Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × type_ss:"p"
  1. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.15
    0.14787881 = product of:
      0.29575762 = sum of:
        0.073939405 = product of:
          0.22181821 = sum of:
            0.22181821 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.22181821 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
        0.22181821 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.22181821 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.39468166 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  2. Großjohann, K.: Gathering-, Harvesting-, Suchmaschinen (1996) 0.01
    0.0133799445 = product of:
      0.053519778 = sum of:
        0.053519778 = product of:
          0.107039556 = sum of:
            0.107039556 = weight(_text_:22 in 3227) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.107039556 = score(doc=3227,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 3227, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3227)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    7. 2.1996 22:38:41
    Pages
    22 S
  3. Lange, C.; Ion, P.; Dimou, A.; Bratsas, C.; Sperber, W.; Kohlhasel, M.; Antoniou, I.: Getting mathematics towards the Web of Data : the case of the Mathematics Subject Classification (2012) 0.01
    0.013037993 = product of:
      0.05215197 = sum of:
        0.05215197 = weight(_text_:open in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05215197 = score(doc=111,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20964009 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046553567 = queryNorm
            0.24876907 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.5032015 = idf(docFreq=1330, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Mathematics Subject Classification (MSC), maintained by the American Mathematical Society's Mathematical Reviews (MR) and FIZ Karlsruhe's Zentralblatt für Mathematik (Zbl), is a scheme for classifying publications in mathematics according to their subjects. While it is widely used, its traditional, idiosyncratic conceptualization and representation requires custom implementations of search, query and annotation support. This did not encourage people to create and explore connections of mathematics to subjects of related domains (e.g. science), and it made the scheme hard to maintain. We have reimplemented the current version of MSC2010 as a Linked Open Dataset using SKOS and our focus is concentrated on turning it into the new MSC authority. This paper explains the motivation, and details of our design considerations and how we realized them in the implementation. We present in-the-field use cases and point out how e-science applications can take advantage of the MSC LOD set. We conclude with a roadmap for bootstrapping the presence of mathematical and mathematics-based science, technology, and engineering knowledge on the Web of Data, where it has been noticeably underrepresented so far, starting from MSC/SKOS as a seed.
  4. Butcher, J.E.; Trotter, R.: Building on PRECIS : strategies for online subject access in the British Library (1989) 0.01
    0.010340675 = product of:
      0.0413627 = sum of:
        0.0413627 = product of:
          0.0827254 = sum of:
            0.0827254 = weight(_text_:access in 996) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0827254 = score(doc=996,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.5242754 = fieldWeight in 996, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=996)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  5. Jouguelet, S.: Subject access and the marketplace for bibliographic information in France (1989) 0.01
    0.010340675 = product of:
      0.0413627 = sum of:
        0.0413627 = product of:
          0.0827254 = sum of:
            0.0827254 = weight(_text_:access in 998) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0827254 = score(doc=998,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.5242754 = fieldWeight in 998, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=998)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  6. Adler, E.: Multilingual and multiscript access : the case of Israel (2000) 0.01
    0.008863435 = product of:
      0.03545374 = sum of:
        0.03545374 = product of:
          0.07090748 = sum of:
            0.07090748 = weight(_text_:access in 5396) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07090748 = score(doc=5396,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.4493789 = fieldWeight in 5396, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5396)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  7. Landry, P.: ¬The MACS project : multilingual access to subject headings (LCSH, RAMEAU, SWD) (2000) 0.01
    0.008863435 = product of:
      0.03545374 = sum of:
        0.03545374 = product of:
          0.07090748 = sum of:
            0.07090748 = weight(_text_:access in 5407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07090748 = score(doc=5407,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.4493789 = fieldWeight in 5407, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5407)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  8. Starr, D.: Cataloging artist files : one library's approach to provide integrated access to ephemeral material (2000) 0.01
    0.008863435 = product of:
      0.03545374 = sum of:
        0.03545374 = product of:
          0.07090748 = sum of:
            0.07090748 = weight(_text_:access in 5414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07090748 = score(doc=5414,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.4493789 = fieldWeight in 5414, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5414)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  9. Wätjen, H.-J.: Mensch oder Maschine? : Auswahl und Erschließung vonm Informationsressourcen im Internet (1996) 0.01
    0.007884207 = product of:
      0.03153683 = sum of:
        0.03153683 = product of:
          0.06307366 = sum of:
            0.06307366 = weight(_text_:22 in 3161) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06307366 = score(doc=3161,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 3161, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3161)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    2. 2.1996 15:40:22
  10. Luo, L.; Ju, J.; Li, Y.-F.; Haffari, G.; Xiong, B.; Pan, S.: ChatRule: mining logical rules with large language models for knowledge graph reasoning (2023) 0.00
    0.0039421036 = product of:
      0.015768414 = sum of:
        0.015768414 = product of:
          0.03153683 = sum of:
            0.03153683 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03153683 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16302267 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    23.11.2023 19:07:22
  11. Aydin, Ö.; Karaarslan, E.: OpenAI ChatGPT generated literature review: : digital twin in healthcare (2022) 0.00
    0.0029544784 = product of:
      0.0118179135 = sum of:
        0.0118179135 = product of:
          0.023635827 = sum of:
            0.023635827 = weight(_text_:access in 851) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023635827 = score(doc=851,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15778996 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046553567 = queryNorm
                0.14979297 = fieldWeight in 851, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.389428 = idf(docFreq=4053, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=851)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Literature review articles are essential to summarize the related work in the selected field. However, covering all related studies takes too much time and effort. This study questions how Artificial Intelligence can be used in this process. We used ChatGPT to create a literature review article to show the stage of the OpenAI ChatGPT artificial intelligence application. As the subject, the applications of Digital Twin in the health field were chosen. Abstracts of the last three years (2020, 2021 and 2022) papers were obtained from the keyword "Digital twin in healthcare" search results on Google Scholar and paraphrased by ChatGPT. Later on, we asked ChatGPT questions. The results are promising; however, the paraphrased parts had significant matches when checked with the Ithenticate tool. This article is the first attempt to show the compilation and expression of knowledge will be accelerated with the help of artificial intelligence. We are still at the beginning of such advances. The future academic publishing process will require less human effort, which in turn will allow academics to focus on their studies. In future studies, we will monitor citations to this study to evaluate the academic validity of the content produced by the ChatGPT. 1. Introduction OpenAI ChatGPT (ChatGPT, 2022) is a chatbot based on the OpenAI GPT-3 language model. It is designed to generate human-like text responses to user input in a conversational context. OpenAI ChatGPT is trained on a large dataset of human conversations and can be used to create responses to a wide range of topics and prompts. The chatbot can be used for customer service, content creation, and language translation tasks, creating replies in multiple languages. OpenAI ChatGPT is available through the OpenAI API, which allows developers to access and integrate the chatbot into their applications and systems. OpenAI ChatGPT is a variant of the GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) language model developed by OpenAI. It is designed to generate human-like text, allowing it to engage in conversation with users naturally and intuitively. OpenAI ChatGPT is trained on a large dataset of human conversations, allowing it to understand and respond to a wide range of topics and contexts. It can be used in various applications, such as chatbots, customer service agents, and language translation systems. OpenAI ChatGPT is a state-of-the-art language model able to generate coherent and natural text that can be indistinguishable from text written by a human. As an artificial intelligence, ChatGPT may need help to change academic writing practices. However, it can provide information and guidance on ways to improve people's academic writing skills.