Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × author_ss:"Leydesdorff, L."
  1. Leydesdorff, L.; Vaughan, L.: Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science : extending ACA to the Web environment (2006) 0.00
    0.0023806747 = product of:
      0.023806747 = sum of:
        0.023806747 = weight(_text_:web in 6113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023806747 = score(doc=6113,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 6113, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6113)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Co-occurrence matrices, such as cocitation, coword, and colink matrices, have been used widely in the information sciences. However, confusion and controversy have hindered the proper statistical analysis of these data. The underlying problem, in our opinion, involved understanding the nature of various types of matrices. This article discusses the difference between a symmetrical cocitation matrix and an asymmetrical citation matrix as well as the appropriate statistical techniques that can be applied to each of these matrices, respectively. Similarity measures (such as the Pearson correlation coefficient or the cosine) should not be applied to the symmetrical cocitation matrix but can be applied to the asymmetrical citation matrix to derive the proximity matrix. The argument is illustrated with examples. The study then extends the application of co-occurrence matrices to the Web environment, in which the nature of the available data and thus data collection methods are different from those of traditional databases such as the Science Citation Index. A set of data collected with the Google Scholar search engine is analyzed by using both the traditional methods of multivariate analysis and the new visualization software Pajek, which is based on social network analysis and graph theory.
  2. Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The university-industry knowledge relationship : analyzing patents and the science base of technologies (2004) 0.00
    0.0020200694 = product of:
      0.020200694 = sum of:
        0.020200694 = weight(_text_:web in 2887) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020200694 = score(doc=2887,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2887, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2887)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    Via the Internet, information scientists can obtain costfree access to large databases in the "hidden" or "deep Web." These databases are often structured far more than the Internet domains themselves. The patent database of the U.S. Patent and Trade Office is used in this study to examine the science base of patents in terms of the literature references in these patents. Universitybased patents at the global level are compared with results when using the national economy of the Netherlands as a system of reference. Methods for accessing the online databases and for the visualization of the results are specified. The conclusion is that "biotechnology" has historically generated a model for theorizing about university-industry relations that cannot easily be generalized to other sectors and disciplines.
  3. Leydesdorff, L.: On the normalization and visualization of author co-citation data : Salton's Cosine versus the Jaccard index (2008) 0.00
    0.0020200694 = product of:
      0.020200694 = sum of:
        0.020200694 = weight(_text_:web in 1341) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020200694 = score(doc=1341,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 1341, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1341)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Abstract
    The debate about which similarity measure one should use for the normalization in the case of Author Co-citation Analysis (ACA) is further complicated when one distinguishes between the symmetrical co-citation - or, more generally, co-occurrence - matrix and the underlying asymmetrical citation - occurrence - matrix. In the Web environment, the approach of retrieving original citation data is often not feasible. In that case, one should use the Jaccard index, but preferentially after adding the number of total citations (i.e., occurrences) on the main diagonal. Unlike Salton's cosine and the Pearson correlation, the Jaccard index abstracts from the shape of the distributions and focuses only on the intersection and the sum of the two sets. Since the correlations in the co-occurrence matrix may be spurious, this property of the Jaccard index can be considered as an advantage in this case.
  4. Lucio-Arias, D.; Leydesdorff, L.: ¬An indicator of research front activity : measuring intellectual organization as uncertainty reduction in document sets (2009) 0.00
    9.2198374E-4 = product of:
      0.009219837 = sum of:
        0.009219837 = product of:
          0.027659511 = sum of:
            0.027659511 = weight(_text_:29 in 3297) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027659511 = score(doc=3297,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.2748193 = fieldWeight in 3297, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3297)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    2. 2.2010 19:29:29
  5. Leydesdorff, L.; Zhou, P.: Co-word analysis using the Chinese character set (2008) 0.00
    9.1271737E-4 = product of:
      0.009127174 = sum of:
        0.009127174 = product of:
          0.027381519 = sum of:
            0.027381519 = weight(_text_:29 in 1970) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.027381519 = score(doc=1970,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1970, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1970)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    12. 7.2008 18:46:29
  6. Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The construction and globalization of the knowledge base in inter-human communication systems (2003) 0.00
    7.752915E-4 = product of:
      0.0077529154 = sum of:
        0.0077529154 = product of:
          0.023258746 = sum of:
            0.023258746 = weight(_text_:22 in 1621) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023258746 = score(doc=1621,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1621, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1621)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    22. 5.2003 19:48:04
  7. Leydesdorff, L.: Can networks of journal-journal citations be used as indicators of change in the social sciences? (2003) 0.00
    7.752915E-4 = product of:
      0.0077529154 = sum of:
        0.0077529154 = product of:
          0.023258746 = sum of:
            0.023258746 = weight(_text_:22 in 4460) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023258746 = score(doc=4460,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4460, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4460)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    6.11.2005 19:02:22
  8. Leydesdorff, L.; Sun, Y.: National and international dimensions of the Triple Helix in Japan : university-industry-government versus international coauthorship relations (2009) 0.00
    7.752915E-4 = product of:
      0.0077529154 = sum of:
        0.0077529154 = product of:
          0.023258746 = sum of:
            0.023258746 = weight(_text_:22 in 2761) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023258746 = score(doc=2761,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028611459 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2761, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2761)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.1 = coord(1/10)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:07:20