Search (30 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Social tagging"
  1. Chen, M.; Liu, X.; Qin, J.: Semantic relation extraction from socially-generated tags : a methodology for metadata generation (2008) 0.04
    0.037985094 = product of:
      0.09496273 = sum of:
        0.059353806 = weight(_text_:relation in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059353806 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.2890464 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
        0.03560893 = product of:
          0.05341339 = sum of:
            0.02682736 = weight(_text_:29 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02682736 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
            0.026586032 = weight(_text_:22 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026586032 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Date
    20. 2.2009 10:29:07
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  2. Kim, H.L.; Scerri, S.; Breslin, J.G.; Decker, S.; Kim, H.G.: ¬The state of the art in tag ontologies : a semantic model for tagging and folksonomies (2008) 0.03
    0.027286327 = product of:
      0.06821582 = sum of:
        0.059353806 = weight(_text_:relation in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059353806 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.2890464 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
        0.008862011 = product of:
          0.026586032 = sum of:
            0.026586032 = weight(_text_:22 in 2650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026586032 = score(doc=2650,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2650, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2650)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    There is a growing interest into how we represent and share tagging data in collaborative tagging systems. Conventional tags, meaning freely created tags that are not associated with a structured ontology, are not naturally suited for collaborative processes, due to linguistic and grammatical variations, as well as human typing errors. Additionally, tags reflect personal views of the world by individual users, and are not normalised for synonymy, morphology or any other mapping. Our view is that the conventional approach provides very limited semantic value for collaboration. Moreover, in cases where there is some semantic value, automatically sharing semantics via computer manipulations is extremely problematic. This paper explores these problems by discussing approaches for collaborative tagging activities at a semantic level, and presenting conceptual models for collaborative tagging activities and folksonomies. We present criteria for the comparison of existing tag ontologies and discuss their strengths and weaknesses in relation to these criteria.
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  3. Rafferty, P.: Tagging (2018) 0.02
    0.016619066 = product of:
      0.08309533 = sum of:
        0.08309533 = weight(_text_:relation in 4647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08309533 = score(doc=4647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.40466496 = fieldWeight in 4647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4647)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This article examines tagging as knowledge organization. Tagging is a kind of indexing, a process of labelling and categorizing information made to support resource discovery for users. Social tagging generally means the practice whereby internet users generate keywords to describe, categorise or comment on digital content. The value of tagging comes when social tags within a collection are aggregated and shared through a folksonomy. This article examines definitions of tagging and folksonomy, and discusses the functions, advantages and disadvantages of tagging systems in relation to knowledge organization before discussing studies that have compared tagging and conventional library-based knowledge organization systems. Approaches to disciplining tagging practice are examined and tagger motivation discussed. Finally, the article outlines current research fronts.
  4. Choi, Y.: ¬A complete assessment of tagging quality : a consolidated methodology (2015) 0.01
    0.014244914 = product of:
      0.07122457 = sum of:
        0.07122457 = weight(_text_:relation in 1730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07122457 = score(doc=1730,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.3468557 = fieldWeight in 1730, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1730)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents a methodological discussion of a study of tagging quality in subject indexing. The data analysis in the study was divided into 3 phases: analysis of indexing consistency, analysis of tagging effectiveness, and analysis of the semantic values of tags. To analyze indexing consistency, this study employed the vector space model-based indexing consistency measures. An analysis of tagging effectiveness with tagging exhaustivity and tag specificity was conducted to ameliorate the drawbacks of consistency analysis based on only the quantitative measures of vocabulary matching. To further investigate the semantic values of tags at various levels of specificity, a latent semantic analysis (LSA) was conducted. To test statistical significance for the relation between tag specificity and semantic quality, correlation analysis was conducted. This research demonstrates the potential of tags for web document indexing with a complete assessment of tagging quality and provides a basis for further study of the strengths and limitations of tagging.
  5. Good tags - bad tags : Social Tagging in der Wissensorganisation (2008) 0.01
    0.013198674 = product of:
      0.06599337 = sum of:
        0.06599337 = weight(_text_:aufsatzsammlung in 3054) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06599337 = score(doc=3054,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.25749236 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.25629252 = fieldWeight in 3054, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.5610886 = idf(docFreq=169, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=3054)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    RSWK
    Wissensorganisation / Social Tagging / Aufsatzsammlung
    Subject
    Wissensorganisation / Social Tagging / Aufsatzsammlung
  6. Rafferty, P.; Murphy, H.: Is there nothing outside the tags? : towards a poststructuralist analysis of social tagging (2015) 0.01
    0.011870761 = product of:
      0.059353806 = sum of:
        0.059353806 = weight(_text_:relation in 1792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.059353806 = score(doc=1792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20534351 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03924537 = queryNorm
            0.2890464 = fieldWeight in 1792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.232299 = idf(docFreq=641, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1792)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose The purpose of the research is to explore relationships between social tagging and key poststructuralist principles; to devise and construct an analytical framework through which key poststructuralist principles are converted into workable research questions and applied to analyse Librarything tags, and to assess the validity of performing such an analysis. The research hypothesis is that tagging represents an imperfect analogy for the poststructuralist project Design/methodology/approach Tags from LibraryThing and from a library OPAC were compared and constrasted with Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) and publishers' descriptions. Research questions derived from poststructuralism, asked whether tags destabilise meaning, whether and how far the death of the author is expressed in tags, and whether tags deconstruct LCSH. Findings Tags can temporarily destabilise meaning by obfuscating the structure of a word. Meaning is destabilised, perhaps only momentarily, and then it is recreated; it might resemble the original meaning, or it may not, however any attempt to make tags useful or functional necessarily imposes some form of structure. The analysis indicates that in tagging, the author, if not dead, is ignored. Authoritative interpretations are not pervasively mimicked in the tags. In relation to LCSH, tagging decentres the dominant view, but neither exposes nor judges it. Nor does tagging achieve the final stage of the deconstructive process, showing the dominant view to be a constructed reality. Originality/value This is one of very few studies to have attempted a critical theoretical approach to social tagging. It offers a novel methodological approach to undertaking analysis based on poststructuralist theory.
  7. Müller-Prove, M.: Modell und Anwendungsperspektive des Social Tagging (2008) 0.01
    0.011394857 = product of:
      0.056974284 = sum of:
        0.056974284 = product of:
          0.08546142 = sum of:
            0.042923775 = weight(_text_:29 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042923775 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
            0.04253765 = weight(_text_:22 in 2882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04253765 = score(doc=2882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2882)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    21. 6.2009 9:55:29
    Pages
    S.15-22
  8. Niemann, C.: Tag-Science : Ein Analysemodell zur Nutzbarkeit von Tagging-Daten (2011) 0.01
    0.010324105 = product of:
      0.05162052 = sum of:
        0.05162052 = product of:
          0.07743078 = sum of:
            0.04552754 = weight(_text_:29 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04552754 = score(doc=164,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.3297832 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
            0.031903237 = weight(_text_:22 in 164) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031903237 = score(doc=164,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 164, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=164)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2012 13:58:08
    29. 5.2012 14:15:36
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  9. Peters, I.: Folksonomies und kollaborative Informationsdienste : eine Alternative zur Websuche? (2011) 0.00
    0.0028615852 = product of:
      0.0143079255 = sum of:
        0.0143079255 = product of:
          0.042923775 = sum of:
            0.042923775 = weight(_text_:29 in 343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042923775 = score(doc=343,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 343, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=343)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Pages
    S.29-53
  10. Evedove Tartarotti, R. Dal'; Lopes Fujita, M.: ¬The perspective of social indexing in online bibliographic catalogs : between the individual and the collaborative (2016) 0.00
    0.0028615852 = product of:
      0.0143079255 = sum of:
        0.0143079255 = product of:
          0.042923775 = sum of:
            0.042923775 = weight(_text_:29 in 4917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042923775 = score(doc=4917,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4917, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4917)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
