Search (274 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × theme_ss:"Formalerschließung"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Smiraglia, R.P.: Further reflections on the nature of a work : introduction (2002) 0.03
    0.028170511 = product of:
      0.056341022 = sum of:
        0.022676213 = weight(_text_:information in 5623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022676213 = score(doc=5623,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5623, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5623)
        0.033664808 = product of:
          0.067329615 = sum of:
            0.067329615 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.067329615 = score(doc=5623,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5623, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5623)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this volume is to extend our understanding of the work entity and its role in information retrieval. Basic definitions are reviewed to provide a summary of current thought about works, their role in the catalog, and the potential for better accommodating them in future information retrieval environments. A discussion of entities for information retrieval and works as entities follows. Research in knowledge organization is summarized, indicating ways in which ontology, epistemology, and semiotics have lately been used as looking glasses through which to view the social informational roles of works.
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
  2. Andersen, J.: ¬The bibliographic record as text (2002) 0.02
    0.024396379 = product of:
      0.048792757 = sum of:
        0.019638177 = weight(_text_:information in 5621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019638177 = score(doc=5621,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 5621, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5621)
        0.029154578 = product of:
          0.058309156 = sum of:
            0.058309156 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.058309156 = score(doc=5621,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 5621, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5621)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Conceptualizing the bibliographic record as text implies that it needs to be treated as such in order to fully exploit its function in information retrieval activities, which affects how access to works can be achieved. A theoretical framework is outlined, including methodological consequences in terms of how to go about teaching students of knowledge organization and users of information retrieval systems the literate activity of using the bibliographic record as a text. For knowledge organization research this implies that providing access to texts and the works they embody is not a technical matter, but rather a literate issue.
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
  3. Blake, V.L.P.: Forging the Anglo-American Cataloging Alliance : descriptive cataloging, 1830-1908 (2003) 0.02
    0.024211846 = product of:
      0.048423693 = sum of:
        0.016197294 = weight(_text_:information in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016197294 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
        0.0322264 = product of:
          0.0644528 = sum of:
            0.0644528 = weight(_text_:22 in 4056) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0644528 = score(doc=4056,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4056, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4056)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Imprint
    New York : Haworth Information Press
    Pages
    S.3-22
  4. Khurshid, Z.: ¬The impact of information technology an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers (2003) 0.02
    0.021098327 = product of:
      0.042196654 = sum of:
        0.019638177 = weight(_text_:information in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019638177 = score(doc=2323,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
        0.022558477 = product of:
          0.045116954 = sum of:
            0.045116954 = weight(_text_:22 in 2323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045116954 = score(doc=2323,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2323, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Information technology (IT) encompassing an integrated library system, computer hardware and software, CDROM, Internet, and other domains, including MARC 21 formats, CORC, and metadata standards (Dublin Core, TEI, XML, RDF) has produced far-reaching changes in the job functions of catalogers. Libraries are now coming up with a new set of recruiting requirements for these positions. This paper aims to review job advertisements published in American Libraries (AL) and College and Research Libraries News (C&RL NEWS) to assess the impact of the use of IT in libraries an job requirements and qualifications for catalogers.
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 22(2003) no. March, S.18-21
  5. Bothmann, R.: Cataloging electronic books (2004) 0.02
    0.021098327 = product of:
      0.042196654 = sum of:
        0.019638177 = weight(_text_:information in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019638177 = score(doc=129,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
        0.022558477 = product of:
          0.045116954 = sum of:
            0.045116954 = weight(_text_:22 in 129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045116954 = score(doc=129,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 129, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=129)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Papers on the cataloging of electronic resources have focused on electronic journals and Internet resources such as Web sites and not on electronic books. Electronic books are nonserial monographic resources accessed with a computer either directly or remotely. Rules and standards for cataloging electronic resources have changed and continue to change. This article discusses the electronic book as a unique manifestation and provides practical instruction on the application of current cataloging rules. The cataloging elements covered are control fields and variable data fields, including classification, uniform titles, title information, edition information, type and extent of the resource, publication and distribution information, physical description, series statements, notes, and subject analysis.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  6. Omekwu, C.O.: Cataloguers in a global information network environment (2008) 0.02
    0.02007009 = product of:
      0.04014018 = sum of:
        0.025712406 = weight(_text_:information in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025712406 = score(doc=2536,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
        0.014427775 = product of:
          0.02885555 = sum of:
            0.02885555 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02885555 = score(doc=2536,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims to explore the traditional and emerging roles of cataloguing professionals in a global network information environment. That exploration becomes even more critical in view of migration of information resources into digital, electronic and virtual domains. Design/methodology/approach - An exploratory research design was adopted. The method was to first examine current issues in library and information practice with specific focus on digital technology, the electronic environment, automation, networking, the internet, cyberspace and virtual libraries. The next approach was to examine the challenges of operating in a globalized information environment. Findings - Cataloguers have key roles in knowledge segmentation, identification, organization and authentication. They are vital as content and system managers, software specialists and information retrieval system designers. In all, more than 23 roles are articulated for forward-looking cataloguing professionals. Originality/value - The paper's originality lies in its argument that roles are correlates of competencies and that as the practice of knowledge organization migrates to a dominantly global information network environment, cataloguers must upgrade their competencies in order to effectively operate in the emerging environment.
