Search (119 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Automatisches Indexieren"
  1. Rädler, K.: In Bibliothekskatalogen "googlen" : Integration von Inhaltsverzeichnissen, Volltexten und WEB-Ressourcen in Bibliothekskataloge (2004) 0.01 
    0.006607776 = product of:
  0.06607776 = sum of:
    0.06607776 = weight(_text_:wahrnehmung in 2432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06607776 = score(doc=2432,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18131447 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027484296 = queryNorm
        0.36443734 = fieldWeight in 2432, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2432)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Ausgangslage Die Katalog-Recherchen über Internet, also von außerhalb der Bibliothek, nehmen erwartungsgemäß stark zu bzw. sind mittlerweile die Regel. Damit ist natürlich das Bedürfnis und die Notwendigkeit gewachsen, über den Titel hinaus zusätzliche inhaltliche Informationen zu erhalten, die es erlauben, die Zweckmäßigkeit wesentlich besser abschätzen zu können, eine Bestellung vorzunehmen oder vielleicht auch 50 km in die Bibliothek zu fahren, um ein Buch zu entleihen. Dieses Informationsdefizit wird zunehmend als gravierender Mangel erfahren. Inhaltsverzeichnisse referieren den Inhalt kurz und prägnant. Sie sind die erste Stelle, welche zur Relevanz-Beurteilung herangezogen wird. Fast alle relevanten Terme einer Fachbuchpublikation finden sich bereits dort. Andererseits wird immer deutlicher, dass die dem bibliothekarischen Paradigma entsprechende intellektuelle Indexierung der einzelnen dokumentarischen Einheiten mit den engsten umfassenden dokumentationssprachlichen Termen (Schlagwörter, Klassen) zwar eine notwendige, aber keinesfalls hinreichende Methode darstellt, das teuer erworbene Bibliotheksgut Information für den Benutzer in seiner spezifischen Problemstellung zu aktivieren und als Informationsdienstleistung anbieten zu können. Informationen zu sehr speziellen Fragestellungen, die oft nur in kürzeren Abschnitten (Kapitel) erörtert werden, sind derzeit nur indirekt, mit großem Zeitaufwand und oft überhaupt nicht auffindbar. Sie liegen sozusagen brach. Die Tiefe der intellektuellen Indexierung bis in einzelne inhaltliche Details zu erweitern, ist aus personellen und damit auch finanziellen Gesichtspunkten nicht vertretbar. Bibliotheken fallen deshalb in der Wahrnehmung von Informationssuchenden immer mehr zurück. Die enorme Informationsvielfalt liegt hinter dem Informations- bzw. Recherchehorizont der bibliographischen Aufnahmen im Katalog.
  2. Hauer, M.: Tiefenindexierung im Bibliothekskatalog : 17 Jahre intelligentCAPTURE (2019) 0.01 
    0.0055573992 = product of:
  0.027786996 = sum of:
    0.018850014 = product of:
      0.05655004 = sum of:
        0.05655004 = weight(_text_:t in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05655004 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.008936982 = product of:
      0.04468491 = sum of:
        0.04468491 = weight(_text_:22 in 5629) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04468491 = score(doc=5629,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 5629, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=5629)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.b-i-t-online.de/heft/2019-02-index.php.
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.2, S.163-166
  3. Spitters, M.J.: Adjust : automatische thesauriele ontsluiting van grote hoeveelheden krantenartikelen (1999) 0.00 
    0.0036740701 = product of:
  0.0367407 = sum of:
    0.0367407 = product of:
      0.091851756 = sum of:
        0.046761222 = weight(_text_:28 in 3938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046761222 = score(doc=3938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09845598 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.4749455 = fieldWeight in 3938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3938)
        0.045090534 = weight(_text_:29 in 3938) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045090534 = score(doc=3938,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09668116 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3938, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3938)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    27. 8.2005 12:55:28
    Source
    Informatie professional. 3(1999) no.10, S.29-31
  4. Salton, G.: Another look at automatic text-retrieval systems (1986) 0.00 
    0.0030617255 = product of:
  0.030617256 = sum of:
    0.030617256 = product of:
      0.07654314 = sum of:
        0.038967688 = weight(_text_:28 in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038967688 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09845598 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
        0.037575446 = weight(_text_:29 in 1356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037575446 = score(doc=1356,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09668116 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 1356, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=1356)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Footnote
    Bezugnahme auf: Blair, D.C.: An evaluation of retrieval effectiveness for a full-text document-retrieval system. Comm. ACM 28(1985) S.280-299. - Vgl. auch: Blair, D.C.: Full text retrieval ... Int. Class. 13(1986) S.18-23; Blair, D.C., M.E. Maron: full-text information retrieval ... Inf. Proc. Man. 26(1990) S.437-447.
    Source
    Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery. 29(1986), S.648-656
  5. Busch, D.: Domänenspezifische hybride automatische Indexierung von bibliographischen Metadaten (2019) 0.00 
    0.0027786996 = product of:
  0.013893498 = sum of:
    0.009425007 = product of:
      0.02827502 = sum of:
        0.02827502 = weight(_text_:t in 5628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02827502 = score(doc=5628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 5628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5628)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.004468491 = product of:
      0.022342455 = sum of:
        0.022342455 = weight(_text_:22 in 5628) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022342455 = score(doc=5628,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5628, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5628)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.b-i-t-online.de/heft/2019-06-index.php.
    Source
    B.I.T.online. 22(2019) H.6, S.465-469
  6. Borko, H.; Bernick, M.: Automatic document classification : T.2 (1964) 0.00 
    0.0025133353 = product of:
  0.025133353 = sum of:
    0.025133353 = product of:
      0.075400054 = sum of:
        0.075400054 = weight(_text_:t in 4197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075400054 = score(doc=4197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.69639564 = fieldWeight in 4197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4197)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
  7. Borko, H.; Bernick, M.: Automatic document classification : T.1 (1963) 0.00 
    0.0025133353 = product of:
  0.025133353 = sum of:
    0.025133353 = product of:
      0.075400054 = sum of:
        0.075400054 = weight(_text_:t in 5487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.075400054 = score(doc=5487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.69639564 = fieldWeight in 5487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5487)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
  8. Lepsky, K.; Vorhauer, J.: Lingo - ein open source System für die Automatische Indexierung deutschsprachiger Dokumente (2006) 0.00 
    0.0024385636 = product of:
  0.024385637 = sum of:
    0.024385637 = product of:
      0.060964093 = sum of:
        0.03117415 = weight(_text_:28 in 3581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03117415 = score(doc=3581,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09845598 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 3581, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3581)
        0.029789941 = weight(_text_:22 in 3581) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029789941 = score(doc=3581,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3581, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3581)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    24. 3.2006 12:22:02
    Source
    ABI-Technik. 26(2006) H.1, S.18-28
  9. Tavakolizadeh-Ravari, M.: Analysis of the long term dynamics in thesaurus developments and its consequences (2017) 0.00 
    0.0024006793 = product of:
  0.012003397 = sum of:
    0.0088859815 = product of:
      0.026657945 = sum of:
        0.026657945 = weight(_text_:t in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026657945 = score(doc=3081,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.24621303 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.003117415 = product of:
      0.015587075 = sum of:
        0.015587075 = weight(_text_:28 in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015587075 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09845598 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.15831517 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit analysiert die dynamische Entwicklung und den Gebrauch von Thesaurusbegriffen. Zusätzlich konzentriert sie sich auf die Faktoren, die die Zahl von Indexbegriffen pro Dokument oder Zeitschrift beeinflussen. Als Untersuchungsobjekt dienten der MeSH und die entsprechende Datenbank "MEDLINE". Die wichtigsten Konsequenzen sind: 1. Der MeSH-Thesaurus hat sich durch drei unterschiedliche Phasen jeweils logarithmisch entwickelt. Solch einen Thesaurus sollte folgenden Gleichung folgen: "T = 3.076,6 Ln (d) - 22.695 + 0,0039d" (T = Begriffe, Ln = natürlicher Logarithmus und d = Dokumente). Um solch einen Thesaurus zu konstruieren, muss man demnach etwa 1.600 Dokumente von unterschiedlichen Themen des Bereiches des Thesaurus haben. Die dynamische Entwicklung von Thesauri wie MeSH erfordert die Einführung eines neuen Begriffs pro Indexierung von 256 neuen Dokumenten. 2. Die Verteilung der Thesaurusbegriffe erbrachte drei Kategorien: starke, normale und selten verwendete Headings. Die letzte Gruppe ist in einer Testphase, während in der ersten und zweiten Kategorie die neu hinzukommenden Deskriptoren zu einem Thesauruswachstum führen. 3. Es gibt ein logarithmisches Verhältnis zwischen der Zahl von Index-Begriffen pro Aufsatz und dessen Seitenzahl für die Artikeln zwischen einer und einundzwanzig Seiten. 4. Zeitschriftenaufsätze, die in MEDLINE mit Abstracts erscheinen erhalten fast zwei Deskriptoren mehr. 5. Die Findablity der nicht-englisch sprachigen Dokumente in MEDLINE ist geringer als die englische Dokumente. 6. Aufsätze der Zeitschriften mit einem Impact Factor 0 bis fünfzehn erhalten nicht mehr Indexbegriffe als die der anderen von MEDINE erfassten Zeitschriften. 7. In einem Indexierungssystem haben unterschiedliche Zeitschriften mehr oder weniger Gewicht in ihrem Findability. Die Verteilung der Indexbegriffe pro Seite hat gezeigt, dass es bei MEDLINE drei Kategorien der Publikationen gibt. Außerdem gibt es wenige stark bevorzugten Zeitschriften."
    Date
    24. 8.2016 13:45:28
  10. Groß, T.: Automatische Indexierung von Dokumenten in einer wissenschaftlichen Bibliothek : Implementierung und Evaluierung am Beispiel der Deutschen Zentralbibliothek für Wirtschaftswissenschaften (2011) 0.00 
    0.0023223436 = product of:
  0.011611718 = sum of:
    0.007854173 = product of:
      0.023562517 = sum of:
        0.023562517 = weight(_text_:t in 1083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023562517 = score(doc=1083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.21762364 = fieldWeight in 1083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1083)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0037575446 = product of:
      0.018787723 = sum of:
        0.018787723 = weight(_text_:29 in 1083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018787723 = score(doc=1083,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09668116 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1083, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1083)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Date
    19. 6.2015 18:00:29
  11. Mohrenweis, T.: Konzepte der automatischen Indexierung und vergleichende Analyse der Systeme STAIRS, STEINADLER/CONDOR, CTX und PASSAT/GOLEM (1984) 0.00 
    0.0021991683 = product of:
  0.021991683 = sum of:
    0.021991683 = product of:
      0.06597505 = sum of:
        0.06597505 = weight(_text_:t in 5171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06597505 = score(doc=5171,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.60934615 = fieldWeight in 5171, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5171)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
  12. Bordoni, L.; Pazienza, M.T.: Documents automatic indexing in an environmental domain (1997) 0.00 
    0.0021337434 = product of:
  0.021337433 = sum of:
    0.021337433 = product of:
      0.05334358 = sum of:
        0.02727738 = weight(_text_:28 in 530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02727738 = score(doc=530,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09845598 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 530, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=530)
        0.026066197 = weight(_text_:22 in 530) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026066197 = score(doc=530,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 530, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=530)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Source
    International forum on information and documentation. 22(1997) no.1, S.17-28
  13. Wolfekuhler, M.R.; Punch, W.F.: Finding salient features for personal Web pages categories (1997) 0.00 
    0.0020947603 = product of:
  0.020947604 = sum of:
    0.020947604 = product of:
      0.052369006 = sum of:
        0.02630281 = weight(_text_:29 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02630281 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09668116 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
        0.026066197 = weight(_text_:22 in 2673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026066197 = score(doc=2673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2673)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    1. 8.1996 22:08:06
    Source
    Computer networks and ISDN systems. 29(1997) no.8, S.1147-1156
  14. Franke-Maier, M.: Anforderungen an die Qualität der Inhaltserschließung im Spannungsfeld von intellektuell und automatisch erzeugten Metadaten (2018) 0.00 
    0.0020947603 = product of:
  0.020947604 = sum of:
    0.020947604 = product of:
      0.052369006 = sum of:
        0.02630281 = weight(_text_:29 in 5344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02630281 = score(doc=5344,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09668116 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5344, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5344)
        0.026066197 = weight(_text_:22 in 5344) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026066197 = score(doc=5344,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5344, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5344)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Spätestens seit dem Deutschen Bibliothekartag 2018 hat sich die Diskussion zu den automatischen Verfahren der Inhaltserschließung der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek von einer politisch geführten Diskussion in eine Qualitätsdiskussion verwandelt. Der folgende Beitrag beschäftigt sich mit Fragen der Qualität von Inhaltserschließung in digitalen Zeiten, wo heterogene Erzeugnisse unterschiedlicher Verfahren aufeinandertreffen und versucht, wichtige Anforderungen an Qualität zu definieren. Dieser Tagungsbeitrag fasst die vom Autor als Impulse vorgetragenen Ideen beim Workshop der FAG "Erschließung und Informationsvermittlung" des GBV am 29. August 2018 in Kiel zusammen. Der Workshop fand im Rahmen der 22. Verbundkonferenz des GBV statt.
  15. Salton, G.; Araya, J.: On the use of clustered file organizations in information search and retrieval (1990) 0.00 
    0.0018850014 = product of:
  0.018850014 = sum of:
    0.018850014 = product of:
      0.05655004 = sum of:
        0.05655004 = weight(_text_:t in 2409) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05655004 = score(doc=2409,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 2409, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2409)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Source
    Library classification and its functions. Int. Conf. on ..., 20.-21.6.1989, Edmonton, Alberta. Ed.: A. Nitecki u. T. Fell
  16. Ward, M.L.: ¬The future of the human indexer (1996) 0.00 
    0.0018289228 = product of:
  0.018289227 = sum of:
    0.018289227 = product of:
      0.045723066 = sum of:
        0.023380611 = weight(_text_:28 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023380611 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09845598 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
        0.022342455 = weight(_text_:22 in 7244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022342455 = score(doc=7244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 7244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7244)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    9. 2.1997 18:44:22
    Source
    Journal of librarianship and information science. 28(1996) no.4, S.217-225
  17. Bunk, T.: Deskriptoren Stoppwortlisten und kryptische Zeichen (2008) 0.00 
    0.0015708347 = product of:
  0.015708346 = sum of:
    0.015708346 = product of:
      0.047125034 = sum of:
        0.047125034 = weight(_text_:t in 2471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047125034 = score(doc=2471,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.43524727 = fieldWeight in 2471, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2471)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
  18. Mödden, E.: Inhaltserschließung im Zeitalter von Suchmaschinen und Volltextsuche (2018) 0.00 
    0.0015708347 = product of:
  0.015708346 = sum of:
    0.015708346 = product of:
      0.047125034 = sum of:
        0.047125034 = weight(_text_:t in 5625) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047125034 = score(doc=5625,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.43524727 = fieldWeight in 5625, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5625)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Content
    Vgl.: https://www.b-i-t-online.de/heft/2018-01-interview-moedden.pdf.
  19. Wang, S.; Koopman, R.: Embed first, then predict (2019) 0.00 
    0.0015308628 = product of:
  0.015308628 = sum of:
    0.015308628 = product of:
      0.03827157 = sum of:
        0.019483844 = weight(_text_:28 in 5400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019483844 = score(doc=5400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09845598 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 5400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5400)
        0.018787723 = weight(_text_:29 in 5400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018787723 = score(doc=5400,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09668116 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5400, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5400)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    29. 9.2019 12:18:42
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Special Issue: Research Information Systems and Science Classifications; including papers from "Trajectories for Research: Fathoming the Promise of the NARCIS Classification," 27-28 September 2018, The Hague, The Netherlands.
  20. Milstead, J.L.: Thesauri in a full-text world (1998) 0.00 
    0.0015241024 = product of:
  0.015241024 = sum of:
    0.015241024 = product of:
      0.03810256 = sum of:
        0.019483844 = weight(_text_:28 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019483844 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09845598 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
        0.018618714 = weight(_text_:22 in 2337) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018618714 = score(doc=2337,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2337, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2337)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    22. 9.1997 19:16:05
    Pages
    S.28-38

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 105
  • el 12
  • x 6
  • m 4
  • p 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications