-
Marion, L.S.; McCain, K.W.: Contrasting views of software engineering journals : author cocitation choices and indexer vocabulary assignments (2001)
0.03
0.026186915 = product of:
0.0916542 = sum of:
0.08339346 = weight(_text_:software in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08339346 = score(doc=5767,freq=14.0), product of:
0.14382327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.5798329 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.0082607325 = product of:
0.024782196 = sum of:
0.024782196 = weight(_text_:29 in 5767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024782196 = score(doc=5767,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12752858 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5767, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5767)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- We explore the intellectual subject structure and research themes in software engineering through the identification and analysis of a core journal literature. We examine this literature via two expert perspectives: that of the author, who identified significant work by citing it (journal cocitation analysis), and that of the professional indexer, who tags published work with subject terms to facilitate retrieval from a bibliographic database (subject profile analysis). The data sources are SCISEARCH (the on-line version of Science Citation Index), and INSPEC (a database covering software engineering, computer science, and information systems). We use data visualization tools (cluster analysis, multidimensional scaling, and PFNets) to show the "intellectual maps" of software engineering. Cocitation and subject profile analyses demonstrate that software engineering is a distinct interdisciplinary field, valuing practical and applied aspects, and spanning a subject continuum from "programming-in-the-smalI" to "programming-in-the-large." This continuum mirrors the software development life cycle by taking the operating system or major application from initial programming through project management, implementation, and maintenance. Object orientation is an integral but distinct subject area in software engineering. Key differences are the importance of management and programming: (1) cocitation analysis emphasizes project management and systems development; (2) programming techniques/languages are more influential in subject profiles; (3) cocitation profiles place object-oriented journals separately and centrally while the subject profile analysis locates these journals with the programming/languages group
- Date
- 29. 9.2001 14:01:01
-
Pao, M.L.: Term and citation retrieval : a field study (1993)
0.01
0.007992683 = product of:
0.02797439 = sum of:
0.014757217 = product of:
0.029514434 = sum of:
0.029514434 = weight(_text_:online in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029514434 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11002589 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.013217172 = product of:
0.039651513 = sum of:
0.039651513 = weight(_text_:29 in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039651513 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12752858 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- Investigates the relative efficacy of searching by terms and by citations in searches collected in health science libraries. In pilot and field studies the odds that overlap items retrieved would be relevant or partially relevant were greatly improved. In the field setting citation searching was able to add average of 24% recall to traditional subject retrieval. Attempts to identify distinguishing characteristics in queries which might benefit most from additional citation searches proved inclusive. Online access of citation databases has been hampered by their high cost
- Source
- Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.1, S.95-112
-
Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005)
0.01
0.007992683 = product of:
0.02797439 = sum of:
0.014757217 = product of:
0.029514434 = sum of:
0.029514434 = weight(_text_:online in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029514434 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11002589 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.013217172 = product of:
0.039651513 = sum of:
0.039651513 = weight(_text_:29 in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039651513 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12752858 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- It has been shown (Lawrence, S. (2001). Online or invisible? Nature, 411, 521) that journal articles which have been posted without charge on the internet are more heavily cited than those which have not been. Using data from the NASA Astrophysics Data System (ads.harvard.edu) and from the ArXiv e-print archive at Cornell University (arXiv.org) we examine the causes of this effect.
- Date
- 27.12.2007 17:16:29
-
H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008)
0.01
0.007278886 = product of:
0.0254761 = sum of:
0.015652394 = product of:
0.031304788 = sum of:
0.031304788 = weight(_text_:online in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031304788 = score(doc=590,freq=4.0), product of:
0.11002589 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.284522 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009823706 = product of:
0.029471118 = sum of:
0.029471118 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029471118 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12695369 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Content
- "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
- Date
- 6. 4.2008 19:04:22
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.0071316385 = product of:
0.024960734 = sum of:
0.011067913 = product of:
0.022135826 = sum of:
0.022135826 = weight(_text_:online in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022135826 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11002589 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.01389282 = product of:
0.04167846 = sum of:
0.04167846 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04167846 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12695369 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Abstract
- This article challenges recent research (Evans, 2008) reporting that the concentration of cited scientific literature increases with the online availability of articles and journals. Using Thomson Reuters' Web of Science, the present article analyses changes in the concentration of citations received (2- and 5-year citation windows) by papers published between 1900 and 2005. Three measures of concentration are used: the percentage of papers that received at least one citation (cited papers); the percentage of papers needed to account for 20%, 50%, and 80% of the citations; and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI). These measures are used for four broad disciplines: natural sciences and engineering, medical fields, social sciences, and the humanities. All these measures converge and show that, contrary to what was reported by Evans, the dispersion of citations is actually increasing.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Small, H.: Visualizing science by citation mapping (1999)
0.01
0.006303953 = product of:
0.04412767 = sum of:
0.04412767 = weight(_text_:software in 3920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04412767 = score(doc=3920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14382327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.30681872 = fieldWeight in 3920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3920)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Science mapping is discussed in the general context of information visualization. Attempts to construct maps of science using citation data are reviewed, focusing on the use of co-citation clusters. New work is reported on a dataset of about 36.000 documents using simplified methods for ordination, and nesting maps hierarchically. an overall map of the dataset shows the multidisciplinary breadth of the document sample, and submaps allow drilling down the document level. An effort to visualize these data using advanced virtual reality software is described, and the creation of document pathways through the map is seen as a realization of Bush's associative trails
-
Gorraiz, J.: "Web of Science" versus "Scopus" oder das aktuelle Dilemma der Bibliotheken (2006)
0.01
0.005994512 = product of:
0.02098079 = sum of:
0.011067913 = product of:
0.022135826 = sum of:
0.022135826 = weight(_text_:online in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.022135826 = score(doc=5021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11002589 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009912878 = product of:
0.029738635 = sum of:
0.029738635 = weight(_text_:29 in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029738635 = score(doc=5021,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12752858 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 4. 6.2006 17:36:29
- Source
- Online Mitteilungen. 2006, Nr.85, S.25-30 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 59(2006) H.1]
-
Lawrence, S.; Giles, C.L.; Bollaker, K.: Digital libraries and Autonomous Citation Indexing (1999)
0.01
0.005403389 = product of:
0.03782372 = sum of:
0.03782372 = weight(_text_:software in 4951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03782372 = score(doc=4951,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14382327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4951, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4951)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Autonomous Citation Indexing (ACI) automates the construction of citation indexes - Lower cost, wider availability: ACI is completely autonomous - no manual effort is required. This should result in lower cost and wider availability. Broader coverage: Because no manual effort is required, there are few barriers to indexing a broader range of literature, compared to indexes like the Science Citation Index that require manual effort. More timely feedback: Conference papers, technical reports, and preprints can be indexed, providing far more timely feedback in many cases (often such publications appear far in advance of corresponding journal publications). Citation context: ACI groups together the context of citations to a given article, allowing researchers to easily see what is being said and why the article was cited. Benefits for both literature search and evaluation. Freely available: Our implementation of ACI is available at no cost for non-commercial use. Several orgnizations have requested the software and expressed interest in providing an index within their domain, or in using ACI within their own digital libraries.
-
Leydesdorff, L.: Clusters and maps of science journals based on bi-connected graphs in Journal Citation Reports (2004)
0.01
0.005403389 = product of:
0.03782372 = sum of:
0.03782372 = weight(_text_:software in 4427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03782372 = score(doc=4427,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14382327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.2629875 = fieldWeight in 4427, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4427)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- The aggregated journal-journal citation matrix derived from Journal Citation Reports 2001 can be decomposed into a unique subject classification using the graph-analytical algorithm of bi-connected components. This technique was recently incorporated in software tools for social network analysis. The matrix can be assessed in terms of its decomposability using articulation points which indicate overlap between the components. The articulation points of this set did not exhibit a next-order network of "general science" journals. However, the clusters differ in size and in terms of the internal density of their relations. A full classification of the journals is provided in the Appendix. The clusters can also be extracted and mapped for the visualization.
-
White, H.D.: Citation analysis : history (2009)
0.00
0.004502824 = product of:
0.031519767 = sum of:
0.031519767 = weight(_text_:software in 3763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031519767 = score(doc=3763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14382327 = queryWeight, product of:
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.21915624 = fieldWeight in 3763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.9671519 = idf(docFreq=2274, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3763)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- References from publications are at the same time citations to other publications. This entry introduces some of the practical uses of citation data in science and scholarship. At the individual level citations identify and permit the retrieval of specific editions of works, while also suggesting their subject matter, authority, and age. Through citation indexes, retrievals may include not only the earlier items referred to by a given work, but also the later items that cite that given work in turn. Some technical notes on retrieval are included here. Counts of citations received over time, and measures derived from them, reveal the varying impacts of works, authors, journals, organizations, and countries. This has obvious implications for the evaluation of, e.g., library collections, academics, research teams, and science policies. When treated as linkages between pairs of publications, references and citations reveal intellectual ties. Several kinds of links have been defined, such as cocitation, bibliographic coupling, and intercitation. In the aggregate, these links form networks that compactly suggest the intellectual histories of research specialties and disciplines, especially when the networks are visualized through mapping software. Citation analysis is of course not without critics, who have long pointed out imperfections in the data or in analytical techniques. However, the criticisms have generally been met by strong counterarguments from proponents.
-
Wildner, B.: Web of Science - Scopus : Auf der Suche nach Zitierungen (2006)
0.00
0.0039793565 = product of:
0.013927747 = sum of:
0.0073786085 = product of:
0.014757217 = sum of:
0.014757217 = weight(_text_:online in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014757217 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11002589 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.13412495 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0065491376 = product of:
0.019647412 = sum of:
0.019647412 = weight(_text_:22 in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019647412 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12695369 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
- Date
- 4. 6.2006 17:22:15
- Source
- Online Mitteilungen. 2006, Nr.85, S.18-20 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 59(2006) H.1]
-
Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007)
0.00
0.0037423645 = product of:
0.02619655 = sum of:
0.02619655 = product of:
0.07858965 = sum of:
0.07858965 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07858965 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12695369 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 13. 7.2008 19:53:22
-
Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992)
0.00
0.0037423645 = product of:
0.02619655 = sum of:
0.02619655 = product of:
0.07858965 = sum of:
0.07858965 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07858965 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12695369 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 7. 2.2005 14:10:22
-
Hauffe, H.: Zitationsanalysen : Editoral (1999)
0.00
0.0036893045 = product of:
0.02582513 = sum of:
0.02582513 = product of:
0.05165026 = sum of:
0.05165026 = weight(_text_:online in 4378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05165026 = score(doc=4378,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11002589 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 4378, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4378)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Online Mitteilungen. 1999, Nr.65, S.3-6 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 52(1999) H.3/4]
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.00
0.0033078142 = product of:
0.023154698 = sum of:
0.023154698 = product of:
0.069464095 = sum of:
0.069464095 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.069464095 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12695369 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Williams, R.M.: ISI search network research front specialities (1983)
0.00
0.003304293 = product of:
0.02313005 = sum of:
0.02313005 = product of:
0.06939015 = sum of:
0.06939015 = weight(_text_:29 in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06939015 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12752858 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Remler, A.: Lässt sich wissenschaftliche Leistung messen? : Wer zitiert wird, liegt vorne - in den USA berechnet man Forschungsleistung nach einem Zitat-Index (2000)
0.00
0.003304293 = product of:
0.02313005 = sum of:
0.02313005 = product of:
0.06939015 = sum of:
0.06939015 = weight(_text_:29 in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06939015 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12752858 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Date
- 30.10.2000 17:47:29
-
Cronin, B.; Weaver-Wozniak, S.: Online access to acknowledgements (1993)
0.00
0.0031950315 = product of:
0.02236522 = sum of:
0.02236522 = product of:
0.04473044 = sum of:
0.04473044 = weight(_text_:online in 7827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04473044 = score(doc=7827,freq=6.0), product of:
0.11002589 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.4065447 = fieldWeight in 7827, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7827)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Abstract
- Reviews the scale, range and consistency of acknowledgement behaviour, in citations, for a number of academic disciplines. The qualitative and quantitative evidence suggests a pervasive and consistent practice in which acknowledgements define a variety of social, cognitive and instrumental relationships between scholars and within and across disciplines. As such they may be used alongside other bibliometric indicators, such as citations, to map networks of influence. Considers the case for using acknowledgements data in the assessment of academic performance and proposes an online acknowledgement index to facilitate this process, perhaps as a logical extension of ISI's citation indexing products
- Source
- Proceedings of the 14th National Online Meeting 1993, New York, 4-6 May 1993. Ed.: M.E. Williams
-
Nacke, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne (1980)
0.00
0.0031622609 = product of:
0.022135826 = sum of:
0.022135826 = product of:
0.04427165 = sum of:
0.04427165 = weight(_text_:online in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04427165 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11002589 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
-
Nacke, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse (1980)
0.00
0.0031622609 = product of:
0.022135826 = sum of:
0.022135826 = product of:
0.04427165 = sum of:
0.04427165 = weight(_text_:online in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04427165 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
0.11002589 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.03625353 = queryNorm
0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
- Source
- Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
