Search (22 results, page 1 of 2)

0.050621103 = product of:
  0.17717385 = sum of:
    0.15801893 = weight(_text_:gestaltung in 565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.15801893 = score(doc=565,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.20432045 = queryWeight, product of:
          5.8332562 = idf(docFreq=351, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035026826 = queryNorm
        0.7733878 = fieldWeight in 565, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          5.8332562 = idf(docFreq=351, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=565)
    0.019154917 = product of:
      0.057464752 = sum of:
        0.057464752 = weight(_text_:29 in 565) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057464752 = score(doc=565,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 565, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=565)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.2857143 = coord(2/7)

Footnote

Ein Beitrag, der große Auswirkungen auf die Buchaufstellung und die Gestaltung systematischer Kataloge in deutschen wissenschaftlichen Bibliotheken hatte; Fortsetzung T.2

Source

Zentralblatt für Bibliothekswesen. 29(1912), S.241-259

0.003973706 = product of:
  0.027815942 = sum of:
    0.027815942 = product of:
      0.11126377 = sum of:
        0.11126377 = weight(_text_:3a in 7394) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.11126377 = score(doc=7394,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29695782 = queryWeight, product of:
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 7394, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=7394)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Ergebnis einer Umfrage aus dem Frühjahr 1993. A. Wissenschaftliche Bibliotheken: Versandt wurde der Fragebogen an die Mitglieder der Sektion IV des DBV. Fragen: (1a) Um welchen Bestand handelt es sich, der sachlich erschlossen wird? (1b) Wie groß ist dieser Bestand? (1c) Wird dieser Bestand vollständig oder nur in Auswahl (einzelne Fächer, Lehrbücher, Dissertationen o.ä.) sachlich erschlossen? (1d) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (2) Auf welche Art wird der Bestand zur Zeit sachlich erschlossen? (3a) Welche Klassifikation wird angewendet? (3b) Gibt es alphabetisches SyK-Register bzw. einen Zugriff auf die Klassenbeschreibungen? (3c) Gibt es ergänzende Schlüssel für die Aspekte Ort, Zeit, Form? (4) Falls Sie einen SWK führen (a) nach welchem Regelwerk? (b) Gibt es ein genormtes Vokabular oder einen Thesaurus (ggf. nur für bestimmte Fächer)? (5) In welcher Form existieren die Sachkataloge? (6) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. in einem Verbund beteiligt? [Nein: 79%] (7) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 46%] (8) Welche sachlichen Suchmöglichkeiten gibt es für Benutzer? (9) Sind zukünftige Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Ja: 73%]. - B. Öffentliche Bibliotheken: Die Umfrage richtete sich an alle ÖBs der Sektionen I, II und III des DBV. Fragen: (1) Welche Sachkataloge führen Sie? (2) Welche Klassifikationen (Systematiken) liegen dem SyK zugrunde? [ASB: 242; KAB: 333; SfB: 4 (???); SSD: 11; Berliner: 18] (3) Führen Sie ein eigenes Schlagwort-Register zum SyK bzw. zur Klassifikation (Systematik)? (4) Führen Sie den SWK nach ...? [RSWK: 132 (= ca. 60%) anderen Regeln: 93] (5) Seit wann bestehen die jetzigen Sachkataloge? (6) In welcher Form existiern die Sachkataloge? (7) In welchem Umfang wird der Bestand erschlossen? (8) Welche Signaturen verwenden Sie? (9) Ist die Bibliothek an einer kooperativen Sacherschließung, z.B. einem Verbund, beteiligt? [Nein: 96%] (10) Nutzen Sie Fremdleistungen bei der Sacherschließung? [Ja: 70%] (11) Woher beziehen Sie diese Fremdleistungen? (12) Verfügen Sie über ein Online-Katalogsystem mit OPAC? [Ja: 78; Nein: 614] (13) Sind zukünftig Veränderungen bei der Sacherschließung geplant? [Nein: 458; Ja: 237]; RESÜMEE für ÖB: "(i) Einführung von EDV-Katalogen bleibt auch in den 90er Jahren ein Thema, (ii) Der Aufbau von SWK wird in vielen Bibliotheken in Angriff genommen, dabei spielt die Fremddatenübernahme eine entscheidende Rolle, (iii) RSWK werden zunehmend angewandt, Nutzung der SWD auch für andere Regeln wirkt normierend, (iv) Große Bewegung auf dem 'Systematik-Markt' ist in absehbarer Zeit nicht zu erwarten, (v) Für kleinere Bibliotheken wird der Zettelkatalog auf absehbare Zeit noch die herrschende Katalogform sein, (vi) Der erhebliche Nachholbedarf in den neuen Bundesländern wird nur in einem größeren Zeitraum zu leisten sein. ??? SPEZIALBIBIOTHEKEN ???

