Search (40 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Objektdokumentation"
  1. Wunderlich, B.: ¬Die wissenschaftliche Erschließung von Bekleidung mit systematischen Ordnungssystemen im musealen Kontext : Wie bekommt man Hemd und Hose in die Datenbank? (2005) 0.01 
    0.012165692 = product of:
  0.048662767 = sum of:
    0.020809827 = weight(_text_:information in 4173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020809827 = score(doc=4173,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 4173, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4173)
    0.027852941 = product of:
      0.08355882 = sum of:
        0.08355882 = weight(_text_:29 in 4173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08355882 = score(doc=4173,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.6595664 = fieldWeight in 4173, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4173)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Date
    28.11.1999 13:32:29
    27. 9.2005 14:29:52
    Footnote
    Abschlussarbeit am Institut für Information und Dokumentation an der Fachhochschule Potsdam
    Imprint
    Potsdam : Institut für Information und Dokumentation
  2. Becker, H.-G.; Förster, F.: Vernetztes Wissen : Ereignisse in der bibliografischen Dokumentation (2010) 0.01 
    0.0107911965 = product of:
  0.08632957 = sum of:
    0.08632957 = weight(_text_:modell in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08632957 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21656582 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.39862972 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Innerhalb der Gedächtnisinstitutionen Bibliothek, Museum und Archiv gibt es je eigene Beschreibungsmodelle der beherbergten Objekte und Materialien. Für eine genauere bibliografische Erschließung wurde im Bibliotheksbereich das von Benutzerbedürfnissen ausgehende, statische Modell "Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records" (FRBR) geschaffen, dessen ungenauer »Werk«-Begriff ebenso thematisiert wird wie die schwer zu realisierende Übertragbarkeit des Modells auf Nicht-Buchmaterialien. Die Museumswelt orientiert die Darstellung ihrer Bestände am CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CRM), das sich hinsichtlich der Beschreibung heterogener Museumsobjekte, also Artefakten künstlerischer und intellektueller Gestaltung, als hilfreich erwiesen hat. In gegenseitigem Austausch zwischen IFLA und ICOM wurde FRBR mit CRM harmonisiert. Das Ergebnis, FRBRoo (objektorientiertes FRBR), zeigt seine Vorzüge zum einen in einer strengeren Interpretation der Entitäten der Gruppe 1 des FRBR-Modells und zum anderen in einer genaueren Abbildung von Prozessen bzw. Ereignissen. Beispiele zum Anwendungsbezug von FRBRoo zeigen dessen Zugewinn für die wissenschaftliche Erschließung hand-, druck- und online-schriftlicher Quellen, Werken der Darstellenden Kunst, Landkarten und Musikalien innerhalb einer CRM-basierten Datenbank.
  3. Orna, E.; Pettitt, C.: Information management in museums (1998) 0.01 
    0.0101908 = product of:
  0.0407632 = sum of:
    0.0150182 = weight(_text_:information in 4986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0150182 = score(doc=4986,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 4986, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4986)
    0.025744999 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4986) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025744999 = score(doc=4986,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 4986, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4986)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    Museums are under pressure to deliver effective management and presentation of their collections, outreach to their public, cost effective use of all of their resources and the generation of maximum income. This book addresses such topics as what information means in the museum context, who uses it and what they need to do with it, developing a strategy for using information to benefit the museum, making the best use of the knowledge and skills of the museum staff, and acquiring the right mix of technology and managing it to support co-operation between people. Basic principles and practical advice is presented for integrated management of a whole range of information which museums need for productive use of human resources and for choosing and using technology effectively. The needs of small museums are given special attention and case studies show how a range of institutions have responded to the challenge.
    LCSH
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Museums
    Subject
    Information storage and retrieval systems / Museums
  4. Smiraglia, R.P.: Knowledge sharing and content genealogy : extensing the "works" model as a metaphor for non-documentary artefacts with case studies of Etruscan artefacts (2004) 0.01 
    0.009762561 = product of:
  0.026033495 = sum of:
    0.0049049235 = weight(_text_:information in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0049049235 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
    0.014563571 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014563571 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
    0.0065650004 = product of:
      0.019695 = sum of:
        0.019695 = weight(_text_:29 in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019695 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.375 = coord(3/8)
    Abstract
    The harmonization and extension of a taxonomy of works from the documentary to the artefactual domain represents an attempt to further knowledge sharing across cultural boundaries. The uses and users of works, both documentary and artefactual, are global-the need for this advance in the organization of knowledge is therefore also global. Works are the formal records of knowledge, the essential records of human accomplishment. Works are a global phenomenon despite potential cultural variations in their creation and instantiation, and the need to organize works for retrieval is likewise a global phenomenon. Artefacts (sculptures, paintings, realia, documents, books, scores, recordings, etc.) are the physical media collected by repositories of culture (libraries, archives, museums, etc.), and are the means by which works are communicated. Works mutate and derive across time and culture in response to their entrance into a canon of cultural meaning. In the present paper, we review the characteristics of documentary works. Then we extend the metaphor from the documentary environment to the artefactual environment. To carry the metaphor from the documentary domain to the artefactual domain we alter the terms of the definition slightly, thus: 1) instantiation is understood as content genealogy. an epistemological architecture of content-genealogy is presented, demonstrating the potential for mutation and derivation of the representations of artefacts. Case studies of Etruscan artefacts from the University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology are used to demonstrate the inherence of the work in nondocumentary artefacts. An outline of a meta-theory of "works" is presented that harmonizes the documentary and artefactual domains.
    Date
    29. 8.2004 19:05:56
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
  5. Meyer, U.: Entwurf und Realisierung eines Hypermediasystems : vernetzte Informationen zu ausgewählten Bauplastiken in Hannover (1993) 0.01 
    0.00855815 = product of:
  0.0342326 = sum of:
    0.014714771 = weight(_text_:information in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014714771 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
    0.01951783 = product of:
      0.058553487 = sum of:
        0.058553487 = weight(_text_:22 in 362) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058553487 = score(doc=362,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 362, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=362)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Source
    Technik und Information: Markt, Medien und Methoden. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1992, Technische Universität Berlin, 22.-25.9.1992. Hrsg.: W. Neubauer u. K.-H. Meier
  6. Schweibenz, W.: Museumsinformation im Internet am Beispiel der Webseiten zweier Kunstmuseen in den USA (1998) 0.01 
    0.007131792 = product of:
  0.028527169 = sum of:
    0.012262309 = weight(_text_:information in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.012262309 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
    0.01626486 = product of:
      0.048794575 = sum of:
        0.048794575 = weight(_text_:22 in 4152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048794575 = score(doc=4152,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4152, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4152)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Source
    Information und Märkte: 50. Deutscher Dokumentartag 1998, Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Dokumentation e.V. (DGD), Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, 22.-24. September 1998. Hrsg. von Marlies Ockenfeld u. Gerhard J. Mantwill
  7. Mensing, P.: Planung und Durchführung von Digitalisierungsprojekten am Beispiel nicht-textueller Materialien (2010) 0.01 
    0.0062948647 = product of:
  0.050358918 = sum of:
    0.050358918 = weight(_text_:modell in 3577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.050358918 = score(doc=3577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.21656582 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.232534 = fieldWeight in 3577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=3577)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Content
    Darin auch: "2.7 Erschließung der Digitalisate Die formale Erschließung von gedruckten Beständen wird in Deutschland nach RAK-WB bzw. RAK-OB durchgeführt. Im Gegensatz zu Druckwerken, die meist alle wichtigen Informationen selbst enthalten (Impressum), sind in oder an Kunstwerken und Bildern meist keine Angaben wie Autor, Künstler oder Entstehungsjahr zu finden. Für die Formalerfassung von Nichtbuchmaterialien sind in Deutschland die "Regeln für die alphabetische Katalogisierung von Nichtbuchmaterialien" anzuwenden (RAK-NBM), eine Erweiterung der o.g. RAK. Zur Erschließung von Kunstwerken wurde seit den 70er Jahren des 20. Jhds. die Marburger-Index-Datenbank (MIDAS) entwickelt, die auf dem AKL, ICONCLASS und auch RAK aufbaut. MIDAS findet hauptsächlich in Museen Anwendung, konnte sich aber aufgrund der nicht verbindlichen Nutzung nicht durchsetzen. Ebenfalls aus dem Museumsbereich stammt CIDOC CRM, das seit 2006 ISO-zertifiziert ist (ISO 21127:2006) und der Datenfeldkatalog zur Grundinventarisation. Um die inhaltliche Erschließung von Bibliotheksbeständen einheitlich gestalten zu können, wurde die Schlagwortnormdatei entwickelt. Diese Datei ist universell ausgerichtet und ist daher für Spezialgebiete nicht tief genug ausgearbeitet. Im kunsthistorischen Bereich sind daher außerdem u.a. der AA und der AGM von Bedeutung. Als Klassifizierungssystem steht ICONCLASS zur Verfügung. Bei der inhaltlichen Erschließung ist darauf zu achten, dass irrelevante Informationen nicht zur unnötigen Vergrößerung des Kataloges führen. Um durchgängig eine größtmögliche Nutzerorientierung bieten zu können, sollten die gewünschten Prioritäten der Erschließung in einer Richtlinie festgehalten werden. Zur Interpretation von Bildern wurde von Panofsky ein 3-Stufen-Modell entwickelt, dass sich in prä- oder vor-ikonografische, ikonografische Beschreibung und ikonologische Interpretation unterteilen lässt. In der ersten Stufe werden nur die dargestellten Dinge oder Personen skizziert, ohne ihre Bedeutung zueinander zu interpretieren. Dies erfolgt erst in der zweiten Stufe. Hier wird das Ahema des Kunstwerkes allerdings ohne weitere Deutung benannt. In der dritten Stufe wird schließlich geklärt, warum dieses Werk so geschaffen wurde und nicht anders.
  8. Ménard, E.; Mas, S.; Alberts, I.: Faceted classification for museum artefacts : a methodology to support web site development of large cultural organizations (2010) 0.01 
    0.0052821427 = product of:
  0.02112857 = sum of:
    0.014563571 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014563571 = score(doc=3945,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.13368362 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
    0.0065650004 = product of:
      0.019695 = sum of:
        0.019695 = weight(_text_:29 in 3945) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019695 = score(doc=3945,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 3945, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3945)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Date
    29. 8.2010 12:31:55
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  9. Küster-Heise, K.; Mitschke, S.: Terminologie in der Museumsarbeit unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Aspekts der Textilterminologie (2009) 0.00 
    0.0043012216 = product of:
  0.017204886 = sum of:
    0.0073573855 = weight(_text_:information in 2827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0073573855 = score(doc=2827,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 2827, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2827)
    0.0098475 = product of:
      0.0295425 = sum of:
        0.0295425 = weight(_text_:29 in 2827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0295425 = score(doc=2827,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2827, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2827)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Date
    10. 5.2009 17:29:18
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 60(2009) H.3, S.159-161
  10. Cappelini, V.: ¬La telematica e i beni culturali (1995) 0.00 
    0.0036408927 = product of:
  0.029127141 = sum of:
    0.029127141 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029127141 = score(doc=4393,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4393, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4393)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    The head of electronic engineering at Florence's Universita degli Studi describes how the department has used digitized imaging and computer reconstructions to aid the restoration and preservation of works of art in museums such as the Uffizi. The dapertmant shares in the MAN (Metropolitan Area Network) Toscana Telecoms project, whose applications include remote access to libraries and museums; and it also takes part in the EU MUSA project, which developed the Vasari (Visual Arts Systems Archiving Retrieval Images) scanner, and in the RAMA (Remote Access to Museum Archives) scheme
  11. Cataloging culutural objects : a guide to describing cultural works and their images (2003) 0.00 
    0.0035843514 = product of:
  0.014337406 = sum of:
    0.0061311545 = weight(_text_:information in 2398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0061311545 = score(doc=2398,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 2398, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2398)
    0.008206251 = product of:
      0.024618752 = sum of:
        0.024618752 = weight(_text_:29 in 2398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024618752 = score(doc=2398,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2398, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2398)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(2/8)
    Abstract
    It may be jumping the gun a bit to review this publication before it is actually published, but we are nothing if not current here at Current Cites, so we will do it anyway (so sue us!). This publication-in-process is a joint effort of the Visual Resources Association and the Digital Library Federation. It aims to "provide guidelines for selecting, ordering, and formatting data used to populate catalog records" relating to cultural works. Although this work is far from finished (Chapters 1, 2, 7, and 9 are available, as well as front and back matter), the authors are making it available so pratictioners can use it and respond with information about how it can be improved to better aid their work. A stated goal is to publish it in print at some point in the future. Besides garnering support from the organizations named above as well as the Getty, the Mellon Foundation and others, the effort is being guided by experienced professionals at the top of their field. Get the point? If you're involved with creating metadata relating to any type of cultural object and/or images of such, this will need to be either on your bookshelf, or bookmarked in your browser, or both
    Date
    2.12.2015 11:29:57
  12. Marty, P.F.: Museum informatics (2009) 0.00 
    0.0033929725 = product of:
  0.02714378 = sum of:
    0.02714378 = weight(_text_:information in 5000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02714378 = score(doc=5000,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.42933714 = fieldWeight in 5000, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5000)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Museum informatics is the study of the sociotechnical interactions that take place at the intersection of people, information, and technology in museums. This entry presents an overview of museum informatics, covering such topics as information representation, information organization and access, information management, information technology, information interactions, and information professionals in museums. It explores the impact of information science and technology on museums, museum professionals, and museum visitors, and argues that museum researchers must take a sociotechnical approach to studying the use of information resources and technologies in museums.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  13. Steffens, M.: Bibliothek im Museum : Bibliothekarisch orientierte Sammlungsverwaltung mit dem Datenbanksystem Allegro/HANS (1995) 0.00 
    0.0032825002 = product of:
  0.026260002 = sum of:
    0.026260002 = product of:
      0.07878 = sum of:
        0.07878 = weight(_text_:29 in 5393) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07878 = score(doc=5393,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 5393, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5393)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.1, S.51-57
  14. Blummer, T.: Objektverwalter : Objektdatenbanken - High Tech Spielzeuge oder Zukunftsmodell? (1997) 0.00 
    0.0032529717 = product of:
  0.026023773 = sum of:
    0.026023773 = product of:
      0.07807132 = sum of:
        0.07807132 = weight(_text_:22 in 820) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07807132 = score(doc=820,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 820, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=820)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Date
    5. 3.1999 17:40:22
  15. Hübner, M.: Integrierte und vielschichtige Dokumentation von Kunstwerken (1991) 0.00 
    0.0024524617 = product of:
  0.019619694 = sum of:
    0.019619694 = weight(_text_:information in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019619694 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Imprint
    Darmstadt : Fachhochschule, FB Information und Dokumentation
  16. Im Dickicht der Fernseharchive : Ein neues Archivsystem unterstützt TV-Redakteure bei der zeitsparenden Zusammenstellung ihrer Beiträge (2003) 0.00 
    0.002275558 = product of:
  0.018204464 = sum of:
    0.018204464 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018204464 = score(doc=1951,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 1951, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1951)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Abstract
    Der Bestand eines Fernseharchivs gleicht auf dem ersten Blick einem Irrgarten. Täglich werden große Mengen an audiovisuellen Informationen über den Äther geschickt und gleichzeitig für eine eventuelle Wiederverwendung digital gespeichert. Die Herausforderung für jeden Archivar besteht darin, aus Millionen von Sendeminuten auf Anfrage möglichst schnell das passende Material zusammenzustellen. Mit diesem Problem befasste sich das EU-Projekt Primavera (Personalized Retrieval und Indexing of Media Assets in Virtual Environments for Real-Time Access). Die darin entwickelte Software testet der Österreichische Rundfunk in Wien seit einem Jahr. Sie wurde vom Fraunhofer-Institut für Integrierte Publikations- und Informationssysteme (IPSI) in Darmstadt, der tecmath AG in Kaiserslautern und dem Instituto Trentino Di Cultura (ITC) in Trient gemeinsam entworfen. Neuer Suchansatz Suchte ein Redakteur bisher in archivierten Sendungen, bestellte er schließlich mehrere, vermutlich passende Mitschnitte. Viele davon erweisen sich jedoch schnell als nutzlos. Nun kann man bereits am Bildschirm anhand von Schlüsselbildern - den Keyframes genannten Standbildern markanter Szenen - eine Vorauswahl treffen. Einzelne Zugriffe auf das System erfolgen über einen Web-Browser, wobei Suchergebnisse grafisch aufberei tet werden. Damit eine Suche erfolgreich ist, müssen die Archivbestände exakt klassifiziert sein. Mit einem Werkzeug namens Piclasso beschleunigt das Programm die Verschlagwortung von bereits vorhandenen Filmen, indem es deren Klassifizierung sozusagen lernt und auf neu hinzukommendes Material automatisch anwendet. Der Archivar hat dabei aber jederzeit die Wahl, ob er einen Vorschlag übernimmt oder nicht. Zudem kann der Nutzer nicht nurtext-, sondern auch bildbezogen suchen.
  17. Düro, M.; Schweibenz, W.: Metadaten für Museen (2002) 0.00 
    0.002145904 = product of:
  0.017167233 = sum of:
    0.017167233 = weight(_text_:information in 1334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.017167233 = score(doc=1334,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 1334, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1334)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 53(2002) H.6, S.339-346
  18. Wolters, C.: Fragen der Terminologie bei der EDV-gestützten Bestandserschließung im Museum (1991) 0.00 
    0.0018393464 = product of:
  0.014714771 = sum of:
    0.014714771 = weight(_text_:information in 6102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014714771 = score(doc=6102,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 6102, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6102)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Wissenschaftliche Information im europäischen Rahmen: 23. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB / Sektion 5 im DBV, 13.-16.3.1991 in München
  19. Wolters, C.: Objektdokumentation im Museum (1990) 0.00 
    0.0018393464 = product of:
  0.014714771 = sum of:
    0.014714771 = weight(_text_:information in 4317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014714771 = score(doc=4317,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4317, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4317)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Grundlagen der praktischen Information und Dokumentation: ein Handbuch zur Einführung in die fachliche Informationsarbeit. 3. Aufl. Hrsg.: M. Buder u.a. Bd.1
  20. When museum informatics meets the World Wide Web (2000) 0.00 
    0.0018393464 = product of:
  0.014714771 = sum of:
    0.014714771 = weight(_text_:information in 4286) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014714771 = score(doc=4286,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.036014426 = queryNorm
        0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 4286, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4286)
  0.125 = coord(1/8)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.1, S.1-49

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 34
  • m 2
  • s 2
  • x 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications