Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  • × theme_ss:"Rechtsfragen"
  1. Kuhlen, R.: In Richtung einer allgemeinen Wissenschaftsklausel (2010) 0.01 
    0.010531584 = product of:
  0.08425267 = sum of:
    0.08425267 = weight(_text_:darstellung in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08425267 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19656755 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03546852 = queryNorm
        0.4286194 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.542029 = idf(docFreq=470, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Die Defizite der bisherigen, Bildung und Wissenschaft betreffenden Schrankenregelungen im deutschen Urheberrecht sollten nach den Vorstellungen wichtiger Wissenschaftsorganisationen, wie des Aktionsbündnisses Urheberrecht für Bildung und Wissenschaft, der Allianz der Wissenschaftsorganisationen, der Kulturministerkonferenz, aber auch der international renommierten Wittem-Gruppe, durch eine umfassende Wissenschaftsklausel/-schranke beseitigt werden. Dies liegt im Interesse sowohl von Bildung und Wissenschaft nach einer liberaleren und flexibleren Nutzung von publizierter Information, vor allem für das mit öffentlicher Förderung entstandene Wissen, als auch der auf Innovationen angewiesenen, im internationalen Wettbewerb stehenden Wirtschaft. Die Darstellung konzentriert sich auf den weitgehendsten Vorschlag des Aktionsbündnisses, in der Hoffnung, dass doch noch einer Änderung der in dieser Sach ablehnenden Haltung des Bundesministeriums der Justiz in der Vorbereitung des Dritten Korbs der Urheberrechtsanpassung in Deutschland bewirkt werden kann.
  2. Poscher, R.: ¬Die Zukunft der informationellen Selbstbestimmung als Recht auf Abwehr von Grundrechtsgefährdungen (2012) 0.00 
    0.0042474973 = product of:
  0.03397998 = sum of:
    0.03397998 = product of:
      0.06795996 = sum of:
        0.06795996 = weight(_text_:22 in 3975) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06795996 = score(doc=3975,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.12420471 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03546852 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3975, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3975)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    22. 2.2018 12:06:44
    22. 2.2018 12:13:53
  3. Mathiesen, K.: Human rights as a topic and guide for LIS research and practice (2015) 0.00 
    0.0018020604 = product of:
  0.014416483 = sum of:
    0.014416483 = product of:
      0.028832966 = sum of:
        0.028832966 = weight(_text_:22 in 2119) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028832966 = score(doc=2119,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12420471 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03546852 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2119, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2119)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    In this global information age, accessing, disseminating, and controlling information is an increasingly important aspect of human life. Often, these interests are expressed in the language of human rights-for example, rights to expression, privacy, and intellectual property. As the discipline concerned with "facilitating the effective communication of desired information between human generator and human user" (Belkin, 1975, p. 22), library and information science (LIS) has a central role in facilitating communication about human rights and ensuring the respect for human rights in information services and systems. This paper surveys the literature at the intersection of LIS and human rights. To begin, an overview of human rights conventions and an introduction to human rights theory is provided. Then the intersections between LIS and human rights are considered. Three central areas of informational human rights-communication, privacy, and intellectual property-are discussed in detail. It is argued that communication rights in particular serve as a central linchpin in the system of human rights.
  4. Bull, H.P. u.a.: Zukunft der informationellen Selbstbestimmung (2016) 0.00 
    9.010302E-4 = product of:
  0.0072082416 = sum of:
    0.0072082416 = product of:
      0.014416483 = sum of:
        0.014416483 = weight(_text_:22 in 4165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014416483 = score(doc=4165,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12420471 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03546852 = queryNorm
            0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 4165, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4165)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    22. 2.2018 12:13:57

Authors

Languages

Types

Classifications