-
Cerbo II, M.A.: Is there a future for library catalogers? (2011)
0.09
0.089994445 = product of:
0.17998889 = sum of:
0.055239964 = weight(_text_:world in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055239964 = score(doc=1892,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.33973572 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
0.07340356 = weight(_text_:wide in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07340356 = score(doc=1892,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
0.039822727 = weight(_text_:web in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039822727 = score(doc=1892,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
0.011522634 = weight(_text_:information in 1892) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011522634 = score(doc=1892,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1892, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1892)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- Is there a future for the library cataloger? For the past thirty years this debate has increased with the continued growth of online resources and greater access to the World Wide Web. Many are concerned that library administrators believe budgetary resources would be better spent on other matters, leaving library users with an overabundance of electronic information to muddle through on their own. This article focuses on the future of the cataloging profession and its importance to the needs of library patrons.
-
Kneifel, F.: Mit Web 2.0 zum Online-Katalog der nächsten Generation (2009)
0.07
0.0690387 = product of:
0.18410319 = sum of:
0.04882569 = weight(_text_:world in 2919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04882569 = score(doc=2919,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.30028677 = fieldWeight in 2919, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2919)
0.0648802 = weight(_text_:wide in 2919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0648802 = score(doc=2919,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.34615302 = fieldWeight in 2919, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2919)
0.07039731 = weight(_text_:web in 2919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07039731 = score(doc=2919,freq=16.0), product of:
0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 2919, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2919)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Das Web 2.0 hat auch bei Bibliotheksnutzern zu veränderten Erwartungshaltungen an bibliothekarische Online-Angebote wie die Kataloge geführt. Diese waren lange Zeit statische Nachweisinstrumente, die heutzutage über das Angebot reiner Bestandsverzeichnisse hinausgehend verschiedene Web 2.0-Funktionalitäten sowie Zusatzinformationen mittels Kataloganreicherung integrierten sollten, um den Erwartungen der Nutzer zu genügen. Die Ergebnisse einer Online-Umfrage unter Nutzern einer Großstadtbibliothek unterstreichen dies: die Nutzer wünschen sich vielfältige Browsingmöglichkeiten, Google-ähnliche Suchmöglichkeiten, zusätzliche Inhalte und ein personalisier-bares Angebot. Welche Funktionen und Inhalte sollte ein Bibliothekskatalog im Zeitalter des Web 2.0 bieten? Am Beispiel der Stadtbücherei Frankfurt wird dargestellt wie Prinzipien des Web 2.0 - u.a. Nutzerfreundlichkeit und Kollaboration - auf das Online-Angebot übertragbar sind, ohne dabei den Personalaufwand, die rechtliche Absicherung der Bibliothek und Fragen der technischen Implementierung zu vergessen.
- Content
- Zugl.: Berlin, Humboldt-Univ., Masterarbeit, 2008 u.d.T.: Welche Funktionen und Inhalte sollte ein Bibliothekskatalog im Zeitalter des Web 2.0 bieten?
- RSWK
- Online-Katalog / World Wide Web 2.0 / Hochschulschrift
- Subject
- Online-Katalog / World Wide Web 2.0 / Hochschulschrift
-
Report on the future of bibliographic control : draft for public comment (2007)
0.06
0.056711134 = product of:
0.11342227 = sum of:
0.029295415 = weight(_text_:world in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029295415 = score(doc=1271,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.18017207 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.047677018 = weight(_text_:wide in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047677018 = score(doc=1271,freq=6.0), product of:
0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.2543695 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.025865624 = weight(_text_:web in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025865624 = score(doc=1271,freq=6.0), product of:
0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.18735787 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.010584215 = weight(_text_:information in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010584215 = score(doc=1271,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.14252704 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- The future of bibliographic control will be collaborative, decentralized, international in scope, and Web-based. Its realization will occur in cooperation with the private sector, and with the active collaboration of library users. Data will be gathered from multiple sources; change will happen quickly; and bibliographic control will be dynamic, not static. The underlying technology that makes this future possible and necessary-the World Wide Web-is now almost two decades old. Libraries must continue the transition to this future without delay in order to retain their relevance as information providers. The Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control encourages the library community to take a thoughtful and coordinated approach to effecting significant changes in bibliographic control. Such an approach will call for leadership that is neither unitary nor centralized. Nor will the responsibility to provide such leadership fall solely to the Library of Congress (LC). That said, the Working Group recognizes that LC plays a unique role in the library community of the United States, and the directions that LC takes have great impact on all libraries. We also recognize that there are many other institutions and organizations that have the expertise and the capacity to play significant roles in the bibliographic future. Wherever possible, those institutions must step forward and take responsibility for assisting with navigating the transition and for playing appropriate ongoing roles after that transition is complete. To achieve the goals set out in this document, we must look beyond individual libraries to a system wide deployment of resources. We must realize efficiencies in order to be able to reallocate resources from certain lower-value components of the bibliographic control ecosystem into other higher-value components of that same ecosystem. The recommendations in this report are directed at a number of parties, indicated either by their common initialism (e.g., "LC" for Library of Congress, "PCC" for Program for Cooperative Cataloging) or by their general category (e.g., "Publishers," "National Libraries"). When the recommendation is addressed to "All," it is intended for the library community as a whole and its close collaborators.
The Library of Congress must begin by prioritizing the recommendations that are directed in whole or in part at LC. Some define tasks that can be achieved immediately and with moderate effort; others will require analysis and planning that will have to be coordinated broadly and carefully. The Working Group has consciously not associated time frames with any of its recommendations. The recommendations fall into five general areas: 1. Increase the efficiency of bibliographic production for all libraries through increased cooperation and increased sharing of bibliographic records, and by maximizing the use of data produced throughout the entire "supply chain" for information resources. 2. Transfer effort into higher-value activity. In particular, expand the possibilities for knowledge creation by "exposing" rare and unique materials held by libraries that are currently hidden from view and, thus, underused. 3. Position our technology for the future by recognizing that the World Wide Web is both our technology platform and the appropriate platform for the delivery of our standards. Recognize that people are not the only users of the data we produce in the name of bibliographic control, but so too are machine applications that interact with those data in a variety of ways. 4. Position our community for the future by facilitating the incorporation of evaluative and other user-supplied information into our resource descriptions. Work to realize the potential of the FRBR framework for revealing and capitalizing on the various relationships that exist among information resources. 5. Strengthen the library profession through education and the development of metrics that will inform decision-making now and in the future. The Working Group intends what follows to serve as a broad blueprint for the Library of Congress and its colleagues in the library and information technology communities for extending and promoting access to information resources.
-
Hillmann, D.I.: "Parallel universes" or meaningful relationships : envisioning a future for the OPAC and the net (1996)
0.04
0.044245616 = product of:
0.1179883 = sum of:
0.055239964 = weight(_text_:world in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055239964 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.33973572 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.039822727 = weight(_text_:web in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039822727 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.022925617 = product of:
0.045851234 = sum of:
0.045851234 = weight(_text_:22 in 5581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045851234 = score(doc=5581,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5581, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5581)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Over the past year, innumerable discussions on the relationship between traditional library OPACs and the newly burgeoning World WideWeb have occured in many libraries and in virtually every library related discussion list. Rumors and speculation abound, some insisting that SGML will replace USMARC "soon," others maintaining that OPACs that haven't migrated to the Web will go the way of the dinosaurs.
