-
Broughton, V.: Automatic metadata generation : Digital resource description without human intervention (2007)
0.02
0.019114183 = product of:
0.038228367 = sum of:
0.026173891 = product of:
0.052347783 = sum of:
0.052347783 = weight(_text_:web in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052347783 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.012054475 = product of:
0.060272373 = sum of:
0.060272373 = weight(_text_:22 in 6048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.060272373 = score(doc=6048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 6048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6048)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Broughton, V.: Essential thesaurus construction (2006)
0.01
0.010937164 = product of:
0.043748654 = sum of:
0.043748654 = sum of:
0.008724631 = weight(_text_:web in 2924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008724631 = score(doc=2924,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.07211407 = fieldWeight in 2924, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2924)
0.035024025 = weight(_text_:seiten in 2924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035024025 = score(doc=2924,freq=4.0), product of:
0.20383513 = queryWeight, product of:
5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.17182526 = fieldWeight in 2924, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2924)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Footnote
- Rez. in: Mitt. VÖB 60(2007) H.1, S.98-101 (O. Oberhauser): "Die Autorin von Essential thesaurus construction (and essential taxonomy construction, so der implizite Untertitel, vgl. S. 1) ist durch ihre Lehrtätigkeit an der bekannten School of Library, Archive and Information Studies des University College London und durch ihre bisherigen Publikationen auf den Gebieten (Facetten-)Klassifikation und Thesaurus fachlich einschlägig ausgewiesen. Nach Essential classification liegt nun ihr Thesaurus-Lehrbuch vor, mit rund 200 Seiten Text und knapp 100 Seiten Anhang ein handliches Werk, das seine Genese zum Grossteil dem Lehrbetrieb verdankt, wie auch dem kurzen Einleitungskapitel zu entnehmen ist. Das Buch ist der Schule von Jean Aitchison et al. verpflichtet und wendet sich an "the indexer" im weitesten Sinn, d.h. an alle Personen, die ein strukturiertes, kontrolliertes Fachvokabular für die Zwecke der sachlichen Erschliessung und Suche erstellen wollen bzw. müssen. Es möchte dieser Zielgruppe das nötige methodische Rüstzeug für eine solche Aufgabe vermitteln, was einschliesslich der Einleitung und der Schlussbemerkungen in zwanzig Kapiteln geschieht - eine ansprechende Strukturierung, die ein wohldosiertes Durcharbeiten möglich macht. Zu letzterem tragen auch die von der Autorin immer wieder gestellten Übungsaufgaben bei (Lösungen jeweils am Kapitelende). Zu Beginn der Darstellung wird der "information retrieval thesaurus" von dem (zumindest im angelsächsischen Raum) weit öfter mit dem Thesaurusbegriff assoziierten "reference thesaurus" abgegrenzt, einem nach begrifflicher Ähnlichkeit angeordneten Synonymenwörterbuch, das gerne als Mittel zur stilistischen Verbesserung beim Abfassen von (wissenschaftlichen) Arbeiten verwendet wird. Ohne noch ins Detail zu gehen, werden optische Erscheinungsform und Anwendungsgebiete von Thesauren vorgestellt, der Thesaurus als postkoordinierte Indexierungssprache erläutert und seine Nähe zu facettierten Klassifikationssystemen erwähnt. In der Folge stellt Broughton die systematisch organisierten Systeme (Klassifikation/ Taxonomie, Begriffs-/Themendiagramme, Ontologien) den alphabetisch angeordneten, wortbasierten (Schlagwortlisten, thesaurusartige Schlagwortsysteme und Thesauren im eigentlichen Sinn) gegenüber, was dem Leser weitere Einordnungshilfen schafft. Die Anwendungsmöglichkeiten von Thesauren als Mittel der Erschliessung (auch als Quelle für Metadatenangaben bei elektronischen bzw. Web-Dokumenten) und der Recherche (Suchformulierung, Anfrageerweiterung, Browsing und Navigieren) kommen ebenso zur Sprache wie die bei der Verwendung natürlichsprachiger Indexierungssysteme auftretenden Probleme. Mit Beispielen wird ausdrücklich auf die mehr oder weniger starke fachliche Spezialisierung der meisten dieser Vokabularien hingewiesen, wobei auch Informationsquellen über Thesauren (z.B. www.taxonomywarehouse.com) sowie Thesauren für nicht-textuelle Ressourcen kurz angerissen werden.
-
Broughton, V.: Notational expressivity : the case for and against the representation of internal subject structure in notational coding (1999)
0.01
0.0061672674 = product of:
0.02466907 = sum of:
0.02466907 = product of:
0.061672673 = sum of:
0.031536486 = weight(_text_:28 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031536486 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.030136187 = weight(_text_:22 in 6392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030136187 = score(doc=6392,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6392, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6392)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
10. 8.2001 13:22:14
-
Broughton, V.: ¬A new common auxiliary table for relations, processes and operations (2002)
0.01
0.0050173523 = product of:
0.02006941 = sum of:
0.02006941 = product of:
0.10034704 = sum of:
0.10034704 = weight(_text_:29 in 3784) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.10034704 = score(doc=3784,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.7694941 = fieldWeight in 3784, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3784)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 11. 8.2005 12:27:29
- Source
- Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 24(2002), S.29-35
-
Broughton, V.: Finding Bliss on the Web : some problems of representing faceted terminologies in digital environments
0.00
0.0046269344 = product of:
0.018507738 = sum of:
0.018507738 = product of:
0.037015475 = sum of:
0.037015475 = weight(_text_:web in 3532) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037015475 = score(doc=3532,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.3059541 = fieldWeight in 3532, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3532)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The Bliss Bibliographic Classification is the only example of a fully faceted general classification scheme in the Western world. Although it is the object of much interest as a model for other tools it suffers from the lack of a web presence, and remedying this is an immediate objective for its editors. Understanding how this might be done presents some challenges, as the scheme is semantically very rich and complex in the range and nature of the relationships it contains. The automatic management of these is already in place using local software, but exporting this to a common data format needs careful thought and planning. Various encoding schemes, both for traditional classifications, and for digital materials, represent variously: the concepts; their functional roles; and the relationships between them. Integrating these aspects in a coherent and interchangeable manner appears to be achievable, but the most appropriate format is as yet unclear.
-
Broughton, V.; Lane, H.: Classification schemes revisited : applications to Web indexing and searching (2000)
0.00
0.0038557786 = product of:
0.015423114 = sum of:
0.015423114 = product of:
0.030846229 = sum of:
0.030846229 = weight(_text_:web in 2476) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030846229 = score(doc=2476,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 2476, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2476)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Content
- A short discussion of using classification systems to organize the web, one of many such. The authors are both involved with BC2 and naturally think it is the best system for organizing information online. They list reasons why faceted classifications are best (e.g. no theoretical limits to specificity or exhaustivity; easier to handle complex subjects; flexible enough to accommodate different user needs) and take a brief look at how BC2 works. They conclude with a discussion of how and why it should be applied to online resources, and a plea for recognition of the importance of classification and subject analysis skills, even when full-text searching is available and databases respond instantly.
-
Broughton, V.: Facet analysis as a tool for modelling subject domains and terminologies (2011)
0.00
0.0038557786 = product of:
0.015423114 = sum of:
0.015423114 = product of:
0.030846229 = sum of:
0.030846229 = weight(_text_:web in 4826) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030846229 = score(doc=4826,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 4826, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4826)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Facet analysis is proposed as a general theory of knowledge organization, with an associated methodology that may be applied to the development of terminology tools in a variety of contexts and formats. Faceted classifications originated as a means of representing complexity in semantic content that facilitates logical organization and effective retrieval in a physical environment. This is achieved through meticulous analysis of concepts, their structural and functional status (based on fundamental categories), and their inter-relationships. These features provide an excellent basis for the general conceptual modelling of domains, and for the generation of KOS other than systematic classifications. This is demonstrated by the adoption of a faceted approach to many web search and visualization tools, and by the emergence of a facet based methodology for the construction of thesauri. Current work on the Bliss Bibliographic Classification (Second Edition) is investigating the ways in which the full complexity of faceted structures may be represented through encoded data, capable of generating intellectually and mechanically compatible forms of indexing tools from a single source. It is suggested that a number of research questions relating to the Semantic Web could be tackled through the medium of facet analysis.
-
Broughton, V.: ¬The need for a faceted classification as the basis of all methods of information retrieval (2006)
0.00
0.0038557786 = product of:
0.015423114 = sum of:
0.015423114 = product of:
0.030846229 = sum of:
0.030846229 = weight(_text_:web in 2874) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030846229 = score(doc=2874,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 2874, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2874)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The aim of this article is to estimate the impact of faceted classification and the faceted analytical method on the development of various information retrieval tools over the latter part of the twentieth and early twenty-first centuries. Design/methodology/approach - The article presents an examination of various subject access tools intended for retrieval of both print and digital materials to determine whether they exhibit features of faceted systems. Some attention is paid to use of the faceted approach as a means of structuring information on commercial web sites. The secondary and research literature is also surveyed for commentary on and evaluation of facet analysis as a basis for the building of vocabulary and conceptual tools. Findings - The study finds that faceted systems are now very common, with a major increase in their use over the last 15 years. Most LIS subject indexing tools (classifications, subject heading lists and thesauri) now demonstrate features of facet analysis to a greater or lesser degree. A faceted approach is frequently taken to the presentation of product information on commercial web sites, and there is an independent strand of theory and documentation related to this application. There is some significant research on semi-automatic indexing and retrieval (query expansion and query formulation) using facet analytical techniques. Originality/value - This article provides an overview of an important conceptual approach to information retrieval, and compares different understandings and applications of this methodology.
-
Broughton, V.: ¬A new classification for the literature of religion (2000)
0.00
0.0035478037 = product of:
0.014191215 = sum of:
0.014191215 = product of:
0.07095607 = sum of:
0.07095607 = weight(_text_:29 in 353) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07095607 = score(doc=353,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 353, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=353)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- International cataloguing and bibliographic control. 29(2000) no.4, S.59-61
-
Broughton, V.: Organizing a national humanities portal : a model for the classification and subject management of digital resources (2002)
0.00
0.0030409747 = product of:
0.012163899 = sum of:
0.012163899 = product of:
0.06081949 = sum of:
0.06081949 = weight(_text_:29 in 4607) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06081949 = score(doc=4607,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 4607, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4607)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 8.2004 9:14:57
-
Broughton, V.: ¬The development of a common auxiliary schedule of property : a preliminary survey and proposal for its development (1998)
0.00
0.0030409747 = product of:
0.012163899 = sum of:
0.012163899 = product of:
0.06081949 = sum of:
0.06081949 = weight(_text_:29 in 6410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06081949 = score(doc=6410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 6410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6410)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Source
- Extensions and corrections to the UDC. 20(1998), S.27-29
-
Broughton, V.: Structural, linguistic and mathematical elements in indexing languages and search engines : implications for the use of index languages in electronic and non-LIS environments (2000)
0.00
0.0027264473 = product of:
0.010905789 = sum of:
0.010905789 = product of:
0.021811578 = sum of:
0.021811578 = weight(_text_:web in 96) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021811578 = score(doc=96,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 96, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=96)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- The paper looks at ways in which traditional classification and indexing tools have dealt with the relationships between constituent terms; variations in these are examined and compared with the methods used in machine searching, particularly of the Internet and World Wide Web. Apparent correspondences with features of index languages are identified, and further methods of applying classification and indexing theory to machine retrieval are proposed. There are various ways in which indexing and retrieval systems, both conventional and electronic, deal with the problem of searching for documents on a subject basis, and various approaches to the analysis and processing of a query. There appear to be three basic models; the taxonomic or structural system, in which the user is offered a map of the `universe of knowledge'; the language based system, which offers a vocabulary of the subject and a grammar for dealing with compound statements; and the mathematical model using the language of symbolic logic or the algebra of set theory
-
Broughton, V.: Facet analysis as a fundamental theory for structuring subject organization tools (2007)
0.00
0.0020273165 = product of:
0.008109266 = sum of:
0.008109266 = product of:
0.040546328 = sum of:
0.040546328 = weight(_text_:29 in 537) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040546328 = score(doc=537,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 537, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=537)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:21:29
-
Broughton, V.: Henry Evelyn Bliss : the other immortal or a prophet without honour? (2008)
0.00
0.0017579442 = product of:
0.007031777 = sum of:
0.007031777 = product of:
0.035158884 = sum of:
0.035158884 = weight(_text_:22 in 2550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035158884 = score(doc=2550,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2550, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2550)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 9. 2.1997 18:44:22
-
Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multidimensional knowledge structures (2003)
0.00
0.0015768243 = product of:
0.0063072974 = sum of:
0.0063072974 = product of:
0.031536486 = sum of:
0.031536486 = weight(_text_:28 in 2631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031536486 = score(doc=2631,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2631, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2631)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
-
Broughton, V.: ¬A faceted classification as the basis of a faceted terminology : conversion of a classified structure to thesaurus format in the Bliss Bibliographic Classification, 2nd Edition (2008)
0.00
0.0015204874 = product of:
0.0060819495 = sum of:
0.0060819495 = product of:
0.030409746 = sum of:
0.030409746 = weight(_text_:29 in 1857) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030409746 = score(doc=1857,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1857, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1857)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 31. 5.2008 19:11:29
-
Broughton, V.; Lane, H.: ¬The Bliss Bibliographic Classification in action : moving from a special to a universal faceted classification via a digital platform (2004)
0.00
0.0013140204 = product of:
0.0052560815 = sum of:
0.0052560815 = product of:
0.026280407 = sum of:
0.026280407 = weight(_text_:28 in 2633) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026280407 = score(doc=2633,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 2633, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2633)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
-
Broughton, V.: ¬The fall and rise of knowledge organization : new dimensions of subject description and retrieval (2010)
0.00
0.0013140204 = product of:
0.0052560815 = sum of:
0.0052560815 = product of:
0.026280407 = sum of:
0.026280407 = weight(_text_:28 in 3940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026280407 = score(doc=3940,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 3940, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3940)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 28. 8.2010 18:34:33
-
Broughton, V.: Concepts and terms in the faceted classification : the case of UDC (2010)
0.00
0.0013140204 = product of:
0.0052560815 = sum of:
0.0052560815 = product of:
0.026280407 = sum of:
0.026280407 = weight(_text_:28 in 4065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026280407 = score(doc=4065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 4065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4065)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
-
Broughton, V.: Faceted classification as a basis for knowledge organization in a digital environment : the Bliss Bibliographic Classification as a model for vocabulary management and the creation of multi-dimensional knowledge structures (2001)
0.00
0.0012670727 = product of:
0.005068291 = sum of:
0.005068291 = product of:
0.025341455 = sum of:
0.025341455 = weight(_text_:29 in 5895) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025341455 = score(doc=5895,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 5895, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5895)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 6.2014 17:31:49