0.0034687952 = product of:
  0.024281565 = sum of:
    0.024281565 = product of:
      0.09712626 = sum of:
        0.09712626 = weight(_text_:seite in 7392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.09712626 = score(doc=7392,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19618745 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.49506867 = fieldWeight in 7392, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.601063 = idf(docFreq=443, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=7392)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Content

Der 'Klassiker' für die Darstellung der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung bis in die 60er Jahre. Der Schwerpunkt liegt nicht so sehr auf der methodischen Seite, sondern der Tenor der Darstellung ist eher beschreibend, historisch; als Zusammenfassung nicht ersetzt

0.0031924865 = product of:
  0.022347404 = sum of:
    0.022347404 = product of:
      0.06704221 = sum of:
        0.06704221 = weight(_text_:29 in 6250) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06704221 = score(doc=6250,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6250, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6250)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

0.0028910947 = product of:
  0.020237662 = sum of:
    0.020237662 = weight(_text_:internet in 5550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020237662 = score(doc=5550,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10340759 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035026826 = queryNorm
        0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 5550, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5550)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

This paper outlines the life and work of Paul Otlet (1868-1944). Otlet was a founder of the scholarly disciplines of bibliography, documentation, and information science. As a result of the work he undertook with Henri La Fontaine (1854-1943)-specifically, the establishment in 1895 in Brussels of the International Institute of Bibliography, which aimed to construct a Universal Bibliographic Repertory-Otlet has become known as the father of the Internet. Otlet's grand project, as stated in his Traité de documentation (1934), was never fully realized. Even before his death, the collections he assembled had been dismembered. After his death, the problematic conditions in which Otlet's personal papers and the collections he had created were preserved meant that his thought and work remained largely unacknowledged. It fell to W. Boyd Rayward, who began to work on Otlet in the late 1960s, to rescue him from obscurity, publishing in 1975 a major biography of the pioneer knowledge entrepreneur and internationalist progenitor of the World Wide Web.

0.0027364169 = product of:
  0.019154917 = sum of:
    0.019154917 = product of:
      0.057464752 = sum of:
        0.057464752 = weight(_text_:29 in 4057) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.057464752 = score(doc=4057,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4057, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4057)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

31. 7.2006 15:04:29

0.002711801 = product of:
  0.018982606 = sum of:
    0.018982606 = product of:
      0.056947816 = sum of:
        0.056947816 = weight(_text_:22 in 6041) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.056947816 = score(doc=6041,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12265798 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6041, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6041)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Series

Kölner Arbeiten zum Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswesen; H.22

0.0024092456 = product of:
  0.016864719 = sum of:
    0.016864719 = weight(_text_:internet in 5557) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.016864719 = score(doc=5557,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10340759 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035026826 = queryNorm
        0.16308975 = fieldWeight in 5557, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5557)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Nowadays, tremendous information sources are preserved, ranging from those of a traditional nature like libraries and museums to new formats like electronic databases and the World Wide Web. Making these sources consistent, easily accessible, and as complete as possible is challenging. Almost a century ago, people like Paul Otlet were already fully aware of this need and tried to develop ways of making human knowledge more accessible using the resources and technology available at that time. Otlet's ideas about a Universal Network of Documentation and the Universal Book are clear examples of such efforts. Computer science currently provides the means to build digital spaces that consist of (multimedia) information sources connected through the Internet. In this article, we give a nontechnical overview of the current state of the art in information management. Next, we focus on those aspects of Otlet's work that deal with the organization of knowledge and information sources. Then we study the potential connections between Otlet's work and the state of the art of computerized information management from a computer scientist's point of view. Finally, we consider some of the problems and challenges that information management still faces today and what computer science professionals have in common with, and can still learn from, Otlet and his work.

0.0020443127 = product of:
  0.014310188 = sum of:
    0.014310188 = weight(_text_:internet in 2788) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014310188 = score(doc=2788,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10340759 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035026826 = queryNorm
        0.13838623 = fieldWeight in 2788, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=2788)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

In 1934, a Belgian entrepreneur named Paul Otlet sketched out plans for a worldwide network of computers-or "electric telescopes," as he called them - that would allow people anywhere in the world to search and browse through millions of books, newspapers, photographs, films and sound recordings, all linked together in what he termed a reseau mondial: a "worldwide web." Today, Otlet and his visionary proto-Internet have been all but forgotten, thanks to a series of historical misfortunes - not least of which involved the Nazis marching into Brussels and destroying most of his life's work. In the years since Otlet's death, however, the world has witnessed the emergence of a global network that has proved him right about the possibilities - and the perils - of networked information. In Cataloging the World, Alex Wright brings to light the forgotten genius of Paul Otlet, an introverted librarian who harbored a bookworm's dream to organize all the world's information. Recognizing the limitations of traditional libraries and archives, Otlet began to imagine a radically new way of organizing information, and undertook his life's great work: a universal bibliography of all the world's published knowledge that ultimately totaled more than 12 million individual entries. That effort eventually evolved into the Mundaneum, a vast "city of knowledge" that opened its doors to the public in 1921 to widespread attention. Like many ambitious dreams, however, Otlet's eventually faltered, a victim to technological constraints and political upheaval in Europe on the eve of World War II. Wright tells not just the story of a failed entrepreneur, but the story of a powerful idea - the dream of universal knowledge - that has captivated humankind since before the great Library at Alexandria. Cataloging the World explores this story through the prism of today's digital age, considering the intellectual challenge and tantalizing vision of Otlet's digital universe that in some ways seems far more sophisticated than the Web as we know it today.
The dream of universal knowledge hardly started with the digital age. From the archives of Sumeria to the Library of Alexandria, humanity has long wrestled with information overload and management of intellectual output. Revived during the Renaissance and picking up pace in the Enlightenment, the dream grew and by the late nineteenth century was embraced by a number of visionaries who felt that at long last it was within their grasp. Among them, Paul Otlet stands out. A librarian by training, he worked at expanding the potential of the catalogue card -- the world's first information chip. From there followed universal libraries and reading rooms, connecting his native Belgium to the world -- by means of vast collections of cards that brought together everything that had ever been put to paper. Recognizing that the rapid acceleration of technology was transforming the world's intellectual landscape, Otlet devoted himself to creating a universal bibliography of all published knowledge. Ultimately totaling more than 12 million individual entries, it would evolve into the Mundaneum, a vast "city of knowledge" that opened its doors to the public in 1921. By 1934, Otlet had drawn up plans for a network of "electric telescopes" that would allow people everywhere to search through books, newspapers, photographs, and recordings, all linked together in what he termed a réseau mondial: a worldwide web. It all seemed possible, almost until the moment when the Nazis marched into Brussels and carted it all away. In Cataloging the World, Alex Wright places Otlet in the long continuum of visionaries and pioneers who have dreamed of unifying the world's knowledge, from H.G. Wells and Melvil Dewey to Ted Nelson and Steve Jobs. And while history has passed Otlet by, Wright shows that his legacy persists in today's networked age, where Internet corporations like Google and Twitter play much the same role that Otlet envisioned for the Mundaneum -- as the gathering and distribution channels for the world's intellectual output. In this sense, Cataloging the World is more than just the story of a failed entrepreneur; it is an ongoing story of a powerful idea that has captivated humanity from time immemorial, and that continues to inspire many of us in today's digital age.

0.0019273964 = product of:
  0.013491774 = sum of:
    0.013491774 = weight(_text_:internet in 3251) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013491774 = score(doc=3251,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10340759 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035026826 = queryNorm
        0.1304718 = fieldWeight in 3251, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3251)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

Tim Berners-Lee described in Weaving the Web his future vision of the World Wide Web in two parts. In the first one, nowadays called Web 2.0, people collaborate and enrich data together in a shared information space. In the second part, exchanges extend to computers, resulting in a "Semantic Web" (Berners-Lee 2000a, 157). Most historical studies of World Wide Web begin with the American roots of the Internet in ARPANET or follow a historiographical line of post war information revolutionaries, from Vannevar Bush to Tim Berners-Lee. This paper follows an alternative line. At the end of the nineteenth and in the first decades of the twentieth century various European scholars, like Patrick Geddes, Paul Otlet, Otto Neurath, and Wilhelm Ostwald explored the organisation, enrichment and dissemination of knowledge on a global level to come to a peaceful, universal society. We focus on Paul Otlet (1868-1944) who developed a knowledge infrastructure to update information mechanically and manually in collaboratories of scholars. First the Understanding Infrastructure (2007) report, that Paul N. Edwards et al. wrote on behalf of NSF, will be used to position Otlet's knowledge organization in their sketched development from information systems to information internetworks or webs. Secondly, the relevance of Otlet's knowledge infrastructure will be assessed for Web 2.0 and Semantic Web applications for research. The hypothesis will be put forward that the instruments and protocols envisioned by Otlet to enhance collaborative knowledge production, can still be relevant for current conceptualizations of "scientific authority" in data sharing and annotation in Web 2.0 applications and the modeling of the Semantic Web.

0.0019273964 = product of:
  0.013491774 = sum of:
    0.013491774 = weight(_text_:internet in 3345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.013491774 = score(doc=3345,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10340759 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035026826 = queryNorm
        0.1304718 = fieldWeight in 3345, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3345)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Abstract

At a time when Internet use is closely tracked and social networking sites supply data for targeted advertising, Lars Heide presents the first academic study of the invention that fueled today's information revolution: the punched card. Early punched cards were first developed to process the United States census in 1890. They were soon used to calculate invoices and to issue pay slips. As demand for more sophisticated systems and reading machines increased in both the United States and Europe, punched cards were no longer a simple data-processing tool. Insurance companies, public utilities, businesses, and governments all used them to keep detailed records of their customers, competitors, employees, citizens, and enemies. The United States used punched-card registers in the late 1930s to pay roughly 21 million Americans their Social Security pensions; Vichy France used similar technologies in an attempt to mobilize an army against the occupying German forces; Germans in 1941 developed several punched-card registers to make the war effort more effective. Heide's analysis of these three major punched-card systems, as well as the impact of the invention on Great Britain, illustrates how industrial nations established administrative systems that enabled them to locate and control their citizens, for better or for worse. Heide's comparative study of the development of punched-card systems in the United States, Great Britain, France, and Germany explores how different cultures collected personal and financial data and how they adapted to new technologies. He examines this history for both its business and technological implications in today's information-dependent society. "Punched-Card Systems in the Early Information Explosion, 1880-1945" will interest students and scholars from a wide range of disciplines, including the history of technology, computer science, business history, and management and organizational studies.

0.0018078673 = product of:
  0.012655071 = sum of:
    0.012655071 = product of:
      0.037965212 = sum of:
        0.037965212 = weight(_text_:22 in 6607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037965212 = score(doc=6607,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12265798 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 6607, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6607)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Source

Probleme des Wiederaufbaus im wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesen: aus d. Verhandlungen des 1. Bibliothekartagung der britischen Zone in Hamburg vom 22.-24.10.1946

0.0018078673 = product of:
  0.012655071 = sum of:
    0.012655071 = product of:
      0.037965212 = sum of:
        0.037965212 = weight(_text_:22 in 2521) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037965212 = score(doc=2521,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12265798 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2521, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2521)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

22. 3.2008 13:33:51

0.0018078673 = product of:
  0.012655071 = sum of:
    0.012655071 = product of:
      0.037965212 = sum of:
        0.037965212 = weight(_text_:22 in 1432) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037965212 = score(doc=1432,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12265798 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1432, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1432)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

22. 8.2016 15:58:46

0.0015962432 = product of:
  0.011173702 = sum of:
    0.011173702 = product of:
      0.033521105 = sum of:
        0.033521105 = weight(_text_:29 in 5541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033521105 = score(doc=5541,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5541, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5541)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

14. 7.1996 13:29:45

0.0015818839 = product of:
  0.011073187 = sum of:
    0.011073187 = product of:
      0.03321956 = sum of:
        0.03321956 = weight(_text_:22 in 3363) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03321956 = score(doc=3363,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12265798 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3363, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3363)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

22. 2.2013 12:10:07

0.0013682084 = product of:
  0.009577459 = sum of:
    0.009577459 = product of:
      0.028732376 = sum of:
        0.028732376 = weight(_text_:29 in 2674) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028732376 = score(doc=2674,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2674, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2674)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

29. 8.2004 19:26:53

0.0013682084 = product of:
  0.009577459 = sum of:
    0.009577459 = product of:
      0.028732376 = sum of:
        0.028732376 = weight(_text_:29 in 5483) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028732376 = score(doc=5483,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5483, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5483)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

29. 7.2006 19:39:21

0.0011401739 = product of:
  0.007981217 = sum of:
    0.007981217 = product of:
      0.023943648 = sum of:
        0.023943648 = weight(_text_:29 in 4377) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023943648 = score(doc=4377,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4377, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4377)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

1. 8.2018 12:21:29

0.0011299171 = product of:
  0.007909419 = sum of:
    0.007909419 = product of:
      0.023728257 = sum of:
        0.023728257 = weight(_text_:22 in 3074) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023728257 = score(doc=3074,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12265798 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3074, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3074)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.14285715 = coord(1/7)

Date

22. 8.2016 16:06:54