-
Li, L.; Shang, Y.; Zhang, W.: Improvement of HITS-based algorithms on Web documents
0.57
0.5693066 = product of:
0.8539599 = sum of:
0.046703033 = product of:
0.14010909 = sum of:
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:3a in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=2514,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.19814417 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19814417 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.014680246 = product of:
0.029360492 = sum of:
0.029360492 = weight(_text_:web in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029360492 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.19814417 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19814417 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.19814417 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19814417 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.19814417 = weight(_text_:2f in 2514) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19814417 = score(doc=2514,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 2514, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2514)
0.6666667 = coord(6/9)
- Content
- Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdelab.csd.auth.gr%2F~dimitris%2Fcourses%2Fir_spring06%2Fpage_rank_computing%2Fp527-li.pdf. Vgl. auch: http://www2002.org/CDROM/refereed/643/.
- Source
- WWW '02: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on World Wide Web, May 7-11, 2002, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
-
Hotho, A.; Bloehdorn, S.: Data Mining 2004 : Text classification by boosting weak learners based on terms and concepts (2004)
0.49
0.4895892 = product of:
0.62947184 = sum of:
0.046703033 = product of:
0.14010909 = sum of:
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:3a in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.010380501 = product of:
0.020761002 = sum of:
0.020761002 = weight(_text_:web in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020761002 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.011951938 = product of:
0.023903877 = sum of:
0.023903877 = weight(_text_:22 in 562) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023903877 = score(doc=562,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 562, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=562)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.7777778 = coord(7/9)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://www.google.de/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CEAQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fciteseerx.ist.psu.edu%2Fviewdoc%2Fdownload%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.91.4940%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf&ei=dOXrUMeIDYHDtQahsIGACg&usg=AFQjCNHFWVh6gNPvnOrOS9R3rkrXCNVD-A&sig2=5I2F5evRfMnsttSgFF9g7Q&bvm=bv.1357316858,d.Yms.
- Date
- 8. 1.2013 10:22:32
-
Suchenwirth, L.: Sacherschliessung in Zeiten von Corona : neue Herausforderungen und Chancen (2019)
0.47
0.46626657 = product of:
0.8392798 = sum of:
0.046703033 = product of:
0.14010909 = sum of:
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:3a in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.19814417 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19814417 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.19814417 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19814417 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.19814417 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19814417 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.19814417 = weight(_text_:2f in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.19814417 = score(doc=484,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7948135 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Footnote
- https%3A%2F%2Fjournals.univie.ac.at%2Findex.php%2Fvoebm%2Farticle%2Fdownload%2F5332%2F5271%2F&usg=AOvVaw2yQdFGHlmOwVls7ANCpTii.
-
Schrodt, R.: Tiefen und Untiefen im wissenschaftlichen Sprachgebrauch (2008)
0.45
0.4497329 = product of:
0.8095192 = sum of:
0.06227071 = product of:
0.18681212 = sum of:
0.18681212 = weight(_text_:3a in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18681212 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.18681212 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18681212 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.18681212 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18681212 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.18681212 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18681212 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.18681212 = weight(_text_:2f in 140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18681212 = score(doc=140,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 140, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=140)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Content
- Vgl. auch: https://studylibde.com/doc/13053640/richard-schrodt. Vgl. auch: http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2FGermanistik%2Fschrodt%2Fvorlesung%2Fwissenschaftssprache.doc&usg=AOvVaw1lDLDR6NFf1W0-oC9mEUJf.
-
Popper, K.R.: Three worlds : the Tanner lecture on human values. Deliverd at the University of Michigan, April 7, 1978 (1978)
0.45
0.4497329 = product of:
0.8095192 = sum of:
0.06227071 = product of:
0.18681212 = sum of:
0.18681212 = weight(_text_:3a in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18681212 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.18681212 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18681212 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.18681212 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18681212 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.18681212 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18681212 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.18681212 = weight(_text_:2f in 230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18681212 = score(doc=230,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 230, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=230)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Ftannerlectures.utah.edu%2F_documents%2Fa-to-z%2Fp%2Fpopper80.pdf&usg=AOvVaw3f4QRTEH-OEBmoYr2J_c7H
-
Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013)
0.42
0.42282733 = product of:
0.76108915 = sum of:
0.18681212 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18681212 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.013840669 = product of:
0.027681338 = sum of:
0.027681338 = weight(_text_:web in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027681338 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.18681212 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18681212 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.18681212 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18681212 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.18681212 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.18681212 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Content
- Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
-
Axelos, C.; Flasch, K.; Schepers, H.; Kuhlen, R.; Romberg, R.; Zimmermann, R.: Allgemeines/Besonderes (1971-2007)
0.41
0.41096568 = product of:
0.9246728 = sum of:
0.2311682 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2311682 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.2311682 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2311682 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.2311682 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2311682 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.2311682 = weight(_text_:2f in 4031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.2311682 = score(doc=4031,freq=4.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.92728245 = fieldWeight in 4031, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4031)
0.44444445 = coord(4/9)
- Footnote
- DOI: 10.24894/HWPh.5033. Vgl. unter: https://www.schwabeonline.ch/schwabe-xaveropp/elibrary/start.xav#__elibrary__%2F%2F*%5B%40attr_id%3D%27verw.allgemeinesbesonderes%27%5D__1515856414979.
-
Vetere, G.; Lenzerini, M.: Models for semantic interoperability in service-oriented architectures (2005)
0.39
0.3935163 = product of:
0.7083293 = sum of:
0.05448687 = product of:
0.16346061 = sum of:
0.16346061 = weight(_text_:3a in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16346061 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16346061 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16346061 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.16346061 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16346061 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.16346061 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16346061 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.16346061 = weight(_text_:2f in 306) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16346061 = score(doc=306,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.65568775 = fieldWeight in 306, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=306)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Content
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=5386707&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fxpls%2Fabs_all.jsp%3Farnumber%3D5386707.
-
Mas, S.; Marleau, Y.: Proposition of a faceted classification model to support corporate information organization and digital records management (2009)
0.34
0.33729967 = product of:
0.6071394 = sum of:
0.046703033 = product of:
0.14010909 = sum of:
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:3a in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 2918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=2918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 2918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2918)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?reload=true&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F4755313%2F4755314%2F04755480.pdf%3Farnumber%3D4755480&authDecision=-203.
-
Zeng, Q.; Yu, M.; Yu, W.; Xiong, J.; Shi, Y.; Jiang, M.: Faceted hierarchy : a new graph type to organize scientific concepts and a construction method (2019)
0.34
0.33729967 = product of:
0.6071394 = sum of:
0.046703033 = product of:
0.14010909 = sum of:
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:3a in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Content
- Vgl.: https%3A%2F%2Faclanthology.org%2FD19-5317.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0ZZFyq5wWTtNTvNkrvjlGA.
-
Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022)
0.34
0.33729967 = product of:
0.6071394 = sum of:
0.046703033 = product of:
0.14010909 = sum of:
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.14010909 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.14010909 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Source
- https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
-
Donsbach, W.: Wahrheit in den Medien : über den Sinn eines methodischen Objektivitätsbegriffes (2001)
0.28
0.28108308 = product of:
0.5059495 = sum of:
0.038919196 = product of:
0.11675758 = sum of:
0.11675758 = weight(_text_:3a in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11675758 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11675758 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11675758 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11675758 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11675758 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Source
- Politische Meinung. 381(2001) Nr.1, S.65-74 [https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dgfe.de%2Ffileadmin%2FOrdnerRedakteure%2FSektionen%2FSek02_AEW%2FKWF%2FPublikationen_Reihe_1989-2003%2FBand_17%2FBd_17_1994_355-406_A.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2KcbRsHy5UQ9QRIUyuOLNi]
-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.28
0.28108308 = product of:
0.5059495 = sum of:
0.038919196 = product of:
0.11675758 = sum of:
0.11675758 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11675758 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11675758 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11675758 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11675758 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.11675758 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.11675758 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24929643 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.5555556 = coord(5/9)
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
-
Schweibenz, W.: Eine Usability-Studie zu Terminologieproblemen bei der Arbeit mit einem Hilfeagenten und einer Online-Dokumentation : Wie hilfreich ist ein Hilfeagent? (2000)
0.06
0.05614743 = product of:
0.25266343 = sum of:
0.23871951 = weight(_text_:benutzerfreundlichkeit in 4831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.23871951 = score(doc=4831,freq=6.0), product of:
0.2289144 = queryWeight, product of:
7.7848644 = idf(docFreq=49, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
1.0428331 = fieldWeight in 4831, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
7.7848644 = idf(docFreq=49, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4831)
0.013943928 = product of:
0.027887857 = sum of:
0.027887857 = weight(_text_:22 in 4831) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027887857 = score(doc=4831,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4831, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4831)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Terminologieprobleme spielen eine wichtige Rolle bei der Beutzung von Softwaredokumentationen in gedruckter und elektronischer Form. Vor allem beim Zugriff auf Hilfeinformationen und bei der Umsetzung von Hilfeanweisungen treten terminologiebedingte Schwierigkeiten auf, die die Arbeit mit Software erschweren und ihre Benutzerfreundlichkeit verringern. Hilfeagenten könnten helfen, die Benutzerfreundlichkeit von Softwaredokumentationen zu verbessern. In einer Usability-Studie wurde in Benutzertests mit lautem Denken untersucht, wie sich terminologiebedingte Probleme auf die Arbeit mit dem Hilfeagenten Karl Klammer von Microsoft Office 97 auswirken und wie sie die Benutzerfreundlichkeit der Online-Dokumentation verringern
- Date
- 22. 6.2000 12:59:53
-
Fahrenkrog, G.; Marahrens, O.; Bittner, E.: Des Surfers Leid, des Surfers Freud : Web usability und wie man sie testet (2002)
0.04
0.041154522 = product of:
0.18519534 = sum of:
0.027681338 = product of:
0.055362675 = sum of:
0.055362675 = weight(_text_:web in 264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055362675 = score(doc=264,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 264, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=264)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.157514 = weight(_text_:benutzerfreundlichkeit in 264) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.157514 = score(doc=264,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2289144 = queryWeight, product of:
7.7848644 = idf(docFreq=49, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.6880913 = fieldWeight in 264, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.7848644 = idf(docFreq=49, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=264)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Web usability befasst sich mit der Benutzerfreundlichkeit und Benutzbarkeit von Internet-Seiten. Eine gute Usability trägt zur Zufriedenheit der Besucher bei und kann somit den Erfolg einer Web-Site nachhaltig beeinflussen. Es werden verschiedene Methoden zum Testen der Usability einer Web-Site vorgestellt
-
Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Internet-Suchwerkzeuge im Vergleich (IV) : Relevance Ranking nach "Popularität" von Webseiten: Google (2001)
0.04
0.03585235 = product of:
0.16133557 = sum of:
0.12244281 = sum of:
0.035959117 = weight(_text_:web in 5771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035959117 = score(doc=5771,freq=6.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 5771, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5771)
0.086483695 = weight(_text_:seite in 5771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.086483695 = score(doc=5771,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16469958 = queryWeight, product of:
5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.52509964 = fieldWeight in 5771, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5771)
0.038892757 = product of:
0.077785514 = sum of:
0.077785514 = weight(_text_:bewertung in 5771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077785514 = score(doc=5771,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18575147 = queryWeight, product of:
6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.41876122 = fieldWeight in 5771, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5771)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- In unserem Retrievaltest von Suchwerkzeugen im World Wide Web (Password 11/2000) schnitt die Suchmaschine Google am besten ab. Im Vergleich zu anderen Search Engines setzt Google kaum auf Informationslinguistik, sondern auf Algorithmen, die sich aus den Besonderheiten der Web-Dokumente ableiten lassen. Kernstück der informationsstatistischen Technik ist das "PageRank"- Verfahren (benannt nach dem Entwickler Larry Page), das aus der Hypertextstruktur des Web die "Popularität" von Seiten anhand ihrer ein- und ausgehenden Links berechnet. Google besticht durch das Angebot intuitiv verstehbarer Suchbildschirme sowie durch einige sehr nützliche "Kleinigkeiten" wie die Angabe des Rangs einer Seite, Highlighting, Suchen in der Seite, Suchen innerhalb eines Suchergebnisses usw., alles verstaut in einer eigenen Befehlsleiste innerhalb des Browsers. Ähnlich wie RealNames bietet Google mit dem Produkt "AdWords" den Aufkauf von Suchtermen an. Nach einer Reihe von nunmehr vier Password-Artikeln über InternetSuchwerkzeugen im Vergleich wollen wir abschließend zu einer Bewertung kommen. Wie ist der Stand der Technik bei Directories und Search Engines aus informationswissenschaftlicher Sicht einzuschätzen? Werden die "typischen" Internetnutzer, die ja in der Regel keine Information Professionals sind, adäquat bedient? Und können auch Informationsfachleute von den Suchwerkzeugen profitieren?
