Search (32 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × theme_ss:"Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval"
  1. Wiesenmüller, H.: Schlagwortketten in Online-Katalogen : Realität und Potenzial (2008) 0.01
    0.0075247115 = product of:
      0.05267298 = sum of:
        0.05267298 = weight(_text_:gestaltung in 2410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05267298 = score(doc=2410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20432045 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.8332562 = idf(docFreq=351, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.25779593 = fieldWeight in 2410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.8332562 = idf(docFreq=351, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2410)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Das Prinzip, zur Wiedergabe eines komplexen Gegenstands mehrere Schlagwörter in Form einer Schlagwortkette zu verknüpfen, gehört zum zentralen Kern der 'Regeln für den Schlagwortkatalog' (RSWK). Während die Bildung solcher Schlagwortketten - also der Input - umfassend geregelt ist, verzichtet das Regelwerk jedoch darauf, auch für den Output nähere Vorgaben zu machen: "Die Gestaltung des Retrievals von Schlagwörtern und ihrer Anzeige im Online-Katalog" sei "Aufgabe des jeweiligen OPACs", weshalb man sich auf "einzelne Hinweise" beschränke (§ 20,1). Explizit genannt werden immerhin die "Suche nach Schlagwortketten" und das Browsing im Schlagwortkettenindex (5 20,5). Freilich ist seit langem bekannt, dass Schlagwortketten in vielen OPACs recht 'stiefmütterlich' behandelt werden. Eine aussagekräftige Bestandsaufnahme über die tatsächliche Nutzung der Schlagwortketten in aktuellen OPACs fehlte jedoch. Eine solche hat die Verfasserin im Februar 2008 unternommen. Den Hintergrund dafür bildeten die Überlegungen der vom Standardisierungsausschuss eingesetzten Ad-hoc-Arbeitsgruppe "Strategie der Sacherschließung" unter dem Vorsitz von Dr. Friedrich Geißelmann (UB Regensburg). In diesem Rahmen wurde auch über Wege diskutiert, um das große Potenzial der Schlagwortketten besser für das Retrieval nutzbar zu machen. Für die Untersuchung wurden - ohne Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit - 40 Online-Kataloge mit Schlagwortkettenfunktionalitäten analysiert. Zehn unterschiedliche Katalogsysteme waren dabei vertreten: Aleph, Allegro, Biber, Bond, Horizon, Libero, PICA, SISIS-Sunrise, Urica und Virtua. Eine Liste der betrachteten OPACs inkl. ihrer URLs und der im Folgenden verwendeten Siglen ist im Anhang zu finden. Die Darstellung stellt zwangsläufig eine Momentaufnahme dar, denn die OPACs sind natürlich keine statischen Systeme: Schon bei Abfassung des vorliegenden Beitrags im Juli 2008 waren einige Änderungen einzuarbeiten, die sich seit Februar ergeben hatten; weitere Umgestaltungen der Kataloge sind nur eine Frage der Zeit. Desungeachtet gibt die Studie einen Überblick über derzeit implementierte Funktionalitäten sowie aktuelle Trends, und ermöglicht auch das Aufzeigen von Problemfeldern und Verbesserungsmöglichkeiten.
  2. Devadason, F.J.; Intaraksa, N.; Patamawongjariya, P.; Desai, K.: Faceted indexing based system for organizing and accessing Internet resources (2002) 0.01
    0.0074383533 = product of:
      0.026034236 = sum of:
        0.020447385 = weight(_text_:internet in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020447385 = score(doc=97,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10340759 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.19773582 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
        0.005586851 = product of:
          0.016760552 = sum of:
            0.016760552 = weight(_text_:29 in 97) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.016760552 = score(doc=97,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035026826 = queryNorm
                0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 97, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=97)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.2857143 = coord(2/7)
    
    Abstract
    Organizing and providing access to the resources an the Internet has been a problem area in spite of the availability of sophisticated search engines and other Software tools. There have been several attempts to organize the resources an the World Wide Web. Some of them have tried to use traditional library classification schemes such as the Library of Congress Classification, the Dewey Decimal Classification and others. However there is a need to assign proper subject headings to them and present them in a logical or hierarchical sequence to cater to the need for browsing. This paper attempts to describe an experimental system designed to organize and provide access to web documents using a faceted pre-coordinate indexing system based an the Deep Structure Indexing System (DSIS) derived from POPSI (Postulate based Permuted Subject Indexing) of Bhattacharyya, and the facet analysis and chain indexing system of Ranganathan. A prototype Software System has been designed to create a database of records specifying Web documents according to the Dublin Core and to input a faceted subject heading according to DSIS. Synonymous terms are added to the Standard terms in the heading using appropriate symbols. Once the data are entered along with a description and the URL of the web document, the record is stored in the System. More than one faceted subject heading can be assigned to a record depending an the content of the original document. The System stores the Surrogates and keeps the faceted subject headings separately after establishing a link. The search is carried out an index entries derived from the faceted subject heading using the chain indexing technique. If a single term is Input, the System searches for its presence in the faceted subject headings and displays the subject headings in a sorted sequence reflecting an organizing sequence. If the number of retrieved Keadings is too large (running into more than a page) the user has the option of entering another search term to be searched in combination. The System searches subject headings already retrieved and looks for those containing the second term. The retrieved faceted subject headings can be displayed and browsed. When the relevant subject heading is selected the system displays the records with their URLs. Using the URL, the original document an the web can be accessed. The prototype system developed in a Windows NT environment using ASP and a web server is under rigorous testing. The database and Index management routines need further development.
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) no.2, S.61-77
    Theme
    Internet
  3. Chan, L.M.; Hodges, T.: Entering the millennium : a new century for LCSH (2000) 0.01
    0.005448218 = product of:
      0.038137525 = sum of:
        0.038137525 = product of:
          0.057206284 = sum of:
            0.028732376 = weight(_text_:29 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028732376 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035026826 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
            0.028473908 = weight(_text_:22 in 5920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028473908 = score(doc=5920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12265798 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035026826 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 5920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5920)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    27. 5.2001 16:22:21
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
  4. Connell, T.H.: Use of the LCSH system : realities (1996) 0.00
    0.0047700624 = product of:
      0.033390436 = sum of:
        0.033390436 = weight(_text_:internet in 6941) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033390436 = score(doc=6941,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10340759 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.32290122 = fieldWeight in 6941, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=6941)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Explores the question of whether academic libraries keep up with the changes in the LCSH system. Analysis of the handling of 15 subject headings in 50 academic library catalogues available via the Internet found that libraries are not consistently maintaining subject authority control, or making syndetic references and scope notes in their catalogues. Discusses the results from the perspective of the libraries' performance, performance on the headings overall, performance on references, performance on the type of change made to the headings,a nd performance within 3 widely used onlien catalogue systems (DRA, INNOPAC and NOTIS). Discusses the implications of the findings in relationship to expressions of dissatisfaction with the effectiveness of subject cataloguing expressed by discussion groups on the Internet
  5. Geißelmann, F. (Hrsg.): Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen (1994) 0.00
    0.0044945506 = product of:
      0.031461854 = sum of:
        0.031461854 = product of:
          0.04719278 = sum of:
            0.023703001 = weight(_text_:29 in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023703001 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035026826 = queryNorm
                0.19237353 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
            0.023489777 = weight(_text_:22 in 4360) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.023489777 = score(doc=4360,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12265798 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035026826 = queryNorm
                0.19150631 = fieldWeight in 4360, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4360)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    15. 7.2018 16:22:16
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitteilungen VÖB 48(1995) H.1, S.66-68 (K. Niedermair) - Vgl. auch Lepsky, K. in: Bibliotheksdienst 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519; Bibliothek: Forschung u. Praxis 19(1995) H.2, S.251-254 (G. Hartwieg; auch in: LDV-Forum Bd. 12, Nr. 2, Jg. 1995, S.22-29 [unter: http://www.jlcl.org/1995_Heft2/Rezensionen_19-27.pdf]) .
  6. Devadason, F.J.; Intaraksa, N.; Patamawongjariya, P.; Desai, K.: Faceted indexing application for organizing and accessing internet resources (2003) 0.00
    0.0033383486 = product of:
      0.023368439 = sum of:
        0.023368439 = weight(_text_:internet in 3966) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023368439 = score(doc=3966,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.10340759 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.22598378 = fieldWeight in 3966, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3966)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Organizing and providing access to the resources an the Internet has been a problem area in spite of the availability of sophisticated search engines and other Software tools. There have been several attempts to organize the resources an the WWW. Some of them have tried to use traditional library classification schemes such as the Library of Congress Classification, the Dewey Decimal Classification and others. However there is a need to assign proper subject headings to them and present them in a logical or hierarchical sequence to cater to the need for browsing. This paper attempts to describe an experimental system designed to organize and provide access to web documents using a faceted pre-coordinate indexing system based an the Deep Structure Indexing System (DSIS) derived from POPSI (Postulate based Permuted Subject Indexing) of Bhattacharyya, and the facet analysis and chain indexing System of Ranganathan. A prototype software system has been designed to create a database of records specifying Web documents according to the Dublin Core and input a faceted subject heading according to DSIS. Synonymous terms are added to the standard terms in the heading using appropriate symbols. Once the data are entered along with a description and URL of the Web document, the record is stored in the system. More than one faceted subject heading can be assigned to a record depending an the content of the original document. The system stores the surrogates and keeps the faceted subject headings separately after establishing a link. Search is carried out an index entries derived from the faceted subject heading using chain indexing technique. If a single term is input, the system searches for its presence in the faceted subject headings and displays the subject headings in a sorted sequence reflecting an organizing sequence. If the number of retrieved headings is too large (running into more than a page) then the user has the option of entering another search term to be searched in combination. The system searches subject headings already retrieved and look for those containing the second term. The retrieved faceted subject headings can be displayed and browsed. When the relevant subject heading is selected the system displays the records with their URLs. Using the URL the original document an the web can be accessed. The prototype system developed under Windows NT environment using ASP and web server is under rigorous testing. The database and indexes management routines need further development.
    Theme
    Internet
  7. Bodoff, D.; Kambil, A.: Partial coordination : I. The best of pre-coordination and post-coordination (1998) 0.00
    0.0028910947 = product of:
      0.020237662 = sum of:
        0.020237662 = weight(_text_:internet in 2322) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020237662 = score(doc=2322,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10340759 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.1957077 = fieldWeight in 2322, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2322)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The introduction of computerized post-coordination has solved many of the problems of pre-coordinated subject access. However, the adoption of computerized post-coordination results in the loss of some pre-coordination benefits. Specifically, the effect of hiding terms within the context of others is lost in post-coodination which give lead status to every document term. This results in spurious matches of terms out of context. Library patrons and Internet searchers are increasingly dissatisfied with subject access performance, in part because of unmanageably large retrieval sets. The need to enhance precision and limit the size of retrieval sets motivates this work which proposes partial coordination, an approach which incorporates the advantages of computer search with the ability of pre-coordination to limit spurious partial matches and thereby enhance precision
  8. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002) 0.00
    0.0027364169 = product of:
      0.019154917 = sum of:
        0.019154917 = product of:
          0.057464752 = sum of:
            0.057464752 = weight(_text_:29 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057464752 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035026826 = queryNorm
                0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    18. 5.2002 17:29:00
  9. Broughton, V.: Structural, linguistic and mathematical elements in indexing languages and search engines : implications for the use of index languages in electronic and non-LIS environments (2000) 0.00
    0.0024092456 = product of:
      0.016864719 = sum of:
        0.016864719 = weight(_text_:internet in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016864719 = score(doc=96,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10340759 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.16308975 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    The paper looks at ways in which traditional classification and indexing tools have dealt with the relationships between constituent terms; variations in these are examined and compared with the methods used in machine searching, particularly of the Internet and World Wide Web. Apparent correspondences with features of index languages are identified, and further methods of applying classification and indexing theory to machine retrieval are proposed. There are various ways in which indexing and retrieval systems, both conventional and electronic, deal with the problem of searching for documents on a subject basis, and various approaches to the analysis and processing of a query. There appear to be three basic models; the taxonomic or structural system, in which the user is offered a map of the `universe of knowledge'; the language based system, which offers a vocabulary of the subject and a grammar for dealing with compound statements; and the mathematical model using the language of symbolic logic or the algebra of set theory
  10. Walsh, J.: ¬The use of Library of Congress Subject Headings in digital collections (2011) 0.00
    0.0019273964 = product of:
      0.013491774 = sum of:
        0.013491774 = weight(_text_:internet in 4549) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013491774 = score(doc=4549,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10340759 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035026826 = queryNorm
            0.1304718 = fieldWeight in 4549, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.9522398 = idf(docFreq=6276, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4549)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper attempts to explain the wide dissemination of Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) within digital libraries and presents some of the advantages and disadvantages of using this controlled vocabulary in digital collections. The paper also presents other classifications used in digital collections for subject access and explores ways of improving search functionality in digital collections that employ LCSH. Design/methodology/approach - Unlike traditional libraries that use Library of Congress Classification for organization and retrieval, digital libraries use metadata forms for organization and retrieval. The collections exist in cyberspace of the internet which is known for containing the universe of knowledge. The use of LCSH for information retrieval has been widely criticized for its difficulty of use and its information retrieval effectiveness in online environments. The Library of Congress (LOC) has claimed the headings were not based on comprehensive principles nor ever intended to cover the universe of knowledge. Despite these claims and criticisms, LCSH is the most popular choice for subject access in digital libraries. Findings - The number of digital collections increases every year and LCSH is still the most popular choice of controlled vocabulary for subject access. Of the numerous criticisms, difficulties of use and user unfamiliarity are the greatest disadvantages of using LCSH for subject access. Average users only have a vague notion of what they are looking for when initializing a search. More work is required in automated generation of subject headings and increased usage of LCSH in faceted search retrieval systems. This will provide users with better access to the LCSH used in the back end of information retrieval. Originality/value - The Greek researchers who developed the Dissertation DSPace system believe this type of module will eventually replace the traditional keyword-based indexing back ends employed by many information retrieval modules within current digital library systems. The system offers the type of access and interactivity that will acquaint users with how LCSH looks and is used. Faceted search and automated pattern matching using an ontology based on LCSH have the best promise of overcoming the disadvantages that have always plagued the LOC-controlled vocabulary. These retrieval techniques give LCSH an opportunity to finally achieve the optimal precision and recall it has so far failed to deliver.
