-
Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Thesaural relationships (2001)
0.05
0.045059934 = product of:
0.09011987 = sum of:
0.011338106 = weight(_text_:information in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011338106 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.07878176 = sum of:
0.033664808 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033664808 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.045116954 = weight(_text_:22 in 1149) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045116954 = score(doc=1149,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1149, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1149)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- A thesaurus in the controlled vocabulary environment is a tool designed to support effective infonnation retrieval (IR) by guiding indexers and searchers consistently to choose the same terms for expressing a given concept or combination of concepts. Terms in the thesaurus are linked by relationships of three well-known types: equivalence, hierarchical, and associative. The functions and properties of these three basic types and some subcategories are described, as well as some additional relationship types conunonly found in thesauri. Progressive automation of IR processes and the capability for simultaneous searching of vast networked resources are creating some pressures for change in the categorization and consistency of relationships.
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:45:57
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.2
-
Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010)
0.05
0.045059934 = product of:
0.09011987 = sum of:
0.011338106 = weight(_text_:information in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011338106 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.07878176 = sum of:
0.033664808 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033664808 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.045116954 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045116954 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Moderne Verfahren des Information Retrieval verlangen nach aussagekräftigen und detailliert relationierten Dokumentationssprachen. Der selektive Transfer einzelner Modellierungsstrategien aus dem Bereich semantischer Technologien für die Gestaltung und Relationierung bestehender Dokumentationssprachen wird diskutiert. In Form einer Taxonomie wird ein hierarchisch strukturiertes Relationeninventar definiert, welches sowohl hinreichend allgemeine als auch zahlreiche spezifische Relationstypen enthält, die eine detaillierte und damit aussagekräftige Relationierung des Vokabulars ermöglichen. Das bringt einen Zugewinn an Übersichtlichkeit und Funktionalität. Im Gegensatz zu anderen Ansätzen und Überlegungen zur Schaffung von Relationeninventaren entwickelt der vorgestellte Vorschlag das Relationeninventar aus der Begriffsmenge eines bestehenden Gegenstandsbereichs heraus.
- Source
- Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
-
Maniez, J.: Fusion de banques de donnees documentaires at compatibilite des languages d'indexation (1997)
0.04
0.042179976 = product of:
0.08435995 = sum of:
0.016832722 = weight(_text_:information in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016832722 = score(doc=2246,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
0.06752723 = sum of:
0.02885555 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02885555 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
0.038671676 = weight(_text_:22 in 2246) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038671676 = score(doc=2246,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2246, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2246)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Discusses the apparently unattainable goal of compatibility of information languages. While controlled languages can improve retrieval performance within a single system, they make cooperation across different systems more difficult. The Internet and downloading accentuate this adverse outcome and the acceleration of data exchange aggravates the problem of compatibility. Defines this familiar concept and demonstrates that coherence is just as necessary as it was for indexing languages, the proliferation of which has created confusion in grouped data banks. Describes 2 types of potential solutions, similar to those applied to automatic translation of natural languages: - harmonizing the information languages themselves, both difficult and expensive, or, the more flexible solution involving automatic harmonization of indexing formulae based on pre established concordance tables. However, structural incompatibilities between post coordinated languages and classifications may lead any harmonization tools up a blind alley, while the paths of a universal concordance model are rare and narrow
- Date
- 1. 8.1996 22:01:00
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Integration of information data banks and compatibility of indexing languages
-
Farradane, J.: Concept organization for information retrieval (1967)
