Search (306 results, page 1 of 16)

  • × theme_ss:"Suchoberflächen"
  1. Wolff, C.: Graphisches Faktenretrieval mit Liniendiagrammen : Gestaltung und Evaluierung eines experimentellen Rechercheverfahrens auf der Grundlage kognitiver Theorien der Graphenwahrnehmung (1996) 0.05
    0.047860682 = product of:
      0.12762849 = sum of:
        0.010404914 = weight(_text_:information in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010404914 = score(doc=2764,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
        0.030894 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030894 = score(doc=2764,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
        0.08632957 = weight(_text_:modell in 2764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08632957 = score(doc=2764,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21656582 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.39862972 = fieldWeight in 2764, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2764)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Das vorliegende Buch befaßt sich mit der theoretischen Begründung, Gestaltung und empirischen Bewertung eines Datenbankzugangs durch graphisches Retrieval. Der Autor stellt das Informationssystem Wing-Graph vor, das am Beispiel Werkstoffdaten die Veränderung von Liniendiagrammen durch graphische Aktionen in der benutzeroberfläche zur Recherche nach numerischer Information erlaubt. Darunter ist eine graphische Recherchesprache zu verstehen, mit der man visuelles Denken direkt für die Suche nutzen kann. Der Autor entwickelt auf der Basis kognitionspsychologischer Erkenntnisse über Wahrnehmung und Interpretation von Informationsgraphiken ein Modell des graphischen Retrieval, in dem 3 wichtige Aspekte der Interaktion mit graphischer Information vereinigt sind: die visuelle Vorstellungsfähigkeit, der Handlungsaspekt der Mensch-Maschine-Interaktion und die Systemfunktionalität einer graphischen Datenbankschnittstelle. Im Vergleich mit traditionellen Abfragesprachen stehen in Wing-Graph einfache, aber leistungsfähige graphische Operationen zur Verfügung, die das visuelle Denken des Benutzers operationalisieren. Die Generalisierbarkeit des Ansatzes für andere Domänen wird untersucht und in exemplarischer Weise an Wirtschaftsdaten überprüft
  2. Gopinath, M.A.: Information retrieval : a confluence of models, techniques and tools into a process (1992) 0.04
    0.03776759 = product of:
      0.100713566 = sum of:
        0.021238944 = weight(_text_:information in 5284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021238944 = score(doc=5284,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 5284, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5284)
        0.06306212 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06306212 = score(doc=5284,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 5284, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5284)
        0.016412502 = product of:
          0.049237505 = sum of:
            0.049237505 = weight(_text_:29 in 5284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049237505 = score(doc=5284,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 5284, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5284)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the basic premises, components, search characteristics, user interfaces, design models and design features of information retrieval. Discusses computer assisted information retrieval, examines current research areas and considers future research areas, trends, and possibilities
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:20:29
  3. Eibl, M.: Visualisierung im Document Retrieval : Theoretische und praktische Zusammenführung von Softwareergonomie und Graphik Design (2000) 0.04
    0.03560551 = product of:
      0.09494802 = sum of:
        0.004291808 = weight(_text_:information in 2802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004291808 = score(doc=2802,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.06788416 = fieldWeight in 2802, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2802)
        0.040297296 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040297296 = score(doc=2802,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.36990163 = fieldWeight in 2802, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2802)
        0.050358918 = weight(_text_:modell in 2802) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.050358918 = score(doc=2802,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21656582 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.232534 = fieldWeight in 2802, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2802)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Content
    Ausgangspunkt der vorliegenden Arbeit ist die Fragestellung, wie Anwender von Document Retrieval-Systemen bei der Formulierung einer Anfrage unterstützt werden können. Bei der Beantwortung dieser Frage gilt es zunächst, die verschiedenen Modelle des Document Retrieval auf ihre Stärken und Schwächen hin zu untersuchen. Es werden hier drei exemplarische Retrieval-Modelle herausgegriffen, die sich in ihrer Recherchegrundlage und Relevanzbehandlung stark voneinander unterscheiden: das Boolesche, das probabilistische und das vage Retrieval-Modell. Um den Recherchezugang beim Einsatz dieser Retrieval-Modelle anwenderfreundlich zu gestalten, wird auf das Mittel der Visualisierung zurückgegriffen. In ihr wird eine gute Möglichkeit gesehen, mit komplexer Information umzugehen, da sie im Gegensatz zu textbasierten Präsentationsformen der optisch ausgerichteten menschlichen Kognition sehr weit entgegenkommen kann. Jedoch zeigen zahlreiche Beispiele, dass Visualisierung keinesfalls als Allheilmittel gelten kann, sondern im Gegenteil sogar zu einer Komplexitätssteigerung der Materie führen kann. Eine genauere Analyse bereits bestehender Ansätze weist denn auch softwareergonomische Probleme nach und läßt die Neukonzeption einer Visualisierung aus softwareergonomischer Sicht notwendig erscheinen. Neben softwareergonomischen Überlegungen fließen auch Aspekte des Graphik Design in die Konzeption der Visualisierung mit ein. Dies ist insofern ein Novum, als beide Schulen einander bislang weitgehend ignorierten. Mit Hilfe des Graphik Design kann der Visualisierung eine ansprechendere Gestaltung gegeben werden, die eine erhöhte Anwenderakzeptanz bewirkt. Um die Kooperation von Softwareergonomie und Graphik Design auf eine allgemeingültige Basis stellen zu können, wird auch eine theoretische Zusammenführung vorgeschlagen. Auf der Basis dieser Vorüberlegungen wird eine Visualisierung vorgestellt, welche Aspekte der drei Retrieval-Modelle integriert: In ihrer Grundkonzeption ermöglicht sie Boolesche Recherche. In zwei Erweiterungen werden ein probabilistisches Ranking-Verfahren sowie die Möglichkeit der Erweiterung der Ergebnismenge durch vage Methoden zur Verfügung gestellt. Optisch verfolgt die Viz, sualisierung ein minimalistisches Design. Es werden zu eingegebenen Suchkriterien sämtliche möglichen Kombinationen mit der entsprechenden Anzahl der gefundenen Dokumente angezeigt. Die Codierung der Kombinationen erfolgt dabei rein über die Farbgebung, die durch die Farben der enthaltenen Suchkriterien bestimmt wird. Je nachdem, welche Erweiterung verwendet wird, verändert sich die Gestaltung der Visualisierung: Wird das probabilistische Rankigverfahren eingesetzt, so wird die Position der Kombinationen auf dem Bildschirm neu berechnet. Wird vages Retrieval eingesetzt, so erhalten die erweiterten Mengen ein neues graphisches Element. Um die Güte der Visualisierung zu ermitteln, wird sie in einem Nutzertest evaluiert. Es werden klassische Retrieval-Maße wie Recall und Precision ermittelt sowie in einem Fragebogen die Anwenderakzeptanz eruiert. Die Ergebnisse des Tests untermauern die zwei grundlegenden Thesen dieser Arbeit: Visualisierung ist ein sinnvolles Mittel, die Schwierigkeiten der Interaktion mit Document Retrieval-Systemen zu minimieren. Und die Integration von Softwareergonomie und Graphik Design ist nicht nur sowohl theoretisch als auch praktisch möglich, sondern in der Tat auch vorteilhaft
  4. Fieldhouse, M.; Hancock-Beaulieu, M.: ¬The design of a graphical user interface for a highly interactive information retrieval system (1996) 0.03
    0.031215616 = product of:
      0.08324164 = sum of:
        0.01486726 = weight(_text_:information in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01486726 = score(doc=6958,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
        0.056988988 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056988988 = score(doc=6958,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.5231199 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
        0.0113854 = product of:
          0.0341562 = sum of:
            0.0341562 = weight(_text_:22 in 6958) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0341562 = score(doc=6958,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6958, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6958)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Reports on the design of a GUI for the Okapi 'best match' retrieval system developed at the Centre for Interactive Systems Research, City University, UK, for online library catalogues. The X-Windows interface includes an interactive query expansion (IQE) facilty which involves the user in the selection of query terms to reformulate a search. Presents the design rationale, based on a game board metaphor, and describes the features of each of the stages of the search interaction. Reports on the early operational field trial and discusses relevant evaluation issues and objectives
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 16th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Drymen, Scotland, 22-23 Mar 94. Ed.: R. Leon
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  5. Laegreid, J.A.: SIFT: a Norwegian information retrieval system (1993) 0.03
    0.030169774 = product of:
      0.08045273 = sum of:
        0.016991155 = weight(_text_:information in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016991155 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
        0.05044969 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05044969 = score(doc=7701,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
        0.013011887 = product of:
          0.03903566 = sum of:
            0.03903566 = weight(_text_:22 in 7701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03903566 = score(doc=7701,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 7701, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7701)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Describes SIFT (Search in Free Text) an information retrieval system originally developed for administering governmental documents in Norway but which is now being applied alsewhere. SIFT handles structured information well. A library system, SIFT-BIBL, is now available. SIFT's retrieval engine and search facilities are powerful. Its user interface is limited but being imporved. An application programmer interface has been released which will allow programmers to develop their own interface. A Windows-based- client-server version is now being beta tested
    Date
    23. 1.1999 19:22:09
  6. Boyack, K.W.; Wylie,B.N.; Davidson, G.S.: Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology : Domain Visualizations (2002) 0.03
    0.02687746 = product of:
      0.07167322 = sum of:
