-
Smiraglia, R.P.: On sameness and difference : an editorial (2008)
0.01
0.01323143 = product of:
0.044104766 = sum of:
0.008416956 = weight(_text_:web in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008416956 = score(doc=1919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.028611459 = queryNorm
0.09014259 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
0.03245743 = weight(_text_:log in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03245743 = score(doc=1919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18335998 = queryWeight, product of:
6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
0.028611459 = queryNorm
0.1770148 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
0.0032303815 = product of:
0.009691144 = sum of:
0.009691144 = weight(_text_:22 in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009691144 = score(doc=1919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.028611459 = queryNorm
0.09672529 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.3 = coord(3/10)
- Content
- 3. A New Perspective: Theme and Variations In musicology there is a factual reality that every sound you hear can be reduced to a sort of calculus that expresses its tonal and metrical relationships. Schenkerian analysis (Forte and Gilbert 1982) is one approach to this. In the end it reveals a singular truth, which is that music (like information) is essentially an ordered accretion of energy. The beauty of this type of analysis is what it reveals when large quantities of music are analyzed-it reveals sets of similarities that might never have been noticed otherwise. The music information retrieval domain has built its technology and its science along these lines. So where does this leave knowledge organization? In the semantic Web and the magical kingdoms that will follow it, it will be necessary to make samenessdifference decisions of a different sort, to provide the ability to make heretofore unimaginable connections. Elsewhere I have asked when a funeral urn is like a ship's log: the answer is when the instantiation set has the same calculus in its scope, which tells us that the two artifacts have approximately equal impact factors along some cultural or social trajectory. These are the sorts of questions knowledge organization can be able to answer if we can move toward a large base of empirical evidence to which similarity measures can be applied and from which new hypotheses can be drawn to direct investigation. Why have these questions not yet been answered? Because they have not yet been posed."
- Date
- 12. 6.2008 20:18:22
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The "works" phenomenon and best selling books (2007)
0.00
0.0029157193 = product of:
0.029157192 = sum of:
0.029157192 = weight(_text_:web in 260) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029157192 = score(doc=260,freq=6.0), product of:
0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.028611459 = queryNorm
0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 260, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=260)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Abstract
- Studying works allows us to see empirically the problem of instantiation of works, both at large and in the catalog. The linkage of relationships among works is a critical goal for information retrieval because the ability to comprehend and select a specific instantiation of a work is crucial for the advancement of scholarship. Hence, the present study examines the instantiation of works among a set of entities known to be popular-best selling books of the 20th century. A sample of best selling works (fiction and non-fiction) from 1900-1999 was constructed. For each work in the sample, all bibliographic records were identified in both OCLC and RLIN as well as instantiations on the World Wide Web. All but one work in the sample exists in multiple instantiations; many have large networks; and complex networks of instantiations have begun to appear in full text on the Web. The results of this study demonstrate the importance of continuing to gather statistical data about works. Solutions devised for the catalog will need to be modified for use in the chaotic environment of the World Wide Web and its successors.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Authority control of works: cataloging's chimera? (2004)
0.00
0.0016833913 = product of:
0.016833913 = sum of:
0.016833913 = weight(_text_:web in 5678) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016833913 = score(doc=5678,freq=2.0), product of:
0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.028611459 = queryNorm
0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 5678, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5678)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Abstract
- Explicit authority control of works is essentially non-existent. Our catalogs are built on a principle of controlling headings, and primarily headings for names of authors. Our syndetic structure creates a spider's web of networked relationships among forms of headings, but it ends there, despite the potential richness of depth among bibliographic entities. Effective authority control of works could yield richness in the catalog that would enhance retrieval capabilities. Works are considered to constitute the intellectual content of informative artifacts that may be collected and ordered for retrieval. In a 1992 study the author examined a random sample of works drawn from the catalog of the Georgetown University Library. For each progenitor work, an instantiation network (also referred to as a bibliographic family) was constituted. A detailed analysis of the linkages that would be required for authority control of these networks is reviewed here. A new study is also presented, in which Library of Congress authority records for the works in this sample are sought and analyzed. Results demonstrate a near total lack of control, with only 5.6% of works for which authority records were found. From a sample of 410 works, of which nearly half have instantiation networks, only 23 works could be said to have implicit authority control. However, many instantiation networks are made up of successive derivations that can be implicitly linked through collocation. The difficult work of explicitly linking instantiations comes with title changes, translations, and containing relations. The empirical evidence in the present study suggests that explicit control of expressions will provide the best control over instantiation networks because it is instantiations such as translations, abridgments, and adaptations that require explicit linking.
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: ¬The nature of "a work" : implications for the organization of knowledge (2001)
0.00
0.0015646582 = product of:
0.015646582 = sum of:
0.015646582 = product of:
0.046939746 = sum of:
0.046939746 = weight(_text_:29 in 5983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046939746 = score(doc=5983,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.028611459 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 5983, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5983)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: KO 29(2002) no.2, S.107-109 (G. Campbell)
-
Sachs, M.Y.; Smiraglia, R.P.: From encyclopedism to domain-based ontology for knowledge management : the evolution of the Sachs Classification (SC) (2004)
0.00
7.823291E-4 = product of:
0.007823291 = sum of:
0.007823291 = product of:
0.023469873 = sum of:
0.023469873 = weight(_text_:29 in 2648) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023469873 = score(doc=2648,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.028611459 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2648, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2648)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 14:09:53
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Content metadata : an analysis of Etruscan artifacts in a museum of archeology (2005)
0.00
7.823291E-4 = product of:
0.007823291 = sum of:
0.007823291 = product of:
0.023469873 = sum of:
0.023469873 = weight(_text_:29 in 176) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023469873 = score(doc=176,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.028611459 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 176, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=176)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Date
- 29. 9.2008 19:14:41
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Rethinking what we catalog : documents as cultural artifacts (2008)
0.00
6.51941E-4 = product of:
0.00651941 = sum of:
0.00651941 = product of:
0.019558229 = sum of:
0.019558229 = weight(_text_:29 in 789) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019558229 = score(doc=789,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.028611459 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 789, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=789)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Date
- 29. 9.2008 14:59:03
-
Smiraglia, R.P.: Knowledge sharing and content genealogy : extensing the "works" model as a metaphor for non-documentary artefacts with case studies of Etruscan artefacts (2004)
0.00
5.2155275E-4 = product of:
0.0052155275 = sum of:
0.0052155275 = product of:
0.015646582 = sum of:
0.015646582 = weight(_text_:29 in 2671) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.015646582 = score(doc=2671,freq=2.0), product of:
0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.028611459 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2671, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2671)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.1 = coord(1/10)
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 19:05:56
