Search (164 results, page 1 of 9)

0.038200855 = product of:
  0.09550214 = sum of:
    0.08309533 = weight(_text_:relation in 6128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08309533 = score(doc=6128,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03924537 = queryNorm
        0.40466496 = fieldWeight in 6128, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6128)
    0.012406815 = product of:
      0.037220445 = sum of:
        0.037220445 = weight(_text_:22 in 6128) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037220445 = score(doc=6128,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 6128, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6128)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Discusses the goals and outcome of the OCLC/NCSA Metadata Workshop, held in Dublin, Ohio, 1-3 Mar 95, which resulted in the proposed 'Dublin Core' Metadata Elements. Describes an attempt to map the Dublin Core data elements to the USMARC format (with particular reference to USMARC field 856 for electronic locations), noting problems and outstanding questions. The USMARC format elements considered include: subject, title, author, other-agent, publisher, publication date, identifier, object-type, form, relation, language, source, coverage, and other issues

Series

Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.22, nos.3/4

0.03278221 = product of:
  0.081955515 = sum of:
    0.07122457 = weight(_text_:relation in 2626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07122457 = score(doc=2626,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03924537 = queryNorm
        0.3468557 = fieldWeight in 2626, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2626)
    0.010730944 = product of:
      0.03219283 = sum of:
        0.03219283 = weight(_text_:29 in 2626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03219283 = score(doc=2626,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2626, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2626)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Even as the number of Web-enabled resources and knowledge repositories continues its unabated climb, both general purpose and domain-specific metadata schemas are in vigorous development. While this might be viewed as a promising direction for more precise access to disparate metadata-enabled resources, semantically-oriented tools to facilitate cross-domain searching by end-users unfamiliar with structured approaches to language or particular metadata schema conventions have received little attention. This paper describes findings from a focus group assessment of a natural language "gateway" previously derived from mapping, then categorizing terminology from nine metadata schemas. Semantic ambiguities identified in relation to three core metadata elements, namely, "Names", "Title", and "Subject", are discussed relative to data collection techniques employed in the research. Implications for further research, and particularly that pertaining to the design of an Interlingua gateway to multilingual, metadata-enabled resources, are addressed.

Date

29. 8.2004 9:04:54

0.028489828 = product of:
  0.14244914 = sum of:
    0.14244914 = weight(_text_:relation in 501) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.14244914 = score(doc=501,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03924537 = queryNorm
        0.6937114 = fieldWeight in 501, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=501)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

AGLS (Australian Government Locator Service) is used for electronic and non-electronic sources. Relation with Dublin Core

0.027286327 = product of:
  0.06821582 = sum of:
    0.059353806 = weight(_text_:relation in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059353806 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03924537 = queryNorm
        0.2890464 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
    0.008862011 = product of:
      0.026586032 = sum of:
        0.026586032 = weight(_text_:22 in 2649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026586032 = score(doc=2649,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2649, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2649)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

OCLC's Crosswalk Web Service (Godby, Smith and Childress, 2008) formalizes the notion of crosswalk, as defined in Gill,et al. (n.d.), by hiding technical details and permitting the semantic equivalences to emerge as the centerpiece. One outcome is that metadata experts, who are typically not programmers, can enter the translation logic into a spreadsheet that can be automatically converted into executable code. In this paper, we describe the implementation of the Dublin Core Terms application profile in the management of crosswalks involving MARC. A crosswalk that encodes an application profile extends the typical format with two columns: one that annotates the namespace to which an element belongs, and one that annotates a 'broader-narrower' relation between a pair of elements, such as Dublin Core coverage and Dublin Core Terms spatial. This information is sufficient to produce scripts written in OCLC's Semantic Equivalence Expression Language (or Seel), which are called from the Crosswalk Web Service to generate production-grade translations. With its focus on elements that can be mixed, matched, added, and redefined, the application profile (Heery and Patel, 2000) is a natural fit with the translation model of the Crosswalk Web Service, which attempts to achieve interoperability by mapping one pair of elements at a time.

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

0.027286327 = product of:
  0.06821582 = sum of:
    0.059353806 = weight(_text_:relation in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059353806 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03924537 = queryNorm
        0.2890464 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
    0.008862011 = product of:
      0.026586032 = sum of:
        0.026586032 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026586032 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

There is a growing interest into how we represent and share tagging data in collaborative tagging systems. Conventional tags, meaning freely created tags that are not associated with a structured ontology, are not naturally suited for collaborative processes, due to linguistic and grammatical variations, as well as human typing errors. Additionally, tags reflect personal views of the world by individual users, and are not normalised for synonymy, morphology or any other mapping. Our view is that the conventional approach provides very limited semantic value for collaboration. Moreover, in cases where there is some semantic value, automatically sharing semantics via computer manipulations is extremely problematic. This paper explores these problems by discussing approaches for collaborative tagging activities at a semantic level, and presenting conceptual models for collaborative tagging activities and folksonomies. We present criteria for the comparison of existing tag ontologies and discuss their strengths and weaknesses in relation to these criteria.

Source

Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas

0.02111788 = product of:
  0.10558939 = sum of:
    0.10558939 = weight(_text_:aufsatzsammlung in 5134) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10558939 = score(doc=5134,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.25749236 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03924537 = queryNorm
        0.41006804 = fieldWeight in 5134, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5134)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

RSWK

Metadaten / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Aufsatzsammlung

Subject

Metadaten / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Aufsatzsammlung

0.019100428 = product of:
  0.04775107 = sum of:
    0.041547664 = weight(_text_:relation in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041547664 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03924537 = queryNorm
        0.20233248 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
    0.0062034074 = product of:
      0.018610222 = sum of:
        0.018610222 = weight(_text_:22 in 2668) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018610222 = score(doc=2668,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.1354154 = fieldWeight in 2668, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=2668)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Content

Carol Jean Godby, Devon Smith, Eric Childress: Encoding Application Profiles in a Computational Model of the Crosswalk. - Maria Elisabete Catarino, Ana Alice Baptista: Relating Folksonomies with Dublin Core. - Ed Summers, Antoine Isaac, Clay Redding, Dan Krech: LCSH, SKOS and Linked Data. - Xia Lin, Jiexun Li, Xiaohua Zhou: Theme Creation for Digital Collections. - Boris Lauser, Gudrun Johannsen, Caterina Caracciolo, Willem Robert van Hage, Johannes Keizer, Philipp Mayr: Comparing Human and Automatic Thesaurus Mapping Approaches in the Agricultural Domain. - P. Bryan Heidorn, Qin Wei: Automatic Metadata Extraction From Museum Specimen Labels. - Stuart Allen Sutton, Diny Golder: Achievement Standards Network (ASN): An Application Profile for Mapping K-12 Educational Resources to Achievement Standards. - Allen H. Renear, Karen M. Wickett, Richard J. Urban, David Dubin, Sarah L. Shreeves: Collection/Item Metadata Relationships. - Seth van Hooland, Yves Bontemps, Seth Kaufman: Answering the Call for more Accountability: Applying Data Profiling to Museum Metadata. - Thomas Margaritopoulos, Merkourios Margaritopoulos, Ioannis Mavridis, Athanasios Manitsaris: A Conceptual Framework for Metadata Quality Assessment. - Miao Chen, Xiaozhong Liu, Jian Qin: Semantic Relation Extraction from Socially-Generated Tags: A Methodology for Metadata Generation. - Hak Lae Kim, Simon Scerri, John G. Breslin, Stefan Decker, Hong Gee Kim: The State of the Art in Tag Ontologies: A Semantic Model for Tagging and Folksonomies. - Martin Malmsten: Making a Library Catalogue Part of the Semantic Web. - Philipp Mayr, Vivien Petras: Building a Terminology Network for Search: The KoMoHe Project. - Michael Panzer: Cool URIs for the DDC: Towards Web-scale Accessibility of a Large Classification System. - Barbara Levergood, Stefan Farrenkopf, Elisabeth Frasnelli: The Specification of the Language of the Field and Interoperability: Cross-language Access to Catalogues and Online Libraries (CACAO)

0.01899322 = product of:
  0.09496609 = sum of:
    0.09496609 = weight(_text_:relation in 1473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09496609 = score(doc=1473,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03924537 = queryNorm
        0.46247426 = fieldWeight in 1473, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1473)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

This book documents the experiences of metadata creators (both catalogers and indexers), library administrators, and educators who are actively engaged in projects that organize Internet resources for educational purposes. It examines the status quo of cataloging Internet resources, explores the relationship between traditional cataloging practices and Internet cataloging, introduces a number of educationally focused metadata schemes, and examines theoretical and practice aspects of metadata in relation to today's evolving Internet-based educational terrain.

0.016619066 = product of:
  0.08309533 = sum of:
    0.08309533 = weight(_text_:relation in 7279) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08309533 = score(doc=7279,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03924537 = queryNorm
        0.40466496 = fieldWeight in 7279, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7279)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Today's enterprises employ multiple information systems which are independently developed, locally administered, and are different in logical or physical design. To share information across organisational boundaries requires a global query system capable of providing online intelligent assistance to users. Conventional technologies such as schema based query languages and hard coded schema integration are insufficient. Develops a model assisted global query system using an online repository of enterprise metadata, the metadatabase, for global query formulation and processing with adaptiveness and open systems architecture. Presents a definition model for the metadata as a knowledge system. Analyzes the improvements of the new system in relation to the old. Tests a prototype system in a computer integrated manufacturing setting

0.016619066 = product of:
  0.08309533 = sum of:
    0.08309533 = weight(_text_:relation in 5333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08309533 = score(doc=5333,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03924537 = queryNorm
        0.40466496 = fieldWeight in 5333, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5333)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

With the transition from cartographic materials to spatial information the nature and amount of access data for the library field is changing. Besides bibliographic data there exists now a range of metadata, each kind for specific purposes within specific user fields. To define their relation to each other they have been put into a diagram. Through the Resource Description Framework these should all be available through a common interface for Internet-searching. To prevent confusion spatial metadata is defined. Spatial metadata introduces new elements to descriptions with new application possibilities.

0.016391104 = product of:
  0.040977757 = sum of:
    0.035612285 = weight(_text_:relation in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.035612285 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03924537 = queryNorm
        0.17342785 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
    0.005365472 = product of:
      0.016096415 = sum of:
        0.016096415 = weight(_text_:29 in 732) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016096415 = score(doc=732,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.11659596 = fieldWeight in 732, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=732)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)

Abstract

Metadata in the Digital Library is a complete guide to building a digital library metadata strategy from scratch, using established metadata standards bound together by the markup language XML. The book introduces the reader to the theory of metadata and shows how it can be applied in practice. It lays out the basic principles that should underlie any metadata strategy, including its relation to such fundamentals as the digital curation lifecycle, and demonstrates how they should be put into effect. It introduces the XML language and the key standards for each type of metadata, including Dublin Core and MODS for descriptive metadata and PREMIS for its administrative and preservation counterpart. Finally, the book shows how these can all be integrated using the packaging standard METS. Two case studies from the Warburg Institute in London show how the strategy can be implemented in a working environment. The strategy laid out in this book will ensure that a digital library's metadata will support all of its operations, be fully interoperable with others and enable its long-term preservation. It assumes no prior knowledge of metadata, XML or any of the standards that it covers. It provides both an introduction to best practices in digital library metadata and a manual for their practical implementation.

Date

29. 9.2022 17:57:57

0.011870761 = product of:
  0.059353806 = sum of:
    0.059353806 = weight(_text_:relation in 172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059353806 = score(doc=172,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03924537 = queryNorm
        0.2890464 = fieldWeight in 172, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=172)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

This paper is a current assessment of the status of metadata creation and mapping between catalogerdefined field names and Dublin Core (DC) metadata elements across three digital image collections. The metadata elements that evince the most frequently inaccurate, inconsistent and incomplete DC metadata application are identified. As well, the most frequently occurring locally added metadata elements and associated pattern development are examined. For this, a randomly collected sample of 659 metadata item records from three digital image collections is analyzed. Implications and issues drawn from the evaluation of the current status of metadata creation and mapping are also discussed in relation to the issue of semantic interoperability of concept representation across digital image collections. The findings of the study suggest that conceptual ambiguities and semantic overlaps inherent among some DC metadata elements hinder semantic interoperability. The DC metadata scheme needs to be refined in order to disambiguate semantic relations of certain DC metadata elements that present semantic overlaps and conceptual ambiguities between element names and their corresponding definitions. The findings of the study also suggest that the development of mediation mechanisms such as concept networks that facilitate the metadata creation and mapping process are critically needed for enhancing metadata quality.