        0.012262309 = weight(_text_:information in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012262309 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
        0.036408927 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036408927 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
        0.023001982 = product of:
          0.069005944 = sum of:
            0.069005944 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.069005944 = score(doc=1352,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Date
    22. 2.2003 17:25:39
    22. 2.2003 18:17:40
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  7. Hemmje, M.: ¬Eine inhaltsdorientierte, intuitive 3D-Benutzerschnittstelle für Information-Retrieval-Systeme (1993) 0.03
    0.025290318 = product of:
      0.10116127 = sum of:
        0.025486732 = weight(_text_:information in 1935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025486732 = score(doc=1935,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 1935, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1935)
        0.07567454 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1935) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07567454 = score(doc=1935,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.6946405 = fieldWeight in 1935, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1935)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Source
    Information Retrieval '93: von der Modellierung zur Anwendung: Proceedings der 1. Tagung 'Information Retrieval'93'. Hrsg.: G. Knorz u.a
  8. Sacco, G.M.: Dynamic taxonomies and guided searches (2006) 0.03
    0.02512937 = product of:
      0.067011654 = sum of:
        0.01486726 = weight(_text_:information in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01486726 = score(doc=5295,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.23515764 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
        0.036043 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.036043 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
        0.01610139 = product of:
          0.048304167 = sum of:
            0.048304167 = weight(_text_:22 in 5295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.048304167 = score(doc=5295,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.38301262 = fieldWeight in 5295, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5295)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    A new search paradigm, in which the primary user activity is the guided exploration of a complex information space rather than the retrieval of items based on precise specifications, is proposed. The author claims that this paradigm is the norm in most practical applications, and that solutions based on traditional search methods are not effective in this context. He then presents a solution based on dynamic taxonomies, a knowledge management model that effectively guides users to reach their goal while giving them total freedom in exploring the information base. Applications, benefits, and current research are discussed.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 17:56:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.792-796
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  9. Chowdhury, S.; Chowdhury, G.G.: Using DDC to create a visual knowledge map as an aid to online information retrieval (2004) 0.02
    0.02436393 = product of:
      0.06497048 = sum of:
        0.01471477 = weight(_text_:information in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01471477 = score(doc=2643,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.23274568 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
        0.04369071 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04369071 = score(doc=2643,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.40105084 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
        0.0065650004 = product of:
          0.019695 = sum of:
            0.019695 = weight(_text_:29 in 2643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.019695 = score(doc=2643,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1266875 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2643, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2643)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Content
    1. Introduction Web search engines and digital libraries usually expect the users to use search terms that most accurately represent their information needs. Finding the most appropriate search terms to represent an information need is an age old problem in information retrieval. Keyword or phrase search may produce good search results as long as the search terms or phrase(s) match those used by the authors and have been chosen for indexing by the concerned information retrieval system. Since this does not always happen, a large number of false drops are produced by information retrieval systems. The retrieval results become worse in very large systems that deal with millions of records, such as the Web search engines and digital libraries. Vocabulary control tools are used to improve the performance of text retrieval systems. Thesauri, the most common type of vocabulary control tool used in information retrieval, appeared in the late fifties, designed for use with the emerging post-coordinate indexing systems of that time. They are used to exert terminology control in indexing, and to aid in searching by allowing the searcher to select appropriate search terms. A large volume of literature exists describing the design features, and experiments with the use, of thesauri in various types of information retrieval systems (see for example, Furnas et.al., 1987; Bates, 1986, 1998; Milstead, 1997, and Shiri et al., 2002).
