Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

0.008080935 = product of:
  0.01616187 = sum of:
    0.010905789 = product of:
      0.021811578 = sum of:
        0.021811578 = weight(_text_:web in 859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021811578 = score(doc=859,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 859, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=859)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0052560815 = product of:
      0.026280407 = sum of:
        0.026280407 = weight(_text_:28 in 859) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026280407 = score(doc=859,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 859, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=859)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

The notion of the classification scheme as a transitional element or "boundary object" (Star, 1989) offers an alternative to the more traditional approach that views classification as an organizational structure imposed upon a body of knowledge to facilitate access within a universal and frequently static framework. Recognition of the underlying relationship between user access and the collective knowledge structures that are the basis for knowledge production indicates the dynamic role of classification in supporting coherence and articulation across heterogeneous contexts. To this end, it is argued that the library should be an active participant in the production of knowledge, and that this role can be effected by the development of classificatory structures that can support the needs of a diverse information ecology consisting of a complex web of interacting agents, users, and technologies. Within such an information ecology, a classificatory structure cannot follow a one-size-fits-all paradigm but must evolve in cooperative interaction between librarians and their user groups.

Date

11. 2.2007 20:46:28

0.0064647477 = product of:
  0.012929495 = sum of:
    0.008724631 = product of:
      0.017449262 = sum of:
        0.017449262 = weight(_text_:web in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017449262 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.004204865 = product of:
      0.021024324 = sum of:
        0.021024324 = weight(_text_:28 in 2755) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021024324 = score(doc=2755,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.15831517 = fieldWeight in 2755, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2755)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Abstract

Collaborative integration of knowledge in distributed and cross-disciplinary work domains poses a number of challenges to classification, comprising: 1) how to analyze the actors' current practice of integration of knowledge and 2) how to model consistent semantic support of diverse interpretive perspectives among the actors. This paper introduces a cognitive systems engineering approach to modelling collaborative integration of knowledge in work domains. A generic means-ends model provides a theoretical foundation for mapping the territory of collaborative work. A decision task model captures the actors' distributed decision-making in integration of knowledge. The problem of collaborative integration of knowledge in a distributed web-based film collaboratory is explored through an empirical case of collaborative film indexing. The empirical study identified a lack of tools for consistent support of integration of knowledge. The means-ends model and the decision task model guided the design of a conceptual structure of the common workspace of film indexing. The paper concludes with a proposal for further work an models for integration of knowledge through ecological classification schemes. 1. Introduction Current work practice and knowledge production to an increasing degree involves actors from different disciplines, cultures and organisations. Additionally, current work practice not only relies an authoritative orderings of knowledge, but also relies an the dynamism of the actors' ongoing collaborative integration of knowledge, i.e. their shared interpretations of knowledge, exchange of perspectives and joint knowledge production. Consequently, in order to support the actors' ongoing collaborative integration of knowledge, the design of support tools, like classification schemes, must address not only the order of knowledge, but also the situational contexts where collaborative integration of knowledge occurs. This paper introduces an ecological approach to integration of knowledge across boundaries in distributed collaboratory work environments, which is founded an (a) work domain analysis (b) the development of models for collaborative integration of knowledge. The work domain analysis is based an means-ends analysis of the territory of work and the actors' information needs during decision making. The result is conceptual structures of collaborative work that can be used to create collaborative classification schemes. Previous work an design of ecological classification schemes proposed that such schemes should be based an a finegrained empirical analysis of actors' collaborative decision tasks in order to identify the knowledge produced and needed by the actors (Pejtersen & Albrechtsen, 2000).

Date

6. 1.1997 18:30:28

0.0064186538 = product of:
  0.0128373075 = sum of:
    0.0076340525 = product of:
      0.015268105 = sum of:
        0.015268105 = weight(_text_:web in 95) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015268105 = score(doc=95,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.12619963 = fieldWeight in 95, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=95)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0052032545 = product of:
      0.026016273 = sum of:
        0.026016273 = weight(_text_:28 in 95) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026016273 = score(doc=95,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.19590501 = fieldWeight in 95, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=95)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)

Content

"3rd ISKO Italy-UniMIB Meeting: Report More than 40 people attended the 3rd ISKO Italy meeting, again organized thanks to cooperation with the University of Milano Bicocca Library, despite a railway strike which impeded some planned speakers (Luca Rosati, Federica Paradisi, Cristiana Bettella) from reaching the venue. In the annual report on ISKO Italy activities and contacts, Claudio Gnoli announced that the 2010 international ISKO conference will be hosted in Rome, an organizing committee chaired by Fulvio Mazzocchi having just been constituted. The morning had an international flavour, as it was reconnected to the trends observed by Mela Bosch at the ISKO Spain conference recently held in Leon, showing an increase in the hermeneutic approach over the heuristic one, and especially to the Leon manifesto (http://www.iskoi.org/ ilc/leon.htm). This was promoted by Rick Szostak in his guest keynote address, concerning his proposal of non-disciplinary classification based on phenomena, theories, and methods. Melissa Tiberi and Barbara De Santis developed on their current research concerning semantics problems in equivalence relationships, and Cristiana Bettella (whose introduction was read by Caterina Barazia) on her one about humanistic knowledge, focusing on the double role played in it by the researcher. The afternoon was devoted to KO applications, starting with the experience of two university libraries (Milan Bicocca and Turin), with contribution of a third one in the discussion (Milan 1), in the use of KOSs to organize digital resources and links in the university web-space. Two emerging, promising domains of KO application were introduced by Paolo Franzese: semantic indexing of institutional archives, and by the DesignNet team: information visualization, exemplified in an impressive solution for thesauri. Finally, Andrea Marchitelli discussed hybridizations of social tagging and blogging with opacs, and Jiri Pika showed UDC-based search techniques in a Swiss multilingual OPAC. Presentations, abstracts, and photos will be progressively available from the event webpage (http://www.iskoi.org/doc/milano07.htm). - Claudio Gnoli.

Date

6. 1.1997 18:30:28
17.11.2007 13:10:28

0.004204865 = product of:
  0.01681946 = sum of:
    0.01681946 = product of:
      0.084097296 = sum of:
        0.084097296 = weight(_text_:28 in 2129) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084097296 = score(doc=2129,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.63326067 = fieldWeight in 2129, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2129)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

6. 1.1997 18:30:28

0.0031536487 = product of:
  0.012614595 = sum of:
    0.012614595 = product of:
      0.06307297 = sum of:
        0.06307297 = weight(_text_:28 in 4299) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06307297 = score(doc=4299,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.4749455 = fieldWeight in 4299, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4299)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

6. 1.1997 18:30:28

0.0026280407 = product of:
  0.010512163 = sum of:
    0.010512163 = product of:
      0.052560814 = sum of:
        0.052560814 = weight(_text_:28 in 7137) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052560814 = score(doc=7137,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 7137, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=7137)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

6. 1.1997 18:30:28

0.0018396284 = product of:
  0.007358514 = sum of:
    0.007358514 = product of:
      0.03679257 = sum of:
        0.03679257 = weight(_text_:28 in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03679257 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

6. 1.1997 18:30:28

0.0015768243 = product of:
  0.0063072974 = sum of:
    0.0063072974 = product of:
      0.031536486 = sum of:
        0.031536486 = weight(_text_:28 in 2617) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031536486 = score(doc=2617,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2617, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2617)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

6. 1.1997 18:30:28

0.0015768243 = product of:
  0.0063072974 = sum of:
    0.0063072974 = product of:
      0.031536486 = sum of:
        0.031536486 = weight(_text_:28 in 3005) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031536486 = score(doc=3005,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 3005, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3005)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

6. 1.1997 18:30:28

0.0013140204 = product of:
  0.0052560815 = sum of:
    0.0052560815 = product of:
      0.026280407 = sum of:
        0.026280407 = weight(_text_:28 in 6391) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026280407 = score(doc=6391,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 6391, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6391)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Date

6. 1.1997 18:30:28

9.291526E-4 = product of:
  0.0037166104 = sum of:
    0.0037166104 = product of:
      0.018583052 = sum of:
        0.018583052 = weight(_text_:28 in 690) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018583052 = score(doc=690,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.13993216 = fieldWeight in 690, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=690)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)

Content

German ISKO The German ISKO held its 10th conference in Vienna from July 3rd to 5th 2006-just before the International ISKO Conference. Main themes were Compatibility and Heterogeneity, Ethics and Future of Knowledge Organization. The program contained some English lessons and a tutorial on Ontologies. The German proceedings (Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation 10) will be published in 2007 by Ergon together with some remaining papers of the international conference. The next German conference will be held in November 2007 in Konstanz with a focus on sustainability. Jörn Sieglerschmidt will be the local organizer 2007 as well as the new German ISKO treasurer. - H. Peter OHLY Extensions and Corrections to the UDC, 28 (2006) The next issue of Extensions and Corrections (E&C), to be published by the end of 2006, will bring to the UDC community important revisions and additions to the schedule, notably an extensive revision of parts of the Area Table concerning some countries of east and southeast Asia and Africa, and the expansion of Class 2 for Islam, which provides a very rich structure and vocabulary for one of the main religions of the world, thus enhancing UDC in an important subject area of worldwide application. Through the contribution of VINITI's collaborators, it was also possible to advance revision work in the areas of Mathematics and Physics, also published in this vol ume. The ongoing work on a proposal for the revision of Class 61 Medicine continued to receive the expert attention of Professor Nancy Williamson, and this year a proposal for the digestive system is included in E&C. Finally, An Extended Table of Common Auxiliaries (Except Place), compiled by G. Robinson, is presented as a special Annex. Although this is not part of the UDC Master Reference File, it is intended as an authoritative source of all that is currently valid in Tables 1a to 1d and 1f to 1k, and including details from older editions, at the 'full' level, that have never been cancelled. This comes in the same line as the Extended Place Table (Table le) published last year, together with Extensions and Corrections 27 (2005). Additionally this issue will feature a set of articles of interest to classification experts and users. Topics include: an exploration in mapping the UDC to DDC, interfaces to classification and UDC application in online catalogs and information on a new editorial support system being developed for UDC.

Date

6. 1.1997 18:30:28