-
Spinas, P.: Benutzerfreundlichkeit von ETHICS : Ergebnisse einer Untersuchung des Online-Kataloges der ETH-Bibliothek (1992)
0.04
0.035003114 = product of:
0.315028 = sum of:
0.315028 = weight(_text_:benutzerfreundlichkeit in 491) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.315028 = score(doc=491,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2289144 = queryWeight, product of:
7.7848644 = idf(docFreq=49, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
1.3761826 = fieldWeight in 491, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.7848644 = idf(docFreq=49, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=491)
0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
-
¬Der Erfolg von Google (2003)
0.03
0.03410502 = product of:
0.1534726 = sum of:
0.1275441 = sum of:
0.027681338 = weight(_text_:web in 1407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027681338 = score(doc=1407,freq=8.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 1407, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1407)
0.09986277 = weight(_text_:seite in 1407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09986277 = score(doc=1407,freq=12.0), product of:
0.16469958 = queryWeight, product of:
5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.60633284 = fieldWeight in 1407, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1407)
0.025928505 = product of:
0.05185701 = sum of:
0.05185701 = weight(_text_:bewertung in 1407) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05185701 = score(doc=1407,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18575147 = queryWeight, product of:
6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.27917415 = fieldWeight in 1407, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1407)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Google ist die weltweit größte Suchmaschine und bietet die schnellste und einfachste Informationssuche im Web an. Googles Aufgabe ist die Bereitstellung des besten Suchdienstes im Internet, um die weltweiten Informationen allgemein erreichbar und nutzbar zu machen. Google erreicht über 2 Mrd. Web-Seiten und liefert in meist weniger als einer halben Sekunde relevante Suchergebnisse an Benutzer in aller Welt. Im Augenblick beantwortet Google mehr als 100 Millionen Anfragen pro Tag.
- Content
- "Zwei Stanford-Doktoranden, Larry Page und Sergey Brin, gründeten 1998 Google. Das Unternehmen, das sich in Privatbesitz befindet, gab 1999 bekannt, dass es Eigenkapitalinvestitionen in Höhe von 25 Millionen US$ sicherstellen konnte. Unter den Investoren sind Kleiner Perkins Caufeld & Byers und Sequoia Capital. Google betreibt seinen Dienst auf seiner eigenen, öffentlich zugänglichen Website, www.google.com. Die Firma bietet außerdem unter gemeinsamen Markennamen Informationsdienstleistern Suchlösungen für das Web an. - Die Google-Technologie - Mit einer innovativen Suchtechnik und einer eleganten Benutzeroberfläche setzt sich Google von den Suchmaschinen der ersten Generation ab. Statt nur eine Stichwort- oder Meta-Suchtechnologie zu verwenden, basiert Google auf der zum Patent angemeldeten PageRankTM-Technologie, bei der die wichtigsten Ergebnisse immer zuerst gelistet werden. PageRank unternimmt eine objektive Bewertung der Wichtigkeit von Webseiten, bei der 500 Millionen Variablen und mehr als 2 Milliorden Begriffe verglichen werden. Dabei nutzt PageRank die riesige Link-Struktur des World-Wide-Web als Organisationsmittel. Der Kern der Methode ist dabei, dass Google einen Link von Seite A zu Seite B als ein "Votum" von Seite Afür Seite B interpretiert. Google schätzt die Wichtigkeit einer Seite über dieses Votum ein. Außerdem wird von Google die Seite bewertet, von der das Votum stammt. Googles komplexe, automatische Suchmethoden schließen einen menschlichen Eingriff aus. Im Gegensatzzu anderen Suchmaschinen kannvon Google keine höhere Listung oder eine kommerzielle Veränderung der Ergebnisse gekauft werden. Eine Google-Suche ist ein einfacher, ehrlicher und objektiver Weg, qualitativ hochwertige Websites zu finden."
