Search (74 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Literaturübersicht"
  1. Busch, J.: Bibliographie zum Bibliotheks- und Büchereiwesen : aus dem Nachlaß bearbeitet von U. von Dietze (1966) 0.04
    0.04492479 = product of:
      0.2695487 = sum of:
        0.2695487 = weight(_text_:aufstellung in 1462) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.2695487 = score(doc=1462,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.27500507 = queryWeight, product of:
              7.3928223 = idf(docFreq=73, maxDocs=44218)
              0.037198927 = queryNorm
            0.98015904 = fieldWeight in 1462, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              7.3928223 = idf(docFreq=73, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1462)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Footnote
    Darin unter '4 Katalogwesen' die Gruppen: '4e: Realkatalog. Systematik' (S.126ff.); '4f: Verhältnis System-Aufstellung. Standortsbezeichnungen. Magazinaufstellung. Storage-Bibliothek' (S.136ff.); '4g: Schlagwortkatalog. Schlagwortregister' (S.138ff.)
  2. Bath, P.A.: Data mining in health and medical information (2003) 0.02
    0.018760383 = product of:
      0.05628115 = sum of:
        0.04271931 = product of:
          0.08543862 = sum of:
            0.08543862 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08543862 = score(doc=4263,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                0.5358175 = fieldWeight in 4263, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4263)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.01356184 = product of:
          0.04068552 = sum of:
            0.04068552 = weight(_text_:29 in 4263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04068552 = score(doc=4263,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13085419 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4263, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4263)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    Data mining (DM) is part of a process by which information can be extracted from data or databases and used to inform decision making in a variety of contexts (Benoit, 2002; Michalski, Bratka & Kubat, 1997). DM includes a range of tools and methods for extractiog information; their use in the commercial sector for knowledge extraction and discovery has been one of the main driving forces in their development (Adriaans & Zantinge, 1996; Benoit, 2002). DM has been developed and applied in numerous areas. This review describes its use in analyzing health and medical information.
    Date
    23.10.2005 18:29:03
  3. Davies, P.H.J.: Intelligence, information technology, and information warfare (2002) 0.02
    0.015920546 = product of:
      0.095523275 = sum of:
        0.095523275 = product of:
          0.19104655 = sum of:
            0.19104655 = weight(_text_:2002 in 3832) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19104655 = score(doc=3832,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                1.1981244 = fieldWeight in 3832, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3832)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 36(2002), S.313-352
    Year
    2002
  4. Bergeron, P.; Hiller, C.A.: Competitive intelligence (2002) 0.02
    0.015920546 = product of:
      0.095523275 = sum of:
        0.095523275 = product of:
          0.19104655 = sum of:
            0.19104655 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19104655 = score(doc=4290,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                1.1981244 = fieldWeight in 4290, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4290)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 36(2002), S.253-392
    Year
    2002
  5. Sawyer, S.; Eschenfelder, K.R.: Social informatics : perspectives, examples, and trends (2002) 0.02
    0.015920546 = product of:
      0.095523275 = sum of:
        0.095523275 = product of:
          0.19104655 = sum of:
            0.19104655 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4292) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19104655 = score(doc=4292,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                1.1981244 = fieldWeight in 4292, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4292)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 36(2002), S.427-466
    Year
    2002
  6. Snyder, H.W.; Pierce, J.B.: Intellectual capital (2002) 0.02
    0.015920546 = product of:
      0.095523275 = sum of:
        0.095523275 = product of:
          0.19104655 = sum of:
            0.19104655 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4295) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19104655 = score(doc=4295,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                1.1981244 = fieldWeight in 4295, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4295)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 36(2002), S.467-502
    Year
    2002
  7. Russell, M.; Brittain, J.M.: Health informatics (2002) 0.02
    0.015920546 = product of:
      0.095523275 = sum of:
        0.095523275 = product of:
          0.19104655 = sum of:
            0.19104655 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.19104655 = score(doc=4297,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                1.1981244 = fieldWeight in 4297, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4297)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 36(2002), S.591-628
    Year
    2002
  8. Kim, K.-S.: Recent work in cataloging and classification, 2000-2002 (2003) 0.01
    0.014548985 = product of:
      0.043646954 = sum of:
        0.03020711 = product of:
          0.06041422 = sum of:
            0.06041422 = weight(_text_:2002 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06041422 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                0.37888017 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.013439844 = product of:
          0.040319532 = sum of:
            0.040319532 = weight(_text_:22 in 152) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040319532 = score(doc=152,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13026431 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 152, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=152)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  9. Herring, S.C.: Computer-mediated communication on the Internet (2002) 0.01
    0.013930479 = product of:
      0.08358287 = sum of:
        0.08358287 = product of:
          0.16716574 = sum of:
            0.16716574 = weight(_text_:2002 in 5323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.16716574 = score(doc=5323,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                1.0483589 = fieldWeight in 5323, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5323)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 36(2002), S.109-170
    Year
    2002
  10. Kling, R.: ¬The Internet and unrefereed scholarly publishing (2003) 0.01
    0.010942238 = product of:
      0.032826714 = sum of:
        0.022655332 = product of:
          0.045310665 = sum of:
