Search (213 results, page 1 of 11)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Schneider, R.: Web 3.0 ante portas? : Integration von Social Web und Semantic Web (2008) 0.04
    0.03895879 = product of:
      0.12986264 = sum of:
        0.05846389 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05846389 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14706601 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.39753503 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
        0.062353685 = weight(_text_:web in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062353685 = score(doc=4184,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.6677857 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
        0.009045068 = product of:
          0.027135205 = sum of:
            0.027135205 = weight(_text_:22 in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027135205 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.3 = coord(3/10)
    
    Abstract
    Das Medium Internet ist im Wandel, und mit ihm ändern sich seine Publikations- und Rezeptionsbedingungen. Welche Chancen bieten die momentan parallel diskutierten Zukunftsentwürfe von Social Web und Semantic Web? Zur Beantwortung dieser Frage beschäftigt sich der Beitrag mit den Grundlagen beider Modelle unter den Aspekten Anwendungsbezug und Technologie, beleuchtet darüber hinaus jedoch auch deren Unzulänglichkeiten sowie den Mehrwert einer mediengerechten Kombination. Am Beispiel des grammatischen Online-Informationssystems grammis wird eine Strategie zur integrativen Nutzung der jeweiligen Stärken skizziert.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 10:38:28
    Source
    Kommunikation, Partizipation und Wirkungen im Social Web, Band 1. Hrsg.: A. Zerfaß u.a
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  2. Fensel, A.: Towards semantic APIs for research data services (2017) 0.02
    0.023201976 = product of:
      0.116009876 = sum of:
        0.08268043 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 4439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08268043 = score(doc=4439,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14706601 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.5621994 = fieldWeight in 4439, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4439)
        0.033329446 = weight(_text_:web in 4439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033329446 = score(doc=4439,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 4439, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4439)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Die schnelle Entwicklung der Internet- und Web-Technologie verändert den Stand der Technik in der Kommunikation von Wissen oder Forschungsergebnissen. Insbesondere werden semantische Technologien, verknüpfte und offene Daten zu entscheidenden Faktoren für einen erfolgreichen und effizienten Forschungsfortschritt. Zuerst definiere ich den Research Data Service (RDS) und diskutiere typische aktuelle und mögliche zukünftige Nutzungsszenarien mit RDS. Darüber hinaus bespreche ich den Stand der Technik in den Bereichen semantische Dienstleistung und Datenanmerkung und API-Konstruktion sowie infrastrukturelle Lösungen, die für die RDS-Realisierung anwendbar sind. Zum Schluss werden noch innovative Methoden der Online-Verbreitung, Förderung und effizienten Kommunikation der Forschung diskutiert.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  3. Blumauer, A.; Pellegrini, T.: Semantic Web Revisited : Eine kurze Einführung in das Social Semantic Web (2009) 0.02
    0.017441912 = product of:
      0.08720955 = sum of:
        0.07816448 = weight(_text_:web in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07816448 = score(doc=4855,freq=22.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.8371137 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
              4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                22.0 = termFreq=22.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
        0.009045068 = product of:
          0.027135205 = sum of:
            0.027135205 = weight(_text_:22 in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027135205 = score(doc=4855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Während in den vergangenen Monaten Themen wie Web 2.0 und Social Software ein erstaunliches Konjunkturhoch erlebt haben, vollzieht sich weitgehend abseits der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung eine technologische Komplementärinnovation. Die wachsende Adaption semantischer Technologien zu Zwecken der strukturierten Erschließung von "Web 2.0 Content", aber auch der Einsatz von Social Software zur kollaborativen Anreicherung von Web Content mit maschinenlesbaren Metadaten sind Ausdruck eines Trends in Richtung "Social Semantic Web". Bezeichnendes Merkmal dieser Entwicklung ist die voranschreitende Konvergenz zwischen Social Software und Semantic Web Technologien. Dieser Beitrag hat das Ziel ein allgemeines Bewusstsein und Verständnis dieser Entwicklung zu schaffen und nähert sich dem Phänomen aus einer nichttechnischen Perspektive.
    Object
    Web 2.0
    Pages
    S.3-22
    Source
    Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  4. Aslam, S.; Sonkar, S.K.: Semantic Web : an overview (2019) 0.02
    0.01732253 = product of:
      0.08661264 = sum of:
        0.07618159 = weight(_text_:web in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07618159 = score(doc=54,freq=16.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.8158776 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
              4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                16.0 = termFreq=16.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
        0.010431055 = product of:
          0.031293165 = sum of:
            0.031293165 = weight(_text_:29 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031293165 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents the semantic web, web writing content, web technology, goals of semantic and obligation for the expansion of web 3.0. This paper also shows the different components of semantic web and such as HTTP, HTML, XML, XML Schema, URI, RDF, Taxonomy and OWL. To provide valuable information services semantic web execute the benefits of library functions and also to be the best use of library collection are mention here.
    Date
    10.12.2020 9:29:12
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  5. Malmsten, M.: Making a library catalogue part of the Semantic Web (2008) 0.02
    0.016695887 = product of:
      0.083479434 = sum of:
        0.047134954 = weight(_text_:web in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047134954 = score(doc=2640,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
        0.036344483 = product of:
          0.054516725 = sum of:
            0.027381519 = weight(_text_:29 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027381519 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
            0.027135205 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027135205 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Library catalogues contain an enormous amount of structured, high-quality data, however, this data is generally not made available to semantic web applications. In this paper we describe the tools and techniques used to make the Swedish Union Catalogue (LIBRIS) part of the Semantic Web and Linked Data. The focus is on links to and between resources and the mechanisms used to make data available, rather than perfect description of the individual resources. We also present a method of creating links between records of the same work.
    Date
    20. 2.2009 10:29:39
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  6. Berners-Lee, T.; Hendler, J.; Lassila, O.: ¬The Semantic Web : a new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities (2001) 0.02
    0.016074894 = product of:
      0.08037447 = sum of:
        0.06733565 = weight(_text_:web in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06733565 = score(doc=376,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.72114074 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
        0.01303882 = product of:
          0.039116457 = sum of:
            0.039116457 = weight(_text_:29 in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.039116457 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Initialbeitrag zum sog. "Semantic Web". - Dt. Übersetzung: dt.: Mein Computer versteht mich. In: Spektrum der Wissenschaft, August 2001, S. 42-49
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  7. Matthews, B.M.: Integration via meaning : using the Semantic Web to deliver Web services (2002) 0.01
    0.014340699 = product of:
      0.07170349 = sum of:
        0.063880205 = weight(_text_:web in 3609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.063880205 = score(doc=3609,freq=20.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.6841342 = fieldWeight in 3609, product of:
              4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                20.0 = termFreq=20.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3609)
        0.007823291 = product of:
          0.023469873 = sum of:
            0.023469873 = weight(_text_:29 in 3609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023469873 = score(doc=3609,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3609, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3609)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    The major developments ofthe World-Wide Web (WWW) in the last two years have been Web Services and the Semantic Web. The former allows the construction of distributed systems across the WWW by providing a lightweight middleware architecture. The latter provides an infrastructure for accessing resources an the WWW via their relationships with respect to conceptual descriptions. In this paper, I shall review the progress undertaken in each of these two areas. Further, I shall argue that in order for the aims of both the Semantic Web and the Web Services activities to be successful, then the Web Service architecture needs to be augmented by concepts and tools of the Semantic Web. This infrastructure will allow resource discovery, brokering and access to be enabled in a standardised, integrated and interoperable manner. Finally, I survey the CLRC Information Technology R&D programme to show how it is contributing to the development of this future infrastructure.
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  8. Padmavathi, T.; Krishnamurthy, M.: Semantic Web tools and techniques for knowledge organization : an overview (2017) 0.01
    0.014296171 = product of:
      0.071480855 = sum of:
        0.062353685 = weight(_text_:web in 3618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062353685 = score(doc=3618,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.6677857 = fieldWeight in 3618, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3618)
        0.009127174 = product of:
          0.027381519 = sum of:
            0.027381519 = weight(_text_:29 in 3618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027381519 = score(doc=3618,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3618, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3618)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    The enormous amount of information generated every day and spread across the web is diversified in nature far beyond human consumption. To overcome this difficulty, the transformation of current unstructured information into a structured form called a "Semantic Web" was proposed by Tim Berners-Lee in 1989 to enable computers to understand and interpret the information they store. The aim of the semantic web is the integration of heterogeneous and distributed data spread across the web for knowledge discovery. The core of sematic web technologies includes knowledge representation languages RDF and OWL, ontology editors and reasoning tools, and ontology query languages such as SPARQL have also been discussed.