-
Ankolekar, A.; Krötzsch, M.; Tran, T.; Vrandecic, D.: ¬Die zwei Kulturen (2009)
0.03
0.03390305 = product of:
0.15256372 = sum of:
0.03442823 = product of:
0.06885646 = sum of:
0.06885646 = weight(_text_:web in 4860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06885646 = score(doc=4860,freq=22.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.717526 = fieldWeight in 4860, product of:
4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
22.0 = termFreq=22.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4860)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.1181355 = weight(_text_:benutzerfreundlichkeit in 4860) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.1181355 = score(doc=4860,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2289144 = queryWeight, product of:
7.7848644 = idf(docFreq=49, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.51606846 = fieldWeight in 4860, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
7.7848644 = idf(docFreq=49, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4860)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Abstract
- Oft werden zwei mögliche Entwicklungen des Webs diskutiert - das Web 2.0 und das Semantic Web. Wenn wir diese zwei Visionen für das zukünftige Web unter die Lupe nehmen, dann lässt sich feststellen, dass sich die Ideen in ihrem Kern und ihren Technologien gegenseitig ergänzen. Dementsprechend können und sollen beide Visionen von den Erfahrungen und Stärken der anderen profitieren. Wir glauben daran, dass zukünftige Webanwendungen den Web 2.0-Fokus auf Community und Benutzerfreundlichkeit beibehalten und, darüber hinaus, auch von Technologien des Semantic Web zur Vereinfachung der mashupähnlichen Datenintegration profitieren werden. Auf Basis eines Semantic Blog-Szenarios werden wir hier die Vorteile einer möglichen Kombination von Semantic Web und Web 2.0 illustrieren, die zeitnah realisiert werden kann. Wir werden auch auf technische Probleme eingehen, die bei der Erweiterung dieses Szenarios entstehen. Wir stellen dar, wie aktuelle Entwicklungen in der Semantic Web Forschung diese Probleme angehen können, und setzen zugleich auch Schwerpunkte für die zukünftige Forschung, die in diesem Zusammenhang relevant sind.
- Object
- Web 2.0
- Source
- Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
-
Sixtus, M.: Verirrter Wegweiser : Die Suchmaschine Google findet nicht immer die korrekte Richtung - wie ein ungewöhnlicher Wettbewerb zeigt (2004)
0.03
0.030775176 = product of:
0.1384883 = sum of:
0.0715337 = sum of:
0.010380501 = weight(_text_:web in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010380501 = score(doc=2430,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09596372 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.108171105 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
0.061153203 = weight(_text_:seite in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.061153203 = score(doc=2430,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16469958 = queryWeight, product of:
5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.3713015 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
0.0669546 = sum of:
0.055002663 = weight(_text_:bewertung in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055002663 = score(doc=2430,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18575147 = queryWeight, product of:
6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.2961089 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
6.31699 = idf(docFreq=216, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
0.011951938 = weight(_text_:22 in 2430) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011951938 = score(doc=2430,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10297151 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.02940506 = queryNorm
0.116070345 = fieldWeight in 2430, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2430)
0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
- Content
- Kennen Sie "Nigritude Ultramarine"? Nein? Fragen Sie doch Anil Dash. Oder vielleicht Google - aber dann könnten-Sie ebenfalls bei Dash landen. Der Internetautor ist Sieger eines ungewöhnlichen Wettbewerbs der Online-Werbefirma Darkblue: Einen Monat lang sollten Webseitenmacher Google veräppeln - und dafür sorgen, dass ihre Seite oben steht, wenn Surfer nach dem Phantasiebegriff suchen. Fast eine halbe Million Seiten stehen nun in der Ergebnisliste. Das stärkt Kritiker, die schon lange warnen, Google sei manipulierbar. Zugleich sammelt mit Yahoo und Microsoft die Konkurrenz ihre Kräfte. Die Lage für den Marktführer wird schwieriger - und das just in der Zeit, in der Google an die Börse strebt. Fachleute spekulieren, das Unternehmen wolle noch in diesem Monat seine Aktien über eine Internet-Auktion verkaufen. Die Stärke wird zur Schwäche Googles "Nigritude Ultramarine"-Schwäche ist die Folge einer eigentlichen Stärke: Die Suchmaschine merkt sich die Inhalte von Webseiten - und sie bewertet darüber hinaus deren Wichtigkeit. Als Maßstab prüft sie, wie viele andere Seiten auf die gefundene Adresse verweisen. Die Logik dahinter: Nennen viele Webautoren eine bestimmte Seite, muss sie interessanter sein als andere mit ähnlichem Inhalt. Google schaut zudem nach, mit welchen Begriffen Surfer auf weitere Angebote verwiesen werden - diese Link-Texte sind besonders wichtig für die Bewertung der Zielseiten. Politische Aktivisten nutzen das manchmal aus. Sie sorgen etwa dafür, dass bei einer Suche nach "miserable failure" ("klägliches Versagen") die Biografie von US-Präsident George W. Bush die Ergebnisliste anführt. Auch konservative Internetkenner arbeiten mit dem Trick: Eine Recherche nach "Waffles" (Geschwafel) führt zum Herausforderer John Kerry. Wesentlich ärgerlicher als solche Politik-spielereien sind' die Machenschaften vieler so genannter Search Engines Optimizers, kurz SEO. Der boomende Wirtschaftszweig lebt davon, die Webangebote der Kunden auf Trefferlisten möglichst weit nach oben zu bugsieren. Webmaster aus der Pornobranche nehmen die Grauzonen-Dienstleistungen gerne in Anspruch. Auch professionelle Ebay-Händler und Partner des Webkaufhauses Amazon arbeiten mit Tricks, um ihre Adressen mit allen nur erdenklichen Suchanfragen zu verknüpfen. Die neueste Masche: Die SEO-Branche lässt eine Software auf das Internet los, die automatisiert und massenweise Kommentare schreibt. Die austauschbaren Stellungnahmen der Güteklasse "coole Website" oder "interessanter Text" enthalten einen Verweis zu der Seite, für die geworben werden soll. Das Kalkül dabei: Google findet die Einträge und erhöht die Bewertung der verlinkten Seite. "In einer Nacht sammelten sich Hunderte der Kommentar-Spams in meinem Weblog an", stöhnt der Düsseldorfer Blogger Siggi Becker, "allesamt führten sie zu Porno-Websites des untersten Niveaus." Ihn ärgert der Arbeitsaufwand, um die Roboter-Hinterlassenschaften zu löschen. Und er fügt hinzu: "Man fühlt sich ein wenig beschmutzt."
- Eine Chance für die Konkurrenz - Des einen Dilemma könnte des anderen Chance sein: Schon seit Monaten arbeitet der Software-Riese Microsoft an einer eigenen Suchmaschinen-Technik, um Google Marktanteile abzujagen. Vor wenigen Tagen ging eine Vorabversion der neuen MSN-Suche online. Die Startseite präsentiert sich schlicht und aufgeräumt, auch der Index wirkt aktuell. An der Relevanzbewertung scheint der Redmonder Konzern jedoch noch zu arbeiten. Eine Testsuche nach "Quitten" lieferte als ersten Treffer das Profil eines russischen Nutzers der Tagebuchschreiber-Gemeinschaft Live Journal, während die gleiche Anfrage bei Google zur Website Quitten -fast vergessene Köstlichkeiten der WDR-Sendung Hobbythek führte. Zweifellos die bessere Wahl. Einen Schritt weiter als Microsoft ist der Portalanbieter Yahoo. Bereits seit Februar indiziert er mit einer selbst entwickelten Technik das Netz. Die Qualität der Ergebnisse kann mit dem Marktführer durchaus konkurrieren, wie Fachleute bestätigen. Kein Wunder: Der Algorithmus orientiert sich an der Seitenbewertungstechnik des großen Vorbilds. Auch von grafisch beladenen Seiten nimmt Yahoo wohl Abschied - die neue Abfragemaske wirkt für YahooVerhältnisse geradezu spartanisch. Einen anderen Ansatz, die Recherche im Web zu vereinfachen, probiert das deutsche Portal Web.de. Das "Smart Search" genannte Verfahren blendet neben der Ergebnisliste einen Themenbaum ein, der helfen soll, die Treffer' einzuordnen. Die Anfrage "Koch" liefert beispielsweise die Ergänzungsvorschläge "Kochbuch" und "Rezepte`; aber auch "Robert Koch". Ein "Ministerpräsident" wurde jedoch nicht angeboten, und Begriffe wie "moved" (verschoben) oder "offers" (Angebote) dürften bei der Suche kaum weiterhelfen. Auch fällt die mangelnde Aktualität des Datenbestands negativ auf, den das Karlsruher Unternehmen vom Zulieferer Inktomi bezieht. Sollte die Konkurrenz von Google wieder stärker werden, könnte das möglicherweise auch den Deutschen Bundestag ein wenig beruhigen. Der Unterausschuss des Parlaments für Neue Medien sorgt sich um den Suchmaschinenmarkt. Um Monopolbildungen und Manipulationen vorzubeugen, sinnierte man in Berlin über die Notwendigkeit einer "öffentlich-rechtlichen" Suchmaschine. Besonders die Grünen befürchten eine mögliche Einschränkung des Rechts auf Informationsfreiheit, sollten nur wenige Unternehmen die Recherchen im Internet anbieten."
- Date
- 22. 7.2004 9:40:10
