing the searchability and browsability of the OPAC. Considers whether the on-line catalogue will ever be a finished, perfect product, or achieve the universal, familiar uniformity experienced by users of the 20th century card catalogue.
  12. Syracuse, R.O.; Poyer, R.K.: Enhancing access to the library's collections : a view from an academy health center library (1991) 0.01
    0.011561224 = product of:
      0.046244897 = sum of:
        0.046244897 = product of:
          0.092489794 = sum of:
            0.092489794 = weight(_text_:access in 516) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.092489794 = score(doc=516,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.5861577 = fieldWeight in 516, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=516)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    With the advent of online public access catalogs, catalog librarians and their staffs have been freed from the labor-intensive processes involved in the creation and maintenance of card catalogs. At the Medical University of South Carolina Library, this new found time has been devoted to enhancing access to the library's collections. Enhancements discussed include the creation of bibliographic records for vertical file materials, the National Library of Medicine bibliographies, and reserve items, as well as providing subject access to individual chapters in books and articles in monographic serials.
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Enhancing Access to Information: Designing Catalogs for the 21st Century
  13. Gratch, B.; Settel, B.; Atherton, P.: Characteristics of book indexes for subject retrieval in the humanities and social sciences (1978) 0.01
    0.01103789 = product of:
      0.04415156 = sum of:
        0.04415156 = product of:
          0.08830312 = sum of:
            0.08830312 = weight(_text_:22 in 1061) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08830312 = score(doc=1061,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 1061, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1061)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Indexer. 11(1978), S.14-22
  14. Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989) 0.01
    0.01103789 = product of:
      0.04415156 = sum of:
        0.04415156 = product of:
          0.08830312 = sum of:
            0.08830312 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08830312 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
  15. Atherton, P.: Books are for use : Final report of the Subject Access Project to the Council of Library Resources (1978) 0.01
    0.010340675 = product of:
      0.0413627 = sum of:
        0.0413627 = product of:
          0.0827254 = sum of:
            0.0827254 = weight(_text_:access in 844) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0827254 = score(doc=844,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.5242754 = fieldWeight in 844, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=844)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  16. Wormell, I.: Subject Access Project : the use of book indexes for subject retrieval systems in libraries (1981) 0.01
    0.010340675 = product of:
      0.0413627 = sum of:
        0.0413627 = product of:
          0.0827254 = sum of:
            0.0827254 = weight(_text_:access in 3116) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0827254 = score(doc=3116,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.5242754 = fieldWeight in 3116, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3116)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  17. Hauer, M.: Collaborative catalog enrichment : 4. Benutzertreffen intelligentCAPTURE / dandelon.com (2007) 0.01
    0.009126595 = product of:
      0.03650638 = sum of:
        0.03650638 = weight(_text_:open in 515) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03650638 = score(doc=515,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.17413835 = fieldWeight in 515, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=515)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Das Highlight unter den Referaten bei dieser Tagung waren die Ausführungen des Vordenkers Andreas Prokoph, Lead Architect - Search Technologies and Portal Server Development, vom deutschen IBM Entwicklungslabor. Er sprach über Information Retrieval. Mit über 200 Patenten, darunter auch seinen eigenen, liegt IBM in diesem Forschungsfeld weit vorne. Die IBM Suchmaschine OMNIFIND soll möglichst bald die Suchtechnik hinter dandelon.com ersetzen und den Suchraum auf Kataloge, Open Archives, Verlage, Hochschul-Server ausdehnen. Schon heute basieren intelligentCAPTURE und dandelon.com weitgehend auf IBM-Technologien, konkret Lotus Notes & Domino und Lotus Sametime (www.ibm.corn/ lotus/hannover), aber auch auf integrierten Modulen anderer international führender Technologiespezialisten."
  18. Wormell, I.: Subject access redefinied : how new technology changes the conception of subject representation (1994) 0.01
    0.008955287 = product of:
      0.035821147 = sum of:
        0.035821147 = product of:
          0.071642295 = sum of:
            0.071642295 = weight(_text_:access in 7741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071642295 = score(doc=7741,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.45403582 = fieldWeight in 7741, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7741)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The paper examines the developmentss that have taken place during the last decade with respect to the provision of intellectual subject access in information databases storage. The principles of the SAP indexing methodology are outlined and exemplified, leading to a discussion of the consequences for the conception of the physical 'document' versus 'semantic entities' as the basic constructs for storage and multi-dimensional representation of subject matter. Finally, the paper analyzes the impact of very recent technologies which make achievable such access conceptions and mechanisms
  19. Wormell, I.: Indizacion SAP para la exploracion del amplio contexto tematico de libros y para el accesso a entidades semanticos mas pequenas (1994) 0.01
    0.008955287 = product of:
      0.035821147 = sum of:
        0.035821147 = product of:
          0.071642295 = sum of:
            0.071642295 = weight(_text_:access in 4652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071642295 = score(doc=4652,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.45403582 = fieldWeight in 4652, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4652)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Describes an approach to indexing which seeks to eliminate the shortcoming of the representation of information in existing bibliographic catalogues: Subject Access Project (SAP) indexing which has been used successfully at Lund University and elsewhere. Existing catalogue records have been enriched with terms selected from lists of contents and indexes in books thus facilitating access to specific parts of documents and smaller semantic entites such as chapter titles, subject titles and data in graphic or tabulated form available in a wide range of publications
    Content
    SAP indexing for exploring the full thematic context of books and for access to smaller semantic entites
  20. Stadler, U.: ¬Die Erweiterung von Online-Katalogen durch die Aufnahme von Angaben aus Inhaltsverzeichnissen und Registern mit dem Ziel einer besseren sachlichen Erschließung : Lösungsansätze unter Berücksichtigung des "Subject Access Project" der Syracuse University (1991) 0.01
    0.008863435 = product of:
      0.03545374 = sum of:
        0.03545374 = product of:
          0.07090748 = sum of:
            0.07090748 = weight(_text_:access in 8348) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07090748 = score(doc=8348,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.4493789 = fieldWeight in 8348, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=8348)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)