-
Malsburg, C. von der: ¬The correlation theory of brain function (1981)
0.20
0.19956459 = product of:
0.39912918 = sum of:
0.05598965 = product of:
0.16796894 = sum of:
0.16796894 = weight(_text_:3a in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16796894 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35864103 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.16796894 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16796894 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35864103 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.16796894 = weight(_text_:2f in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.16796894 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.35864103 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.007201646 = weight(_text_:information in 76) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007201646 = score(doc=76,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 76, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=76)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Source
- http%3A%2F%2Fcogprints.org%2F1380%2F1%2FvdM_correlation.pdf&usg=AOvVaw0g7DvZbQPb2U7dYb49b9v_
- Theme
- Information
-
Teskey, F.N.: User models and world models for data, information and knowledge (1989)
0.09
0.08811796 = product of:
0.17623591 = sum of:
0.055239964 = weight(_text_:world in 2163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055239964 = score(doc=2163,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.33973572 = fieldWeight in 2163, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2163)
0.07340356 = weight(_text_:wide in 2163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07340356 = score(doc=2163,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 2163, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2163)
0.030486025 = weight(_text_:information in 2163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030486025 = score(doc=2163,freq=14.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.41052482 = fieldWeight in 2163, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2163)
0.01710635 = product of:
0.0342127 = sum of:
0.0342127 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0342127 = score(doc=2163,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 2163, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2163)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- In this article we identify the need for a new theory of data, information, and knowledge. A model is developed that distinguishes between data as directly observable facts, information as structured collections of data, and knowledge as methods of using information. The model is intended to support a wide range of information systems. In the article we develop the use of the model for a semantic information retrieval system using the concept of semantic categories. The likely benefits of this are discussed, though as yet no detailed evaluation has been conducted
- Source
- Information processing and management. 25(1989), S.7-14
-
Dewey, M.: Decimal classification and relativ index : introduction (1985)
0.06
0.058800355 = product of:
0.11760071 = sum of:
0.047839213 = weight(_text_:world in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047839213 = score(doc=3628,freq=6.0), product of:
0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.29421976 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
0.05190416 = weight(_text_:wide in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05190416 = score(doc=3628,freq=4.0), product of:
0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.2769224 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
0.005761317 = weight(_text_:information in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005761317 = score(doc=3628,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
0.012096017 = product of:
0.024192033 = sum of:
0.024192033 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024192033 = score(doc=3628,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.18905719 = fieldWeight in 3628, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3628)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(4/8)
- Abstract
- To those outside the field of library science, the name Melvil Dewey (1851-1931) is virtually synonymous with library classification. To those in the field, Dewey has been recognized as the premier classification maker. His enormously successful system (i.e., successful in terms of the wide adoption of the system around the world for over one hundred years) has now undergone nineteen editions. The Dewey Decimal Classification has been translated into more than twenty languages and is the most widely adopted classification scheme in the world. Even in its earliest manifestations, the Dewey Decimal Classification contained features that anticipated modern classification theory. Among these are the use of mnemonics and the commonly applied standard subdivisions, later called "common isolates" by S. R. Ranganathan (q.v.), which are the mainstays of facet analysis and synthesis. The device of standard subdivisions is an indication of the recognition of common aspects that pervade all subjects. The use of mnemonics, whereby recurring concepts in the scheme are represented by the same notation, for example, geographic concepts and language concepts, eased the transition of the Dewey Decimal Classification from a largely enumerative system to an increasingly faceted one. Another significant feature of the Dewey Decimal Classification is the use of the hierarchical notation based an the arabic numeral system. To a large extent, this feature accounts for the wide use and success of the system in the world across language barriers. With the prospect of increasing online information retrieval, the hierarchical notation will have a significant impact an the effectiveness of the Dewey Decimal Classification as an online retrieval tool. Because the notation is hierarchical, for example, with increasing digits in a number representing narrower subjects and decreasing digits indicating broader subjects, the Dewey Decimal Classification is particularly useful in generic searches for broadening or narrowing search results. In the preface to the second edition of his Decimal Classification Dewey explained the features of his "new" system. The excerpt below presents his ideas and theory concerning the rational basis of his classification, the standard subdivisions, the hierarchical notation based an decimal numbers, the use of mnemonics, the relative index, and relative location. It also reflects Dewey's lifelong interest in simplified spelling.
-
Smith, L.C.: Artificial intelligence and information retrieval (1987)
0.05
0.0481797 = product of:
0.1927188 = sum of:
0.03259093 = weight(_text_:information in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03259093 = score(doc=335,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
0.16012788 = sum of:
0.0684254 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0684254 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
0.09170247 = weight(_text_:22 in 335) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09170247 = score(doc=335,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 335, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=335)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.41-77
-
Voorhees, E.M.: Implementing agglomerative hierarchic clustering algorithms for use in document retrieval (1986)
0.05
0.045793287 = product of:
0.18317315 = sum of:
0.023045268 = weight(_text_:information in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023045268 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.16012788 = sum of:
0.0684254 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0684254 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.09170247 = weight(_text_:22 in 402) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09170247 = score(doc=402,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 402, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=402)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 22(1986) no.6, S.465-476
-
Belkin, N.J.; Croft, W.B.: Retrieval techniques (1987)
0.05
0.045793287 = product of:
0.18317315 = sum of:
0.023045268 = weight(_text_:information in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023045268 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
0.16012788 = sum of:
0.0684254 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0684254 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
0.09170247 = weight(_text_:22 in 334) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09170247 = score(doc=334,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 334, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=334)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 22(1987), S.109-145
-
Teskey, F.N.: Enriched knowledge representation for information retrieval (1987)
0.04
0.044501483 = product of:
0.11867062 = sum of:
0.06422812 = weight(_text_:wide in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06422812 = score(doc=698,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
0.028517064 = weight(_text_:information in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028517064 = score(doc=698,freq=16.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
0.025925435 = product of:
0.05185087 = sum of:
0.05185087 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05185087 = score(doc=698,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 698, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=698)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- In this paper we identify the need for a new theory of information. An information model is developed which distinguishes between data, as directly observable facts, information, as structured collections of data, and knowledge as methods of using information. The model is intended to support a wide range of information systems. In the paper we develop the use of the model for a semantic information retrieval system using the concept of semantic categories. The likely benefits of this area discussed, though as yet no detailed evaluation has been conducted.
- Source
- SIGIR'87: Proceedings of the 10th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval
-
Dubois, C.P.R.: Free text vs. controlled vocabulary; a reassessment (1987)
0.04
0.042958226 = product of:
0.11455527 = sum of:
0.07340356 = weight(_text_:wide in 2048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07340356 = score(doc=2048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 2048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2048)
0.011522634 = weight(_text_:information in 2048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011522634 = score(doc=2048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 2048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2048)
0.02962907 = product of:
0.05925814 = sum of:
0.05925814 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05925814 = score(doc=2048,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.46309367 = fieldWeight in 2048, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- Free text and controlled vocabulary searching can no longer be viewed as antagonistic techniques in information retrieval since they both display advantages and weaknesses dependent on a fairly wide range of context, with the option to use both increasingly favoured. An attempt is made to present a list of features associated with the two techniques and to suggest a methodology to assist in deciding on the optimal retrieval technique for a particular purpose. The relevance of the techniques in expert systems and full text contexts is also discussed. Finally, recommendations for further research are suggested, concentrating on survey techniques in real-life retrieval situations
-
Ingwersen, P.; Wormell, I.: Modern indexing and retrieval techniques matching different types of information needs (1989)
0.04
0.04215724 = product of:
0.16862896 = sum of:
0.028517064 = weight(_text_:information in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028517064 = score(doc=7322,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
0.1401119 = sum of:
0.05987223 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05987223 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
0.08023966 = weight(_text_:22 in 7322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08023966 = score(doc=7322,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 7322, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=7322)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 14(1989), S.17-22
-
Greenwood, D.: OPAC research in the UK (1989)
0.04
0.038262203 = product of:
0.10203254 = sum of:
0.07340356 = weight(_text_:wide in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07340356 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.3916274 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
0.011522634 = weight(_text_:information in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011522634 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
0.01710635 = product of:
0.0342127 = sum of:
0.0342127 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0342127 = score(doc=887,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 887, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=887)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- The rapid pace of OPAC implementation in this country is providing a fruitful environment for research, with a wide range of projects currently being undertaken, including a number concerned with the application of advanced information retrieval techniques to OPAC systems. This article reviews the current situation and describes some of the more important research projects being undertaken, particularly those funded by the British Library Research and Development Department. A brief description of the British Library's own OPAC project is also provided. The article concludes with an examination of the value of OPAC research and a look at where further research effort might best be concentrated
-
Lancaster, F.W.: Vocabulary control for information retrieval (1986)
0.04
0.037644435 = product of:
0.15057774 = sum of:
0.028224573 = weight(_text_:information in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028224573 = score(doc=217,freq=12.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.38007212 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
0.12235317 = sum of:
0.07650193 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07650193 = score(doc=217,freq=10.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.59785134 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
0.045851234 = weight(_text_:22 in 217) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045851234 = score(doc=217,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 217, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=217)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Date
- 22. 4.2007 10:07:51
- Imprint
- Arlington, VA : Information Resources Pr.
- LCSH
- Information retrieval
- RSWK
- Information Retrieval / Terminologische Kontrolle
- Subject
- Information Retrieval / Terminologische Kontrolle
Information retrieval
-
Alkula, R.; Sormunen, E.: Problems and guidelines for database descriptions (1989)
0.04
0.037260294 = product of:
0.09936079 = sum of:
0.06422812 = weight(_text_:wide in 2397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06422812 = score(doc=2397,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.342674 = fieldWeight in 2397, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2397)
0.02016461 = weight(_text_:information in 2397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02016461 = score(doc=2397,freq=8.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2397, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2397)
0.014968057 = product of:
0.029936114 = sum of:
0.029936114 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2397) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029936114 = score(doc=2397,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2397, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2397)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- An essential part of information retrieval knowledge is the knowledge of data base contents and structures. Currently, the variety of data bases is so wide that it is difficult to know the contents and structure of a particular data base and how they differ from those of other data bases. Because of the lack of commonly acknowledged guidelines for data base descriptions, each on-line service designs and produces printed manuals, on-line help texts and other user documentation in its own manner. For the presentation of exact information and knowledge on a data base, common, structured principles for data base descriptions are needed. Requirements and some solutions for such description principles are presented.
- Source
- Information and innovation. Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference for Information and Documentation, Århus University, Denmark, 28-30 August 1989. Ed. by Helge Clausen
-
Biebricher, N.; Fuhr, N.; Lustig, G.; Schwantner, M.; Knorz, G.: ¬The automatic indexing system AIR/PHYS : from research to application (1988)
0.03
0.034540866 = product of:
0.13816346 = sum of:
0.02036933 = weight(_text_:information in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02036933 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
0.117794126 = sum of:
0.06048008 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06048008 = score(doc=1952,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.47264296 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
0.057314046 = weight(_text_:22 in 1952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057314046 = score(doc=1952,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1952, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1952)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Date
- 16. 8.1998 12:51:22
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.513-517.
- Source
- Proceedings of the 11th annual conference on research and development in information retrieval. Ed.: Y. Chiaramella
-
Schabas, A.H.: Postcoordinate retrieval : a comparison of two retrieval languages (1982)
0.03
0.033507816 = product of:
0.08935417 = sum of:
0.05505267 = weight(_text_:wide in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05505267 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18743214 = queryWeight, product of:
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.29372054 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.4307585 = idf(docFreq=1430, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
0.008641975 = weight(_text_:information in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008641975 = score(doc=1202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
0.025659526 = product of:
0.05131905 = sum of:
0.05131905 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05131905 = score(doc=1202,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1202, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1202)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.375 = coord(3/8)
- Abstract
- This article reports on a comparison of the postcoordinate retrieval effectiveness of two indexing languages: LCSH and PRECIS. The effect of augmenting each with title words was also studies. The database for the study was over 15.000 UK MARC records. Users returned 5.326 relevant judgements for citations retrieved for 61 SDI profiles, representing a wide variety of subjects. Results are reported in terms of precision and relative recall. Pure/applied sciences data and social science data were analyzed separately. Cochran's significance tests for ratios were used to interpret the findings. Recall emerged as the more important measure discriminating the behavior of the two languages. Addition of title words was found to improve recall of both indexing languages significantly. A direct relationship was observed between recall and exhaustivity. For the social sciences searches, recalls from PRECIS alone and from PRECIS with title words were significantly higher than those from LCSH alone and from LCSH with title words, respectively. Corresponding comparisons for the pure/applied sciences searches revealed no significant differences
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 33(1982), S.32-37
- Theme
- Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
-
Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983)
0.03
0.03125679 = product of:
0.12502716 = sum of:
0.024947235 = weight(_text_:information in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024947235 = score(doc=2417,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.3359395 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.100079924 = sum of:
0.04276588 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04276588 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.057314046 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057314046 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Pages
- S.22-25
- Series
- Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science; vol. 20
- Source
- Productivity in the information age : proceedings of the 46th ASIS annual meeting, 1983. Ed.: Raymond F Vondra
-
Brookes, B.C.: ¬The foundations of information science : Pt.1: Philosophical aspects (1980)
0.03
0.0308363 = product of:
0.1233452 = sum of:
0.096669935 = weight(_text_:world in 3253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.096669935 = score(doc=3253,freq=8.0), product of:
0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.5945375 = fieldWeight in 3253, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3253)
0.02667527 = weight(_text_:information in 3253) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02667527 = score(doc=3253,freq=14.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.3592092 = fieldWeight in 3253, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3253)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- It is first argued that a niche for information science, unclaimed by any other discipline, can be found by admitting the near-autonomy of Popper's World III - the world of objective knowledge. The task of information science can then be defined as the exploration of this world of objective knowledge which is an extension of, but is distinct from, the world of documentation and librarianship. The Popperian ontology then has to be extended to admit the concept of information and its relations to subjective and objective knowledge. The spaces of Popper's three worlds are then considered. It is argued that cognitive and physical spaces are not identical and that this lack of identity creates problems for the proper quantification of information phenomena
- Source
- Journal of information science. 2(1980), S.125-133
- Theme
- Information
-
Schwarz, C.: THESYS: Thesaurus Syntax System : a fully automatic thesaurus building aid (1988)
0.03
0.02959773 = product of:
0.11839092 = sum of:
0.048334967 = weight(_text_:world in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.048334967 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.16259687 = queryWeight, product of:
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.29726875 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.8436708 = idf(docFreq=2573, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
0.07005595 = sum of:
0.029936114 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029936114 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
0.04011983 = weight(_text_:22 in 1361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04011983 = score(doc=1361,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1361, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1361)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- THESYS is based on the natural language processing of free-text databases. It yields statistically evaluated correlations between words of the database. These correlations correspond to traditional thesaurus relations. The person who has to build a thesaurus is thus assisted by the proposals made by THESYS. THESYS is being tested on commercial databases under real world conditions. It is part of a text processing project at Siemens, called TINA (Text-Inhalts-Analyse). Software from TINA is actually being applied and evaluated by the US Department of Commerce for patent search and indexing (REALIST: REtrieval Aids by Linguistics and STatistics)
- Date
- 6. 1.1999 10:22:07
-
Walker, S.: ¬The Okapi online catalogue research projects (1989)
0.03
0.028620804 = product of:
0.114483215 = sum of:
0.014403292 = weight(_text_:information in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014403292 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
0.100079924 = sum of:
0.04276588 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04276588 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
0.057314046 = weight(_text_:22 in 1942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.057314046 = score(doc=1942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 1942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1942)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Date
- 16. 8.1998 11:22:08
- Footnote
- Wiederabgedruckt in: Readings in information retrieval. Ed.: K. Sparck Jones u. P. Willett. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann 1997. S.424-435.
-
Hodges, P.R.: Keyword in title indexes : effectiveness of retrieval in computer searches (1983)
0.03
0.028562648 = product of:
0.11425059 = sum of:
0.014258532 = weight(_text_:information in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014258532 = score(doc=5001,freq=4.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
0.09999206 = sum of:
0.05987223 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05987223 = score(doc=5001,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
0.04011983 = weight(_text_:22 in 5001) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04011983 = score(doc=5001,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5001, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5001)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- A study was done to test the effectiveness of retrieval using title word searching. It was based on actual search profiles used in the Mechanized Information Center at Ohio State University, in order ro replicate as closely as possible actual searching conditions. Fewer than 50% of the relevant titles were retrieved by keywords in titles. The low rate of retrieval can be attributes to three sources: titles themselves, user and information specialist ignorance of the subject vocabulary in use, and to general language problems. Across fields it was found that the social sciences had the best retrieval rate, with science having the next best, and arts and humanities the lowest. Ways to enhance and supplement keyword in title searching on the computer and in printed indexes are discussed.
- Date
- 14. 3.1996 13:22:21
-
Dack, D.: Australian attends conference on Dewey (1989)
0.03
0.028033827 = product of:
0.112135306 = sum of:
0.02016461 = weight(_text_:information in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02016461 = score(doc=2509,freq=8.0), product of:
0.0742611 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.0919707 = sum of:
0.05185087 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05185087 = score(doc=2509,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12796146 = queryWeight, product of:
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.40520695 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.04011983 = weight(_text_:22 in 2509) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04011983 = score(doc=2509,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14813614 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.042302497 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2509, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2509)
0.25 = coord(2/8)
- Abstract
- Edited version of a report to the Australian Library and Information Association on the Conference on classification theory in the computer age, Albany, New York, 18-19 Nov 88, and on the meeting of the Dewey Editorial Policy Committee which preceded it. The focus of the Editorial Policy Committee Meeting lay in the following areas: browsing; potential for improved subject access; system design; potential conflict between shelf location and information retrieval; and users. At the Conference on classification theory in the computer age the following papers were presented: Applications of artificial intelligence to bibliographic classification, by Irene Travis; Automation and classification, By Elaine Svenonious; Subject classification and language processing for retrieval in large data bases, by Diana Scott; Implications for information processing, by Carol Mandel; and implications for information science education, by Richard Halsey.
- Date
- 8.11.1995 11:52:22
- Theme
- Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