    Date
    29. 9.2017 18:30:57
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  9. Tennis, J.T.: Scheme versioning in the Semantic Web (2006) 0.01
    0.014131579 = product of:
      0.070657894 = sum of:
        0.06022684 = weight(_text_:web in 4939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06022684 = score(doc=4939,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.6450079 = fieldWeight in 4939, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4939)
        0.010431055 = product of:
          0.031293165 = sum of:
            0.031293165 = weight(_text_:29 in 4939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031293165 = score(doc=4939,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4939, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4939)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a conceptual framework and methodology for managing scheme versioning for the Semantic Web. The first part of the paper introduces the concept of vocabulary encoding schemes, distinguished from metadata schemas, and discusses the characteristics of changes in schemes. The paper then presents a proposal to use a value record-similar to a term record in thesaurus management techniques-to manage scheme versioning challenges for the Semantic Web. The conclusion identifies future research directions.
    Date
    23.12.2007 10:14:29
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Knitting the Semantic Web
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  10. Faaborg, A.; Lagoze, C.: Semantic browsing (2003) 0.01
    0.013354673 = product of:
      0.06677336 = sum of:
        0.057728294 = weight(_text_:web in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057728294 = score(doc=1026,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
        0.009045068 = product of:
          0.027135205 = sum of:
            0.027135205 = weight(_text_:22 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027135205 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    We have created software applications that allow users to both author and use Semantic Web metadata. To create and use a layer of semantic content on top of the existing Web, we have (1) implemented a user interface that expedites the task of attributing metadata to resources on the Web, and (2) augmented a Web browser to leverage this semantic metadata to provide relevant information and tasks to the user. This project provides a framework for annotating and reorganizing existing files, pages, and sites on the Web that is similar to Vannevar Bushrsquos original concepts of trail blazing and associative indexing.
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  11. Berners-Lee, T.; Hendler, J.; Lassila, O.: Mein Computer versteht mich (2001) 0.01
    0.0128599135 = product of:
      0.06429957 = sum of:
        0.053868517 = weight(_text_:web in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053868517 = score(doc=4550,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
        0.010431055 = product of:
          0.031293165 = sum of:
            0.031293165 = weight(_text_:29 in 4550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031293165 = score(doc=4550,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4550, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4550)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Was wäre, wenn der Computer den Inhalt einer Seite aus dem World Wide Web nicht nur anzeigen, sondern auch seine Bedeutung erfassen würde? Er könnte ungeahnte Dinge für seinen Benutzer tun - und das vielleicht schon bald, wenn das semantische Netz etabliert ist
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41
    Footnote
    Dt. Übersetzung von: The Semantic Web: a new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. In: Scientific American. 284(2001) no.5, S.34-43.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  12. Stamou, G.; Chortaras, A.: Ontological query answering over semantic data (2017) 0.01
    0.0128599135 = product of:
      0.06429957 = sum of:
        0.053868517 = weight(_text_:web in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053868517 = score(doc=3926,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
        0.010431055 = product of:
          0.031293165 = sum of:
            0.031293165 = weight(_text_:29 in 3926) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031293165 = score(doc=3926,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3926, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3926)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Pages
    S.29-63
    Series
    Lecture Notes in Computer Scienc;10370) (Information Systems and Applications, incl. Internet/Web, and HCI
    Source
    Reasoning Web: Semantic Interoperability on the Web, 13th International Summer School 2017, London, UK, July 7-11, 2017, Tutorial Lectures. Eds.: Ianni, G. et al
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  13. Franklin, R.A.: Re-inventing subject access for the semantic web (2003) 0.01
    0.012239787 = product of:
      0.06119893 = sum of:
        0.053446017 = weight(_text_:web in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053446017 = score(doc=2556,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.57238775 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
        0.0077529154 = product of:
          0.023258746 = sum of:
            0.023258746 = weight(_text_:22 in 2556) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023258746 = score(doc=2556,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2556, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2556)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    First generation scholarly research on the Web lacked a firm system of authority control. Second generation Web research is beginning to model subject access with library science principles of bibliographic control and cataloguing. Harnessing the Web and organising the intellectual content with standards and controlled vocabulary provides precise search and retrieval capability, increasing relevance and efficient use of technology. Dublin Core metadata standards permit a full evaluation and cataloguing of Web resources appropriate to highly specific research needs and discovery. Current research points to a type of structure based on a system of faceted classification. This system allows the semantic and syntactic relationships to be defined. Controlled vocabulary, such as the Library of Congress Subject Headings, can be assigned, not in a hierarchical structure, but rather as descriptive facets of relating concepts. Web design features such as this are adding value to discovery and filtering out data that lack authority. The system design allows for scalability and extensibility, two technical features that are integral to future development of the digital library and resource discovery.
    Date
    30.12.2008 18:22:46
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  14. Papadakis, I. et al.: Highlighting timely information in libraries through social and semantic Web technologies (2016) 0.01
    0.012107004 = product of:
      0.06053502 = sum of:
        0.047613494 = weight(_text_:web in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047613494 = score(doc=2090,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.5099235 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
        0.012921526 = product of:
          0.038764577 = sum of:
            0.038764577 = weight(_text_:22 in 2090) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038764577 = score(doc=2090,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2090, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2090)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Source
    Metadata and semantics research: 10th International Conference, MTSR 2016, Göttingen, Germany, November 22-25, 2016, Proceedings. Eds.: E. Garoufallou
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  15. Wielinga, B.; Wielemaker, J.; Schreiber, G.; Assem, M. van: Methods for porting resources to the Semantic Web (2004) 0.01
    0.0114609385 = product of:
      0.05730469 = sum of:
        0.0494814 = weight(_text_:web in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0494814 = score(doc=4640,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.5299281 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
        0.007823291 = product of:
          0.023469873 = sum of:
            0.023469873 = weight(_text_:29 in 4640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023469873 = score(doc=4640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4640)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Ontologies will play a central role in the development of the Semantic Web. It is unrealistic to assume that such ontologies will be developed from scratch. Rather, we assume that existing resources such as thesauri and lexical data bases will be reused in the development of ontologies for the Semantic Web. In this paper we describe a method for converting existing source material to a representation that is compatible with Semantic Web languages such as RDF(S) and OWL. The method is illustrated with three case studies: converting Wordnet, AAT and MeSH to RDF(S) and OWL.
    Date
    29. 7.2011 14:44:56
    Source
    Proceedings of the First European Semantic Web Symposium (ESWS2004), Eds.: C. Bussler, J. Davies, D. Fensel and R. Studer. 2004. S.299-311
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  16. Synak, M.; Dabrowski, M.; Kruk, S.R.: Semantic Web and ontologies (2009) 0.01
    0.011397746 = product of:
      0.05698873 = sum of:
        0.04665151 = weight(_text_:web in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04665151 = score(doc=3376,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.49962097 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
        0.010337221 = product of:
          0.031011663 = sum of:
            0.031011663 = weight(_text_:22 in 3376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031011663 = score(doc=3376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3376)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    This chapter presents ontologies and their role in the creation of the Semantic Web. Ontologies hold special interest, because they are very closely related to the way we understand the world. They provide common understanding, the very first step to successful communication. In following sections, we will present ontologies, how they are created and used. We will describe available tools for specifying and working with ontologies.
    Date
    31. 7.2010 16:58:22
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  17. O'Hara, K.; Hall, W.: Semantic Web (2009) 0.01
    0.011252426 = product of:
      0.056262128 = sum of:
        0.047134954 = weight(_text_:web in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047134954 = score(doc=3871,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
        0.009127174 = product of:
          0.027381519 = sum of:
            0.027381519 = weight(_text_:29 in 3871) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027381519 = score(doc=3871,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3871, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3871)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    The "semantic web (SW)" is a vision of a web of linked data, allowing querying, integration, and sharing of data from distributed sources in heterogeneous formats, using ontologies to provide an associated and explicit semantic interpretation. This entry describes the series of layered formalisms and standards that underlie this vision, and chronicles their historical and ongoing development. A number of applications, scientific and otherwise, academic and commercial, are reviewed. The SW has often been a controversial enterprise, and some of the controversies are reviewed, and misconceptions defused.
    Date
    27. 8.2011 14:29:18
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  18. Feigenbaum, L.; Herman, I.; Hongsermeier, T.; Neumann, E.; Stephens, S.: ¬The Semantic Web in action (2007) 0.01
    0.010754392 = product of:
      0.053771958 = sum of:
        0.04855643 = weight(_text_:web in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04855643 = score(doc=3000,freq=26.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.520022 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
              5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
                26.0 = termFreq=26.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
        0.0052155275 = product of:
          0.015646582 = sum of:
            0.015646582 = weight(_text_:29 in 3000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015646582 = score(doc=3000,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 3000, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3000)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Six years ago in this magazine, Tim Berners-Lee, James Hendler and Ora Lassila unveiled a nascent vision of the Semantic Web: a highly interconnected network of data that could be easily accessed and understood by any desktop or handheld machine. They painted a future of intelligent software agents that would head out on the World Wide Web and automatically book flights and hotels for our trips, update our medical records and give us a single, customized answer to a particular question without our having to search for information or pore through results. They also presented the young technologies that would make this vision come true: a common language for representing data that could be understood by all kinds of software agents; ontologies--sets of statements--that translate information from disparate databases into common terms; and rules that allow software agents to reason about the information described in those terms. The data format, ontologies and reasoning software would operate like one big application on the World Wide Web, analyzing all the raw data stored in online databases as well as all the data about the text, images, video and communications the Web contained. Like the Web itself, the Semantic Web would grow in a grassroots fashion, only this time aided by working groups within the World Wide Web Consortium, which helps to advance the global medium. Since then skeptics have said the Semantic Web would be too difficult for people to understand or exploit. Not so. The enabling technologies have come of age. A vibrant community of early adopters has agreed on standards that have steadily made the Semantic Web practical to use. Large companies have major projects under way that will greatly improve the efficiencies of in-house operations and of scientific research. Other firms are using the Semantic Web to enhance business-to-business interactions and to build the hidden data-processing structures, or back ends, behind new consumer services. And like an iceberg, the tip of this large body of work is emerging in direct consumer applications, too.
    Content
    Vgl. auch unter: http://thefigtrees.net/lee/sw/sciam/semantic-web-in-action#single-page.
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  19. Hooland, S. van; Verborgh, R.; Wilde, M. De; Hercher, J.; Mannens, E.; Wa, R.Van de: Evaluating the success of vocabulary reconciliation for cultural heritage collections (2013) 0.01
    0.010270621 = product of:
      0.051353104 = sum of:
        0.020200694 = weight(_text_:web in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020200694 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
        0.031152412 = product of:
          0.04672862 = sum of:
            0.023469873 = weight(_text_:29 in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023469873 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
            0.023258746 = weight(_text_:22 in 662) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023258746 = score(doc=662,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 662, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=662)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2013 19:29:20
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  20. Dunsire, G.: FRBR and the Semantic Web (2012) 0.01
    0.009989449 = product of:
      0.049947243 = sum of:
        0.04082007 = weight(_text_:web in 1928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04082007 = score(doc=1928,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 1928, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1928)
        0.009127174 = product of:
          0.027381519 = sum of:
            0.027381519 = weight(_text_:29 in 1928) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027381519 = score(doc=1928,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1928, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1928)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2 = coord(2/10)
    
    Abstract
    Each of the FR family of models has been represented in Resource Description Framework (RDF), the basis of the Semantic Web. This has involved analysis of the entity-relationship diagrams and text of the models to identify and create the RDF classes, properties, definitions and scope notes required. The work has shown that it is possible to seamlessly connect the models within a semantic framework, specifically in the treatment of names, identifiers, and subjects, and link the RDF elements to those in related namespaces.
    Date
    29. 5.2015 10:50:02
    Theme
    Semantic Web

Years

Languages

  • e 151
  • d 60
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • el 26
  • x 1
  • More… Less…