Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Saracevic, T."
  1. Spink, A.; Wolfram, D.; Jansen, B.J.; Saracevic, T.: Searching the Web : the public and their queries (2001) 0.01
    0.008993143 = product of:
      0.035972573 = sum of:
        0.035972573 = product of:
          0.071945146 = sum of:
            0.071945146 = weight(_text_:web in 6980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.071945146 = score(doc=6980,freq=34.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.59466785 = fieldWeight in 6980, product of:
                  5.8309517 = tf(freq=34.0), with freq of:
                    34.0 = termFreq=34.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6980)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In previous articles, we reported the state of Web searching in 1997 (Jansen, Spink, & Saracevic, 2000) and in 1999 (Spink, Wolfram, Jansen, & Saracevic, 2001). Such snapshot studies and statistics on Web use appear regularly (OCLC, 1999), but provide little information about Web searching trends. In this article, we compare and contrast results from our two previous studies of Excite queries' data sets, each containing over 1 million queries submitted by over 200,000 Excite users collected on 16 September 1997 and 20 December 1999. We examine how public Web searching changing during that 2-year time period. As Table 1 shows, the overall structure of Web queries in some areas did not change, while in others we see change from 1997 to 1999. Our comparison shows how Web searching changed incrementally and also dramatically. We see some moves toward greater simplicity, including shorter queries (i.e., fewer terms) and shorter sessions (i.e., fewer queries per user), with little modification (addition or deletion) of terms in subsequent queries. The trend toward shorter queries suggests that Web information content should target specific terms in order to reach Web users. Another trend was to view fewer pages of results per query. Most Excite users examined only one page of results per query, since an Excite results page contains ten ranked Web sites. Were users satisfied with the results and did not need to view more pages? It appears that the public continues to have a low tolerance of wading through retrieved sites. This decline in interactivity levels is a disturbing finding for the future of Web searching. Queries that included Boolean operators were in the minority, but the percentage increased between the two time periods. Most Boolean use involved the AND operator with many mistakes. The use of relevance feedback almost doubled from 1997 to 1999, but overall use was still small. An unusually large number of terms were used with low frequency, such as personal names, spelling errors, non-English words, and Web-specific terms, such as URLs. Web query vocabulary contains more words than found in large English texts in general. The public language of Web queries has its own and unique characteristics. How did Web searching topics change from 1997 to 1999? We classified a random sample of 2,414 queries from 1997 and 2,539 queries from 1999 into 11 categories (Table 2). From 1997 to 1999, Web searching shifted from entertainment, recreation and sex, and pornography, preferences to e-commerce-related topics under commerce, travel, employment, and economy. This shift coincided with changes in information distribution on the publicly indexed Web.
  2. Wolfram, D.; Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.; Saracevic, T.: Vox populi : the public searching of the Web (2001) 0.01
    0.006543473 = product of:
      0.026173891 = sum of:
        0.026173891 = product of:
          0.052347783 = sum of:
            0.052347783 = weight(_text_:web in 6949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052347783 = score(doc=6949,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 6949, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6949)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  3. Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.; Saracevic, T.: Real life, real users and real needs : a study and analysis of users queries on the Web (2000) 0.01
    0.006543473 = product of:
      0.026173891 = sum of:
        0.026173891 = product of:
          0.052347783 = sum of:
            0.052347783 = weight(_text_:web in 411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052347783 = score(doc=411,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.43268442 = fieldWeight in 411, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=411)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
  4. Saracevic, T.: Information retrieval (1985) 0.00
    0.0035478037 = product of:
      0.014191215 = sum of:
        0.014191215 = product of:
          0.07095607 = sum of:
            0.07095607 = weight(_text_:29 in 3302) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07095607 = score(doc=3302,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 3302, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3302)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    Chpt.4, S.1-29
  5. Saracevic, T.: Information science (2009) 0.00
    0.0032717364 = product of:
      0.013086946 = sum of:
        0.013086946 = product of:
          0.026173891 = sum of:
            0.026173891 = weight(_text_:web in 3812) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026173891 = score(doc=3812,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3812, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3812)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The purpose of this entry is to provide an overview of information science as a field or discipline, including a historical perspective to illustrate the events and forces that shaped it. Information science is a field of professional practice and scientific inquiry dealing with effective communication of information and information objects, particularly knowledge records, among humans in the context of social, organizational, and individual need for and use of information. Information science emerged in the aftermath of the Second World War, as did a number of other fields, addressing the problem of information explosion and using technology as a solution. Presently, information science deals with the same problems in the Web and digital environments. This entry covers problems addressed by information science, the intellectual structure of the field, and the description of main areas-information retrieval, human information behavior, metric studies, and digital libraries. This entry also includes an account of education related to information science and conclusions about major characteristics.
  6. Saracevic, T.: Why is relevance still the basic notion in information science? (2015) 0.00
    0.0026280407 = product of:
      0.010512163 = sum of:
        0.010512163 = product of:
          0.052560814 = sum of:
            0.052560814 = weight(_text_:28 in 2980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052560814 = score(doc=2980,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 2980, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2980)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    6. 6.2016 10:31:28
  7. Saracevic, T.: On a method for studying the structure and nature of requests in information retrieval (1983) 0.00
    0.0025113493 = product of:
      0.010045397 = sum of:
        0.010045397 = product of:
          0.050226983 = sum of:
            0.050226983 = weight(_text_:22 in 2417) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050226983 = score(doc=2417,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2417, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2417)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Pages
    S.22-25
  8. Saracevic, T.: Individual differences in organizing, searching and retrieving information (1991) 0.00
    0.0021024325 = product of:
      0.00840973 = sum of:
        0.00840973 = product of:
          0.042048648 = sum of:
            0.042048648 = weight(_text_:28 in 3692) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042048648 = score(doc=3692,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 3692, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3692)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    ASIS'91: systems understanding people. Proc. of the 54th Annual Meeting of the ASIS, vol.28, Washington, DC, 27.-31.10.1991. Ed.: J.-M. Griffiths
  9. Spink, A.; Saracevic, T.: Dynamics of search term selection during mediated online searching (1993) 0.00
    0.0015768243 = product of:
      0.0063072974 = sum of:
        0.0063072974 = product of:
          0.031536486 = sum of:
            0.031536486 = weight(_text_:28 in 7968) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031536486 = score(doc=7968,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 7968, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=7968)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Integrating technologies - converging professions: proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Columbus, OH, 24-28 October 1993. Ed.: S. Bonzi
  10. Saracevic, T.: Ciencia da informacao, origem, evolucao e relacoes (1996) 0.00
    0.0015204874 = product of:
      0.0060819495 = sum of:
        0.0060819495 = product of:
          0.030409746 = sum of:
            0.030409746 = weight(_text_:29 in 811) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030409746 = score(doc=811,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 811, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=811)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 1.1996 18:23:13
  11. Kantor, P.B.; Saracevic, T.: Quantitative study of the value of research libraries : a foundation for the evaluation of digital libraries (1999) 0.00
    0.0013140204 = product of:
      0.0052560815 = sum of:
        0.0052560815 = product of:
          0.026280407 = sum of:
            0.026280407 = weight(_text_:28 in 6711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026280407 = score(doc=6711,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 6711, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=6711)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    10.10.2001 17:28:35