Zyl, R.E. v.: Fiksieherwinning in openbare biblioteke (1993)
0.02
0.016619066 = product of:
0.08309533 = sum of:
0.08309533 = weight(_text_:relation in 5837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08309533 = score(doc=5837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
0.03924537 = queryNorm
0.40466496 = fieldWeight in 5837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5837)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Public libraries offer fiction readers various approaches to retrieve reading matter: shelving systems that facilityte browsing, knowledgable staff bibliographic aids and also user training and reader guidance. Despite these alternatives, readers often experience difficulty in identifying relevant fiction and no single factor can be isolated as the main cause. Classifies shelving systems and bibliographic aids do not take into account the fiction reader's approach. The nature of fiction does not allow for content to be moulded into any formal knowledge structure. The Analysis and Mediation of Publications (AMP) classification scheme, developed in Denmark, is a fiction classification scheme based on the relation between content and needs of fiction readers