    Date
    29. 8.2004 13:37:50
    Source
    Knowledge organization and the global information society: Proceedings of the 8th International ISKO Conference 13-16 July 2004, London, UK. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  10. Wilson, M.: Interfaces for information retrieval (2011) 0.02
    0.024091033 = product of:
      0.09636413 = sum of:
        0.024278132 = weight(_text_:information in 549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024278132 = score(doc=549,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 549, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=549)
        0.072086 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072086 = score(doc=549,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.6617001 = fieldWeight in 549, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=549)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Source
    Interactive information seeking, behaviour and retrieval. Eds.: Ruthven, I. u. D. Kelly
  11. Stempfhuber, M.: Objektorientierte Dynamische Benutzungsoberflächen - ODIN : Behandlung semantischer und struktureller Heterogenität in Informationssystemen mit den Mitteln der Softwareergonomie (2003) 0.02
    0.02342174 = product of:
      0.09368696 = sum of:
        0.0073573855 = weight(_text_:information in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0073573855 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
        0.08632957 = weight(_text_:modell in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08632957 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21656582 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.39862972 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Integrierten Informationssystemen kommt bei der Informationsversorgung von Wissenschaft und Praxis eine immer stärkere Bedeutung zu. Die aktuell stattfindende Integration der vom Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung und Deutscher Forschungsgemeinschaft geförderten Informationsverbünde und Virtuellen Fachbibliotheken in das deutsche Wissenschaftsportal vascoda zeigt dies deutlich. Dabei stellt die Unterschiedlichkeit der verfügbaren Datenbestände bezüglich ihrer formalen Struktur und inhaltlichen Erschließung die Entwickler von Informationssystemen vor neue Herausforderungen. Der vorliegende Forschungsbericht beschreibt ODIN - ein Modell für die Gestaltung von grafischen Benutzungsoberflächen, das ein abgestimmtes Bündel von Konzepten und Oberflächenelementen zur Behandlung von Heterogenität darstellt. ODIN führt zum einen eine neue Syntax für adaptive und adaptierbare Benutzungsoberflächen ein, die dem Nutzer sowohl auf seinem Weg vom Anfänger zum Experten als auch in unterschiedlichen Kontexten einen konsistenten und erwartungskonformen Interaktionsmodus bieten soll. Zum anderen ermöglicht ODIN die Exploration und aktive Nutzung von Metadaten über die Heterogenität in einem Informationssystem und integriert unterschiedliche Verfahren zur Heterogenitätsbehandlung mit den informationellen Prozessen des Nutzers.
    Theme
    Information Gateway
  12. Perspectives on visual information retrieval interfaces (1999) 0.02
    0.021818683 = product of:
      0.08727473 = sum of:
        0.025486732 = weight(_text_:information in 3917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025486732 = score(doc=3917,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.40312737 = fieldWeight in 3917, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3917)
        0.061788 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061788 = score(doc=3917,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 3917, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3917)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    A special topic issue devoted to visual information retrieval interfaces
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.9, S.789-837
  13. Krause, J.: ¬Das WOB-Modell zur softwareergonomischen Gestaltung grafischer Oberflächen (1994) 0.02
    0.021582393 = product of:
      0.17265914 = sum of:
        0.17265914 = weight(_text_:modell in 111) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17265914 = score(doc=111,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.21656582 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.79725945 = fieldWeight in 111, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.0133076 = idf(docFreq=293, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=111)
      0.125 = coord(1/8)
    
  14. Rorvig, M.E.; Lunin, L.F.: Introduction and overview : visualization, retrieval, and knowledge (1999) 0.02
    0.020649457 = product of:
      0.08259783 = sum of:
        0.020809827 = weight(_text_:information in 3918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020809827 = score(doc=3918,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 3918, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3918)
        0.061788 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.061788 = score(doc=3918,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.5671716 = fieldWeight in 3918, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3918)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Introduction to a special topic issue devoted to visual information retrieval interfaces
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.9, S.790-793
  15. Lin, S.-j.: Human-computer interaction research in information retrieval (2009) 0.02
    0.02057085 = product of:
      0.0822834 = sum of:
        0.024029119 = weight(_text_:information in 3786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024029119 = score(doc=3786,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.38007212 = fieldWeight in 3786, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3786)
        0.058254283 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3786) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058254283 = score(doc=3786,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 3786, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3786)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Human-computer interaction is a very important topic in studying computerized information retrieval systems, as it takes into account both the human searchers and the information system features. This entry surveys the major research streams and applications of interactive information seeking and retrieval. It also presents how the expectations and requirements for interactive information seeking and retrieval have been expanded and what the challenges are ahead for evaluating such systems.
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
  16. Komlodi, A.; Soergel, D.; Marchionini, G.: Search histories for user support in user interfaces (2006) 0.02
    0.019655287 = product of:
      0.0524141 = sum of:
        0.020809827 = weight(_text_:information in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020809827 = score(doc=5298,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.3291521 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
        0.021845357 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021845357 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
        0.009758915 = product of:
          0.029276744 = sum of:
            0.029276744 = weight(_text_:22 in 5298) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029276744 = score(doc=5298,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12611638 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.036014426 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5298, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5298)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    The authors describe user interface tools based on search histories to support legal information seekers. The design of the tools was informed by the results of a user study (Komlodi, 2002a) that examined the use of human memory, external memory aids, and search histories in legal information seeking and derived interface design recommendations for information storage and retrieval systems. The data collected were analyzed to identify potential task areas where search histories can support information seeking and use. The results show that many information-seeking tasks can take advantage of automatically and manually recorded history information. These findings encouraged the design of user interface tools building on search history information: direct search history displays, history-enabled scratchpad facilities, and organized results collection tools.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:04:19
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57(2006) no.6, S.803-897
  17. Nelson, M.J.: ¬The design of a hypertext interface for information retrieval (1991) 0.02
    0.019468494 = product of:
      0.077873975 = sum of:
        0.019619694 = weight(_text_:information in 4805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019619694 = score(doc=4805,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 4805, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4805)
        0.058254283 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.058254283 = score(doc=4805,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 4805, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4805)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    Hypertext for multi-media and full-text documents is rapidly developed on all fronts. For bibliographic information retrieval the applications are promising but pose several difficulties. Describes work conducted at the School of Library and Information Science at Univ. of Western Ontario the objective of which is to add the capability of a browsing search to an existing OPAC through the use of Windowed Hypertext Interface for Zippy Retrieval and Display (WHIZRD) software. Discusses the underlying retrieval capabilities of the system. Examines design problems and solutions and outlines future enhancements
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.2, S.1-12
  18. Hildreth, C.R.: Intelligent interfaces and retrieval methods for subject searching in bibliographic retrieval systems (1989) 0.02
    0.018831106 = product of:
      0.07532442 = sum of:
        0.012262309 = weight(_text_:information in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012262309 = score(doc=2306,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
        0.06306212 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06306212 = score(doc=2306,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.5788671 = fieldWeight in 2306, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2306)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Series
    Advances in library information technology; 2
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  19. Johnson, C.; Dunlop, M.D.: Subjectivity and notions of time and value in interactive information retrieval (1998) 0.02
    0.018096294 = product of:
      0.07238518 = sum of:
        0.021935485 = weight(_text_:information in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021935485 = score(doc=3611,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
        0.05044969 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05044969 = score(doc=3611,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 3611, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3611)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    In the short term, technological advances will not solve the problems of information saturation and electronic gridlock on the Internet. Advocates interface design techniques as the only effective means of addressing the usability problems that frustrate interaction with Internet resources. Collaborative approaches to information retrieval, where search engines are augmented by advice from human experts, can reduce the problems of electronic gridlock and information saturation
    Footnote
    Contribution to a special section devoted to human computer interaction and information retrieval
  20. Fox, K.L.; Frieder, O.; Knepper, M.M.; Snowberg, E.J.: SENTINEL: a multiple engine information retrieval and visualization system (1999) 0.02
    0.017999494 = product of:
      0.07199798 = sum of:
        0.02102548 = weight(_text_:information in 3547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02102548 = score(doc=3547,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.06322253 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.3325631 = fieldWeight in 3547, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3547)
        0.0509725 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3547) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0509725 = score(doc=3547,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.10894058 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.036014426 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 3547, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3547)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Abstract
    We describe a prototype Information Retrieval system; SENTINEL, under development at Harris Corporation's Information Systems Division. SENTINEL is a fusion of multiple information retrieval technologies, integrating n-grams, a vector space model, and a neural network training rule. One of the primary advantages of SENTINEL is its 3-dimensional visualization capability that is based fully upon the mathematical representation of information with SENTINEL. The 3-dimensional visualization capability provides users with an intuitive understanding, with relevance/query refinement techniques athat can be better utilized, resulting in higher retrieval precision
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 50(1999) no.7, S.616-625

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 262
  • m 28
  • s 10
  • el 3
  • r 3
  • x 3
  • p 1
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications