Search (273 results, page 1 of 14)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.04 
    0.039387837 = product of:
  0.23632702 = sum of:
    0.23632702 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.23632702 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.3153729 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037198927 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
  2. Abt, H.A.; Garfield, E.: Is the relationship between numbers of references and paper lengths the same for all sciences? (2002) 0.03 
    0.031754173 = product of:
  0.19052503 = sum of:
    0.19052503 = sum of:
      0.11888256 = weight(_text_:1000 in 5223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11888256 = score(doc=5223,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2582832 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037198927 = queryNorm
          0.46027988 = fieldWeight in 5223, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5223)
      0.07164246 = weight(_text_:2002 in 5223) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.07164246 = score(doc=5223,freq=5.0), product of:
          0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037198927 = queryNorm
          0.44929665 = fieldWeight in 5223, product of:
            2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
              5.0 = termFreq=5.0
            4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5223)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    It has been shown in the physical sciences that a paper's length is related to its number of references in a linear manner. Abt and Garfield here look at the life and social sciences with the thought that if the relation holds the citation counts will provide a measure of relative importance across these disciplines. In the life sciences 200 research papers from 1999-2000 were scanned in each of 10 journals to produce counts of 1000 word normalized pages. In the social sciences an average of 70 research papers in nine journals were scanned for the two-year period. Papers of average length in the various sciences have the same average number of references within plus or minus 17%. A look at the 30 to 60 papers over the two years in 18 review journals indicates twice the references of research papers of the same length.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 53(2002) no.13, S.1106-1112
    Year
    2002
  3. Janssens, F.; Leta, J.; Glänzel, W.; Moor, B. de: Towards mapping library and information science (2006) 0.03 
    0.02736554 = product of:
  0.16419323 = sum of:
    0.16419323 = sum of:
      0.11888256 = weight(_text_:1000 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11888256 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.2582832 = queryWeight, product of:
            6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037198927 = queryNorm
          0.46027988 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
      0.045310665 = weight(_text_:2002 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.045310665 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
            0.037198927 = queryNorm
          0.28416014 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    In an earlier study by the authors, full-text analysis and traditional bibliometric methods were combined to map research papers published in the journal Scientometrics. The main objective was to develop appropriate techniques of full-text analysis and to improve the efficiency of the individual methods in the mapping of science. The number of papers was, however, rather limited. In the present study, we extend the quantitative linguistic part of the previous studies to a set of five journals representing the field of Library and Information Science (LIS). Almost 1000 articles and notes published in the period 2002-2004 have been selected for this exercise. The optimum solution for clustering LIS is found for six clusters. The combination of different mapping techniques, applied to the full text of scientific publications, results in a characteristic tripod pattern. Besides two clusters in bibliometrics, one cluster in information retrieval and one containing general issues, webometrics and patent studies are identified as small but emerging clusters within LIS. The study is concluded with the analysis of cluster representations by the selected journals.
  4. Craven, T.C.: Determining authorship of Web pages (2006) 0.03 
    0.027071591 = product of:
  0.08121477 = sum of:
    0.069348164 = product of:
      0.13869633 = sum of:
        0.13869633 = weight(_text_:1000 in 1498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13869633 = score(doc=1498,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2582832 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.5369932 = fieldWeight in 1498, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1498)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.01186661 = product of:
      0.035599828 = sum of:
        0.035599828 = weight(_text_:29 in 1498) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035599828 = score(doc=1498,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085419 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1498, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1498)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Assignability of authors to Web pages using either normal browsing procedures or browsing assisted by simple automatic extraction was investigated. Candidate strings for 1000 pages were extracted automatically from title elements, meta-tags, and address-like and copyright-like passages; 539 of the pages produced at least one candidate: 310 candidates from titles, 66 from meta-tags, 91 from address-like passages, and 259 from copyright-like passages. An assistant attempted to identify personal authors for 943 pages by examining the pages themselves and related pages; this added 90 pages with authors to the pages from which no candidate strings were extracted. Specific problems are noted and some refinements to the extraction methods are suggested.
    Date
    29. 2.2008 17:17:33
  5. Jovanovic, M.: ¬Eine kleine Frühgeschichte der Bibliometrie (2012) 0.02 
    0.021927936 = product of:
  0.065783806 = sum of:
    0.055703923 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055703923 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17679906 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037198927 = queryNorm
        0.3150691 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
    0.010079883 = product of:
      0.030239647 = sum of:
        0.030239647 = weight(_text_:22 in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030239647 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13026431 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    In der Bibliometrie werden meist zwei Größen vermessen: die Anzahl von Publikationen und Zitationen. Publiziert und zitiert haben Menschen bereits sehr früh in der Geschichte. Schon in der Antike sind bei überlieferten Werken Zitationen zu finden. Der englische Begriff "Bibliometrics" selbst wurde aber erst 1969 definiert. In dem folgenden Artikel wird eine kleine Frühgeschichte der Bibliometrie, einer Unterdisziplin der Informationswissenschaft, bis zu diesem wichtigen Jahr anhand von beispielhaften Studien und Arbeiten dargestellt. Es wird auf die Anfänge von Publikationen und Zitationen und den fachlichen Rahmen der Bibliometrie eingegangen. Der Ursprung der Bibliometriegeschichte selbst wird von unterschiedlichen Autoren unterschiedlich früh angesetzt. Die verschiedenen Ansätze werden vorgestellt und diskutiert. Der Artikel schließt mit einer Beschreibung der wachsenden Bedeutung dieses Fachs im heutigen Informationszeitalter.
    Date
    22. 7.2012 19:23:32
  6. Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004) 0.02 
    0.02105262 = product of:
  0.06315786 = sum of:
    0.022655332 = product of:
      0.045310665 = sum of:
        0.045310665 = weight(_text_:2002 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045310665 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.28416014 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.040502526 = product of:
      0.060753785 = sum of:
        0.03051414 = weight(_text_:29 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03051414 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085419 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
        0.030239647 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030239647 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13026431 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    The reference lists of forty-three education dissertations on curriculum and instruction completed at the University of Minnesota during the calendar years 2000-2002 were analyzed to inform collection development. As one measure of use of the academic library collection, the citation analysis yielded data to guide journal selection, retention, and cancellation decisions. The project aimed to ensure that the most frequently cited journals were retained on subscription. The serial monograph ratio for citation also was evaluated in comparison with other studies and explored in the context of funding ratios. Results of citation studies can provide a basis for liaison conversations with faculty in addition to guiding selection decisions. This research project can serve as a model for similar projects in other libraries that look at literature in education as well as other fields.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    17.12.2006 19:44:29
  7. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.02 
    0.015750982 = product of:
  0.09450589 = sum of:
    0.09450589 = product of:
      0.14175883 = sum of:
        0.071199656 = weight(_text_:29 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.071199656 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085419 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
        0.07055918 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07055918 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13026431 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  8. Grazia Colonia; Dimmler, E.; Dresel, R.; Messner, C.; Krobath, A.; Petz, S.; Sypien, M.; Boxen, P. van; Harders, M.; Heuer, D.; Jordans, I.; Juchem, K.; Linnertz, M.; Mittelhuber, I.; Schwammel, S.; Schlögl, C.; Stock, W.G.: Informationswissenschaftliche Zeitschriften in szientometrischer Analyse (2002) 0.01 
    0.014746038 = product of:
  0.044238113 = sum of:
    0.032371502 = product of:
      0.064743005 = sum of:
        0.064743005 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064743005 = score(doc=1075,freq=3.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.40602762 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
              1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                3.0 = termFreq=3.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.01186661 = product of:
      0.035599828 = sum of:
        0.035599828 = weight(_text_:29 in 1075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035599828 = score(doc=1075,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085419 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1075, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1075)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Date
    23. 8.2002 11:51:29
    Year
    2002
  9. Raan, A.F.J. van; Noyons, E.C.M.: Discovery of patterns of scientific and technological development and knowledge transfer (2002) 0.01 
    0.014598787 = product of:
  0.04379636 = sum of:
    0.035320207 = product of:
      0.070640415 = sum of:
        0.070640415 = weight(_text_:2002 in 3603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070640415 = score(doc=3603,freq=7.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.44301245 = fieldWeight in 3603, product of:
              2.6457512 = tf(freq=7.0), with freq of:
                7.0 = termFreq=7.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3603)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.008476151 = product of:
      0.025428452 = sum of:
        0.025428452 = weight(_text_:29 in 3603) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025428452 = score(doc=3603,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085419 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 3603, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3603)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This paper addresses a bibliometric methodology to discover the structure of the scientific 'landscape' in order to gain detailed insight into the development of MD fields, their interaction, and the transfer of knowledge between them. This methodology is appropriate to visualize the position of MD activities in relation to interdisciplinary MD developments, and particularly in relation to socio-economic problems. Furthermore, it allows the identification of the major actors. It even provides the possibility of foresight. We describe a first approach to apply bibliometric mapping as an instrument to investigate characteristics of knowledge transfer. In this paper we discuss the creation of 'maps of science' with help of advanced bibliometric methods. This 'bibliometric cartography' can be seen as a specific type of data-mining, applied to large amounts of scientific publications. As an example we describe the mapping of the field neuroscience, one of the largest and fast growing fields in the life sciences. The number of publications covered by this database is about 80,000 per year, the period covered is 1995-1998. Current research is going an to update the mapping for the years 1999-2002. This paper addresses the main lines of the methodology and its application in the study of knowledge transfer.
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
    Year
    2002
  10. Glänzel, W.; Moed, H.F.: Journal impact measures in bibliometric research (2002) 0.01 
    0.013930479 = product of:
  0.08358287 = sum of:
    0.08358287 = product of:
      0.16716574 = sum of:
        0.16716574 = weight(_text_:2002 in 2904) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16716574 = score(doc=2904,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            1.0483589 = fieldWeight in 2904, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2904)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Scientometrics. 53(2002) no.2, S.171-193
    Year
    2002
  11. He, Y.; Hui, S.C.: Mining a web database for author cocitation analysis (2002) 0.01 
    0.013930479 = product of:
  0.08358287 = sum of:
    0.08358287 = product of:
      0.16716574 = sum of:
        0.16716574 = weight(_text_:2002 in 2584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.16716574 = score(doc=2584,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            1.0483589 = fieldWeight in 2584, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2584)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Information processing and management. 38(2002) no.4, S.491-508
    Year
    2002
  12. Stock, W.G.: Eugene Garfield und die Folgen : der Weg der Fußnote bis in die Wissenschaftspolitik (2002) 0.01 
    0.01194041 = product of:
  0.07164246 = sum of:
    0.07164246 = product of:
      0.14328492 = sum of:
        0.14328492 = weight(_text_:2002 in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14328492 = score(doc=472,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.8985933 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Password. 2002, H.3, S.14-19
    Year
    2002
  13. Larsen, B.: Exploiting citation overlaps for information retrieval : generating a boomerang effect from the network of scientific papers (2002) 0.01 
    0.01194041 = product of:
  0.07164246 = sum of:
    0.07164246 = product of:
      0.14328492 = sum of:
        0.14328492 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4175) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.14328492 = score(doc=4175,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.8985933 = fieldWeight in 4175, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4175)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Scientometrics. 54(2002) no.2, S.155-178
    Year
    2002
  14. Chan, H.C.; Kim, H.-W.; Tan, W.C.: Information systems citation patterns from International Conference on Information Systems articles (2006) 0.01 
    0.0109117385 = product of:
  0.032735214 = sum of:
    0.022655332 = product of:
      0.045310665 = sum of:
        0.045310665 = weight(_text_:2002 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045310665 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.28416014 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.010079883 = product of:
      0.030239647 = sum of:
        0.030239647 = weight(_text_:22 in 201) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030239647 = score(doc=201,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13026431 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 201, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=201)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Research patterns could enhance understanding of the Information Systems (IS) field. Citation analysis is the methodology commonly used to determine such research patterns. In this study, the citation methodology is applied to one of the top-ranked Information Systems conferences - International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS). Information is extracted from papers in the proceedings of ICIS 2000 to 2002. A total of 145 base articles and 4,226 citations are used. Research patterns are obtained using total citations, citations per journal or conference, and overlapping citations. We then provide the citation ranking of journals and conferences. We also examine the difference between the citation ranking in this study and the ranking of IS journals and IS conferences in other studies. Based on the comparison, we confirm that IS research is a multidisciplinary research area. We also identify the most cited papers and authors in the IS research area, and the organizations most active in producing papers in the top-rated IS conference. We discuss the findings and implications of the study.
    Date
    3. 1.2007 17:22:03
  15. Albarrán, P.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: References made and citations received by scientific articles (2011) 0.01 
    0.0109117385 = product of:
  0.032735214 = sum of:
    0.022655332 = product of:
      0.045310665 = sum of:
        0.045310665 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045310665 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.28416014 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.010079883 = product of:
      0.030239647 = sum of:
        0.030239647 = weight(_text_:22 in 4185) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030239647 = score(doc=4185,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13026431 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4185, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4185)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This article studies massive evidence about references made and citations received after a 5-year citation window by 3.7 million articles published in 1998 to 2002 in 22 scientific fields. We find that the distributions of references made and citations received share a number of basic features across sciences. Reference distributions are rather skewed to the right while citation distributions are even more highly skewed: The mean is about 20 percentage points to the right of the median, and articles with a remarkable or an outstanding number of citations represent about 9% of the total. Moreover, the existence of a power law representing the upper tail of citation distributions cannot be rejected in 17 fields whose articles represent 74.7% of the total. Contrary to the evidence in other contexts, the value of the scale parameter is above 3.5 in 13 of the 17 cases. Finally, power laws are typically small, but capture a considerable proportion of the total citations received.
  16. Dees, W.: Aktuelle Themen der Szientometrie : Bericht über die 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics vom 14. bis 17. Juli 2009 (2009) 0.01 
    0.009283988 = product of:
  0.055703923 = sum of:
    0.055703923 = weight(_text_:geschichte in 3242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.055703923 = score(doc=3242,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.17679906 = queryWeight, product of:
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.037198927 = queryNorm
        0.3150691 = fieldWeight in 3242, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          4.7528 = idf(docFreq=1036, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3242)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Vom 14. bis 17. Juli fand in Rio de Janeiro die 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics statt. Das von den Organisatoren formulierte Ziel der Tagung war es, ein internationals Forum für Wissenschaftler, Wissenschaftsmanager und im Informationsbereich Tätige zu bieten, um den gegenwärtigen Stand und die Fortschritte im Feld szientometrischer Theorien und Anwendungen zu diskutieren. Nachdem die letzten beiden Konferenzen in Europa stattgefunden hatten (Stockholm und Madrid), war mit der Wahl des Tagungsortes zudem der Anspruch verknüpft, einen Beitrag zur weiteren Verbreitung der Szientometrie in lateinamerikanischen Ländern zu leisten. Die Konferenz verzeichnete die in ihrer bisherigen Geschichte höchste Zahl von eingereichten Beiträgen (254), von denen 66 Prozent angenommen wurden. Das endgültige Programm umfasste damit zwei Keynotes, über 90 Vorträge in 21 Sessions sowie 64 Poster. Vor dem Beginn dieses Hauptprogramms der Konferenz fanden darüber hinaus ein Doctoral Forum und drei Workshops zu den Themen "Tracking and evaluating interdisciplinary research: metric and maps", "Visualizing and Analyzing Scientific Literature with CiteSpace" und "Using Maps of Science to Teach Science" statt.
  17. Chen, C.: CiteSpace II : detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature (2006) 0.01 
    0.009093116 = product of:
  0.027279347 = sum of:
    0.018879443 = product of:
      0.037758887 = sum of:
        0.037758887 = weight(_text_:2002 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037758887 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.2368001 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.008399903 = product of:
      0.025199708 = sum of:
        0.025199708 = weight(_text_:22 in 5272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025199708 = score(doc=5272,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13026431 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5272, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5272)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    This article describes the latest development of a generic approach to detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. The work makes substantial theoretical and methodological contributions to progressive knowledge domain visualization. A specialty is conceptualized and visualized as a time-variant duality between two fundamental concepts in information science: research fronts and intellectual bases. A research front is defined as an emergent and transient grouping of concepts and underlying research issues. The intellectual base of a research front is its citation and co-citation footprint in scientific literature - an evolving network of scientific publications cited by research-front concepts. Kleinberg's (2002) burst-detection algorithm is adapted to identify emergent research-front concepts. Freeman's (1979) betweenness centrality metric is used to highlight potential pivotal points of paradigm shift over time. Two complementary visualization views are designed and implemented: cluster views and time-zone views. The contributions of the approach are that (a) the nature of an intellectual base is algorithmically and temporally identified by emergent research-front terms, (b) the value of a co-citation cluster is explicitly interpreted in terms of research-front concepts, and (c) visually prominent and algorithmically detected pivotal points substantially reduce the complexity of a visualized network. The modeling and visualization process is implemented in CiteSpace II, a Java application, and applied to the analysis of two research fields: mass extinction (1981-2004) and terrorism (1990-2003). Prominent trends and pivotal points in visualized networks were verified in collaboration with domain experts, who are the authors of pivotal-point articles. Practical implications of the work are discussed. A number of challenges and opportunities for future studies are identified.
    Date
    22. 7.2006 16:11:05
  18. Mukherjee, B.: Do open-access journals in library and information science have any scholarly impact? : a bibliometric study of selected open-access journals using Google Scholar (2009) 0.01 
    0.009093116 = product of:
  0.027279347 = sum of:
    0.018879443 = product of:
      0.037758887 = sum of:
        0.037758887 = weight(_text_:2002 in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037758887 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.2368001 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.008399903 = product of:
      0.025199708 = sum of:
        0.025199708 = weight(_text_:22 in 2745) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025199708 = score(doc=2745,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13026431 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2745, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2745)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    Abstract
    Using 17 fully open-access journals published uninterruptedly during 2000 to 2004 in the field of library and information science, the present study investigates the impact of these open-access journals in terms of quantity of articles published, subject distribution of the articles, synchronous and diachronous impact factor, immediacy index, and journals' and authors' self-citation. The results indicate that during this 5-year publication period, there are as many as 1,636 articles published by these journals. At the same time, the articles have received a total of 8,591 Web citations during a 7-year citation period. Eight of 17 journals have received more than 100 citations. First Monday received the highest number of citations; however, the average number of citations per article was the highest in D-Lib Magazine. The value of the synchronous impact factor varies from 0.6989 to 1.0014 during 2002 to 2005, and the diachronous impact factor varies from 1.472 to 2.487 during 2000 to 2004. The range of the immediacy index varies between 0.0714 and 1.395. D-Lib Magazine has an immediacy index value above 0.5 in all the years whereas the immediacy index value varies from year to year for the other journals. When the citations of sample articles were analyzed according to source, it was found that 40.32% of the citations came from full-text articles, followed by 33.35% from journal articles. The percentage of journals' self-citation was only 6.04%.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:54:59
  19. Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016) 0.01 
    0.009000562 = product of:
  0.05400337 = sum of:
    0.05400337 = product of:
      0.08100505 = sum of:
        0.04068552 = weight(_text_:29 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04068552 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13085419 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
        0.040319532 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040319532 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13026431 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    20. 1.2019 11:22:31
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  20. Yoshikane, F.; Kageura, K.; Tsuji, K.: ¬A method for the comparative analysis of concentration of author productivity, giving consideration to the effect of sample size dependency of statistical measures (2003) 0.01 
    0.008255734 = product of:
  0.049534403 = sum of:
    0.049534403 = product of:
      0.099068806 = sum of:
        0.099068806 = weight(_text_:1000 in 5123) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.099068806 = score(doc=5123,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2582832 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.3835666 = fieldWeight in 5123, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.943297 = idf(docFreq=115, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5123)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Studies of the concentration of author productivity based upon counts of papers by individual authors will produce measures that change systematically with sample size. Yoshikane, Kageura, and Tsuji seek a statistical framework which will avoid this scale effect problem. Using the number of authors in a field as an absolute concentration measure, and Gini's index as a relative concentration measure, they describe four literatures form both viewpoints with measures insensitive to one another. Both measures will increase with sample size. They then plot profiles of the two measures on the basis of a Monte-Carlo simulation of 1000 trials for 20 equally spaced intervals and compare the characteristics of the literatures. Using data from conferences hosted by four academic societies between 1992 and 1997, they find a coefficient of loss exceeding 0.15 indicating measures will depend highly on sample size. The simulation shows that a larger sample size leads to lower absolute concentration and higher relative concentration. Comparisons made at the same sample size present quite different results than the original data and allow direct comparison of population characteristics.

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 245
  • d 26
  • ro 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 266
  • el 4
  • m 4
  • r 2
  • s 2
  • b 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications