Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

0.0138502 = product of:
  0.138502 = sum of:
    0.138502 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 2141) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.138502 = score(doc=2141,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.14706601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.9417676 = fieldWeight in 2141, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2141)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

Abstract

Was ersetzt in unserer heutigen, von der Globalisierung geprägten Kommunikationsgesellschaft die Netzwerke früherer Gesellschaften: Berufliche oder nachbarschaftliche Hilfe, oder geheime Absprachen? Diese Netzwerke bildeten die heimliche private Ordnung. Welche Chancen bieten die neuen technologischen Möglichkeiten der vernetzten Kommunikation. Diesen und anderen Fragen, die mit diesen Problemen zusammenhängen, geht diese Einführung nach

BK

05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft

Classification

MR 6600 Soziologie / Sozialwissenschaftliche Theorien und Methoden / Psychologische Ansätze / Theorie der sozialen Interaktion, Kommunikation, Konformität
05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft

RSWK

Informationsgesellschaft / Interpersonale Kommunikation / Internet
Informationsgesellschaft / Internationale Kommunikation / Internet (BVB)
Internet / Kommunikation / Gesellschaft / Auswirkung (BVB)

RVK

MR 6600 Soziologie / Sozialwissenschaftliche Theorien und Methoden / Psychologische Ansätze / Theorie der sozialen Interaktion, Kommunikation, Konformität

Subject

Informationsgesellschaft / Interpersonale Kommunikation / Internet
Informationsgesellschaft / Internationale Kommunikation / Internet (BVB)
Internet / Kommunikation / Gesellschaft / Auswirkung (BVB)

0.007086894 = product of:
  0.07086894 = sum of:
    0.07086894 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 5939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07086894 = score(doc=5939,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14706601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.48188522 = fieldWeight in 5939, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5939)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

Classification

MS 7850 Soziologie / Spezielle Soziologien / Soziologie der Massenkommunikation und öffentlichen Meinung / Allgemeine Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation und ihrer Medien; Begriff der Öffentlichkeit; Meinungsbildung, public relations

RVK

MS 7850 Soziologie / Spezielle Soziologien / Soziologie der Massenkommunikation und öffentlichen Meinung / Allgemeine Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation und ihrer Medien; Begriff der Öffentlichkeit; Meinungsbildung, public relations

0.0066815875 = product of:
  0.066815875 = sum of:
    0.066815875 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 1565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066815875 = score(doc=1565,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14706601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.45432574 = fieldWeight in 1565, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1565)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

Classification

MS 7850 Soziologie / Spezielle Soziologien / Soziologie der Massenkommunikation und öffentlichen Meinung / Allgemeine Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation und ihrer Medien; Begriff der Öffentlichkeit; Meinungsbildung, public relations
AP 14000 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Beziehungen, Ausstrahlungen, Einwirkungen / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft

RVK

MS 7850 Soziologie / Spezielle Soziologien / Soziologie der Massenkommunikation und öffentlichen Meinung / Allgemeine Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation und ihrer Medien; Begriff der Öffentlichkeit; Meinungsbildung, public relations
AP 14000 Allgemeines / Medien- und Kommunikationswissenschaften, Kommunikationsdesign / Beziehungen, Ausstrahlungen, Einwirkungen / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft

0.006071309 = product of:
  0.030356545 = sum of:
    0.02362298 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02362298 = score(doc=1795,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14706601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.16062841 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
    0.0067335647 = weight(_text_:web in 1795) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0067335647 = score(doc=1795,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.07211407 = fieldWeight in 1795, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=1795)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)

BK

05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft

Classification

05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft

Footnote

The economic opportunity divide is predicated an the hypothesis that there has, indeed, been a major shift in opportunities driven by changes in the information environment. The authors document this paradigm shift well with arguments from the political and economic right and left. This chapter might be described as an "attitudinal" chapter. The authors are concerned here with the perceptions of their respondents of their information skills and skill levels with their economic outlook and opportunities. Technological skills and economic opportunities are correlated, one finds, in the minds of all across all ages, genders, races, ethnicities, and income levels. African Americans in particular are ". . attuned to the use of technology for economic opportunity" (p. 80). The fourth divide is the democratic divide. The Internet may increase political participation, the authors posit, but only among groups predisposed to participate and perhaps among those with the skills necessary to take advantage of the electronic environment (p. 86). Certainly the Web has played an important role in disseminating and distributing political messages and in some cases in political fund raising. But by the analysis here, we must conclude that the message does not reach everyone equally. Thus, the Internet may widen the political participation gap rather than narrow it. The book has one major, perhaps fatal, flaw: its methodology and statistical application. The book draws upon a survey performed for the authors in June and July 2001 by the Kent State University's Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) lab (pp. 7-9). CATI employed a survey protocol provided to the reader as Appendix 2. An examination of the questionnaire reveals that all questions yield either nominal or ordinal responses, including the income variable (pp. 9-10). Nevertheless, Mossberger, Tolbert, and Stansbury performed a series of multiple regression analyses (reported in a series of tables in Appendix 1) utilizing these data. Regression analysis requires interval/ratio data in order to be valid although nominal and ordinal data can be incorporated by building dichotomous dummy variables. Perhaps Mossberger, Tolbert, and Stansbury utilized dummy variables; but 1 do not find that discussed. Moreover, 1 would question a multiple regression made up completely of dichotomous dummy variables. I come away from Virtual Inequality with mixed feelings. It is useful to think of the digital divide as more than one phenomenon. The four divides that Mossberger, Tolbert, and Stansbury offeraccess, skills, economic opportunity, and democratic-are useful as a point of departure and debate. No doubt, other divides will be identified and documented. This book will lead the way. Second, without question, Mossberger, Tolbert, and Stansbury provide us with an extremely well-documented, -written, and -argued work. Third, the authors are to be commended for the multidisciplinarity of their work. Would that we could see more like it. My reservations about their methodological approach, however, hang over this review like a shroud."

0.0041340212 = product of:
  0.041340213 = sum of:
    0.041340213 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 9) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041340213 = score(doc=9,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.14706601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.2810997 = fieldWeight in 9, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=9)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)

BK

05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft

Classification

05.20 / Kommunikation und Gesellschaft