Search (294 results, page 1 of 15)

  • × year_i:[2020 TO 2030}
  1. Gabler, S.: Vergabe von DDC-Sachgruppen mittels eines Schlagwort-Thesaurus (2021) 0.20 
    0.19776104 = product of:
  0.3955221 = sum of:
    0.03786882 = product of:
      0.11360646 = sum of:
        0.11360646 = weight(_text_:3a in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11360646 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24256827 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.11360646 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11360646 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24256827 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.11360646 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11360646 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24256827 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.016833913 = weight(_text_:web in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016833913 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
    0.11360646 = weight(_text_:2f in 1000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11360646 = score(doc=1000,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24256827 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 1000, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1000)
  0.5 = coord(5/10)
    Content
    Master thesis Master of Science (Library and Information Studies) (MSc), Universität Wien. Advisor: Christoph Steiner. Vgl.: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371680244_Vergabe_von_DDC-Sachgruppen_mittels_eines_Schlagwort-Thesaurus. DOI: 10.25365/thesis.70030. Vgl. dazu die Präsentation unter: https://www.google.com/url?sa=i&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=0CAIQw7AJahcKEwjwoZzzytz_AhUAAAAAHQAAAAAQAg&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.dnb.de%2Fdownload%2Fattachments%2F252121510%2FDA3%2520Workshop-Gabler.pdf%3Fversion%3D1%26modificationDate%3D1671093170000%26api%3Dv2&psig=AOvVaw0szwENK1or3HevgvIDOfjx&ust=1687719410889597&opi=89978449.
  2. Noever, D.; Ciolino, M.: ¬The Turing deception (2022) 0.18 
    0.18177032 = product of:
  0.4544258 = sum of:
    0.04544258 = product of:
      0.13632774 = sum of:
        0.13632774 = weight(_text_:3a in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.13632774 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24256827 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.13632774 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13632774 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24256827 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.13632774 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13632774 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24256827 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
    0.13632774 = weight(_text_:2f in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13632774 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.24256827 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.56201804 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
  0.4 = coord(4/10)
    Source
    https%3A%2F%2Farxiv.org%2Fabs%2F2212.06721&usg=AOvVaw3i_9pZm9y_dQWoHi6uv0EN
  3. Hubert, M.; Griesbaum, J.; Womser-Hacker, C.: Usability von Browsererweiterungen zum Schutz vor Tracking (2020) 0.04 
    0.04177886 = product of:
  0.2088943 = sum of:
    0.19976713 = weight(_text_:schutz in 5866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.19976713 = score(doc=5866,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.20656188 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.9671055 = fieldWeight in 5866, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5866)
    0.009127174 = product of:
      0.027381519 = sum of:
        0.027381519 = weight(_text_:29 in 5866) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027381519 = score(doc=5866,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5866, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5866)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Abstract
    Browsererweiterungen zum Schutz vor Tracking stellen beliebte Werkzeuge zum Schutz der Privatsphäre von Nutzerinnen und Nutzern dar. Ihre tatsächliche Effektivität ist in hohem Maße von ihrer Usability abhängig, da diese bestimmt, in welchem Ausmaß diese Werkzeuge effektiv, effizient und zufriedenstellend genutzt werden können. Die vorliegende Untersuchung prüft die Gebrauchstauglichkeit vier solcher Browsererweiterungen mit Hilfe von Benutzertests. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Add-ons auch heutzutage noch eine Vielzahl an Usability-Mängeln aufweisen. Kernprobleme stellen insbesondere die mangelnde Verständlichkeit und die fehlende Führung und Unterstützung der Nutzenden dar.
    Date
    11. 7.2020 18:50:29
  4. Option für Metager als Standardsuchmaschine, Suchmaschine nach dem Peer-to-Peer-Prinzip (2021) 0.02 
    0.0198628 = product of:
  0.099314004 = sum of:
    0.033407938 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033407938 = score(doc=431,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14706601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.22716287 = fieldWeight in 431, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=431)
    0.06590606 = weight(_text_:schutz in 431) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06590606 = score(doc=431,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20656188 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.31906208 = fieldWeight in 431, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=431)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Content
    Auch auf dem Volla-Phone ist es bald möglich, MetaGer als Standardsuchmaschine zu wählen. Das Volla Phone ist ein Produkt von "Hallo Welt Systeme UG" in Remscheid. Die Entwickler des Smartphones verfolgen den Ansatz, möglichst wenig von der Aufmerksamkeit des Nutzers zu beanspruchen. Technik soll nicht ablenken und sich in der Vordergrund spielen, sondern als bloßes Werkzeug im Hintergrund bleiben. Durch Möglichkeiten wie detaillierter Datenschutzeinstellungen, logfreiem VPN, quelloffener Apps aus einem alternativen App Store wird zudem Schutz der Privatsphäre ermöglicht - ganz ohne Google-Dienste. Durch die Partnerschaft mit MetaGer können die Nutzer von Volla-Phone auch im Bereich Suchmaschine Privatsphärenschutz realisieren. Mehr unter: https://suma-ev.de/mit-metager-auf-dem-volla-phone-suchen/
    YaCy: Suchmaschine nach dem Peer-to-Peer-Prinzip. YaCy ist eine dezentrale, freie Suchmaschine. Die Besonderheit: die freie Suchmaschine läuft nicht auf zentralen Servern eines einzelnen Betreibers, sondern funktioniert nach dem Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Prinzip. Dieses basiert darauf, dass die YaCy-Nutzer aufgerufene Webseiten auf ihrem Computer lokal indexieren. Jeder Nutzer "ercrawlt" sich damit einen kleinen Index, den er durch Kommunikation mit anderen YaCy-Peers teilen kann. Das Programm sorgt dafür, dass durch die kleinen dezentralen Crawler einzelner Nutzer schließlich ein globaler Gesamtindex entsteht. Je mehr Nutzer Teil dieser dezentralen Suche sind, desto größer wird der gemeinsame Index, auf den der einzelne Nutzer dann Zugriff haben kann. Seit kurzem befindet sich YaCy im Verbund unserer abgefragten Suchmaschinen. Wir sind somit auch Teil des Indexes der Suchmaschine.
  5. Breuer, T.; Tavakolpoursaleh, N.; Schaer, P.; Hienert, D.; Schaible, J.; Castro, L.J.: Online Information Retrieval Evaluation using the STELLA Framework (2022) 0.02 
    0.019619705 = product of:
  0.098098524 = sum of:
    0.020200694 = weight(_text_:web in 640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020200694 = score(doc=640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=640)
    0.07789783 = weight(_text_:log in 640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07789783 = score(doc=640,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18335998 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.42483553 = fieldWeight in 640, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=640)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Abstract
    Involving users in early phases of software development has become a common strategy as it enables developers to consider user needs from the beginning. Once a system is in production, new opportunities to observe, evaluate and learn from users emerge as more information becomes available. Gathering information from users to continuously evaluate their behavior is a common practice for commercial software, while the Cranfield paradigm remains the preferred option for Information Retrieval (IR) and recommendation systems in the academic world. Here we introduce the Infrastructures for Living Labs STELLA project which aims to create an evaluation infrastructure allowing experimental systems to run along production web-based academic search systems with real users. STELLA combines user interactions and log files analyses to enable large-scale A/B experiments for academic search.
  6. Molor-Erdene, B.: Schutz der Privatsphäre oder der Gesundheit? (2020) 0.02 
    0.018641049 = product of:
  0.18641049 = sum of:
    0.18641049 = weight(_text_:schutz in 5821) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18641049 = score(doc=5821,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.20656188 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.9024438 = fieldWeight in 5821, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5821)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Source
    https://www.heise.de/tp/features/Schutz-der-Privatsphaere-oder-der-Gesundheit-4695908.html?view=print
  7. Lee, D.J.; Stvilia, B.; Ha, S.; Hahn, D.: ¬The structure and priorities of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities : a case of institutional research information management system (2023) 0.01 
    0.014275125 = product of:
  0.07137562 = sum of:
    0.06491486 = weight(_text_:log in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06491486 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18335998 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.3540296 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
    0.006460763 = product of:
      0.019382289 = sum of:
        0.019382289 = weight(_text_:22 in 884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019382289 = score(doc=884,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 884, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=884)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Abstract
    Research information management systems (RIMS) have become critical components of information technology infrastructure on university campuses. They are used not just for sharing and promoting faculty research, but also for conducting faculty evaluation and development, facilitating research collaborations, identifying mentors for student projects, and expert consultants for local businesses. This study is one of the first empirical investigations of the structure of researchers' scholarly profile maintenance activities in a nonmandatory institutional RIMS. By analyzing the RIMS's log data, we identified 11 tasks researchers performed when updating their profiles. These tasks were further grouped into three activities: (a) adding publication, (b) enhancing researcher identity, and (c) improving research discoverability. In addition, we found that junior researchers and female researchers were more engaged in maintaining their RIMS profiles than senior researchers and male researchers. The results provide insights for designing profile maintenance action templates for institutional RIMS that are tailored to researchers' characteristics and help enhance researchers' engagement in the curation of their research information. This also suggests that female and junior researchers can serve as early adopters of institutional RIMS.
    Date
    22. 1.2023 18:43:02
  8. Krekeler, H.: Blockchain : Anwendungen im Dokumentenmanagement (2021) 0.01 
    0.013181212 = product of:
  0.13181213 = sum of:
    0.13181213 = weight(_text_:schutz in 200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13181213 = score(doc=200,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20656188 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.63812417 = fieldWeight in 200, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=200)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    In der Unternehmenspraxis bietet die Documentchain (https://de.documentchain.org), eine speziell für das Dokumentenmanagement entwickelte dezentrale Blockchain, die Möglichkeit, verschlüsselte Beschreibungen sowie Hashwerte einer Dokumentdatei gemeinsam mit einem Zeitstempel in der verteilten Datenbank dauerhaft zu hinterlegen und später mit dem Originaldokument abzugleichen. Auf diese Weise wird der Beweis erbracht, seit wann ein Dokument vorhanden ist. Hieraus ergeben sich vielfältige Möglichkeiten. Denn es geht nicht nur um die Erfüllung von Aufbewahrungsvorschriften, sondern insbesondere um den Schutz des Copyrights.
  9. Räwel, J.: Automatisierte Kommunikation (2023) 0.01 
    0.01181149 = product of:
  0.1181149 = sum of:
    0.1181149 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 909) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1181149 = score(doc=909,freq=16.0), product of:
        0.14706601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.8031421 = fieldWeight in 909, product of:
          4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
            16.0 = termFreq=16.0
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=909)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Content
    In den Sozialwissenschaften gibt es zwei fundamental unterschiedliche Auffassungen, was unter Kommunikation zu verstehen ist. Angelehnt an das Alltagsverständnis und daher auch in den Sozialwissenschaften dominant, gehen "handlungstheoretische" Vorstellungen von Kommunikation davon aus, dass diese instrumentellen Charakters ist. Es sind Menschen in ihrer physisch-psychischen Kompaktheit, die mittels Kommunikation, sei dies in mündlicher oder schriftlicher Form, Informationen austauschen. Kommunizierende werden nach dieser Vorstellung wechselseitig als Sender bzw. Empfänger von Informationen verstanden. Kommunikation dient der mehr oder minder erfolgreichen Übertragung von Informationen von Mensch zu Mensch. Davon paradigmatisch zu unterscheiden sind "systemtheoretische" Vorstellungen von Kommunikation, wie sie wesentlich von dem 1998 verstorbenen Soziologen Niklas Luhmann in Vorschlag gebracht wurden. Nach diesem Paradigma wird behauptet, dass ihr "Eigenleben" charakteristisch ist. Kommunikation zeichnet sich durch ihre rekursive Eigendynamik aus, welche die Möglichkeiten der Kommunizierenden begrenzt, diese zu steuern und zu beeinflussen. Gemäß dieser Konzeption befindet sich individuelles Bewusstseins - in ihrer je gedanklichen Eigendynamik - in der Umwelt von Kommunikationssystemen und vermag diese mittels Sprache lediglich zu irritieren, nicht aber kontrollierend zu determinieren. Dies schon deshalb nicht, weil in Kommunikationssystemen, etwa einem Gespräch als einem "Interaktionssystem", mindestens zwei bewusste Systeme mit ihrer je unterschiedlichen gedanklichen Eigendynamik beteiligt sind.
    Source
    https://www.telepolis.de/features/Automatisierte-Kommunikation-7520683.html?seite=all
  10. Döring, N.: Computervermittelte Kommunikation (2023) 0.01 
    0.01157285 = product of:
  0.1157285 = sum of:
    0.1157285 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1157285 = score(doc=807,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.14706601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.7869153 = fieldWeight in 807, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=807)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Der vorliegende Beitrag erklärt, wie computervermittelte Kommunikation definiert ist (Abschnitt 2) und wo sie eingesetzt wird (Abschnitt 3). Anschließend wird der aktuelle Forschungsstand umrissen (Abschnitt 4). Der Schwerpunkt des Beitrags liegt auf der Darstellung zentraler Theorien der computervermittelten Kommunikation (Abschnitt 5).
  11. Brettschneider, P.: Urheberrecht (2023) 0.01 
    0.011533561 = product of:
  0.11533561 = sum of:
    0.11533561 = weight(_text_:schutz in 822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.11533561 = score(doc=822,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20656188 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.55835867 = fieldWeight in 822, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.2195506 = idf(docFreq=87, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=822)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    In einer digitalen Wissensgesellschaft kommt dem Urheberrecht eine herausragende Bedeutung zu. Es ist - wie auch das Datenschutzrecht (s. Kapitel F 4 Informationelle Selbstbestimmung und Informationsfreiheit) - Kernbestandteil eines Kommunikationsrechts, das die Weitergabe und Nutzung von Informationen regelt. Daher mag es paradox klingen, dass das Urheberrecht Informationen - wie auch Ideen oder (wissenschaftliche) Theorien - überhaupt nicht schützt.1 Vielmehr greift sein Schutz erst, wenn sich Information z. B. in Form eines gedruckten oder digitalen Textes oder auch einer Rede manifestiert. Dieser richtet sich dann aber nicht auf den Informationsgehalt an sich, sondern seine Verkörperung in Form eines originellen und individuellen Werkes (s. Abschnitt 2 und 3).
  12. Asubiaro, T.V.; Onaolapo, S.: ¬A comparative study of the coverage of African journals in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef (2023) 0.01 
    0.009539052 = product of:
  0.047695257 = sum of:
    0.041234493 = weight(_text_:web in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.041234493 = score(doc=992,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.4416067 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
    0.006460763 = product of:
      0.019382289 = sum of:
        0.019382289 = weight(_text_:22 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019382289 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Abstract
    This is the first study that evaluated the coverage of journals from Africa in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef. A list of active journals published in each of the 55 African countries was compiled from Ulrich's periodicals directory and African Journals Online (AJOL) website. Journal master lists for Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef were searched for the African journals. A total of 2,229 unique active African journals were identified from Ulrich (N = 2,117, 95.0%) and AJOL (N = 243, 10.9%) after removing duplicates. The volume of African journals in Web of Science and Scopus databases is 7.4% (N = 166) and 7.8% (N = 174), respectively, compared to the 45.6% (N = 1,017) covered in CrossRef. While making up only 17.% of all the African journals, South African journals had the best coverage in the two most authoritative databases, accounting for 73.5% and 62.1% of all the African journals in Web of Science and Scopus, respectively. In contrast, Nigeria published 44.5% of all the African journals. The distribution of the African journals is biased in favor of Medical, Life and Health Sciences and Humanities and the Arts in the three databases. The low representation of African journals in CrossRef, a free indexing infrastructure that could be harnessed for building an African-centric research indexing database, is concerning.
    Date
    22. 6.2023 14:09:06
    Object
    Web of Science
  13. Dietz, K.: en.wikipedia.org > 6 Mio. Artikel (2020) 0.01 
    0.008877646 = product of:
  0.04438823 = sum of:
    0.03786882 = product of:
      0.11360646 = sum of:
        0.11360646 = weight(_text_:3a in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11360646 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24256827 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.46834838 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.00651941 = product of:
      0.019558229 = sum of:
        0.019558229 = weight(_text_:29 in 5669) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019558229 = score(doc=5669,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5669, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5669)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Content
    "Die Englischsprachige Wikipedia verfügt jetzt über mehr als 6 Millionen Artikel. An zweiter Stelle kommt die deutschsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.3 Millionen Artikeln, an dritter Stelle steht die französischsprachige Wikipedia mit 2.1 Millionen Artikeln (via Researchbuzz: Firehose <https://rbfirehose.com/2020/01/24/techcrunch-wikipedia-now-has-more-than-6-million-articles-in-english/> und Techcrunch <https://techcrunch.com/2020/01/23/wikipedia-english-six-million-articles/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Techcrunch+%28TechCrunch%29&guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly9yYmZpcmVob3NlLmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzI0L3RlY2hjcnVuY2gtd2lraXBlZGlhLW5vdy1oYXMtbW9yZS10aGFuLTYtbWlsbGlvbi1hcnRpY2xlcy1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLw&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAK0zHfjdDZ_spFZBF_z-zDjtL5iWvuKDumFTzm4HvQzkUfE2pLXQzGS6FGB_y-VISdMEsUSvkNsg2U_NWQ4lwWSvOo3jvXo1I3GtgHpP8exukVxYAnn5mJspqX50VHIWFADHhs5AerkRn3hMRtf_R3F1qmEbo8EROZXp328HMC-o>). 250120 via digithek ch = #fineBlog s.a.: Angesichts der Veröffentlichung des 6-millionsten Artikels vergangene Woche in der englischsprachigen Wikipedia hat die Community-Zeitungsseite "Wikipedia Signpost" ein Moratorium bei der Veröffentlichung von Unternehmensartikeln gefordert. Das sei kein Vorwurf gegen die Wikimedia Foundation, aber die derzeitigen Maßnahmen, um die Enzyklopädie gegen missbräuchliches undeklariertes Paid Editing zu schützen, funktionierten ganz klar nicht. *"Da die ehrenamtlichen Autoren derzeit von Werbung in Gestalt von Wikipedia-Artikeln überwältigt werden, und da die WMF nicht in der Lage zu sein scheint, dem irgendetwas entgegenzusetzen, wäre der einzige gangbare Weg für die Autoren, fürs erste die Neuanlage von Artikeln über Unternehmen zu untersagen"*, schreibt der Benutzer Smallbones in seinem Editorial <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2020-01-27/From_the_editor> zur heutigen Ausgabe."
  14. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.01 
    0.008558852 = product of:
  0.042794257 = sum of:
    0.016833913 = weight(_text_:web in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016833913 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
    0.025960347 = product of:
      0.03894052 = sum of:
        0.019558229 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019558229 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10064617 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
        0.019382289 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019382289 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  15. Tay, A.: ¬The next generation discovery citation indexes : a review of the landscape in 2020 (2020) 0.01 
    0.008474903 = product of:
  0.042374514 = sum of:
    0.033329446 = weight(_text_:web in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.033329446 = score(doc=40,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
    0.009045068 = product of:
      0.027135205 = sum of:
        0.027135205 = weight(_text_:22 in 40) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027135205 = score(doc=40,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10019246 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 40, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=40)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Abstract
    Conclusion There is a reason why Google Scholar and Web of Science/Scopus are kings of the hills in their various arenas. They have strong brand recogniton, a head start in development and a mass of eyeballs and users that leads to an almost virtious cycle of improvement. Competing against such well established competitors is not easy even when one has deep pockets (Microsoft) or a killer idea (scite). It will be interesting to see how the landscape will look like in 2030. Stay tuned for part II where I review each particular index.
    Date
    17.11.2020 12:22:59
    Object
    Web of Science
  16. Esders, M.: Sprachregime : die Macht der politischen Wahrheitssysteme (2020) 0.01 
    0.008351984 = product of:
  0.08351984 = sum of:
    0.08351984 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 533) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08351984 = score(doc=533,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.14706601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.56790715 = fieldWeight in 533, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=533)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    BK
    89.56 Politische Kommunikation
    Classification
    MS 7850: Allgemeine Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation und ihrer Medien; Begriff der Öffentlichkeit; Meinungsbildung, Public Relations / Soziologie / Spezielle Soziologien
    89.56 Politische Kommunikation
    RVK
    MS 7850: Allgemeine Theorie der gesellschaftlichen Kommunikation und ihrer Medien; Begriff der Öffentlichkeit; Meinungsbildung, Public Relations / Soziologie / Spezielle Soziologien
  17. Vogt, T.: ¬Die Transformation des renommierten Informationsservices zbMATH zu einer Open Access-Plattform für die Mathematik steht vor dem Abschluss. (2020) 0.01 
    0.008015121 = product of:
  0.080151215 = sum of:
    0.080151215 = product of:
      0.24045363 = sum of:
        0.24045363 = weight(_text_:c3 in 31) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.24045363 = score(doc=31,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2789897 = queryWeight, product of:
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028611459 = queryNorm
            0.8618728 = fieldWeight in 31, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              9.7509775 = idf(docFreq=6, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=31)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Content
    "Mit Beginn des Jahres 2021 wird der umfassende internationale Informationsservice zbMATH in eine Open Access-Plattform überführt. Dann steht dieser bislang kostenpflichtige Dienst weltweit allen Interessierten kostenfrei zur Verfügung. Die Änderung des Geschäftsmodells ermöglicht, die meisten Informationen und Daten von zbMATH für Forschungszwecke und zur Verknüpfung mit anderen nicht-kommerziellen Diensten frei zu nutzen, siehe: https://www.mathematik.de/dmv-blog/2772-transformation-von-zbmath-zu-einer-open-access-plattform-f%C3%BCr-die-mathematik-kurz-vor-dem-abschluss."
  18. Geras, A.; Siudem, G.; Gagolewski, M.: Time to vote : temporal clustering of user activity on Stack Overflow (2022) 0.01 
    0.007789783 = product of:
  0.07789783 = sum of:
    0.07789783 = weight(_text_:log in 765) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07789783 = score(doc=765,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18335998 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.42483553 = fieldWeight in 765, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.4086204 = idf(docFreq=197, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=765)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Question-and-answer (Q&A) sites improve access to information and ease transfer of knowledge. In recent years, they have grown in popularity and importance, enabling research on behavioral patterns of their users. We study the dynamics related to the casting of 7 M votes across a sample of 700 k posts on Stack Overflow, a large community of professional software developers. We employ log-Gaussian mixture modeling and Markov chains to formulate a simple yet elegant description of the considered phenomena. We indicate that the interevent times can naturally be clustered into 3 typical time scales: those which occur within hours, weeks, and months and show how the events become rarer and rarer as time passes. It turns out that the posts' popularity in a short period after publication is a weak predictor of its overall success, contrary to what was observed, for example, in case of YouTube clips. Nonetheless, the sleeping beauties sometimes awake and can receive bursts of votes following each other relatively quickly.
  19. Grundlagen der Informationswissenschaft (2023) 0.01 
    0.0070312605 = product of:
  0.035156302 = sum of:
    0.025055954 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 1043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.025055954 = score(doc=1043,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14706601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.17037216 = fieldWeight in 1043, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1043)
    0.010100347 = weight(_text_:web in 1043) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010100347 = score(doc=1043,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0933738 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.108171105 = fieldWeight in 1043, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=1043)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Content
    Hans-Christian Jetter: B 13 Informationsvisualisierung und Visual Analytics - 295 / Melanie Siegel: B 14 Maschinelle Übersetzung - 307 / Ulrich Herb: B 15 Verfahren der wissenschaftlichen Qualitäts-/ Relevanzsicherung / Evaluierung - 317 / Thomas Mandl: B 16 Text Mining und Data Mining - 327 / Heike Neuroth: B 17 Forschungsdaten - 339 / Isabella Peters: B 18 Folksonomies & Social Tagging - 351 / Christa Womser-Hacker: C 1 Informationswissenschaftliche Perspektiven des Information Retrieval - 365 / Norbert Fuhr: C 2 Modelle im Information Retrieval - 379 / Dirk Lewandowski: C 3 Suchmaschinen - 391 / David Elsweiler & Udo Kruschwitz: C 4 Interaktives Information Retrieval - 403 / Thomas Mandl & Sebastian Diem: C 5 Bild- und Video-Retrieval - 413 / Maximilian Eibl, Josef Haupt, Stefan Kahl, Stefan Taubert & Thomas Wilhelm-Stein: C 6 Audio- und Musik-Retrieval - 423 / Christa Womser-Hacker: C 7 Cross-Language Information Retrieval (CLIR) - 433 / Vivien Petras & Christa Womser-Hacker: C 8 Evaluation im Information Retrieval - 443 / Philipp Schaer: C 9 Sprachmodelle und neuronale Netze im Information Retrieval - 455 / Stefanie Elbeshausen: C 10 Modellierung von Benutzer*innen, Kontextualisierung, Personalisierung - 467 / Ragna Seidler-de Alwis: C 11 Informationsrecherche - 477 / Ulrich Reimer: C 12 Empfehlungssysteme - 485 / Elke Greifeneder & Kirsten Schlebbe: D 1 Information Behaviour - 499 / Nicola Döring: D 2 Computervermittelte Kommunikation - 511 / Hans-Christian Jetter: D 3 Mensch-Computer-Interaktion, Usability und User Experience - 525 / Gabriele Irle: D 4 Emotionen im Information Seeking - 535 /
    Kirsten Schlebbe & Elke Greifeneder: D 5 Information Need, Informationsbedarf und -bedürfnis - 543 / Dirk Lewandowski & Christa Womser-Hacker: D 6 Information Seeking Behaviour - 553 / Wolfgang Semar: D 7 Informations- und Wissensmanagement - 567 / Joachim Griesbaum: D 8 Informationskompetenz - 581 / Antje Michel, Maria Gäde, Anke Wittich & Inka Tappenbeck: D 9 Informationsdidaktik - 595 / Rainer Kuhlen: E 1 Informationsmarkt - 605 / Wolfgang Semar: E 2 Plattformökonomie - 621 / Tassilo Pellegrini & Jan Krone: E 3 Medienökonomie - 633 / Christoph Bläsi: E 4 Verlage in Wissenschaft und Bildung - 643 / Irina Sens, Alexander Pöche, Dana Vosberg, Judith Ludwig & Nicola Bieg: E 5 Lizenzierungsformen - 655 / Joachim Griesbaum: E 6 Online-Marketing - 667 / Frauke Schade & Ursula Georgy: E 7 Marketing für Informationseinrichtungen - 679 / Isabella Peters: E 8 Social Media & Social Web - 691 / Klaus Tochtermann & Anna Maria Höfler: E 9 Open Science - 703 / Ulrich Herb & Heinz Pampel: E 10 Open Access - 715 / Tobias Siebenlist: E 11 Open Data - 727 / Sigrid Fahrer & Tamara Heck: E 12 Open Educational Resources - 735 / Tobias Siebenlist: E 13 Open Government - 745 / Herrmann Rösch: F 1 Informationsethik - 755 / Bernard Bekavac: F 2 Informations-, Kommunikationstechnologien- und Webtechnologien - 773 / Peter Brettschneider: F 3 Urheberrecht - 789 / Johannes Caspar: F 4 Datenschutz und Informationsfreiheit - 803 / Norman Meuschke, Nicole Walger & Bela Gipp: F 5 Plagiat - 817 / Rainer Kuhlen: F 6 Informationspathologien - Desinformation - 829 / Glossar
  20. Schüller-Zwierlein, A.: ¬Die Fragilität des Zugangs : eine Kritik der Informationsgesellschaft (2021) 0.01 
    0.0066815875 = product of:
  0.066815875 = sum of:
    0.066815875 = weight(_text_:kommunikation in 5716) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.066815875 = score(doc=5716,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14706601 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.028611459 = queryNorm
        0.45432574 = fieldWeight in 5716, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.140109 = idf(docFreq=703, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5716)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Wir haben uns in der Informationsgesellschaft gemütlich eingerichtet: Information steht allenthalben auf Abruf bereit. Gleichzeitig kann man ein Wiederaufkommen von Populismus und Radikalismus, von Gewalt und enthemmter Kommunikation beobachten. Das Buch widmet sich der Frage, ob in der Vorstellung einer Informationsgesellschaft selbst und in den damit verbundenen Praktiken ein Strickfehler verborgen ist, der Populismus und Radikalismus befördert.

Authors

Languages

  • e 193
  • d 99
  • pt 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 254
  • el 60
  • m 19
  • p 6
  • s 3
  • x 2
  • A 1
  • EL 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications