Search (16 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Schneider, K.: Scopus contra ISI-WOS : Versuch einer vergleichenden Bewertung aus pharmakognostischer Sicht (2006) 0.01
    0.009027071 = product of:
      0.07221657 = sum of:
        0.07221657 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 39) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07221657 = score(doc=39,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19656755 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03546852 = queryNorm
            0.36738807 = fieldWeight in 39, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=39)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Abstract
    Bei der vorliegenden Präsentation handelt es sich ausdrücklich um keine umfassende statistisch-bibliometrische Vergleichsanalyse der beiden Datenbanken, sondern um die Darstellung einiger subjektiv ausgewählter, punktueller, jedoch durchaus praxisnaher Suchanfragen (Zeitraum: 23.11. - 06.12.2005). Es wurde dazu nach in Fachzeitschriften publizierten, persönlich bekannten Arbeiten österreichischer Autoren mit vorwiegend "selteneren" deutschsprachigen Namen bzw. Doppelnamen (Wolfgang Wlach, Johannes Saukel, Ulrike Kastner, Karin Zitterl-Eglseer und Roswitha SchrutkaRechtenstamm) gesucht, die am Department für Pharmakognosie / Fakultät für Lebenswissenschaften / Universität Wien wissenschaftlich arbeiten bzw. gearbeitet haben. Weitere Suchanfragen galten (aus der Mitarbeit an Hagers Handbuch der Pharmazeutischen Praxis) persönlich bekannten Arbeiten über in der Phytotherapie, Homöopathie oder Volksheilkunde genutzte Pflanzen (Adlumia, Alchornea cordifolia, Siderits scardica). Zur vergleichenden Bewertung wurden die absolute Anzahl der "relevanten, gesuchten Treffer", die Anzahl der "Dubletten-Treffer" in beiden Datenbanken sowie die in der jeweiligen Datenbank "exklusiven Treffer" tabellarisch zusammen mit eigenen Anmerkungen angeführt.
  2. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.00
    0.0048054946 = product of:
      0.038443957 = sum of:
        0.038443957 = product of:
          0.07688791 = sum of:
            0.07688791 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07688791 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12420471 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03546852 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  3. Leydesdorff, L.: Visualization of the citation impact environments of scientific journals : an online mapping exercise (2007) 0.00
    0.004413237 = product of:
      0.035305895 = sum of:
        0.035305895 = product of:
          0.07061179 = sum of:
            0.07061179 = weight(_text_:visualisierung in 82) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07061179 = score(doc=82,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21292302 = queryWeight, product of:
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03546852 = queryNorm
                0.3316306 = fieldWeight in 82, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  6.003155 = idf(docFreq=296, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=82)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Theme
    Visualisierung
  4. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.00
    0.0042474973 = product of:
      0.03397998 = sum of:
        0.03397998 = product of:
          0.06795996 = sum of:
            0.06795996 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06795996 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12420471 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03546852 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  5. Garfield, E.; Stock, W.G.: Citation Consciousness : Interview with Eugene Garfiels, chairman emeritus of ISI; Philadelphia (2002) 0.00
    0.0030034343 = product of:
      0.024027474 = sum of:
        0.024027474 = product of:
          0.04805495 = sum of:
            0.04805495 = weight(_text_:22 in 613) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04805495 = score(doc=613,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12420471 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03546852 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 613, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=613)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.6, S.22-25
  6. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.00
    0.0025484986 = product of:
      0.020387989 = sum of:
        0.020387989 = product of:
          0.040775977 = sum of:
            0.040775977 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040775977 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12420471 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03546852 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  7. Garfield, E.: Recollections of Irving H. Sher 1924-1996 : Polymath/information scientist extraordinaire (2001) 0.00
    0.002102404 = product of:
      0.016819231 = sum of:
        0.016819231 = product of:
          0.033638462 = sum of:
            0.033638462 = weight(_text_:22 in 6920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033638462 = score(doc=6920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12420471 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03546852 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6920)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    16.12.2001 14:01:22
  8. Van der Veer Martens, B.; Goodrum, G.: ¬The diffusion of theories : a functional approach (2006) 0.00
    0.002102404 = product of:
      0.016819231 = sum of:
        0.016819231 = product of:
          0.033638462 = sum of:
            0.033638462 = weight(_text_:22 in 5269) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033638462 = score(doc=5269,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12420471 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03546852 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5269, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5269)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:20:01
  9. wst: Cut-and-paste-Wissenschaft (2003) 0.00
    0.0018020604 = product of:
      0.014416483 = sum of:
        0.014416483 = product of:
          0.028832966 = sum of:
            0.028832966 = weight(_text_:22 in 1270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028832966 = score(doc=1270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12420471 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03546852 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Content
    "Mikhail Simkin und Vwani Roychowdhury von der University of Califomia, Los Angeles, haben eine in der wissenschaftlichen Gemeinschaft verbreitete Unsitte erstmals quantitativ erfasst. Die Wissenschaftler analysierten die Verbreitung von Druckfehlern in den Literaturlisten wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten (www.arxiv.org/abs/cond-mat/0212043). 78 Prozent aller zitierten Aufsätze - so schätzen die Forscher - haben die zitierenden Wissenschaftler demnach nicht gelesen, sondern nur per 'cut and paste' von einer Vorlage in ihre eigene Literaturliste übernommen. Das könne man beispielsweise abschätzen aus der Analyse fehlerhafter Seitenangaben in der Literaturliste eines 1973 veröffentlichten Aufsatzes über die Struktur zweidimensionaler Kristalle: Dieser Aufsatz ist rund 4300 mal zitiert worden. In 196 Fällen enthalten die Zitate jedoch Fehler in der Jahreszahl, dem Band der Zeitschrift oder der Seitenzahl, die als Indikatoren für cut and paste genommen werden können, denn man kann, obwohl es Milliarden Möglichkeiten gibt, nur 45 verschiedene Arten von Druckfehlern unterscheiden. In erster Näherung ergibt sich eine Obergrenze für die Zahl der `echten Leser' daher aus der Zahl der unterscheidbaren Druckfehler (45) geteilt durch die Gesamtzahl der Publikationen mit Druckfehler (196), das macht etwa 22 Prozent."
  10. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.00
    0.0018020604 = product of:
      0.014416483 = sum of:
        0.014416483 = product of:
          0.028832966 = sum of:
            0.028832966 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028832966 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12420471 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03546852 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  11. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.00
    0.0018020604 = product of:
      0.014416483 = sum of:
        0.014416483 = product of:
          0.028832966 = sum of:
            0.028832966 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028832966 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12420471 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03546852 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  12. Mingers, J.; Burrell, Q.L.: Modeling citation behavior in Management Science journals (2006) 0.00
    0.0018020604 = product of:
      0.014416483 = sum of:
        0.014416483 = product of:
          0.028832966 = sum of:
            0.028832966 = weight(_text_:22 in 994) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028832966 = score(doc=994,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12420471 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03546852 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 994, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=994)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 19:22:05
  13. Ma, N.; Guan, J.; Zhao, Y.: Bringing PageRank to the citation analysis (2008) 0.00
    0.0018020604 = product of:
      0.014416483 = sum of:
        0.014416483 = product of:
          0.028832966 = sum of:
            0.028832966 = weight(_text_:22 in 2064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028832966 = score(doc=2064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12420471 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03546852 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    31. 7.2008 14:22:05
  14. Hayer, L.: Lazarsfeld zitiert : eine bibliometrische Analyse (2008) 0.00
    0.0015017171 = product of:
      0.012013737 = sum of:
        0.012013737 = product of:
          0.024027474 = sum of:
            0.024027474 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024027474 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12420471 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03546852 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    22. 6.2008 12:54:12
  15. Wildner, B.: Web of Science - Scopus : Auf der Suche nach Zitierungen (2006) 0.00
    0.0012013736 = product of:
      0.009610989 = sum of:
        0.009610989 = product of:
          0.019221978 = sum of:
            0.019221978 = weight(_text_:22 in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019221978 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12420471 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03546852 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    4. 6.2006 17:22:15
  16. Ahlgren, P.; Jarneving, B.; Rousseau, R.: Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient (2003) 0.00
    0.0012013736 = product of:
      0.009610989 = sum of:
        0.009610989 = product of:
          0.019221978 = sum of:
            0.019221978 = weight(_text_:22 in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019221978 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12420471 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03546852 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
    Date
    9. 7.2006 10:22:35