            0.045310665 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.045310665 = score(doc=4272,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                0.28416014 = fieldWeight in 4272, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4272)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.01017138 = product of:
          0.03051414 = sum of:
            0.03051414 = weight(_text_:29 in 4272) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03051414 = score(doc=4272,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13085419 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4272, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4272)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    In the early 1990s, much of the enthusiasm for the use of electronic media to enhance scholarly communication focused an electronic journals, especially electronic-only, (pure) e journals (see for example, Peek & Newby's [1996] anthology). Much of the systematic research an the use of electronic media to enhance scholarly communication also focused an electronic journals. However, by the late 1990s, numerous scientific publishers had transformed their paper journals (p journals) into paper and electronic journals (p-e journals) and sold them via subscription models that did not provide the significant costs savings, speed of access, or breadth of audience that pure e -journal advocates had expected (Okerson, 1996). In 2001, a group of senior life scientists led a campaign to have publishers make their journals freely available online six months after publication (Russo, 2001). The campaign leaders, using the name "Public Library of Science," asked scientists to boycott journals that did not comply with these demands for open access. Although the proposal was discussed in scientific magazines and conferences, it apparently did not persuade any journal publishers to comply (Young, 2002). Most productive scientists, who work for major universities and research institutes
    Date
    23.10.2005 18:29:25
  11. Kling, R.; Callahan, E.: Electronic journals, the Internet, and scholarly communication (2002) 0.01
    0.010790501 = product of:
      0.064743005 = sum of:
        0.064743005 = product of:
          0.12948601 = sum of:
            0.12948601 = weight(_text_:2002 in 1969) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.12948601 = score(doc=1969,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                0.81205523 = fieldWeight in 1969, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1969)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Year
    2002
  12. Galloway, P.: Preservation of digital objects (2003) 0.01
    0.009118532 = product of:
      0.027355595 = sum of:
        0.018879443 = product of:
          0.037758887 = sum of:
            0.037758887 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037758887 = score(doc=4275,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                0.2368001 = fieldWeight in 4275, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4275)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008476151 = product of:
          0.025428452 = sum of:
            0.025428452 = weight(_text_:29 in 4275) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025428452 = score(doc=4275,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13085419 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4275, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4275)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    The preservation of digital objects (defined here as objects in digital form that require a computer to support their existence and display) is obviously an important practical issue for the information professions, with its importance growing daily as more information objects are produced in, or converted to, digital form. Yakel's (2001) review of the field provided a much-needed introduction. At the same time, the complexity of new digital objects continues to increase, challenging existing preservation efforts (Lee, Skattery, Lu, Tang, & McCrary, 2002). The field of information science itself is beginning to pay some reflexive attention to the creation of fragile and unpreservable digital objects. But these concerns focus often an the practical problems of short-term repurposing of digital objects rather than actual preservation, by which I mean the activity of carrying digital objects from one software generation to another, undertaken for purposes beyond the original reasons for creating the objects. For preservation in this sense to be possible, information science as a discipline needs to be active in the formulation of, and advocacy for, national information policies. Such policies will need to challenge the predominant cultural expectation of planned obsolescence for information resources, and cultural artifacts in general.
    Date
    23.10.2005 18:29:46
  13. Rader, H.B.: Information literacy 1973-2002 : a selected literature review (2002) 0.01
    0.0066748923 = product of:
      0.04004935 = sum of:
        0.04004935 = product of:
          0.0800987 = sum of:
            0.0800987 = weight(_text_:2002 in 43) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0800987 = score(doc=43,freq=9.0), product of:
                0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                0.50232893 = fieldWeight in 43, product of:
                  3.0 = tf(freq=9.0), with freq of:
                    9.0 = termFreq=9.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=43)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Abstract
    More than 5000 publications related to library user instruction and information literacy have been published and reviewed in the past thirty years. New developments in education and technology during the last two decades have affected user instruction and have led to the emergence of information literacy. Based on needs related to the rapid development of information technology and the evolving information society, librarians have begun teaching information skills to all types of users to ensure that they gain information fluency so they can become productive and effective information users both in the education environment and in the work environment. The number of publications related to user instruction and information literacy, like the field itself, show phenomenal growth during the past three decades as demonstrated by the fact that in 1973 twenty-eight publications were reviewed, and in 2002 more than 300 publications dealing with the topic of information literacy will be issued. It is noteworthy that in the last decade there has been a tremendous growth in publications related to information literacy globally. During the 1970s, publications indicate that user instruction activities were of concern primarily to librarians in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand. At the present time, publications indicate a major concern with information literacy not only in the countries mentioned above but also in China, Germany, Mexico, Scandinavia, Singapore, South Africa, South America, Spain, and others. On an annual hasis, the majority of the publications have addressed information literacy in academic libraries (60 percent) followed by publications related to information literacy instruction in school media centers (20 percent).
    Source
    Library trends. 51(2002) no.2, S.242-259
    Year
    2002
  14. Rogers, Y.: New theoretical approaches for human-computer interaction (2003) 0.01
    0.0063829715 = product of:
      0.019148914 = sum of:
        0.01321561 = product of:
          0.02643122 = sum of:
            0.02643122 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02643122 = score(doc=4270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                0.16576007 = fieldWeight in 4270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4270)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005933305 = product of:
          0.017799914 = sum of:
            0.017799914 = weight(_text_:29 in 4270) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017799914 = score(doc=4270,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13085419 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 4270, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4270)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
    
    Abstract
    "Theory weary, theory leery, why can't I be theory cheery?" (Erickson, 2002, p. 269). The field of human-computer interaction (HCI) is rapidly expanding. Alongside the extensive technological developments that are taking place, a profusion of new theories, methods, and concerns has been imported into the field from a range of disciplines and contexts. An extensive critique of recent theoretical developments is presented here together with an overview of HCI practice. A consequence of bringing new theories into the field has been much insightful explication of HCI phenomena and also a broadening of the field's discourse. However, these theoretically based approaches have had limited impact an the practice of interaction design. This chapter discusses why this is so and suggests that different kinds of mechanisms are needed that will enable both designers and researchers to better articulate and theoretically ground the challenges facing them today. Human-computer interaction is bursting at the seams. Its mission, goals, and methods, well established in the '80s, have all greatly expanded to the point that "HCI is now effectively a boundless domain" (Barnard, May, Duke, & Duce, 2000, p. 221). Everything is in a state of flux: The theory driving research is changing, a flurry of new concepts is emerging, the domains and type of users being studied are diversifying, many of the ways of doing design are new, and much of what is being designed is significantly different. Although potentially much is to be gained from such rapid growth, the downside is an increasing lack of direction, structure, and coherence in the field. What was originally a bounded problem space with a clear focus and a small set of methods for designing computer systems that were easier and more efficient to use by a single user is now turning into a diffuse problem space with less clarity in terms of its objects of study, design foci, and investigative methods. Instead, aspirations of overcoming the Digital Divide, by providing universal accessibility, have become major concerns (e.g., Shneiderman, 2002a). The move toward greater openness in the field means that many more topics, areas, and approaches are now considered acceptable in the worlds of research and practice.
    Date
    23.10.2005 18:29:10
  15. Borgman, C.L.; Furner, J.: Scholarly communication and bibliometrics (2002) 0.01
    0.005970205 = product of:
      0.03582123 = sum of:
        0.03582123 = product of:
          0.07164246 = sum of:
            0.07164246 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07164246 = score(doc=4291,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                0.44929665 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 36(2002), S.3-72
    Year
    2002
  16. Davenport, E.; Hall, H.: Organizational Knowledge and Communities of Practice (2002) 0.01
    0.005970205 = product of:
      0.03582123 = sum of:
        0.03582123 = product of:
          0.07164246 = sum of:
            0.07164246 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4293) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07164246 = score(doc=4293,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                0.44929665 = fieldWeight in 4293, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4293)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 36(2002), S.171-228
    Year
    2002
  17. Solomon, S.: Discovering information in context (2002) 0.01
    0.005970205 = product of:
      0.03582123 = sum of:
        0.03582123 = product of:
          0.07164246 = sum of:
            0.07164246 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07164246 = score(doc=4294,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                0.44929665 = fieldWeight in 4294, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4294)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 36(2002), S.229-264
    Year
    2002
  18. Benoit, G.: Data mining (2002) 0.01
    0.005970205 = product of:
      0.03582123 = sum of:
        0.03582123 = product of:
          0.07164246 = sum of:
            0.07164246 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07164246 = score(doc=4296,freq=5.0), product of:
                0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                0.44929665 = fieldWeight in 4296, product of:
                  2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                    5.0 = termFreq=5.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 36(2002), S.265-312
    Year
    2002
  19. Høyrup, E.: Books about mathematics : history, philosophy, education, models, system theory, and works of reference etc (1979) 0.01
    0.005593974 = product of:
      0.033563845 = sum of:
        0.033563845 = product of:
          0.10069153 = sum of:
            0.10069153 = weight(_text_:29 in 1733) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10069153 = score(doc=1733,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13085419 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                0.7694941 = fieldWeight in 1733, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1733)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Date
    9. 1.1999 18:29:29
  20. Lievrouw, A.A.; Farb, S.E.: Information and equity (2002) 0.00
    0.0046245004 = product of:
      0.027747001 = sum of:
        0.027747001 = product of:
          0.055494003 = sum of:
            0.055494003 = weight(_text_:2002 in 4243) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055494003 = score(doc=4243,freq=3.0), product of:
                0.15945469 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.037198927 = queryNorm
                0.34802365 = fieldWeight in 4243, product of:
                  1.7320508 = tf(freq=3.0), with freq of:
                    3.0 = termFreq=3.0
                  4.28654 = idf(docFreq=1652, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4243)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    
    Year
    2002

Languages

  • e 70
  • d 2
  • m 1
  • ru 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 67
  • b 15
  • m 4
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…