Search (339 results, page 1 of 17)

  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  1. Herb, U.; Beucke, D.: ¬Die Zukunft der Impact-Messung : Social Media, Nutzung und Zitate im World Wide Web (2013) 0.21 
    0.2120252 = product of:
  0.530063 = sum of:
    0.1746094 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1746094 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23301217 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027484296 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.1746094 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1746094 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23301217 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027484296 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.1746094 = weight(_text_:2f in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1746094 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.23301217 = queryWeight, product of:
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027484296 = queryNorm
        0.7493574 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
    0.00623483 = product of:
      0.03117415 = sum of:
        0.03117415 = weight(_text_:28 in 2188) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03117415 = score(doc=2188,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09845598 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 2188, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2188)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.4 = coord(4/10)
    Content
    Vgl. unter: https://www.leibniz-science20.de%2Fforschung%2Fprojekte%2Faltmetrics-in-verschiedenen-wissenschaftsdisziplinen%2F&ei=2jTgVaaXGcK4Udj1qdgB&usg=AFQjCNFOPdONj4RKBDf9YDJOLuz3lkGYlg&sig2=5YI3KWIGxBmk5_kv0P_8iQ.
    Date
    28. 8.2015 12:17:58
  2. Riechert, M.; Schmitz, J.: Qualitätssicherung von Forschungsinformationen durch visuelle Repräsentation : das Fallbeispiel des "Informationssystems Promotionsnoten" (2017) 0.02 
    0.024372473 = product of:
  0.12186237 = sum of:
    0.1166018 = weight(_text_:visuelle in 3724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.1166018 = score(doc=3724,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20356046 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027484296 = queryNorm
        0.57281166 = fieldWeight in 3724, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3724)
    0.005260562 = product of:
      0.02630281 = sum of:
        0.02630281 = weight(_text_:29 in 3724) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02630281 = score(doc=3724,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09668116 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3724, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3724)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  3. Glänzel, W.: Visual bibliometrics : eine visuelle Oberfläche zur Erweiterung der Nutzungsmöglichkeiten bibliographischer Datenbanken (1996) 0.02 
    0.020196026 = product of:
  0.20196027 = sum of:
    0.20196027 = weight(_text_:visuelle in 6110) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.20196027 = score(doc=6110,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.20356046 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027484296 = queryNorm
        0.992139 = fieldWeight in 6110, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          7.406428 = idf(docFreq=72, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6110)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    In einer früheren Studie wurde bereits der 'informationelle Mehrwert' von bibliographischen Datenbanken durch bibliometrische Nutzung untersucht. Im folgenden soll nun eine visuelle Oberfläche vorgestellt werden, die mit Hilfe einer bibliometrischen 'Sekundärdatenbank' einerseits die Nutzungsmöglichkeiten der zugrundeliegenden bibliographischen Datenbanken vor allem in den Bereichen Wissenschaftsinformation, Forschungsevaluation und Wissenschaftspolitik erweitern soll, andererseits aber auch eine Rückkopplung zu den Aufgaben des traditionellen Retrievals erlaubt. Die visuelle Oberfläche 'Visual Bibliometrics' ist eine Erweiterung des CD-Edition des 'Science Citation Index' und des 'Social Science Citation Index'
  4. Herb, U.; Geith, U.: Kriterien der qualitativen Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Publikationen : Befunde aus dem Projekt visOA (2020) 0.02 
    0.018312007 = product of:
  0.18312007 = sum of:
    0.18312007 = weight(_text_:wahrnehmung in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.18312007 = score(doc=108,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.18131447 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027484296 = queryNorm
        1.0099584 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Dieser Beitrag beschreibt a) die Ergebnisse einer Literaturstudie zur qualitativen Wahrnehmung wissenschaftlicher Publikationen, b) die Konstruktion eines daraus abgeleiteten Kriterienkatalogs zur Wahrnehmung der Qualität wissenschaftlicher Publikationen sowie c) der Überprüfung dieses Katalogs in qualitativen Interviews mit Wissenschaflterinnen und Wissenschaftlern aus dem Fachspektrum Chemie, Physik, Biologie, Materialwissenschaft und Engineering. Es zeigte sich, dass die Wahrnehmung von Qualität auf äußerlichen und von außen herangetragenen Faktoren, inhaltlichen / semantischen Faktoren und sprachlichen, syntaktischen sowie strukturellen Faktoren beruht.
  5. Tunger, D.: Bibliometrie als Teil eines Trenderkennugns-Systems in der Naturwissenschaft (2009) 0.01 
    0.009250886 = product of:
  0.09250886 = sum of:
    0.09250886 = weight(_text_:wahrnehmung in 2770) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09250886 = score(doc=2770,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18131447 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027484296 = queryNorm
        0.51021224 = fieldWeight in 2770, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2770)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Die Anzahl wissenschaftlicher Publikationen in Zeitschriften, die Anzahl von Zitaten in diesen Zeitschriftenartikeln und die Anzahl angemeldeter Patente steigen ständig und scheinbar unaufhaltsam. Der Einsatz von Bibliometrie eröffnet die Möglichkeit, diese Kommunikation in der Wissenschaft transparenter zu machen: So können mit Hilfe von Bibliometrie die Entwicklung von Themen nachvollzogen, die Wahrnehmung von Einrichtungen bestimmt und mögliche Kooperationspartner identifiziert werden. Der Beitrag illustriert, wie es mit Hilfe von quantitativen bibliometrischen Methoden möglich ist, einen objektiven Eindruck wissenschaftlicher Entwicklung zu gewinnen. Er befasst sich dabei mit der Frage, wie Bibliometrie im Kontext von Trendbeobachtung und Trenderkennung in der Naturwissenschaft eingesetzt werden kann und welcher Nutzen sich hieraus ergibt.
  6. Li, T.-C.: Reference sources in periodicals : research note (1995) 0.01 
    0.007390463 = product of:
  0.036952313 = sum of:
    0.012566676 = product of:
      0.037700027 = sum of:
        0.037700027 = weight(_text_:t in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037700027 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.024385637 = product of:
      0.060964093 = sum of:
        0.03117415 = weight(_text_:28 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03117415 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09845598 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
        0.029789941 = weight(_text_:22 in 5092) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029789941 = score(doc=5092,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5092, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5092)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Abstract
    Presents a list of 53 periodicals in 22 subject fields which regularly provide bibliographies of theses, research in progress and patents in their particular subject field. The fields of business, economics, history and literature have most periodical listings of dissertations and theses. Also lists 63 periodicals in 25 sub-disciplines which provide rankings or ratings. Rankings and ratings information predominates in the fields of business, sports and games, finance and banking, and library and information science
    Source
    Journal of information; communication; and library science. 2(1995) no.2, S.20-28
  7. Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003) 0.01 
    0.007299614 = product of:
  0.03649807 = sum of:
    0.015550467 = product of:
      0.0466514 = sum of:
        0.0466514 = weight(_text_:t in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0466514 = score(doc=3837,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.4308728 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.020947604 = product of:
      0.052369006 = sum of:
        0.02630281 = weight(_text_:29 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02630281 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09668116 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
        0.026066197 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026066197 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Abstract
    In this article we further develop the theory for a stochastic model for the citation process in the presence of obsolescence to predict the future citation pattern of individual papers in a collection. More precisely, we investigate the conditional distribution-and its mean- of the number of citations to a paper after time t, given the number of citations it has received up to time t. In an important parametric case it is shown that the expected number of future citations is a linear function of the current number, this being interpretable as an example of a success-breeds-success phenomenon.
    Date
    29. 3.2003 19:22:48
  8. First International Conference on the Evaluation of Research Technology and Development (1995) 0.01 
    0.0064152167 = product of:
  0.032076083 = sum of:
    0.018850014 = product of:
      0.05655004 = sum of:
        0.05655004 = weight(_text_:t in 415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05655004 = score(doc=415,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 415, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=415)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.013226071 = product of:
      0.066130355 = sum of:
        0.066130355 = weight(_text_:28 in 415) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.066130355 = score(doc=415,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09845598 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.6716744 = fieldWeight in 415, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=415)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Content
    Issue comprising papers presented at the First International Conference on the Evaluation of Research Technology and Development, Thessaloniki, 26-28 Apr 95
    Date
    6. 9.1996 19:36:28
    Editor
    Braun, T.
  9. Althouse, B.M.; West, J.D.; Bergstrom, C.T.; Bergstrom, T.: Differences in impact factor across fields and over time (2009) 0.01 
    0.005542847 = product of:
  0.027714234 = sum of:
    0.009425007 = product of:
      0.02827502 = sum of:
        0.02827502 = weight(_text_:t in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02827502 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.018289227 = product of:
      0.045723066 = sum of:
        0.023380611 = weight(_text_:28 in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023380611 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09845598 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
        0.022342455 = weight(_text_:22 in 2695) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022342455 = score(doc=2695,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2695, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2695)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Date
    23. 2.2009 18:22:28
  10. Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014) 0.01 
    0.0054760193 = product of:
  0.027380096 = sum of:
    0.009425007 = product of:
      0.02827502 = sum of:
        0.02827502 = weight(_text_:t in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02827502 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.017955089 = product of:
      0.04488772 = sum of:
        0.022545267 = weight(_text_:29 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022545267 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09668116 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
        0.022342455 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022342455 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Date
    22. 8.2014 17:11:29
  11. Czepel, R.: ¬Die Geographie der wissenschaftlichen Zitierung (2003) 0.01 
    0.005286221 = product of:
  0.05286221 = sum of:
    0.05286221 = weight(_text_:wahrnehmung in 2273) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05286221 = score(doc=2273,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.18131447 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.027484296 = queryNorm
        0.29154986 = fieldWeight in 2273, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.5970206 = idf(docFreq=163, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2273)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Ein britischer Forscher hat sich die Mühe gemacht, die geografischen Muster der Zitierungen von 1981 bis zur Gegenwart freizulegen. Das Ergebnis: Die publizistische Wahrnehmung ist in der Wissenschaft äußerst ungleich verteilt. Die USA dominieren mit großem Abstand vor dem Rest der WeIt. Und auch dort konzentrieren sich die Verweise auf einige wenige Ballungsräume der Forschung. Michael Batty vom Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis in London bediente sich für seine Analyse der Datenbank "ISIHighlyCited.com" (http: //www.isihighlycited.com/), in der Forscher aus verschiedenen Disziplinen aufgelistet werden, die die weltweit meisten Zitate auf sich gezogen haben. In diesen Ranglisten nehmen die akademischen Edelschmieden aus den USA etwa jene Rolle ein, die Österreichische Athleten im Alpinschisport besetzen. Einzig der Forschungsraum London kann mit der Konkurrenz aus Übersee halbwegs mithalten. Der Artikel "Citation Geography: It's About Location" von Michael Batty erschien im Magazin "The Scientist" (Band 17, Heft 16/10, Ausgabe vom 25.8.03; http://www.thescientist.com/yr2003/aug/opinion 030825.html). Die Zeitschrift ist nach individueller Registrierung frei zugänglich. Der Homepage des Autors http: //www.casa.ucl.ac.uk/citations/ können weitere Details entnommen werden. Ob die Anzahl derZitate auch etwas über die wissenschaftliche Qualität aussagt, ist genau so Gegenstand von Diskussionen, wie dies etwa bei den "Impact-Faktoren" von Journalen der Fall ist (vgl. "Kann wissenschaftliche Qualität gemessen werden?", http://science.orf.at/science/news/58648). Ganz wertfrei kann man die ISI-Daten jedenfalls dazu verwenden, um herauszufinden, in welchem Land, in welcher Stadt und in welcher Institution die meist zitierten Forscher dieses Erdballs sitzen. Das Ergebnis dieser von Michael Batty erstellten "Geografie derwissenschaftlichen Zitierung" ist eindeutig: Einige Wenige ziehen den Großteil der publizistischen Aufmerksamkeit auf sich - und lassen für den Rest nur wenig über. Diese Aussage gilt gleichermaßen für Ranglisten von Städten, Institutionen und Ländern. Und: In allen drei Fällen kommen die Spitzereiter aus dem US-amerikanischen Raum.
  12. Egghe, L.: Untangling Herdan's law and Heaps' law : mathematical and informetric arguments (2007) 0.00 
    0.004907546 = product of:
  0.024537731 = sum of:
    0.020780187 = product of:
      0.06234056 = sum of:
        0.06234056 = weight(_text_:t in 271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06234056 = score(doc=271,freq=14.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.575778 = fieldWeight in 271, product of:
              3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                14.0 = termFreq=14.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=271)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0037575446 = product of:
      0.018787723 = sum of:
        0.018787723 = weight(_text_:29 in 271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018787723 = score(doc=271,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09668116 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 271, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=271)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Abstract
    Herdan's law in linguistics and Heaps' law in information retrieval are different formulations of the same phenomenon. Stated briefly and in linguistic terms they state that vocabularies' sizes are concave increasing power laws of texts' sizes. This study investigates these laws from a purely mathematical and informetric point of view. A general informetric argument shows that the problem of proving these laws is, in fact, ill-posed. Using the more general terminology of sources and items, the author shows by presenting exact formulas from Lotkaian informetrics that the total number T of sources is not only a function of the total number A of items, but is also a function of several parameters (e.g., the parameters occurring in Lotka's law). Consequently, it is shown that a fixed T(or A) value can lead to different possible A (respectively, T) values. Limiting the T(A)-variability to increasing samples (e.g., in a text as done in linguistics) the author then shows, in a purely mathematical way, that for large sample sizes T~ A**phi, where phi is a constant, phi < 1 but close to 1, hence roughly, Heaps' or Herdan's law can be proved without using any linguistic or informetric argument. The author also shows that for smaller samples, a is not a constant but essentially decreases as confirmed by practical examples. Finally, an exact informetric argument on random sampling in the items shows that, in most cases, T= T(A) is a concavely increasing function, in accordance with practical examples.
    Date
    29. 4.2007 19:51:08
  13. Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990) 0.00 
    0.0041895206 = product of:
  0.041895207 = sum of:
    0.041895207 = product of:
      0.10473801 = sum of:
        0.05260562 = weight(_text_:29 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05260562 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09668116 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
        0.052132394 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052132394 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 18:55:29
  14. Rao, I.K.: ¬The distribution of scientific productivity and social change (1978) 0.00 
    0.0037157496 = product of:
  0.018578747 = sum of:
    0.012566676 = product of:
      0.037700027 = sum of:
        0.037700027 = weight(_text_:t in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037700027 = score(doc=8,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.006012071 = product of:
      0.030060355 = sum of:
        0.030060355 = weight(_text_:29 in 8) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030060355 = score(doc=8,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09668116 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 8, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Abstract
    Results in the literature concerning the probability that an author publishes r articles in time t are reexamined, and it is found that a negative binomial distribution bits scientific productivity data (by the chi-squared goodness-of-fit-test) better than many other distribution such as geometric, logarithmic, zeta, cumulative advantage, etc. It is shown analytically that the nagative binomial distribution describes a pattern of scientific productivity under the 'success-breeds-success' condition in a wide variety of social circumstances
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 29(1978), S.111-122
  15. Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006) 0.00 
    0.0037049332 = product of:
  0.018524665 = sum of:
    0.012566676 = product of:
      0.037700027 = sum of:
        0.037700027 = weight(_text_:t in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037700027 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.34819782 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.0059579886 = product of:
      0.029789941 = sum of:
        0.029789941 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029789941 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Date
    4.12.2006 12:12:22
  16. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.00 
    0.0036651741 = product of:
  0.03665174 = sum of:
    0.03665174 = product of:
      0.091629356 = sum of:
        0.038967688 = weight(_text_:28 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038967688 = score(doc=3925,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09845598 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
        0.052661672 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052661672 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  17. Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.00 
    0.0034134171 = product of:
  0.034134172 = sum of:
    0.034134172 = product of:
      0.056890283 = sum of:
        0.019483844 = weight(_text_:28 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019483844 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09845598 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
        0.018787723 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018787723 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09668116 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
        0.018618714 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018618714 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09624532 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
  0.1 = coord(1/10)
    Abstract
    Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    12. 3.2021 18:41:28
  18. Bookstein, A.; Raita, T.: Discovering term occurence structure in text (2001) 0.00 
    0.0032512806 = product of:
  0.016256403 = sum of:
    0.010995842 = product of:
      0.032987524 = sum of:
        0.032987524 = weight(_text_:t in 5751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032987524 = score(doc=5751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 5751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5751)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.005260562 = product of:
      0.02630281 = sum of:
        0.02630281 = weight(_text_:29 in 5751) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02630281 = score(doc=5751,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09668116 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5751, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5751)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Date
    29. 9.2001 14:00:18
  19. Möller, T.: Woher stammt das Wissen über die Halbwertzeiten des Wissens? (2017) 0.00 
    0.0032512806 = product of:
  0.016256403 = sum of:
    0.010995842 = product of:
      0.032987524 = sum of:
        0.032987524 = weight(_text_:t in 3520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032987524 = score(doc=3520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.30467308 = fieldWeight in 3520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3520)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.005260562 = product of:
      0.02630281 = sum of:
        0.02630281 = weight(_text_:29 in 3520) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02630281 = score(doc=3520,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09668116 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3520, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3520)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  20. Brooks, T.A.: How good are the best papers of JASIS? (2000) 0.00 
    0.002820226 = product of:
  0.014101129 = sum of:
    0.009425007 = product of:
      0.02827502 = sum of:
        0.02827502 = weight(_text_:t in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02827502 = score(doc=4593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10827187 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.26114836 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    0.004676122 = product of:
      0.023380611 = sum of:
        0.023380611 = weight(_text_:28 in 4593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023380611 = score(doc=4593,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09845598 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.027484296 = queryNorm
            0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 4593, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4593)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(2/10)
    Abstract
    A citation analysis examined the 28 best articles published in JASIS from 1969-1996. Best articles tend to single-authored works twice as long as the avergae article published in JASIS. They are cited and self-cited much more often than the average article. The greatest source of references made to the best articles is from JASIS itself. The top 5 best papers focus largely on information retrieval and online searching
    Content
    Top by numbers of citations: (1) Saracevic, T. et al.: A study of information seeking and retrieving I-III (1988); (2) Bates, M.: Information search tactics (1979); (3) Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness (1973); (4) Marcus, R.S.: A experimental comparison of the effectiveness of computers and humans as search intermediaries (1983); (4) Fidel, R.: Online searching styles (1984)

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 295
  • d 41
  • m 1
  • ro 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 323
  • el 9
  • s 7
  • m 6
  • r 2
  • b 1
  • x 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications