Search (149 results, page 1 of 8)

  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Poynder, R.: Web research engines? (1996) 0.07
    0.06953925 = product of:
      0.1390785 = sum of:
        0.04142997 = weight(_text_:world in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04142997 = score(doc=5698,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
        0.066784754 = weight(_text_:web in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066784754 = score(doc=5698,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.48375595 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
        0.008641975 = weight(_text_:information in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008641975 = score(doc=5698,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
        0.022221804 = product of:
          0.044443607 = sum of:
            0.044443607 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044443607 = score(doc=5698,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 5698, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5698)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Describes the shortcomings of search engines for the WWW comparing their current capabilities to those of the first generation CD-ROM products. Some allow phrase searching and most are improving their Boolean searching. Few allow truncation, wild cards or nested logic. They are stateless, losing previous search criteria. Unlike the indexing and classification systems for today's CD-ROMs, those for Web pages are random, unstructured and of variable quality. Considers that at best Web search engines can only offer free text searching. Discusses whether automatic data classification systems such as Infoseek Ultra can overcome the haphazard nature of the Web with neural network technology, and whether Boolean search techniques may be redundant when replaced by technology such as the Euroferret search engine. However, artificial intelligence is rarely successful on huge, varied databases. Relevance ranking and automatic query expansion still use the same simple inverted indexes. Most Web search engines do nothing more than word counting. Further complications arise with foreign languages
    Source
    Information world review. 1996, no.120, S.47-48
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  2. Broughton, V.: Structural, linguistic and mathematical elements in indexing languages and search engines : implications for the use of index languages in electronic and non-LIS environments (2000) 0.06
    0.061904788 = product of:
      0.123809576 = sum of:
        0.034524977 = weight(_text_:world in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034524977 = score(doc=96,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
        0.045877226 = weight(_text_:wide in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045877226 = score(doc=96,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.24476713 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
        0.024889207 = weight(_text_:web in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024889207 = score(doc=96,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
        0.018518168 = product of:
          0.037036337 = sum of:
            0.037036337 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037036337 = score(doc=96,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    The paper looks at ways in which traditional classification and indexing tools have dealt with the relationships between constituent terms; variations in these are examined and compared with the methods used in machine searching, particularly of the Internet and World Wide Web. Apparent correspondences with features of index languages are identified, and further methods of applying classification and indexing theory to machine retrieval are proposed. There are various ways in which indexing and retrieval systems, both conventional and electronic, deal with the problem of searching for documents on a subject basis, and various approaches to the analysis and processing of a query. There appear to be three basic models; the taxonomic or structural system, in which the user is offered a map of the `universe of knowledge'; the language based system, which offers a vocabulary of the subject and a grammar for dealing with compound statements; and the mathematical model using the language of symbolic logic or the algebra of set theory
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  3. Devadason, F.J.; Intaraksa, N.; Patamawongjariya, P.; Desai, K.: Faceted indexing based system for organizing and accessing Internet resources (2002) 0.06
    0.058071837 = product of:
      0.11614367 = sum of:
        0.024167484 = weight(_text_:world in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024167484 = score(doc=97,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.14863437 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
        0.03211406 = weight(_text_:wide in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03211406 = score(doc=97,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.171337 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
        0.049278118 = weight(_text_:web in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049278118 = score(doc=97,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
        0.0105840145 = product of:
          0.021168029 = sum of:
            0.021168029 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.021168029 = score(doc=97,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.16542503 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(4/8)
    
    Abstract
    Organizing and providing access to the resources an the Internet has been a problem area in spite of the availability of sophisticated search engines and other Software tools. There have been several attempts to organize the resources an the World Wide Web. Some of them have tried to use traditional library classification schemes such as the Library of Congress Classification, the Dewey Decimal Classification and others. However there is a need to assign proper subject headings to them and present them in a logical or hierarchical sequence to cater to the need for browsing. This paper attempts to describe an experimental system designed to organize and provide access to web documents using a faceted pre-coordinate indexing system based an the Deep Structure Indexing System (DSIS) derived from POPSI (Postulate based Permuted Subject Indexing) of Bhattacharyya, and the facet analysis and chain indexing system of Ranganathan. A prototype Software System has been designed to create a database of records specifying Web documents according to the Dublin Core and to input a faceted subject heading according to DSIS. Synonymous terms are added to the Standard terms in the heading using appropriate symbols. Once the data are entered along with a description and the URL of the web document, the record is stored in the System. More than one faceted subject heading can be assigned to a record depending an the content of the original document. The System stores the Surrogates and keeps the faceted subject headings separately after establishing a link. The search is carried out an index entries derived from the faceted subject heading using the chain indexing technique. If a single term is Input, the System searches for its presence in the faceted subject headings and displays the subject headings in a sorted sequence reflecting an organizing sequence. If the number of retrieved Keadings is too large (running into more than a page) the user has the option of entering another search term to be searched in combination. The System searches subject headings already retrieved and looks for those containing the second term. The retrieved faceted subject headings can be displayed and browsed. When the relevant subject heading is selected the system displays the records with their URLs. Using the URL, the original document an the web can be accessed. The prototype system developed in a Windows NT environment using ASP and a web server is under rigorous testing. The database and Index management routines need further development.
    An interesting but somewhat confusing article telling how the writers described web pages with Dublin Core metadata, including a faceted classification, and built a system that lets users browse the collection through the facets. They seem to want to cover too much in a short article, and unnecessary space is given over to screen shots showing how Dublin Core metadata was entered. The screen shots of the resulting browsable system are, unfortunately, not as enlightening as one would hope, and there is no discussion of how the system was actually written or the technology behind it. Still, it could be worth reading as an example of such a system and how it is treated in journals.
    Footnote
    Vgl. auch: Devadason, F.J.: Facet analysis and Semantic Web: musings of a student of Ranganathan. Unter: http://www.geocities.com/devadason.geo/FASEMWEB.html#FacetedIndex.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  4. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000) 0.05
    0.045280658 = product of:
      0.12074842 = sum of:
        0.04142997 = weight(_text_:world in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04142997 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
        0.008641975 = weight(_text_:information in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008641975 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
        0.070676476 = sum of:
          0.03628805 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.03628805 = score(doc=5920,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042302497 = queryNorm
              0.2835858 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
          0.034388427 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034388427 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042302497 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH), a system originally designed as a tool for subject access to the Library's own collection in the late nineteenth century, has become, in the course of the last century, the main subject retrieval tool in library catalogs throughout the United States and in many other countries. It is one of the largest non-specialized controlled vocabularies in the world. As LCSH enters a new century, it faces an information environment that has undergone vast changes from what had prevailed when LCSH began, or, indeed, from its state in the early days of the online age. In order to continue its mission and to be useful in spheres outside library catalogs as well, LCSH must adapt to the multifarious environment. One possible approach is to adopt a series of scalable and flexible syntax and application rules to meet the needs of different user communities
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:21
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  5. Anderson, J.D.; Pérez-Carballo, J.: Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) (2009) 0.04
    0.041294962 = product of:
      0.1101199 = sum of:
        0.04142997 = weight(_text_:world in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04142997 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
        0.008641975 = weight(_text_:information in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008641975 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
        0.060047954 = sum of:
          0.025659526 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.025659526 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042302497 = queryNorm
              0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
          0.034388427 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.034388427 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042302497 = queryNorm
              0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Library of Congress Subject Headings (LSCH), which celebrated its 100th birthday in 1998, is the largest cataloging and indexing language in the world for the indication of the topics and formats of books and similar publications. It consists of a controlled list of main headings, many with subdivisions, with a rich system of cross references. It is supported by the U.S. government, and undergoes systematic revision. In recent decades its managers have begun to confront challenges such as biased terminology, complicated syntax (how terms are put together to form headings), and effective displays in electronic media. Many suggestions have been made for its improvement, including moving to a fully faceted system.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:22:13
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  6. Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998) 0.04
    0.037113085 = product of:
      0.09896823 = sum of:
        0.034524977 = weight(_text_:world in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034524977 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
        0.014403292 = weight(_text_:information in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014403292 = score(doc=2337,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
        0.050039962 = sum of:
          0.02138294 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.02138294 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042302497 = queryNorm
              0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
          0.028657023 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.028657023 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.042302497 = queryNorm
              0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Despite early claims to the contemporary, thesauri continue to find use as access tools for information in the full-text environment. Their mode of use is changing, but this change actually represents an expansion rather than a contrdiction of their utility. Thesauri and similar vocabulary tools can complement full-text access by aiding users in focusing their searches, by supplementing the linguistic analysis of the text search engine, and even by serving as one of the tools used by the linguistic engine for its analysis. While human indexing contunues to be used for many databases, the trend is to increase the use of machine aids for this purpose. All machine-aided indexing (MAI) systems rely on thesauri as the basis for term selection. In the 21st century, the balance of effort between human and machine will change at both input and output, but thesauri will continue to play an important role for the foreseeable future
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Imprint
    Urbana-Champaign, IL : Illinois University at Urbana-Champaign, Graduate School of Library and Information Science
    Source
    Visualizing subject access for 21st century information resources: Papers presented at the 1997 Clinic on Library Applications of Data Processing, 2-4 Mar 1997, Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Ed.: P.A. Cochrane et al
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  7. Schabas, A.H.: Postcoordinate retrieval : a comparison of two retrieval languages (1982) 0.03
    0.033507816 = product of:
      0.08935417 = sum of:
        0.05505267 = weight(_text_:wide in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05505267 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
        0.008641975 = weight(_text_:information in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008641975 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
        0.025659526 = product of:
          0.05131905 = sum of:
            0.05131905 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05131905 = score(doc=1202,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    This article reports on a comparison of the postcoordinate retrieval effectiveness of two indexing languages: LCSH and PRECIS. The effect of augmenting each with title words was also studies. The database for the study was over 15.000 UK MARC records. Users returned 5.326 relevant judgements for citations retrieved for 61 SDI profiles, representing a wide variety of subjects. Results are reported in terms of precision and relative recall. Pure/applied sciences data and social science data were analyzed separately. Cochran's significance tests for ratios were used to interpret the findings. Recall emerged as the more important measure discriminating the behavior of the two languages. Addition of title words was found to improve recall of both indexing languages significantly. A direct relationship was observed between recall and exhaustivity. For the social sciences searches, recalls from PRECIS alone and from PRECIS with title words were significantly higher than those from LCSH alone and from LCSH with title words, respectively. Corresponding comparisons for the pure/applied sciences searches revealed no significant differences
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 33(1982), S.32-37
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  8. Papadakis, I.; Stefanidakis, M.; Tzali, A.: Visualizing OPAC subject headings (2008) 0.03
    0.029738149 = product of:
      0.07930173 = sum of:
        0.049778413 = weight(_text_:web in 2549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.049778413 = score(doc=2549,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 2549, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2549)
        0.014403292 = weight(_text_:information in 2549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014403292 = score(doc=2549,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 2549, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2549)
        0.01512002 = product of:
          0.03024004 = sum of:
            0.03024004 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03024004 = score(doc=2549,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 2549, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2549)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper aims at providing a robust, user-friendly and efficient navigation procedure in an online library catalog that is based on semantic information encapsulated within subject headings. Design/methodology/approach - The paper describes an interactive navigation procedure inside an online library catalog based on semantic information. The proposed approach is presented through a web-based, prototype application following the most recent trends of the semantic web such as AJAX technology and the web ontology language - OWL for encoding semantics. Findings - According to the proposed method, a GUI interface exposes the hierarchy of the subject headings employed within an OPAC, as well as all stated relations between such headings, as links that the user can follow, effectively traversing the ontology and formulating at the same time the actual query to the underlying OPAC. This act of interactive navigation through the library's assets aids searchers in accurately formulating their queries, by offering broader or narrower concepts for selection or indicating alternative or related concepts they might be initially unaware of. The augmented exposition of inter-relations between concepts provides multiple paths for information retrieval and enables searchers to fulfill their information needs in a faster, more efficient and intuitive manner. Practical implications - The paper includes implications for the development of modern, semantic web applications focused on the library domain. The novel approach of visualizing subject headings could be further extended to visualize a number of other conceptualizations of the library domain. Originality/value - This paper fulfils an identified need to take advantage of the "hidden knowledge" existing within the library domain but, for a number of reasons, is never exposed to the library users.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  9. Walsh, J.: ¬The use of Library of Congress Subject Headings in digital collections (2011) 0.03
    0.027706476 = product of:
      0.073883936 = sum of:
        0.03670178 = weight(_text_:wide in 4549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03670178 = score(doc=4549,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.1958137 = fieldWeight in 4549, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4549)
        0.011522634 = weight(_text_:information in 4549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011522634 = score(doc=4549,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 4549, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4549)
        0.025659524 = product of:
          0.051319048 = sum of:
            0.051319048 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.051319048 = score(doc=4549,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.40105084 = fieldWeight in 4549, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4549)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper attempts to explain the wide dissemination of Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) within digital libraries and presents some of the advantages and disadvantages of using this controlled vocabulary in digital collections. The paper also presents other classifications used in digital collections for subject access and explores ways of improving search functionality in digital collections that employ LCSH. Design/methodology/approach - Unlike traditional libraries that use Library of Congress Classification for organization and retrieval, digital libraries use metadata forms for organization and retrieval. The collections exist in cyberspace of the internet which is known for containing the universe of knowledge. The use of LCSH for information retrieval has been widely criticized for its difficulty of use and its information retrieval effectiveness in online environments. The Library of Congress (LOC) has claimed the headings were not based on comprehensive principles nor ever intended to cover the universe of knowledge. Despite these claims and criticisms, LCSH is the most popular choice for subject access in digital libraries. Findings - The number of digital collections increases every year and LCSH is still the most popular choice of controlled vocabulary for subject access. Of the numerous criticisms, difficulties of use and user unfamiliarity are the greatest disadvantages of using LCSH for subject access. Average users only have a vague notion of what they are looking for when initializing a search. More work is required in automated generation of subject headings and increased usage of LCSH in faceted search retrieval systems. This will provide users with better access to the LCSH used in the back end of information retrieval. Originality/value - The Greek researchers who developed the Dissertation DSPace system believe this type of module will eventually replace the traditional keyword-based indexing back ends employed by many information retrieval modules within current digital library systems. The system offers the type of access and interactivity that will acquaint users with how LCSH looks and is used. Faceted search and automated pattern matching using an ontology based on LCSH have the best promise of overcoming the disadvantages that have always plagued the LOC-controlled vocabulary. These retrieval techniques give LCSH an opportunity to finally achieve the optimal precision and recall it has so far failed to deliver.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  10. Julien, C.-A.; Tirilly, P.; Leide, J.E.; Guastavino, C.: Using the LCSH hierarchy to browse a collection (2012) 0.03
    0.027004234 = product of:
      0.07201129 = sum of:
        0.034524977 = weight(_text_:world in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034524977 = score(doc=834,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
        0.01610337 = weight(_text_:information in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01610337 = score(doc=834,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
        0.02138294 = product of:
          0.04276588 = sum of:
            0.04276588 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 834) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04276588 = score(doc=834,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 834, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=834)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    The Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) is a subject structure used to index large collections throughout the world. Browsing a collection through LCSH is difficult using current on-line tools in part because they are inadequately integrated with information collections. Users of these LCSH browsing tools are expected to find a promising LCSH string before using it to search for the information itself; many users do not have the patience for such a two-step process. This article proposes a method to fully integrate a specific collection in its subset of the LCSH hierarchy in order to facilitate LCSH browsing as well as information retrieval. Techniques are described to match LCSH strings assigned to the collection with an established string from the authority records, and build their specific LCSH hierarchy. The resulting subset of LCSH structure is described in terms of its size and broader/narrower term statistics, and implications for browsing and information retrieval are discussed. The results of this research have implications for institutions wishing to further capitalize on existing LCSH organization investments for the purpose of subject browsing and information retrieval.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  11. Losee, R.M.: Improving collection browsing : small world networking and Gray code ordering (2017) 0.03
    0.026680257 = product of:
      0.07114735 = sum of:
        0.04882569 = weight(_text_:world in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04882569 = score(doc=5148,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.30028677 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
        0.007201646 = weight(_text_:information in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007201646 = score(doc=5148,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
        0.01512002 = product of:
          0.03024004 = sum of:
            0.03024004 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5148) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03024004 = score(doc=5148,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 5148, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5148)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Documents in digital and paper libraries may be arranged, based on their topics, in order to facilitate browsing. It may seem intuitively obvious that ordering documents by their subject should improve browsing performance; the results presented in this article suggest that ordering library materials by their Gray code values and through using links consistent with the small world model of document relationships is consistent with improving browsing performance. Below, library circulation data, including ordering with Library of Congress Classification numbers and Library of Congress Subject Headings, are used to provide information useful in generating user-centered document arrangements, as well as user-independent arrangements. Documents may be linearly arranged so they can be placed in a line by topic, such as on a library shelf, or in a list on a computer display. Crossover links, jumps between a document and another document to which it is not adjacent, can be used in library databases to allow additional paths that one might take when browsing. The improvement that is obtained with different combinations of document orderings and different crossovers is examined and applications suggested.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  12. Julien, C.-A.; Guastavino, C.; Bouthillier, F.: Capitalizing on information organization and information visualization for a new-generation catalogue (2012) 0.02
    0.02465564 = product of:
      0.06574837 = sum of:
        0.034524977 = weight(_text_:world in 5567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034524977 = score(doc=5567,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.21233483 = fieldWeight in 5567, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5567)
        0.01610337 = weight(_text_:information in 5567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01610337 = score(doc=5567,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 5567, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5567)
        0.01512002 = product of:
          0.03024004 = sum of:
            0.03024004 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5567) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03024004 = score(doc=5567,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.23632148 = fieldWeight in 5567, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5567)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Subject searching is difficult with traditional text-based online public access library catalogues (OPACs), and the next-generation discovery layers are keyword searching and result filtering tools that offer little support for subject browsing. Next-generation OPACs ignore the rich network of relations offered by controlled subject vocabulary, which can facilitate subject browsing. A new generation of OPACs could leverage existing information-organization investments and offer online searchers a novel browsing and searching environment. This is a case study of the design and development of a virtual reality subject browsing and information retrieval tool. The functional prototype shows that the Library of Congress subject headings (LCSH) can be shaped into a useful and usable tree structure serving as a visual metaphor that contains a real world collection from the domain of science and engineering. Formative tests show that users can effectively browse the LCSH tree and carve it up based on their keyword search queries. This study uses a complex information-organization structure as a defining characteristic of an OPAC that goes beyond the standard keyword search model, toward the cutting edge of online search tools.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  13. Devadason, F.J.; Intaraksa, N.; Patamawongjariya, P.; Desai, K.: Faceted indexing application for organizing and accessing internet resources (2003) 0.02
    0.024412133 = product of:
      0.06509902 = sum of:
        0.04452317 = weight(_text_:web in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04452317 = score(doc=3966,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.32250395 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
        0.005761317 = weight(_text_:information in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005761317 = score(doc=3966,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
        0.014814535 = product of:
          0.02962907 = sum of:
            0.02962907 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02962907 = score(doc=3966,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.23154683 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Organizing and providing access to the resources an the Internet has been a problem area in spite of the availability of sophisticated search engines and other Software tools. There have been several attempts to organize the resources an the WWW. Some of them have tried to use traditional library classification schemes such as the Library of Congress Classification, the Dewey Decimal Classification and others. However there is a need to assign proper subject headings to them and present them in a logical or hierarchical sequence to cater to the need for browsing. This paper attempts to describe an experimental system designed to organize and provide access to web documents using a faceted pre-coordinate indexing system based an the Deep Structure Indexing System (DSIS) derived from POPSI (Postulate based Permuted Subject Indexing) of Bhattacharyya, and the facet analysis and chain indexing System of Ranganathan. A prototype software system has been designed to create a database of records specifying Web documents according to the Dublin Core and input a faceted subject heading according to DSIS. Synonymous terms are added to the standard terms in the heading using appropriate symbols. Once the data are entered along with a description and URL of the Web document, the record is stored in the system. More than one faceted subject heading can be assigned to a record depending an the content of the original document. The system stores the surrogates and keeps the faceted subject headings separately after establishing a link. Search is carried out an index entries derived from the faceted subject heading using chain indexing technique. If a single term is input, the system searches for its presence in the faceted subject headings and displays the subject headings in a sorted sequence reflecting an organizing sequence. If the number of retrieved headings is too large (running into more than a page) then the user has the option of entering another search term to be searched in combination. The system searches subject headings already retrieved and look for those containing the second term. The retrieved faceted subject headings can be displayed and browsed. When the relevant subject heading is selected the system displays the records with their URLs. Using the URL the original document an the web can be accessed. The prototype system developed under Windows NT environment using ASP and web server is under rigorous testing. The database and indexes management routines need further development.
    Source
    Subject retrieval in a networked environment: Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting held in Dublin, OH, 14-16 August 2001 and sponsored by the IFLA Classification and Indexing Section, the IFLA Information Technology Section and OCLC. Ed.: I.C. McIlwaine
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  14. O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2012) 0.02
    0.02277406 = product of:
      0.060730822 = sum of:
        0.029867046 = weight(_text_:web in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029867046 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
        0.008641975 = weight(_text_:information in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008641975 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
        0.022221804 = product of:
          0.044443607 = sum of:
            0.044443607 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044443607 = score(doc=310,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Authority files have played an important role in improving the quality of indexing and subject cataloging. Although authorities can significantly improve search by increasing the number of access points, they are rarely an integral part of the information retrieval process, particularly end-users searches. A retrieval prototype, searchFAST, was developed to test the feasibility of using an authority file as an index to bibliographic records. searchFAST uses FAST (Faceted Application of Subject Terminology) as an index to OCLC's WorldCat.org bibliographic database. The searchFAST methodology complements, rather than replaces, existing WorldCat.org access. The bibliographic file is searched indirectly; first the authority file is searched to identify appropriate subject headings, then the headings are used to retrieve the matching bibliographic records. The prototype demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of using an authority file as an index. Searching the authority file leverages authority control work by increasing the number of access points while supporting a simple interface designed for end-users.
    Source
    Beyond libraries - subject metadata in the digital environment and semantic web. IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  15. Gilchrist, A.: ¬The thesaurus in retrieval (1971) 0.02
    0.020295968 = product of:
      0.08118387 = sum of:
        0.028806584 = weight(_text_:information in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028806584 = score(doc=4593,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.38790947 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
        0.05237729 = product of:
          0.10475458 = sum of:
            0.10475458 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10475458 = score(doc=4593,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.81864166 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    LCSH
    Information retrieval
    RSWK
    Schlagwortnormdatei / Information Retrieval
    Subject
    Schlagwortnormdatei / Information Retrieval
    Information retrieval
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  16. O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2014) 0.02
    0.018978383 = product of:
      0.050609022 = sum of:
        0.024889207 = weight(_text_:web in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024889207 = score(doc=1970,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
        0.007201646 = weight(_text_:information in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007201646 = score(doc=1970,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
        0.018518168 = product of:
          0.037036337 = sum of:
            0.037036337 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037036337 = score(doc=1970,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Abstract
    Authority files have played an important role in improving the quality of indexing and subject cataloging. Although authorities can significantly improve searching by increasing the number of access points, they are rarely an integral part of the information retrieval process, particularly end-users' searches. A retrieval prototype, searchFAST, was developed to test the feasibility of using an authority file as an index to bibliographic records. searchFAST uses Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) as an index to OCLC's WorldCat.org bibliographic database. The searchFAST prototype complements, rather than replaces, existing WorldCat.org access. The bibliographic file is searched indirectly; first the authority file is searched to identify appropriate subject headings, then the headings are used to retrieve the matching bibliographic records. The prototype demonstrates the effectiveness and practicality of using an authority file as an index. Searching the authority file leverages authority control work by increasing the number of access points while supporting a simple interface designed for end-users.
    Footnote
    Contribution in a special issue "Beyond libraries: Subject metadata in the digital environment and Semantic Web" - Enthält Beiträge der gleichnamigen IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn.
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  17. Hjoerland, B.; Kyllesbech Nielsen, L.: Subject access points in electronic retrieval (2001) 0.02
    0.01800387 = product of:
      0.07201548 = sum of:
        0.02016461 = weight(_text_:information in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02016461 = score(doc=3826,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
        0.05185087 = product of:
          0.10370174 = sum of:
            0.10370174 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10370174 = score(doc=3826,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.8104139 = fieldWeight in 3826, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3826)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 35(2001), S.249-298
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  18. Hauffe, H.: Sacherschließung bibliographischer Datenbanken und ihre Nutzung im Information Retrieval : Vortrag anläßlich der Tagung 'Automatisierte Sacherschließung - Status und Trends, Schloß Hofen, Lochau bei Bregenz, 17.4.-20.4.1989. 0.02
    0.015431889 = product of:
      0.061727557 = sum of:
        0.01728395 = weight(_text_:information in 891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01728395 = score(doc=891,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 891, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=891)
        0.044443607 = product of:
          0.088887215 = sum of:
            0.088887215 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.088887215 = score(doc=891,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.6946405 = fieldWeight in 891, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=891)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  19. Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung (2021) 0.02
    0.015058167 = product of:
      0.040155113 = sum of:
        0.019911364 = weight(_text_:web in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019911364 = score(doc=753,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13805464 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
        0.008147732 = weight(_text_:information in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008147732 = score(doc=753,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.10971737 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
        0.012096017 = product of:
          0.024192033 = sum of:
            0.024192033 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 753) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024192033 = score(doc=753,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.18905719 = fieldWeight in 753, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=753)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.375 = coord(3/8)
    
    Content
    Inhalt: Editorial - Michael Franke-Maier, Anna Kasprzik, Andreas Ledl und Hans Schürmann Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung - Ein Überblick aus 50 Jahren (1970-2020) - Andreas Ledl Fit for Purpose - Standardisierung von inhaltserschließenden Informationen durch Richtlinien für Metadaten - Joachim Laczny Neue Wege und Qualitäten - Die Inhaltserschließungspolitik der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek - Ulrike Junger und Frank Scholze Wissensbasen für die automatische Erschließung und ihre Qualität am Beispiel von Wikidata - Lydia Pintscher, Peter Bourgonje, Julián Moreno Schneider, Malte Ostendorff und Georg Rehm Qualitätssicherung in der GND - Esther Scheven Qualitätskriterien und Qualitätssicherung in der inhaltlichen Erschließung - Thesenpapier des Expertenteams RDA-Anwendungsprofil für die verbale Inhaltserschließung (ET RAVI) Coli-conc - Eine Infrastruktur zur Nutzung und Erstellung von Konkordanzen - Uma Balakrishnan, Stefan Peters und Jakob Voß Methoden und Metriken zur Messung von OCR-Qualität für die Kuratierung von Daten und Metadaten - Clemens Neudecker, Karolina Zaczynska, Konstantin Baierer, Georg Rehm, Mike Gerber und Julián Moreno Schneider Datenqualität als Grundlage qualitativer Inhaltserschließung - Jakob Voß Bemerkungen zu der Qualitätsbewertung von MARC-21-Datensätzen - Rudolf Ungváry und Péter Király Named Entity Linking mit Wikidata und GND - Das Potenzial handkuratierter und strukturierter Datenquellen für die semantische Anreicherung von Volltexten - Sina Menzel, Hannes Schnaitter, Josefine Zinck, Vivien Petras, Clemens Neudecker, Kai Labusch, Elena Leitner und Georg Rehm Ein Protokoll für den Datenabgleich im Web am Beispiel von OpenRefine und der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) - Fabian Steeg und Adrian Pohl Verbale Erschließung in Katalogen und Discovery-Systemen - Überlegungen zur Qualität - Heidrun Wiesenmüller Inhaltserschließung für Discovery-Systeme gestalten - Jan Frederik Maas Evaluierung von Verschlagwortung im Kontext des Information Retrievals - Christian Wartena und Koraljka Golub Die Qualität der Fremddatenanreicherung FRED - Cyrus Beck Quantität als Qualität - Was die Verbünde zur Verbesserung der Inhaltserschließung beitragen können - Rita Albrecht, Barbara Block, Mathias Kratzer und Peter Thiessen Hybride Künstliche Intelligenz in der automatisierten Inhaltserschließung - Harald Sack
    Footnote
    Vgl.: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/9783110691597/html. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110691597. Rez. in: Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis 73(2022) H.2-3, S.131-132 (B. Lorenz u. V. Steyer). Weitere Rezension in: o-bib 9(20229 Nr.3. (Martin Völkl) [https://www.o-bib.de/bib/article/view/5843/8714].
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  20. Jin, Q.: Is FAST the right direction for a new system of subject cataloging and metadata? (2008) 0.01
    0.013564933 = product of:
      0.054259732 = sum of:
        0.04142997 = weight(_text_:world in 791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04142997 = score(doc=791,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042302497 = queryNorm
            0.25480178 = fieldWeight in 791, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=791)
        0.012829763 = product of:
          0.025659526 = sum of:
            0.025659526 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 791) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025659526 = score(doc=791,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.042302497 = queryNorm
                0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 791, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=791)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(2/8)
    
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "The Intellectual and Professional World of Cataloging"
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 117
  • d 27
  • nl 2
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • ja 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 122
  • m 13
  • el 10
  • s 7
  • d 2
  • i 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Classifications