0.011870761 = product of:
  0.059353806 = sum of:
    0.059353806 = weight(_text_:relation in 2781) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.059353806 = score(doc=2781,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03924537 = queryNorm
        0.2890464 = fieldWeight in 2781, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2781)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Abstract

Das XML-Format "Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard" (METS) bietet eine übersichtliche Form, beliebige Metadaten nach funktionalen Kategorien geordnet zusammen mit den betreffenden digitalen Objekten auszutauschen. Ursprünglich im Kontext von Digitalisierungsprojekten in den USA entstanden, findet es heute weltweit insbesondere in Bibliotheken Anwendung. Über so genannte METS-Profile können dabei konkrete Anwendungsszenarien für das ansonsten sehr generische Format spezifiziert werden. Ein solches METS-Profil ist z. B. das im deutschen Langzeitarchivierungsprojekt kopal entstandene Universelle Objektformat für die Archivierung und den Austausch von digitalen Objekten. Der Metadata Encoding and Transmission Standard (METS) wurde 2001 von der US-amerikanischen Digital Library Federation entwickelt und wird seitdem von der Library of Congress verwaltet. Es handelt sich dabei um eine XML-basierte Spezifikation zur Bündelung von Metadata zu digitalen Objekten. Entstanden ist sie im Zuge von Digitalisierungsprojekten, in denen ein hoher Bedarf an einer einheitlichen Beschreibung der Strukturinformationen zu einem Digitalisat und der zugehörigen Meta-daten - bibliografische und andere - vorhanden war. Insbesondere beim Digitalisieren von Büchern entstehen zahlreiche Bilddateien, die ohne eine zusätzliche Information zur Struktur und Relation untereinander schwer nachnutzbar sind. Zugleich fallen verschiedene Kategorien von Metadaten als Zusatzinformationen an, die es gilt, sinnvoll den Dateien zuzuordnen: Inhaltlich-bibliografische, administrative, rechtliche, technische und Informationen über die ursprüngliche Digitalisierungsvorlage. Da METS sich als Austauschformat zwischen verschiedenen Projekten versteht und nicht als einheitliche Vorgabe für alle diese Bereiche, macht es keine Vorschriften, welche Metadatenfelder und -formate in den einzelnen Bereichen verwendet werden müssen. Zwar werden einheitliche Informationen zur Struktur und Dateibeschreibung vorgesehen, aber ansonsten beliebige Metadaten in benannten thematischen Blöcken zugelassen. Darüber hinaus ist es auch möglich, die beschriebenen digitalen Objekte selbst in die METS-XML-Datei einzubinden.

0.011394857 = product of:
  0.056974284 = sum of:
    0.056974284 = product of:
      0.08546142 = sum of:
        0.042923775 = weight(_text_:29 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042923775 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
        0.04253765 = weight(_text_:22 in 1953) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04253765 = score(doc=1953,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1953, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1953)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

29. 5.2015 19:09:22

0.0099705 = product of:
  0.0498525 = sum of:
    0.0498525 = product of:
      0.07477875 = sum of:
        0.037558302 = weight(_text_:29 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037558302 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
        0.037220445 = weight(_text_:22 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037220445 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

1. 8.1996 22:08:06

Source

Computer networks and ISDN systems. 29(1997) no.8, S.1147-1156

0.0060157324 = product of:
  0.030078663 = sum of:
    0.030078663 = product of:
      0.090235986 = sum of:
        0.090235986 = weight(_text_:22 in 5743) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.090235986 = score(doc=5743,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.6565931 = fieldWeight in 5743, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5743)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

30. 3.2002 19:45:22

Source

Revista Española de Documentaçion Cientifica. 22(1999) no.2, S.198-219

0.005671687 = product of:
  0.028358433 = sum of:
    0.028358433 = product of:
      0.0850753 = sum of:
        0.0850753 = weight(_text_:22 in 4899) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0850753 = score(doc=4899,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4899, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4899)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Date

16. 7.2000 20:58:22

0.005671687 = product of:
  0.028358433 = sum of:
    0.028358433 = product of:
      0.0850753 = sum of:
        0.0850753 = weight(_text_:22 in 2840) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0850753 = score(doc=2840,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2840, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2840)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

Library hi tech. 22(2004) no.1

0.0050077736 = product of:
  0.025038868 = sum of:
    0.025038868 = product of:
      0.075116605 = sum of:
        0.075116605 = weight(_text_:29 in 4900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075116605 = score(doc=4900,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 4900, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4900)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

Vine. 2000, no.117, S.24-29

0.0050077736 = product of:
  0.025038868 = sum of:
    0.025038868 = product of:
      0.075116605 = sum of:
        0.075116605 = weight(_text_:29 in 6338) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075116605 = score(doc=6338,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6338, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6338)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)

Source

International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.2, S.33-35