  7. Raghavan, K.S.; Neelameghan, A.: Composite multimedia works on CD : catalogue entry according to ISBD (ER) and AACR-2 Revision 1998 (2002) 0.02
    0.019919557 = product of:
      0.039839115 = sum of:
        0.016034503 = weight(_text_:information in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016034503 = score(doc=5622,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
        0.023804612 = product of:
          0.047609225 = sum of:
            0.047609225 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5622) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047609225 = score(doc=5622,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5622, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5622)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Gives operational definitions of work, associated work, composite work and other selected terms. Mentions the challenges posed by the abundant availability of digital resources in different media, forms and formats to catalogers in particular and information professionals in general. Discusses with examples the applicability and adequacy of the rules and prescriptions of ISBD(ER) and AACR2, 1998 rev. for cataloging multimedia resources on CD, in view of the fact that the record medium, the physical form and format affect the effectiveness of accessing, retrieval and use of a work.
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
  8. McEathron, S.: Cartographic materials as works (2002) 0.02
    0.019919557 = product of:
      0.039839115 = sum of:
        0.016034503 = weight(_text_:information in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016034503 = score(doc=5625,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
        0.023804612 = product of:
          0.047609225 = sum of:
            0.047609225 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047609225 = score(doc=5625,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The methods cartographers and publishers have used to compile and distribute maps in the past are central to historians of cartography in their thinking and documentation of them as works. This article presents case studies that describe the nature and characteristics of three works wherein the primary manifestations are cartographic. The cases are mapped into an entity-relationship model and include Ptolemy's Geographia, Martini's Novus Atlas Sinensis and Bailey's Ecoregions of the United States. Consideration is made of the implications of using cartographic works as entities for information retrieval.
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
  9. Beall, J.; Kafadar, K.: ¬The effectiveness of copy cotaloging at eliminating typographical errors in shared bibliographic records (2004) 0.02
    0.01969544 = product of:
      0.07878176 = sum of:
        0.07878176 = sum of:
          0.033664808 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.033664808 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047571484 = queryNorm
              0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
          0.045116954 = weight(_text_:22 in 4849) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.045116954 = score(doc=4849,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047571484 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4849, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4849)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Typographical errors in bibliographic records can cause retrieval problems in online catalogs. This study examined one hundred typographical errors in records in the OCLC WorldCat database. The local catalogs of five libraries holding the items described by the bibliographic records with typographical errors were searched to determine whether each library had corrected the errors. The study found that only 35.8 percent of the errors had been corrected. Knowledge of copy cataloging error rates can help underscore the importance of quality data in bibliographic utilities and, further, can serve as an indication to libraries whether they need to pay more attention to correcting types in the copy cataloging process.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  10. Ho, J.: Cataloging practices and access methods for videos at arl and public libraries in the United States (2004) 0.02
    0.019386295 = product of:
      0.03877259 = sum of:
        0.019436752 = weight(_text_:information in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019436752 = score(doc=134,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
        0.019335838 = product of:
          0.038671676 = sum of:
            0.038671676 = weight(_text_:22 in 134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038671676 = score(doc=134,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 134, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=134)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Libraries may vary in the level and fullness of cataloging they give to video recordings and in the methods they use to provide access to them. This paper reports the results of a survey exploring the level of cataloging and access methods applied to videos, the degree to which catalogers view screen credits, and how often various credit information is included and used to create access points in catalog records in selected U. S. public and Association of Research Libraries member libraries. Resources for cataloging videos also were examined. Results showed that most libraries cataloged videos at the full level and provided access points to similar types of information in catalog records. Academic librarians reported viewing videos and providing access points to certain information to a greater extent than public librarians did. This study offers a general picture of the credit information libraries include or omit in video catalog records.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  11. Hill, J.S.: Analog people for digital dreams : staffing and educational considerations for cataloging and metadata professionals (2005) 0.02
    0.019369476 = product of:
      0.03873895 = sum of:
        0.012957836 = weight(_text_:information in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012957836 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
        0.025781117 = product of:
          0.051562235 = sum of:
            0.051562235 = weight(_text_:22 in 126) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051562235 = score(doc=126,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 126, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=126)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    As libraries attempt to incorporate increasing amounts of electronic resources into their catalogs, utilizing a growing variety of metadata standards, library and information science programs are grappling with how to educate catalogers to meet these challenges. In this paper, an employer considers the characteristics and skills that catalogers will need and how they might acquire them.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  12. Madison, O.M.A.: Utilizing the FRBR framework in designing user-focused digital content and access systems (2006) 0.02
    0.019369476 = product of:
      0.03873895 = sum of:
        0.012957836 = weight(_text_:information in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012957836 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
        0.025781117 = product of:
          0.051562235 = sum of:
            0.051562235 = weight(_text_:22 in 1085) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051562235 = score(doc=1085,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1085, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1085)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper discusses the rapidly expanding environment of emerging electronic content and the importance of librarians to partner with new research and teaching communities in meeting users' needs to find, identify, select, and obtain the information and resources they need. The methodology and framework of the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records could serve as a useful tool in building expanded access and content systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  13. Creider, L.S.: Family names and the cataloger (2007) 0.02
    0.01929649 = product of:
      0.03859298 = sum of:
        0.016034503 = weight(_text_:information in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016034503 = score(doc=2285,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
        0.022558477 = product of:
          0.045116954 = sum of:
            0.045116954 = weight(_text_:22 in 2285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045116954 = score(doc=2285,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2285, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2285)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Joint Steering Committee for the Revision of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, to be known as Resource Description and Access (RDA), has indicated that the replacement for the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules (AACR2) will allow the use of family names as authors and will provide rules for their formation. This paper discusses what a family name describes; examines how information seekers look for family names and what they expect to find; describes the ways in which family names have been established in Anglo-American cataloging and archival traditions; asks how adequately the headings established under these rules help users seek such information; and suggests how revised cataloging rules might better enable users to identify resources that meet their needs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. RAK-NBM : Interpretationshilfe zu NBM 3b,3 (2000) 0.02
    0.018230004 = product of:
      0.07292002 = sum of:
        0.07292002 = product of:
          0.14584003 = sum of:
            0.14584003 = weight(_text_:22 in 4362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.14584003 = score(doc=4362,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.8754574 = fieldWeight in 4362, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4362)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2000 19:22:27
  15. Bowman, J.H.: Sic catalog syndrome : title page transcription as barrier to retrieval (2001) 0.02
    0.01757136 = product of:
      0.03514272 = sum of:
        0.011338106 = weight(_text_:information in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011338106 = score(doc=5421,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
        0.023804612 = product of:
          0.047609225 = sum of:
            0.047609225 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5421) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047609225 = score(doc=5421,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5421, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5421)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Examines the problem of errors in the chief source of information and their transcription into catalog records. A survey of 80 different OPACs was undertaken, looking at the occurrence of "sic" and "i.e." in titles and the position of the errors within the titles. The various usages of "sic" and "i.e." are categorized and described; these range from those where the error is obvious to some where there seems to be no error at all. Some seem to be clear misuses, particularly the common system of using additions in square brackets to spell out numerals, and in some cases the cataloger goes beyond what is required. Concludes with recommendations for improvement in retrieval.
  16. Dickey,T.J.: FRBRization of a library catalog : better collocation of records, leading to enhanced search, retrieval and display (2008) 0.02
    0.01757136 = product of:
      0.03514272 = sum of:
        0.011338106 = weight(_text_:information in 2344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011338106 = score(doc=2344,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2344, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2344)
        0.023804612 = product of:
          0.047609225 = sum of:
            0.047609225 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.047609225 = score(doc=2344,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2344, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2344)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR)'s hierarchical system defines families of bibliographic relationship between records and collocates them better than most extant bibliographic systems. Certain library materials (especially audio-visual formats) pose notable challenges to search and retrieval; the first benefits of a FRBRized system would be felt in music libraries, but research already has proven its advantages for fine arts, theology, and literature-the bulk of the non-science, technology, and mathematics collections. This report will summarize the benefits of FRBR to next-generation library catalogs and OPACs, and will review the handful of ILS and catalog systems currently operating with its theoretical structure.
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 27(2008) no.1, S.23-32
  17. Walker, K.; Kwasnik, B.: Providing access to collected works (2002) 0.02
    0.017073907 = product of:
      0.034147814 = sum of:
        0.01374386 = weight(_text_:information in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01374386 = score(doc=5630,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
        0.020403953 = product of:
          0.040807907 = sum of:
            0.040807907 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5630) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040807907 = score(doc=5630,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 5630, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5630)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    How are the boundaries of information objects to be defined in the networked electronic environment and what is the role of our retrieval systems in providing access where these boundaries are uncertain? The authors consider these questions in light of longstanding problems surrounding the definition of the "work" in the print environment. In particular, they examine the role of the index in providing access to the collected works of the individual writer. They review the discussion in the indexing literature of the "long index," and the close relationship between the functions of indexer and editor in collected works projects. And they treat the role of the index in constituting as a self-contained corpus the disparate types of text that make up a writer's lifetime output. Finally, by way of example, the authors turn to the extensive indexes to Sigmund Freud's psychoanalytic writings.
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Works as entities for information retrieval"
  18. Letarte, K.M.; Turvey, M.R.; Bornemann, D.; Adams, D.L.: Practitioner perspectives on cataloging education for entry-level academic Librarians (2002) 0.02
    0.016948292 = product of:
      0.033896584 = sum of:
        0.011338106 = weight(_text_:information in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011338106 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
        0.022558477 = product of:
          0.045116954 = sum of:
            0.045116954 = weight(_text_:22 in 158) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045116954 = score(doc=158,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 158, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=158)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The role of cataloging education within the library profession is a topic of considerable interest and debate. Fifty-five heads of reference and sixty-five heads of cataloging in Association of Research Librarians institutions responded to a survey based upon the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services Educational Policy Statement, Appendix: Knowledge and Skills, Intellectual Access and Information Organization, concerning the importance of cataloging competencies for all entry-level academic librarians. The survey found that practitioners agreed upon a definite set of core cataloging competencies that all entry-level academic librarians should possess. This finding holds larger implications for library education for academic librarians and for the profession as a whole.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Antelman, K.: Identifying the serial work as a bibliographic entity (2004) 0.02
    0.016881807 = product of:
      0.06752723 = sum of:
        0.06752723 = sum of:
          0.02885555 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02885555 = score(doc=130,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047571484 = queryNorm
              0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
          0.038671676 = weight(_text_:22 in 130) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.038671676 = score(doc=130,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.047571484 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 130, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=130)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    A solid theoretical foundation has been built over the years exploring the bibliographic work and developing cataloging rules and practices to describe the work in the traditional catalog. With the increasing prevalence of multiple manifestations of serial titles, as well as tools that automate discovery and retrieval, bibliographic control of serials at a higher level of abstraction is more necessary than ever before. At the same time, models such as the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions' Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records offer new opportunities to control all bibliographic entities at this higher level and build more useful catalog displays. The bibliographic mechanisms that control the work for monographs - author, title, and uniform title - are weak identifiers for serials. New identifiers being adopted by the content industry are built on models and practices that are fundamentally different from those underlying the new bibliographic models. What is needed is a work identifier for serials that is both congruent with the new models and can enable us to meet the objective of providing work-level access to all resources in our catalogs.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Park, J.-r.; Lu, C.; Marion, L.: Cataloging professionals in the digital environment : a content analysis of job descriptions (2009) 0.02
    0.01653985 = product of:
      0.0330797 = sum of:
        0.01374386 = weight(_text_:information in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01374386 = score(doc=2766,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047571484 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
        0.019335838 = product of:
          0.038671676 = sum of:
            0.038671676 = weight(_text_:22 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038671676 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.047571484 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This study assesses the current state of responsibilities and skill sets required of cataloging professionals. It identifies emerging roles and competencies focusing on the digital environment and relates these to the established knowledge of traditional cataloging standards and practices. We conducted a content analysis of 349 job descriptions advertised in AutoCAT in 2005-2006. Multivariate techniques of cluster and multidimensional-scaling analyses were applied to the data. Analysis of job titles, required and preferred qualifications/skills, and responsibilities lends perspective to the roles that cataloging professionals play in the digital environment. Technological advances increasingly demand knowledge and skills related to electronic resource management, metadata creation, and computer and Web applications. Emerging knowledge and skill sets are increasingly being integrated into the core technical aspects of cataloging such as bibliographic and authority control and integrated library-system management. Management of cataloging functions is also in high demand. The results of the study provide insight on current and future curriculum design of library and information-science programs.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:20:24
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.4, S.844-857

Authors

Languages

  • e 230
  • d 38
  • a 1
  • chi 1
  • f 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 247
  • m 17
  • b 12
  • el 10
  • s 9
  • r 4
  • More… Less…