-
Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013)
0.22
0.22492675 = product of:
0.4498535 = sum of:
0.22098143 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22098143 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29489458 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.22098143 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22098143 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.29489458 = queryWeight, product of:
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.00789065 = product of:
0.03945325 = sum of:
0.03945325 = weight(_text_:28 in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03945325 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12460351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Content
- Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
- Date
- 28. 8.2015 12:17:58
-
Haiqi, Z.: ¬The literature of Qigong : publication patterns and subject headings (1997)
0.03
0.034384094 = product of:
0.10315228 = sum of:
0.09655453 = sum of:
0.045795128 = weight(_text_:cd in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045795128 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14351408 = queryWeight, product of:
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.3190985 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.05075941 = weight(_text_:rom in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05075941 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15109257 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3438053 = idf(docFreq=1560, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.33594906 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3438053 = idf(docFreq=1560, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.00659775 = product of:
0.03298875 = sum of:
0.03298875 = weight(_text_:22 in 862) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03298875 = score(doc=862,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12180575 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 862, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=862)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Reports results of a bibliometric study of the literature of Qigong: a relaxation technique used to teach patients to control their heart rate, blood pressure, temperature and other involuntary functions through controlles breathing. All articles indexed in the MEDLINE CD-ROM database, between 1965 and 1995 were identified using 'breathing exercises' MeSH term. The articles were analyzed for geographical and language distribution and a ranking exercise enabled a core list of periodicals to be identified. In addition, the study shed light on the changing frequency of the MeSH terms and evaluated the research areas by measuring the information from these respective MeSH headings
- Source
- International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.3, S.38-44
-
Kreider, J.: ¬The correlation of local citation data with citation data from Journal Citation Reports (1999)
0.03
0.029472083 = product of:
0.08841625 = sum of:
0.082761034 = sum of:
0.03925297 = weight(_text_:cd in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03925297 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14351408 = queryWeight, product of:
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.27351302 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
0.043508064 = weight(_text_:rom in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043508064 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15109257 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3438053 = idf(docFreq=1560, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.28795633 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3438053 = idf(docFreq=1560, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
0.005655214 = product of:
0.028276071 = sum of:
0.028276071 = weight(_text_:22 in 102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028276071 = score(doc=102,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12180575 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 102, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=102)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- University librarians continue to face the difficult task of determining which journals remain crucial for their collections during these times of static financial resources and escalating journal costs. One evaluative tool, Journal Citation Reports (JCR), recently has become available on CD-ROM, making it simpler for librarians to use its citation data as input for ranking journals. But many librarians remain unconvinced that the global citation data from the JCR bears enough correspondence to their local situation to be useful. In this project, I explore the correlation between global citation data available from JCR with local citation data generated specifically for the University of British Columbia, for 20 subject fields in the sciences and social sciences. The significant correlations obtained in this study suggest that large research-oriented university libraries could consider substituting global citation data for local citation data when evaluating their journals, with certain cautions.
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
-
Leydesdorff, L.: ¬The generation of aggregated journal-journal citation maps on the basis of the CD-ROM version of the Science Citation Index (1994)
0.02
0.022758124 = product of:
0.13654874 = sum of:
0.13654874 = sum of:
0.0647641 = weight(_text_:cd in 8281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0647641 = score(doc=8281,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14351408 = queryWeight, product of:
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.45127347 = fieldWeight in 8281, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8281)
0.071784645 = weight(_text_:rom in 8281) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.071784645 = score(doc=8281,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15109257 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3438053 = idf(docFreq=1560, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.4751037 = fieldWeight in 8281, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
4.3438053 = idf(docFreq=1560, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=8281)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Describes a method for the generation of journal-journal citation maps on the basis of the CD-ROM version of the Science Citation Index. Discusses sources of potential error from this data. Offers strategies to counteract such errors. Analyzes a number of scientometric periodical mappings in relation to mappings from previous studies which have used tape data and/or data from ISI's Journal Citation Reports. Compares the quality of these mappings with the quality of those for previous years in order to demonstrate the use of such mappings as indicators for dynamic developments in the sciences
-
Lardy, J.P.; Herzhaft, L.: Bibliometric treatments according to bibliographic errors and data heterogenity : the end-user point of view (1992)
0.02
0.016092423 = product of:
0.09655453 = sum of:
0.09655453 = sum of:
0.045795128 = weight(_text_:cd in 5064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.045795128 = score(doc=5064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14351408 = queryWeight, product of:
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.3190985 = fieldWeight in 5064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5064)
0.05075941 = weight(_text_:rom in 5064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.05075941 = score(doc=5064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15109257 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3438053 = idf(docFreq=1560, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.33594906 = fieldWeight in 5064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3438053 = idf(docFreq=1560, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5064)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- The quality of online and CD-ROM databases is far from satisfactory. Errors are frequently found in listings from online searches. Spelling mistakes are the most common but there are also more misleading errors such as variations of an author's name or absence of homogenity in the content of certain field. Describes breifly a bibliometric study of large amounts of data downloaded from databases to investigate bibliographic errors and data heterogeneity. Recommends that database producers should consider either the implementation of a common format or the recommendations of the Société Française de Bibliométrie
-
Heinz, M.: Bemerkungen zur Entwicklung der Internationalität der Forschung : Bibliometrische Untersuchungen am SCI (2006)
0.01
0.013793506 = product of:
0.082761034 = sum of:
0.082761034 = sum of:
0.03925297 = weight(_text_:cd in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03925297 = score(doc=6110,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14351408 = queryWeight, product of:
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.27351302 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
0.043508064 = weight(_text_:rom in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043508064 = score(doc=6110,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15109257 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3438053 = idf(docFreq=1560, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.28795633 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3438053 = idf(docFreq=1560, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- In der Arbeit werden verschiedene Kennziffern zur Messung der Internationalität der Forschung untersucht. Die Grundlage bilden die Daten des Science Citation Index (SCI) von 1980 bis 2002 in der CD-ROM Version. Alle betrachteten Kennziffern weisen einen einheitlichen Gesamttrend in diesem Zeitraum auf der die Hypothese der Zunahme der Internationalität in der Forschung bestätigt. Zwei Kennziffern, der mittlere Anteil eines Landes an einem Artikel und die Diversität, gemessen durch die Shannonsche Entropie des Vektors der Anteile der Länder am SCI, zeigen eine charakteristische Verstärkung der Trends ab 1987, was für eine erhöhte Zunahme des Internationalisierungsprozesses der Forschung ab Mitte der 80er Jahre des vergangenen Jahrhunderts spricht. Darüber hinaus werden Zusammenhänge zwischen der ökonomischen Leistung eines Landes, seinem Anteil am SCI und seiner internationalen Forschungskooperation aufgezeigt.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Radicchi, F.; Bornmann, L.; Castellano, C.; Nooy, W. de: Field-normalized impact factors (IFs) : a comparison of rescaling and fractionally counted IFs (2013)
0.01
0.013793506 = product of:
0.082761034 = sum of:
0.082761034 = sum of:
0.03925297 = weight(_text_:cd in 1108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03925297 = score(doc=1108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14351408 = queryWeight, product of:
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.27351302 = fieldWeight in 1108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1108)
0.043508064 = weight(_text_:rom in 1108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043508064 = score(doc=1108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15109257 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3438053 = idf(docFreq=1560, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.28795633 = fieldWeight in 1108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3438053 = idf(docFreq=1560, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1108)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Two methods for comparing impact factors and citation rates across fields of science are tested against each other using citations to the 3,705 journals in the Science Citation Index 2010 (CD-Rom version of SCI) and the 13 field categories used for the Science and Engineering Indicators of the U.S. National Science Board. We compare (a) normalization by counting citations in proportion to the length of the reference list (1/N of references) with (b) rescaling by dividing citation scores by the arithmetic mean of the citation rate of the cluster. Rescaling is analytical and therefore independent of the quality of the attribution to the sets, whereas fractional counting provides an empirical strategy for normalization among sets (by evaluating the between-group variance). By the fairness test of Radicchi and Castellano (), rescaling outperforms fractional counting of citations for reasons that we consider.
-
Larivière, V.; Archambault, V.; Gingras, Y.; Vignola-Gagné, E.: ¬The place of serials in referencing practices : comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities (2006)
0.01
0.011494587 = product of:
0.06896752 = sum of:
0.06896752 = sum of:
0.032710806 = weight(_text_:cd in 5107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032710806 = score(doc=5107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14351408 = queryWeight, product of:
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.2279275 = fieldWeight in 5107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5107)
0.03625672 = weight(_text_:rom in 5107) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03625672 = score(doc=5107,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15109257 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3438053 = idf(docFreq=1560, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.2399636 = fieldWeight in 5107, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3438053 = idf(docFreq=1560, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5107)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Journal articles constitute the core documents for the diffusion of knowledge in the natural sciences. It has been argued that the same is not true for the social sciences and humanities where knowledge is more often disseminated in monographs that are not indexed in the journal-based databases used for bibliometric analysis. Previous studies have made only partial assessments of the role played by both serials and other types of literature. The importance of journal literature in the various scientific fields has therefore not been systematically characterized. The authors address this issue by providing a systematic measurement of the role played by journal literature in the building of knowledge in both the natural sciences and engineering and the social sciences and humanities. Using citation data from the CD-ROM versions of the Science Citation Index (SCI), Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), and Arts and Humanities Citation Index (AHCI) databases from 1981 to 2000 (Thomson ISI, Philadelphia, PA), the authors quantify the share of citations to both serials and other types of literature. Variations in time and between fields are also analyzed. The results show that journal literature is increasingly important in the natural and social sciences, but that its role in the humanities is stagnant and has even tended to diminish slightly in the 1990s. Journal literature accounts for less than 50% of the citations in several disciplines of the social sciences and humanities; hence, special care should be used when using bibliometric indicators that rely only on journal literature.
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Zhou, P.; Bornmann, L.: How can journal impact factors be normalized across fields of science? : An assessment in terms of percentile ranks and fractional counts (2013)
0.01
0.011494587 = product of:
0.06896752 = sum of:
0.06896752 = sum of:
0.032710806 = weight(_text_:cd in 532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032710806 = score(doc=532,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14351408 = queryWeight, product of:
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.2279275 = fieldWeight in 532, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.125929 = idf(docFreq=1940, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=532)
0.03625672 = weight(_text_:rom in 532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03625672 = score(doc=532,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15109257 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3438053 = idf(docFreq=1560, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.2399636 = fieldWeight in 532, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3438053 = idf(docFreq=1560, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=532)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Using the CD-ROM version of the Science Citation Index 2010 (N = 3,705 journals), we study the (combined) effects of (a) fractional counting on the impact factor (IF) and (b) transformation of the skewed citation distributions into a distribution of 100 percentiles and six percentile rank classes (top-1%, top-5%, etc.). Do these approaches lead to field-normalized impact measures for journals? In addition to the 2-year IF (IF2), we consider the 5-year IF (IF5), the respective numerators of these IFs, and the number of Total Cites, counted both as integers and fractionally. These various indicators are tested against the hypothesis that the classification of journals into 11 broad fields by PatentBoard/NSF (National Science Foundation) provides statistically significant between-field effects. Using fractional counting the between-field variance is reduced by 91.7% in the case of IF5, and by 79.2% in the case of IF2. However, the differences in citation counts are not significantly affected by fractional counting. These results accord with previous studies, but the longer citation window of a fractionally counted IF5 can lead to significant improvement in the normalization across fields.
-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990)
0.01
0.008836927 = product of:
0.05302156 = sum of:
0.05302156 = product of:
0.1325539 = sum of:
0.0665764 = weight(_text_:29 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0665764 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12235734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.0659775 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0659775 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12180575 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:29
-
Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001)
0.01
0.007730927 = product of:
0.04638556 = sum of:
0.04638556 = product of:
0.1159639 = sum of:
0.049316563 = weight(_text_:28 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049316563 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12460351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.066647336 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.066647336 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12180575 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 15:22:28
-
Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020)
0.01
0.0071998965 = product of:
0.04319938 = sum of:
0.04319938 = product of:
0.07199896 = sum of:
0.024658281 = weight(_text_:28 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024658281 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12460351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.023777287 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023777287 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12235734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.023563394 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023563394 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12180575 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.6 = coord(3/5)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
12. 3.2021 18:41:28
-
Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995)
0.01
0.0051436457 = product of:
0.030861873 = sum of:
0.030861873 = product of:
0.07715468 = sum of:
0.03945325 = weight(_text_:28 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03945325 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12460351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.037701428 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037701428 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12180575 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Abstract
- Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
- Source
- Journal of information; communication; and library science. 2(1995) no.2, S.20-28
-
Chongde, W.; Zhe, W.: Evaluation of the models for Bradford's law (1998)
0.01
0.0051436457 = product of:
0.030861873 = sum of:
0.030861873 = product of:
0.07715468 = sum of:
0.03945325 = weight(_text_:28 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03945325 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12460351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
0.037701428 = weight(_text_:22 in 3688) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037701428 = score(doc=3688,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12180575 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3688, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3688)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 5.1999 19:12:28
-
Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016)
0.01
0.005049673 = product of:
0.030298037 = sum of:
0.030298037 = product of:
0.07574509 = sum of:
0.03804366 = weight(_text_:29 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03804366 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12235734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.037701428 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037701428 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12180575 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 20. 1.2019 11:22:31
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
-
Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998)
0.00
0.0044184634 = product of:
0.02651078 = sum of:
0.02651078 = product of:
0.06627695 = sum of:
0.0332882 = weight(_text_:29 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0332882 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12235734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.03298875 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03298875 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12180575 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 10. 1.1999 16:22:37
- Source
- Art documentation. 17(1998) no.1, S.29-33
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003)
0.00
0.0044184634 = product of:
0.02651078 = sum of:
0.02651078 = product of:
0.06627695 = sum of:
0.0332882 = weight(_text_:29 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0332882 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12235734 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.03298875 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03298875 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12180575 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 29. 3.2003 19:22:48
-
Althouse, B.M.; West, J.D.; Bergstrom, C.T.; Bergstrom, T.: Differences in impact factor across fields and over time (2009)
0.00
0.0038577341 = product of:
0.023146404 = sum of:
0.023146404 = product of:
0.057866007 = sum of:
0.029589938 = weight(_text_:28 in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029589938 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12460351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
0.028276071 = weight(_text_:22 in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028276071 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12180575 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 23. 2.2009 18:22:28
-
Ajiferuke, I.; Lu, K.; Wolfram, D.: ¬A comparison of citer and citation-based measure outcomes for multiple disciplines (2010)
0.00
0.0038577341 = product of:
0.023146404 = sum of:
0.023146404 = product of:
0.057866007 = sum of:
0.029589938 = weight(_text_:28 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029589938 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12460351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
0.028276071 = weight(_text_:22 in 4000) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028276071 = score(doc=4000,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12180575 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4000, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4000)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 28. 9.2010 12:54:22
-
Hicks, D.; Wang, J.: Coverage and overlap of the new social sciences and humanities journal lists (2011)
0.00
0.0038577341 = product of:
0.023146404 = sum of:
0.023146404 = product of:
0.057866007 = sum of:
0.029589938 = weight(_text_:28 in 4192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029589938 = score(doc=4192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12460351 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 4192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4192)
0.028276071 = weight(_text_:22 in 4192) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028276071 = score(doc=4192,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12180575 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03478346 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4192, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4192)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 13:21:28