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.97-103
-
Eversberg, B.: Wie sagt man's dem Benutzer? : Bemerkungen zur öffentlichen Sprache der Bibliotheken (2002)
0.04
0.039054185 = product of:
0.10414449 = sum of:
0.027619982 = weight(_text_:world in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027619982 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.16986786 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
0.03670178 = weight(_text_:wide in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03670178 = score(doc=1096,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
0.039822727 = weight(_text_:web in 1096) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039822727 = score(doc=1096,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 1096, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1096)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Bibliotheken können heute im World Wide Web ein größeres Publikum "ansprechen" als jemals zuvor. Seit längerem war aufgefallen, dass Bibliotheken in ihren Web-Angeboten sprachlich und vor allem terminologisch durchaus uneinheitlich auftreten. Es erscheint wünschenswert, dass Bibliotheken trotz aller äußerlichen Unterschiede des Erscheinungsbildes (Homepage-Design) nicht als einzelne, unverbundene Einrichtungen wahrgenommen werden, sondern dass Gemeinsamkeiten hervortreten, durch die sich Bibliotheken von anderen Anbietern im Web unterscheiden. Dazu gehört eine gemeinsame Terminologie und ein sprachliches Niveau, das zeitgemäßen Erwartungen entspricht, ohne aufdringlich zu sein, und das die Waage hält zwischen unangemessen vergröbernder Popularisierung oder oberflächlichem Marktschreiertum und dem zwar präzisen, aber für Außenstehende unzugänglichen Fachjargon. Von Anbeginn sollte man sich auch über dieses im Klaren sein: es gibt auch anspruchsvolle Benutzer, die ein auch in sprachlicher Hinsicht niveauvolles Angebot zu schätzen wissen. Werden sie uns ernst nehmen, wenn wir einseitig eine Annäherung an ein möglichst niedriges Niveau versuchen, mit der allzu deutlich durchscheinenden Bemühung, "alles ganz einfach" zu machen? Ursache für einen großen Teil der Divergenzen im Sprachgebrauch ist sicherlich die "Modernisierung". Bibliotheken stellen sich neuen Herausforderungen, aber die Sprache hält nicht immer Schritt (sondern bleibt zu stark buchbezogen) oder wagt sich zu weit vor auf noch unsicheres Terrain (erkennbar meist an einem Übermaß an Neologismen, insbesondere Anglizismen). Modewörter erkennt man nicht immer sofort als solche, aber der Bedarf für neue Ausdrucksmöglichkeiten kann nicht ignoriert werden. Es besteht jedoch ein Dilemma: Bibliotheken haben nicht die Art von "Ausstrahlung", Autorität oder Präsenz im öffentlichen Raum, die sprachliche Impulse geben kann. Davon sind sie weit entfernt, darüber verfügen heute wohl nur die Medien und die Werbung. Nur vereintes, einvernehmliches und einheitliches Vorgehen könnte die Chancen geringfügig vergrößern: eine konsistent verwendete und durchdachte Terminologie kann immerhin einen Wiedererkennungswert erreichen und den Bibliothekskontext als ein größeres Ganzes erlebbar machen.
- Footnote
- Teil eines Heftschwerpunktes: 'Bibliothekarische Web-Sites'
-
Cochrane, P.A.: 34th UIUC clinic highlights visualizing subject access (1997)
0.03
0.03244361 = product of:
0.08651629 = sum of:
0.04142997 = weight(_text_:world in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04142997 = score(doc=377,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
0.022864517 = weight(_text_:information in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022864517 = score(doc=377,freq=14.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.3078936 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
0.022221804 = product of:
0.044443607 = sum of:
0.044443607 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044443607 = score(doc=377,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 377, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=377)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Reports on the 34th Annual Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, held 2-4 Mar 1997 at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The clinic was entitled 'Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources'. Summarizes the following individual sessions: Visual browsing for information retrieval; Hypostatizing data collections, especially bibliographic; Simultaneous searching of distributed information and subject repositories on the WWW; Information filtering from multiple sources; Thesauri in the full text world; The role of controlled vocabulary in visualizing document associations; Rutgers' investigations of interactive information retrieval; Spatial abilities and visualizations; Using IODyne as an indexing tool; Knowledge structures for information visualizing; Visualizing digital libraries; what role for the OPAC?; How will we provide subject access in the Interspace of the 21st century?; Natural language processing based information retrieval; Building and accessing vocabulary resources for networked resource discovery and navigation; Using electronic services to become an interbetworked business; and Conference Wrap up
-
Aliprand, J.M.: ¬The Unicode Standard : its scope, design prin. ciples, and prospects for international cataloging (2000)
0.03
0.0315771 = product of:
0.1263084 = sum of:
0.09765138 = weight(_text_:world in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09765138 = score(doc=4608,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.60057354 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.028657023 = product of:
0.057314046 = sum of:
0.057314046 = weight(_text_:22 in 4608) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057314046 = score(doc=4608,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 4608, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4608)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
- Footnote
- Beitrag in einem Themenheft "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale": papers from the ALCTS preconference, June 26, 1998 "What in the World...Cataloging on an International Scale". ALCTS Preconference, Washington, D.C.
-
Allen, L.: Towards a learning catalogue : developing the next generation of library catalogues (1993)
0.03
0.031365823 = product of:
0.08364219 = sum of:
0.05859083 = weight(_text_:world in 8192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05859083 = score(doc=8192,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.36034414 = fieldWeight in 8192, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8192)
0.012221599 = weight(_text_:information in 8192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012221599 = score(doc=8192,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 8192, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8192)
0.012829763 = product of:
0.025659526 = sum of:
0.025659526 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 8192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025659526 = score(doc=8192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 8192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=8192)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Contends that library catalogues need to be seen as merely part of the information seeker's world and proposes the concept of a learning catalogue for library clients which will capture ways in which clients use data thus providing ideas for the further development of the system. Proposes a client centred system which is separated to maintain the bibliographic database from the mode of presentation of that data to the client. The designer of retrieval systems, by accepting that each client brings a unique view of the world's knowledge base to the information seeking activity, needs to acknowledge that this view of the world must be handled uniquely. By overlaying the idea of a learning component, it is possible to see how future queries might be handled more efficiently and the system can grow with client's developing needs
-
Adler, M.: ¬The strangeness of subject cataloging : afterword (2020)
0.03
0.030571368 = product of:
0.08152365 = sum of:
0.03906055 = weight(_text_:world in 5887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03906055 = score(doc=5887,freq=4.0), product of:
0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.24022943 = fieldWeight in 5887, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5887)
0.03670178 = weight(_text_:wide in 5887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03670178 = score(doc=5887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 5887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5887)
0.005761317 = weight(_text_:information in 5887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005761317 = score(doc=5887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 5887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5887)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- "I can't presume to know how other catalogers view the systems, information resources, and institutions with which they engage on a daily basis. David Paton gives us a glimpse in this issue of the affective experiences of bibliographers and catalogers of artists' books in South Africa, and it is clear that the emotional range among them is wide. What I can say is that catalogers' feelings and worldviews, whatever they may be, give the library its shape. I think we can agree that the librarians who constructed the Library of Congress Classification around 1900, Melvil Dewey, and the many classifiers around the world past and present, have had particular sets of desires around control and access and order. We all are asked to submit to those desires in our library work, as well as our own pursuit of knowledge and pleasure reading. And every decision regarding the aboutness of a book, or about where to place it within a particular discipline, takes place in a cataloger's affective and experiential world. While the classification provides the outlines, the catalogers color in the spaces with the books, based on their own readings of the book descriptions and their interpretations of the classification scheme. The decisions they make and the structures to which they are bound affect the circulation of books and their readers across the library. Indeed, some of the encounters will be unexpected, strange, frustrating, frightening, shame-inducing, awe-inspiring, and/or delightful. The emotional experiences of students described in Mabee and Fancher's article, as well as those of any visitor to the library, are all affected by classificatory design. One concern is that a library's ordering principles may reinforce or heighten already existing feelings of precarity or marginality. Because the classifications are hidden from patrons' view, it is difficult to measure the way the order affects a person's mind and body. That a person does not consciously register the associations does not mean that they are not affected."
-
Conversations with catalogers in the 21st century (2011)
0.03
0.027866615 = product of:
0.05573323 = sum of:
0.020714985 = weight(_text_:world in 4530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020714985 = score(doc=4530,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.12740089 = fieldWeight in 4530, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4530)
0.021119192 = weight(_text_:web in 4530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021119192 = score(doc=4530,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.15297705 = fieldWeight in 4530, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4530)
0.0074841706 = weight(_text_:information in 4530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0074841706 = score(doc=4530,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.10078184 = fieldWeight in 4530, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4530)
0.0064148814 = product of:
0.012829763 = sum of:
0.012829763 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012829763 = score(doc=4530,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.10026272 = fieldWeight in 4530, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4530)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- Library specialists in the cataloging and metadata professions have a greater purpose than simply managing information and connecting users to resources. There is a deeper and more profound impact that comes of their work: preservation of the human record. Conversations with Catalogers in the 21st Century contains four chapters addressing broad categories of issues that catalogers and metadata librarians are currently facing. Every important topic is covered, such as changing metadata practices, standards, data record structures, data platforms, and user expectations, providing both theoretical and practical information. Guidelines for dealing with present challenges are based on fundamentals from the past. Recommendations on training staff, building new information platforms of digital library resources, documenting new cataloging and metadata competencies, and establishing new workflows enable a real-world game plan for improvement.
- Footnote
- Rez. in Mitt VÖB 64(2011) H.1, S.151-153 (S. Breitling): "Wie sieht die Rolle der Katalogisierung im 21. Jahrhundert aus? In diversen Blogs und Mailinglisten wird darüber seit geraumer Zeit diskutiert. Der Bereich Katalogisierung befindet sich in einer Phase tiefgreifenden Wandels, ausgelöst durch eine Vielzahl von Faktoren, von denen veränderte Nutzererwartungen bei der Recherche und die wachsende Menge an neuen zu katalogisierenden Materialien (e-Books, Web-Ressourcen etc.) und Formaten nur zwei Aspekte darstellen. Das technische Umfeld wird nicht zuletzt durch fortgeschrittene Möglichkeiten im Bereich Retrieval und Präsentation geprägt. Wie schafft man es, dass Katalogisierung als Teil des gesamten Bibliothekswesens relevant und zeitgemäß bleibt? Welche der in Jahrzehnten Katalogisierungspraxis erarbeiteten Standards sind erhaltenswert, und welche sind im Hinblick auf den Fortschritt der IT und ein mögliches Semantic Web vielleicht gar nicht mehr nötig oder müssen an die Gegebenheiten angepasst werden? Mit diesen und anderen Fragen beschäftigt sich die Aufsatzsammlung "Conversations with catalogers in the 21st century". In der Community bekannte Personen wie Martha Yee, Christine Schwartz oder James Weinheimer kommen zu Wort, aus dem deutschsprachigen Raum Bernhard Eversberg, Entwickler des Bibliothekssystems Allegro.
-
White, R.W.: Interactions with search systems (2016)
0.03
0.025929943 = product of:
0.069146514 = sum of:
0.034524977 = weight(_text_:world in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034524977 = score(doc=3612,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
0.01610337 = weight(_text_:information in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01610337 = score(doc=3612,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
0.018518168 = product of:
0.037036337 = sum of:
0.037036337 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037036337 = score(doc=3612,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 3612, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3612)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Information seeking is a fundamental human activity. In the modern world, it is frequently conducted through interactions with search systems. The retrieval and comprehension of information returned by these systems is a key part of decision making and action in a broad range of settings. Advances in data availability coupled with new interaction paradigms, and mobile and cloud computing capabilities, have created a broad range of new opportunities for information access and use. In this comprehensive book for professionals, researchers, and students involved in search system design and evaluation, search expert Ryen White discusses how search systems can capitalize on new capabilities and how next-generation systems must support higher order search activities such as task completion, learning, and decision making. He outlines the implications of these changes for the evolution of search evaluation, as well as challenges that extend beyond search systems in areas such as privacy and societal benefit.
- RSWK
- Information Retrieval
- Subject
- Information Retrieval
-
Serra, E.: Biblos: el projecte de conversion retrospectiva de la Bilioteca de Catalunya (1998)
0.03
0.025669394 = product of:
0.06845172 = sum of:
0.039822727 = weight(_text_:web in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039822727 = score(doc=4564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
0.011522634 = weight(_text_:information in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011522634 = score(doc=4564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
0.01710635 = product of:
0.0342127 = sum of:
0.0342127 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4564) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0342127 = score(doc=4564,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 4564, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4564)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Explains the Biblos project for the retrospective conversion of the catalogues of the Biblioteca de Catalunya. This consists of the scanning of the catalogue cards, the retrieval of the images via the Web, and the subsequent codification of the information into MARC format. Describes the objectives, methodology, processes and other factors contributing to its fulfilment
-
Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009)
0.03
0.025642768 = product of:
0.10257107 = sum of:
0.079645455 = weight(_text_:web in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.079645455 = score(doc=2905,freq=8.0), product of:
0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.022925617 = product of:
0.045851234 = sum of:
0.045851234 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045851234 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Der Artikel betrachtet anhand einer Studie zum Benutzerverhalten bei der Online-Katalogrecherche den gegenwärtigen Stellenwert und das zukünftige Potential der Web-OPACs. Dabei werden zunächst die Ergebnisse einer quantitativen Logfile-Analyse sowie qualitativer Benutzertests erörtert, bevor aktuelle Entwicklungen der Webtechnologie, die unter den Schlagworten Web 2.0 und Web 3.0 propagiert werden, im Zusammenhang mit der Online-Recherche und der Entwicklung neuartiger Suchverfahren kurz diskutiert werden.
- Date
- 22. 2.2009 18:50:43
-
Julien, C.-A.; Guastavino, C.; Bouthillier, F.: Capitalizing on information organization and information visualization for a new-generation catalogue (2012)
0.02
0.02465564 = product of:
0.06574837 = sum of:
0.034524977 = weight(_text_:world in 5567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034524977 = score(doc=5567,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 5567, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5567)
0.01610337 = weight(_text_:information in 5567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01610337 = score(doc=5567,freq=10.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 5567, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5567)
0.01512002 = product of:
0.03024004 = sum of:
0.03024004 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03024004 = score(doc=5567,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 5567, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5567)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Subject searching is difficult with traditional text-based online public access library catalogues (OPACs), and the next-generation discovery layers are keyword searching and result filtering tools that offer little support for subject browsing. Next-generation OPACs ignore the rich network of relations offered by controlled subject vocabulary, which can facilitate subject browsing. A new generation of OPACs could leverage existing information-organization investments and offer online searchers a novel browsing and searching environment. This is a case study of the design and development of a virtual reality subject browsing and information retrieval tool. The functional prototype shows that the Library of Congress subject headings (LCSH) can be shaped into a useful and usable tree structure serving as a visual metaphor that contains a real world collection from the domain of science and engineering. Formative tests show that users can effectively browse the LCSH tree and carve it up based on their keyword search queries. This study uses a complex information-organization structure as a defining characteristic of an OPAC that goes beyond the standard keyword search model, toward the cutting edge of online search tools.
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Peterson, E.: Parallel systems : the coexistence of subject cataloging and folksonomy (2008)
0.02
0.02440327 = product of:
0.09761308 = sum of:
0.048334967 = weight(_text_:world in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048334967 = score(doc=251,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
0.049278118 = weight(_text_:web in 251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049278118 = score(doc=251,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 251, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=251)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Catalogers have always had to balance adherence to cataloging rules and authority files with creating cataloging that is current and relevant to users. That dilemma has been complicated in new ways because of user demands in the world of Web 2.0. Standardized cataloging is crucial for communication between computer systems, but patrons now have an expectation of social interaction on the Internet, as evidenced by the popularity of folksonomy. After a description of traditional subject cataloging and folksonomy, this article discusses several institutions where subject cataloging is still used, but where patron interaction is also encouraged. User-generated tags can coexist with controlled vocabulary such as subject headings.
- Object
- Web 2.0
-
Crosnier, H. Le: Nouveaux besoins, nouveaux services, nouveaux catalogues (1997)
0.02
0.021624431 = product of:
0.05766515 = sum of:
0.029867046 = weight(_text_:web in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029867046 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.014968341 = weight(_text_:information in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014968341 = score(doc=918,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.012829763 = product of:
0.025659526 = sum of:
0.025659526 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 918) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025659526 = score(doc=918,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 918, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=918)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- For users, the catalogue is a tool to assist in satisfying information demands. Bibliographic databases raise the question of how to describe a document to facilitate retrieval. Information technology development have led to the creation of hypercatalogues, affording links to related material and other services. This necessitates improved descriptive cataloguing and also improved search interfaces to simplify user manipulation, along the lines of the Web. Given the massive output of electronic documents, the librarian's role is to select, prioritise and organise. The information society and its consequent economic consequences for the social organisation of knowledge raise the prospect of marginalisation of libraries. Catalogues enable access to knowledge as a public good, but this access must be democratic
-
Lügger, J.: Neustart für Bibliotheken ins Informationszeitalter (2006)
0.02
0.021028046 = product of:
0.05607479 = sum of:
0.035198655 = weight(_text_:web in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035198655 = score(doc=889,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
0.010184665 = weight(_text_:information in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010184665 = score(doc=889,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
0.01069147 = product of:
0.02138294 = sum of:
0.02138294 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02138294 = score(doc=889,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 889, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=889)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Wir erleben zu Beginn des aufkommenden Informationszeitalters mit dem Siegeszug von Google und anderen Internet-Technologien einen Wandel im Verhalten von Wissenschaftlern und Studenten, der mit dem Einsatz von Google Scholar und Google Book Search einem Paradigmenwechsel für Bibliotheken und Informationsversorger gleichkommt. Der Artikel untersucht die technischen Hintergründe für den Erfolg dieser besonderen Art des Information Retrievals: Fulltext Indexing und Citation Ranking als besondere Form des Information Mining. Er diskutiert Stärken und auch Schwächen des Google-Ansatzes. Der Autor stellt sich auch der Frage, unter welchen Bedingungen es möglich ist, ein zu Google Scholar und der Google Book Search konkurrenzfähiges Retrieval in der Landschaft der Bibliotheken und Bibliotheksverbünde zu errichten. Die These ist, dass dieses unter Einsatz des Open Source Indexierers Lucene und des Web-Robots Nutch möglich ist. Bibliotheken können durch gezielten Einsatz solcher Internet-Technologien dem Nutzer die Leistungen, welche Google uns mit seinen Tools im Visible Web und mit Referenzen auf Citations in der Welt der Literatur zur Verfügung stellt, in vergleichbarer Art auch für ihre eigenen durch Lizenzen geschützten digitalen Journale und ihre speziellen lokal verfügbaren Ressourcen, auf die Internet-Suchmaschinen keine Zugriff haben, anbieten. Es besteht die Hoffnung, dass Nutzer dann nicht - wie in einer kürzlich erschienenen Studie des OCLC konstatiert - überwiegend im Internet verbleiben, sondern bei ihrer Suche auch den Weg zu den Angeboten der örtlichen Bibliothek attraktiv finden.
-
Barry, J.: ¬The catalogue revolution (1997)
0.02
0.020863311 = product of:
0.083453245 = sum of:
0.069049954 = weight(_text_:world in 914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069049954 = score(doc=914,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.42466965 = fieldWeight in 914, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=914)
0.014403292 = weight(_text_:information in 914) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014403292 = score(doc=914,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 914, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=914)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Examines the purpose of catalogues, how card catalogues first fulfilled that purpose and how computers represented a superior and inevitable replacement for the card catalogue, ultimately providing electronic access to information anywhere in the world. Describes recent developments in cataloguing and their implications for the future
-
Barton, J.; Mak, L.: Old hopes, new possibilities : next-generation catalogues and the centralization of access (2012)
0.02
0.020594401 = product of:
0.054918405 = sum of:
0.029867046 = weight(_text_:web in 5560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029867046 = score(doc=5560,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 5560, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5560)
0.012221599 = weight(_text_:information in 5560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012221599 = score(doc=5560,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 5560, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5560)
0.012829763 = product of:
0.025659526 = sum of:
0.025659526 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5560) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025659526 = score(doc=5560,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5560, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5560)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Next-generation catalogues can be viewed as the latest manifestation of a tendency in library catalogue history to strive for centralization of access to collections-a single portal for the discovery of library resources. Due to an increasing volume of published materials and the explosion of online information resources during the Internet age, the library does not currently provide centralized access to its various information silos, nor does it provide a user-friendly search and retrieval experience for users whose expectations are shaped by Google and other major commercial Web sites. Searching across library resources is a complicated task, bearing high-attention "transaction costs" for the user, which discourage the use of library resources. Libraries need access systems that minimize complexity, easing discovery and delivery of resources for user populations. Here, the authors review past efforts of centralization of access, consider the potential of next-generation catalogues in the context of this historical tendency toward centralization of access, and describe what goals underlie that centralization.
-
Ducharme, C.: ¬Le catalogue, signe du changement (1997)
0.02
0.019621663 = product of:
0.07848665 = sum of:
0.06422812 = weight(_text_:wide in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06422812 = score(doc=905,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
0.014258532 = weight(_text_:information in 905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014258532 = score(doc=905,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 905, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=905)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Digital documents and Internet access are changing cataloguing practices. MARC formats can accomodate Internet documents by assigning a field for URL but quality control is vital, especially with multimedia catalogues, and new links have to be created. Heterogeneous distant resources can now be searches using the Z39.50 standard, thus enabling access to a wide range of diverse catalogues, and Internet formats are being used to create local systems (intranets). The librarian needs new skills to manipulate digital documents and use information technology tool but the mission is the same: to optimise access to the widest possible range of information