  11. Catarino, M.E.; Baptista, A.A.: Relating folksonomies with Dublin Core (2008) 0.00
    0.0025065553 = product of:
      0.012532776 = sum of:
        0.012532776 = product of:
          0.037598327 = sum of:
            0.037598327 = weight(_text_:22 in 2652) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037598327 = score(doc=2652,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2652, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2652)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Pages
    S.14-22
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
  12. Marchitelli, A.; Piazzini, T.: OPAC, SOPAC e social networking : cataloghi di biblioteca 2.0? (2008) 0.00
    0.0025038868 = product of:
      0.012519434 = sum of:
        0.012519434 = product of:
          0.037558302 = sum of:
            0.037558302 = weight(_text_:29 in 3862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037558302 = score(doc=3862,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3862, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3862)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
  13. Oudenaar, H.; Bullard, J.: NOT A BOOK : goodreads and the risks of social cataloging with insufficient direction (2024) 0.00
    0.0025038868 = product of:
      0.012519434 = sum of:
        0.012519434 = product of:
          0.037558302 = sum of:
            0.037558302 = weight(_text_:29 in 1156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037558302 = score(doc=1156,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1156, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1156)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22.11.2023 18:29:56
  14. Harrer, A.; Lohmann, S.: Potenziale von Tagging als partizipative Methode für Lehrportale und E-Learning-Kurse (2008) 0.00
    0.002481363 = product of:
      0.012406815 = sum of:
        0.012406815 = product of:
          0.037220445 = sum of:
            0.037220445 = weight(_text_:22 in 2889) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037220445 = score(doc=2889,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2889, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2889)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    21. 6.2009 12:22:44
  15. Furner, J.: User tagging of library resources : toward a framework for system evaluation (2007) 0.00
    0.0021461889 = product of:
      0.010730944 = sum of:
        0.010730944 = product of:
          0.03219283 = sum of:
            0.03219283 = weight(_text_:29 in 703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03219283 = score(doc=703,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 703, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=703)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    26.12.2011 13:29:31
  16. Corrado, E.; Moulaison, H.L.: Social tagging and communities of practice : two case studies (2008) 0.00
    0.0021461889 = product of:
      0.010730944 = sum of:
        0.010730944 = product of:
          0.03219283 = sum of:
            0.03219283 = weight(_text_:29 in 2271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03219283 = score(doc=2271,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2271, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2271)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    27.12.2008 11:20:29
  17. Kruk, S.R.; Kruk, E.; Stankiewicz, K.: Evaluation of semantic and social technologies for digital libraries (2009) 0.00
    0.0021268826 = product of:
      0.010634413 = sum of:
        0.010634413 = product of:
          0.031903237 = sum of:
            0.031903237 = weight(_text_:22 in 3387) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031903237 = score(doc=3387,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3387, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3387)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    1. 8.2010 12:35:22
  18. Rolla, P.J.: User tags versus Subject headings : can user-supplied data improve subject access to library collections? (2009) 0.00
    0.0021268826 = product of:
      0.010634413 = sum of:
        0.010634413 = product of:
          0.031903237 = sum of:
            0.031903237 = weight(_text_:22 in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031903237 = score(doc=3601,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  19. Strader, C.R.: Author-assigned keywords versus Library of Congress Subject Headings : implications for the cataloging of electronic theses and dissertations (2009) 0.00
    0.0021268826 = product of:
      0.010634413 = sum of:
        0.010634413 = product of:
          0.031903237 = sum of:
            0.031903237 = weight(_text_:22 in 3602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031903237 = score(doc=3602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13743061 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3602)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  20. Santini, M.: Zero, single, or multi? : genre of web pages through the users' perspective (2008) 0.00
    0.0017884907 = product of:
      0.008942453 = sum of:
        0.008942453 = product of:
          0.02682736 = sum of:
            0.02682736 = weight(_text_:29 in 2059) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02682736 = score(doc=2059,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13805294 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03924537 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2059, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2059)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    30. 7.2008 10:29:54

Languages

  • e 24
  • d 5
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 27
  • b 2
  • el 2
  • m 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…