  11. Lambert, N.: Of thesauri and computers : reflections on the need for thesauri (1995) 0.00
    0.0018078673 = product of:
      0.012655071 = sum of:
        0.012655071 = product of:
          0.037965212 = sum of:
            0.037965212 = weight(_text_:22 in 3734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.037965212 = score(doc=3734,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12265798 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035026826 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3734, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3734)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Searcher. 3(1995) no.8, S.18-22
  12. Lepsky, K.: RSWK - und was noch? : Stellungnahme zum Bericht 'Sacherschließung in Online-Katalogen' der Expertengruppe Online-Kataloge (1995) 0.00
    0.0015962432 = product of:
      0.011173702 = sum of:
        0.011173702 = product of:
          0.033521105 = sum of:
            0.033521105 = weight(_text_:29 in 772) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033521105 = score(doc=772,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035026826 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 772, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=772)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Bibliotheksdienst. 29(1995) H.3, S.500-519
  13. Turquet, B.: Que faire de Rameau? : Ou comment faire avec Rameau? (1997) 0.00
    0.0015962432 = product of:
      0.011173702 = sum of:
        0.011173702 = product of:
          0.033521105 = sum of:
            0.033521105 = weight(_text_:29 in 2249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033521105 = score(doc=2249,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035026826 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2249, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2249)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 16:50:24
  14. Miller, U.; Teitelbaum, R.: Pre-coordination and post-coordination : past and future (2002) 0.00
    0.0015962432 = product of:
      0.011173702 = sum of:
        0.011173702 = product of:
          0.033521105 = sum of:
            0.033521105 = weight(_text_:29 in 1395) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033521105 = score(doc=1395,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035026826 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1395, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1395)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 29(2002) no.2, S.87-93
  15. Stone, A.T.: Up-ending Cutter's pyramid : the case for making subject references to broader terms (1996) 0.00
    0.0015818839 = product of:
      0.011073187 = sum of:
        0.011073187 = product of:
          0.03321956 = sum of:
            0.03321956 = weight(_text_:22 in 7238) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03321956 = score(doc=7238,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12265798 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035026826 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7238, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7238)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Date
    22. 4.1997 20:43:23
  16. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.00
    0.0013682084 = product of:
      0.009577459 = sum of:
        0.009577459 = product of:
          0.028732376 = sum of:
            0.028732376 = weight(_text_:29 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028732376 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035026826 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
  17. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.00
    0.0013682084 = product of:
      0.009577459 = sum of:
        0.009577459 = product of:
          0.028732376 = sum of:
            0.028732376 = weight(_text_:29 in 5602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028732376 = score(doc=5602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035026826 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5602)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
  18. Cochrane, P.A.: Improving LCSH for use in online catalogs revisited : What progress has been made? What issues still remain? (2000) 0.00
    0.0013682084 = product of:
      0.009577459 = sum of:
        0.009577459 = product of:
          0.028732376 = sum of:
            0.028732376 = weight(_text_:29 in 5609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028732376 = score(doc=5609,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035026826 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5609, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5609)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
  19. Hoerman, H.L.; Furniss, K.A.: Turning practice into principles : a comparison of the IFLA Principles underlying Subject Heading Languages (SHLs) and the principles underlying the Library of Congress Subject Headings system (2000) 0.00
    0.0013682084 = product of:
      0.009577459 = sum of:
        0.009577459 = product of:
          0.028732376 = sum of:
            0.028732376 = weight(_text_:29 in 5611) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028732376 = score(doc=5611,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035026826 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5611, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5611)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
  20. Wool, G.: Filing and precoordination : how subject headings are displayed in online catalogs and why it matters (2000) 0.00
    0.0013682084 = product of:
      0.009577459 = sum of:
        0.009577459 = product of:
          0.028732376 = sum of:
            0.028732376 = weight(_text_:29 in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028732376 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.123213425 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035026826 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.14285715 = coord(1/7)
    
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2

Years

Languages

  • e 25
  • d 5
  • f 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 28
  • m 3
  • s 2
  • el 1
  • i 1
  • More… Less…