0.04
0.039839115 = product of:
0.07967823 = sum of:
0.032069005 = weight(_text_:information in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032069005 = score(doc=35,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
0.047609225 = product of:
0.09521845 = sum of:
0.09521845 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 35) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09521845 = score(doc=35,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.6617001 = fieldWeight in 35, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=35)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Source
- Information storage and retrieval. 3(1967) S.297-314
-
Fox, E.A.: Lexical relations : enhancing effectiveness of information retrieval systems (1980)
0.03
0.032194868 = product of:
0.064389735 = sum of:
0.025915671 = weight(_text_:information in 5310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025915671 = score(doc=5310,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 5310, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5310)
0.038474064 = product of:
0.07694813 = sum of:
0.07694813 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07694813 = score(doc=5310,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 5310, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5310)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Mooers, C.N.: ¬The indexing language of an information retrieval system (1985)
0.03
0.031525582 = product of:
0.063051164 = sum of:
0.011338106 = weight(_text_:information in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011338106 = score(doc=3644,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.051713057 = sum of:
0.029154578 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029154578 = score(doc=3644,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.20260347 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.022558477 = weight(_text_:22 in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022558477 = score(doc=3644,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16658723 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Calvin Mooers' work toward the resolution of the problem of ambiguity in indexing went unrecognized for years. At the time he introduced the "descriptor" - a term with a very distinct meaning-indexers were, for the most part, taking index terms directly from the document, without either rationalizing them with context or normalizing them with some kind of classification. It is ironic that Mooers' term came to be attached to the popular but unsophisticated indexing methods which he was trying to root out. Simply expressed, what Mooers did was to take the dictionary definitions of terms and redefine them so clearly that they could not be used in any context except that provided by the new definition. He did, at great pains, construct such meanings for over four hundred words; disambiguation and specificity were sought after and found for these words. He proposed that all indexers adopt this method so that when the index supplied a term, it also supplied the exact meaning for that term as used in the indexed document. The same term used differently in another document would be defined differently and possibly renamed to avoid ambiguity. The disambiguation was achieved by using unabridged dictionaries and other sources of defining terminology. In practice, this tends to produce circularity in definition, that is, word A refers to word B which refers to word C which refers to word A. It was necessary, therefore, to break this chain by creating a new, definitive meaning for each word. Eventually, means such as those used by Austin (q.v.) for PRECIS achieved the same purpose, but by much more complex means than just creating a unique definition of each term. Mooers, however, was probably the first to realize how confusing undefined terminology could be. Early automatic indexers dealt with distinct disciplines and, as long as they did not stray beyond disciplinary boundaries, a quick and dirty keyword approach was satisfactory. The trouble came when attempts were made to make a combined index for two or more distinct disciplines. A number of processes have since been developed, mostly involving tagging of some kind or use of strings. Mooers' solution has rarely been considered seriously and probably would be extremely difficult to apply now because of so much interdisciplinarity. But for a specific, weIl defined field, it is still weIl worth considering. Mooers received training in mathematics and physics from the University of Minnesota and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He was the founder of Zator Company, which developed and marketed a coded card information retrieval system, and of Rockford Research, Inc., which engages in research in information science. He is the inventor of the TRAC computer language.
- Footnote
- Original in: Information retrieval today: papers presented at an Institute conducted by the Library School and the Center for Continuation Study, University of Minnesota, Sept. 19-22, 1962. Ed. by Wesley Simonton. Minneapolis, Minn.: The Center, 1963. S.21-36.
-
Fugmann, R.: ¬The analytico-synthetic foundation for large indexing & information retrieval systems : dedicated to Prof. Dr. Werner Schultheis, the vigorous initiator of modern chem. documentation in Germany on the occasion of his 85th birthday (1983)
0.03
0.031147059 = product of:
0.062294118 = sum of:
0.0289746 = weight(_text_:information in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0289746 = score(doc=215,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
0.033319518 = product of:
0.066639036 = sum of:
0.066639036 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 215) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066639036 = score(doc=215,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 215, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=215)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- LCSH
- Information retrieval
- RSWK
- Information und Dokumentation / Systemgrundlage (BVB)
- Subject
- Information und Dokumentation / Systemgrundlage (BVB)
Information retrieval
-
Maniez, J.: Actualité des langages documentaires : fondements théoriques de la recherche d'information (2002)
0.03
0.028171634 = product of:
0.05634327 = sum of:
0.02748772 = weight(_text_:information in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02748772 = score(doc=887,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
0.02885555 = product of:
0.0577111 = sum of:
0.0577111 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0577111 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Übers. d. Titels: Actuality of information languages: theoretical foundation of information retrieval
-
Kobrin, R.Y.: On the principles of terminological work in the creation of thesauri for information retrieval systems (1979)
0.03
0.028170511 = product of:
0.056341022 = sum of:
0.022676213 = weight(_text_:information in 2954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022676213 = score(doc=2954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2954)
0.033664808 = product of:
0.067329615 = sum of:
0.067329615 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2954) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067329615 = score(doc=2954,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2954, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2954)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Salton, G.: Experiments in automatic thesaurus construction for information retrieval (1972)
0.03
0.028170511 = product of:
0.056341022 = sum of:
0.022676213 = weight(_text_:information in 5314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022676213 = score(doc=5314,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5314, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5314)
0.033664808 = product of:
0.067329615 = sum of:
0.067329615 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5314) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.067329615 = score(doc=5314,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5314, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5314)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
-
Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval (2002)
0.03
0.026996218 = product of:
0.053992435 = sum of:
0.021730952 = weight(_text_:information in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021730952 = score(doc=1201,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.2602176 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
0.032261483 = product of:
0.06452297 = sum of:
0.06452297 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06452297 = score(doc=1201,freq=10.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.44838852 = fieldWeight in 1201, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1201)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Thesaural relations have long been used in information retrieval to enrich queries; they have sometimes been used to cluster documents as well. Sometimes the first query to an information retrieval system yields no results at all, or, what can be even more disconcerting, many thousands of hits. One solution is to rephrase the query, improving the choice of query terms by using related terms of different types. A collection of related terms is often called a thesaurus. This chapter describes the lexical-semantic relations that have been used in building thesauri and summarizes some of the effects of using these relational thesauri in information retrieval experiments
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
- Theme
- Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
-
Miller, U.; Teitelbaum, R.: Pre-coordination and post-coordination : past and future (2002)
0.03
0.025915395 = product of:
0.05183079 = sum of:
0.022676213 = weight(_text_:information in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022676213 = score(doc=1395,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
0.029154578 = product of:
0.058309156 = sum of:
0.058309156 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.058309156 = score(doc=1395,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article deals with the meaningful processing of information in relation to two systems of Information processing: pre-coordination and post-coordination. The different approaches are discussed, with emphasis an the need for a controlled vocabulary in information retrieval. Assigned indexing, which employs a controlled vocabulary, is described in detail. Types of indexing language can be divided into two broad groups - those using pre-coordinated terms and those depending an post-coordination. They represent two different basic approaches in processing and Information retrieval. The historical development of these two approaches is described, as well as the two tools that apply to these approaches: thesauri and subject headings.
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Takeda, N.: Problems in hierarchical structures in thesauri : their influences on the results of information retrieval (1994)
0.02
0.023138676 = product of:
0.04627735 = sum of:
0.012957836 = weight(_text_:information in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012957836 = score(doc=2642,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
0.033319518 = product of:
0.066639036 = sum of:
0.066639036 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066639036 = score(doc=2642,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2642, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2642)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- In online retrieval search results do not always match the intent in spite of using correct keywords (descriptors). One of the causes of this problem is found in the hierarchical structures of the thesaurus, which often contains relations between broader and narrower concepts, the opposite of which is not necessarily true. Some examples are described from 2 thesauri, MeSH and JICST. In these cases searchers need to make an effort to increase precision
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Engerer, V.: Control and syntagmatization : vocabulary requirements in information retrieval thesauri and natural language lexicons (2017)
0.02
0.022213196 = product of:
0.044426393 = sum of:
0.019436752 = weight(_text_:information in 3678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019436752 = score(doc=3678,freq=8.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 3678, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3678)
0.02498964 = product of:
0.04997928 = sum of:
0.04997928 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04997928 = score(doc=3678,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 3678, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3678)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper explores the relationships between natural language lexicons in lexical semantics and thesauri in information retrieval research. These different areas of knowledge have different restrictions on use of vocabulary; thesauri are used only in information search and retrieval contexts, whereas lexicons are mental systems and generally applicable in all domains of life. A set of vocabulary requirements that defines the more concrete characteristics of vocabulary items in the 2 contexts can be derived from this framework: lexicon items have to be learnable, complex, transparent, etc., whereas thesaurus terms must be effective, current and relevant, searchable, etc. The differences in vocabulary properties correlate with 2 other factors, the well-known dimension of Control (deliberate, social activities of building and maintaining vocabularies), and Syntagmatization, which is less known and describes vocabulary items' varying formal preparedness to exit the thesaurus/lexicon, enter into linear syntactic constructions, and, finally, acquire communicative functionality. It is proposed that there is an inverse relationship between Control and Syntagmatization.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.6, S.1480-1490
-
Vickery, B.B.: Structure and function in retrieval languages (2006)
0.02
0.021299705 = product of:
0.04259941 = sum of:
0.01374386 = weight(_text_:information in 5584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01374386 = score(doc=5584,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 5584, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5584)
0.02885555 = product of:
0.0577111 = sum of:
0.0577111 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0577111 = score(doc=5584,freq=8.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 5584, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5584)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to summarize the varied structural characteristics which may be present in retrieval languages. Design/methodology/approach - The languages serve varied purposes in information systems, and a number of these are identified. The relations between structure and function are discussed and suggestions made as to the most suitable structures needed for various purposes. Findings - A quantitative approach has been developed: a simple measure is the number of separate terms in a retrieval language, but this has to be related to the scope of its subject field. Some ratio of terms to items in the field seems a more suitable measure of the average specificity of the terms. Other aspects can be quantified - for example, the average number of links in hierarchical chains, or the average number of cross-references in a thesaurus. Originality/value - All the approaches to the analysis of retrieval language reported in this paper are of continuing value. Some practical studies of computer information systems undertaken by Aslib Research Department have suggested a further approach.
-
Riesthuis, G.J.A.: Zoeken met woorden : hergebruik van onderwerpsontsluiting (1998)
0.02
0.020121792 = product of:
0.040243585 = sum of:
0.016197294 = weight(_text_:information in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016197294 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
0.02404629 = product of:
0.04809258 = sum of:
0.04809258 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04809258 = score(doc=3154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Theory of information languages. Decomposition of UDC-notations
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
-
Casagrande, J.B.; Hale, K.L.: Semantic relations in Papago folk definitions (1967)
0.02
0.020121792 = product of:
0.040243585 = sum of:
0.016197294 = weight(_text_:information in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016197294 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
0.02404629 = product of:
0.04809258 = sum of:
0.04809258 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1194) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04809258 = score(doc=1194,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 1194, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1194)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Footnote
- Zitiert in: Evens, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval. In: The semantics of relationships: an interdisciplinary perspective. Eds: R. Green u.a. Dordrecht: Kluwer 2002. S.143-160.
-
¬The semantics of relationships : an interdisciplinary perspective (2002)
0.02
0.01946691 = product of:
0.03893382 = sum of:
0.018109124 = weight(_text_:information in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018109124 = score(doc=1430,freq=10.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
0.020824699 = product of:
0.041649397 = sum of:
0.041649397 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.041649397 = score(doc=1430,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 1430, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1430)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Work on relationships takes place in many communities, including, among others, data modeling, knowledge representation, natural language processing, linguistics, and information retrieval. Unfortunately, continued disciplinary splintering and specialization keeps any one person from being familiar with the full expanse of that work. By including contributions form experts in a variety of disciplines and backgrounds, this volume demonstrates both the parallels that inform work on relationships across a number of fields and the singular emphases that have yet to be fully embraced, The volume is organized into 3 parts: (1) Types of relationships (2) Relationships in knowledge representation and reasoning (3) Applications of relationships
- Content
- Enthält die Beiträge: Pt.1: Types of relationships: CRUDE, D.A.: Hyponymy and its varieties; FELLBAUM, C.: On the semantics of troponymy; PRIBBENOW, S.: Meronymic relationships: from classical mereology to complex part-whole relations; KHOO, C. u.a.: The many facets of cause-effect relation - Pt.2: Relationships in knowledge representation and reasoning: GREEN, R.: Internally-structured conceptual models in cognitive semantics; HOVY, E.: Comparing sets of semantic relations in ontologies; GUARINO, N., C. WELTY: Identity and subsumption; JOUIS; C.: Logic of relationships - Pt.3: Applications of relationships: EVENS, M.: Thesaural relations in information retrieval; KHOO, C., S.H. MYAENG: Identifying semantic relations in text for information retrieval and information extraction; McCRAY, A.T., O. BODENREICHER: A conceptual framework for the biiomedical domain; HETZLER, B.: Visual analysis and exploration of relationships
- Series
- Information science and knowledge management; vol.3
-
Gilchrist, A.: Structure and function in retrieval (2006)
0.02
0.01936675 = product of:
0.0387335 = sum of:
0.01374386 = weight(_text_:information in 5585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01374386 = score(doc=5585,freq=4.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 5585, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5585)
0.02498964 = product of:
0.04997928 = sum of:
0.04997928 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5585) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04997928 = score(doc=5585,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 5585, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5585)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - This paper forms part of the series "60 years of the best in information research", marking the 60th anniversary of the Journal of Documentation. It aims to review the influence of Brian Vickery's 1971 paper, "Structure and function in retrieval languages". The paper is not an update of Vickery's work, but a comment on a greatly changed environment, in which his analysis still has much validity. Design/methodology/approach - A commentary on selected literature illustrates the continuing relevance of Vickery's ideas. Findings - Generic survey and specific reference are still the main functions of retrieval languages, with minor functional additions such as relevance ranking. New structures are becoming increasingly significant, through developments such as XML. Future development in artificial intelligence hold out new prospects still. Originality/value - The paper shows the continuing relevance of "traditional" ideas of information science from the 1960s and 1970s.
-
Engerer, V.: Thesauri, Terminologien, Lexika, Fachsprachen : Kontrolle, physische Verortung und das Prinzip der Syntagmatisierung von Vokabularen (2014)
0.02
0.018618338 = product of:
0.037236676 = sum of:
0.016832722 = weight(_text_:information in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016832722 = score(doc=3644,freq=6.0), product of:
0.08351069 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.020403953 = product of:
0.040807907 = sum of:
0.040807907 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040807907 = score(doc=3644,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1438997 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.047571484 = queryNorm
0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 3644, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3644)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Ich unternehme in diesem Beitrag den Versuch, die Informationswissenschaft - hier gedeutet als 'Information Retrieval'- Disziplin - einer synchronen Querschnittsanalyse zu unterziehen, welche die aktuelle Position dieser Disziplin im Feld anderer zeichen- und wortschatzorientierter Disziplinen (neben der Linguistik die Terminologielehre und die Fachsprachenforschung) näher bestimmen soll. Im Rahmen der Analyse wird von einem Information Retrieval-Kern der Informationswissenschaft ausgegangen, welcher den Informationssuchkontext sowie die Konzepte des Informationsbedarfs und der Relevanz als für diese Disziplin zentrale Komponenten ansieht. Synchron wird das Verhältnis der Informationswissenschaft zu benachbarten Disziplinen durch eine Reihe disziplinspezifischer Zeichenanforderungen erklärt, wodurch ein systemischer Zusammenhang entsteht, der die Informationswissenschaft mit den drei anderen zeichenbezogenen und vokabularorientierten Disziplinen in Beziehung setzt. Das Verhältnis zwischen diesen Disziplinen wird anhand der Dimensionen Kontrolle/Verbindlichkeit sowie Verortung des Vokabulars ("im Kopf" vs. in externen Dokumenten) aufgezeigt, und es wird ein übergeordnetes Prinzip der Syntagmatisierung, welches die beiden Dimensionen vereint, vorgeschlagen.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 65(2014) H.2, S.99-108
