-
Hjoerland, B.: Theories of knowledge organization - theories of knowledge (2017)
0.02
0.021761436 = product of:
0.043522872 = sum of:
0.015268105 = product of:
0.03053621 = sum of:
0.03053621 = weight(_text_:web in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03053621 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.028254768 = product of:
0.07063692 = sum of:
0.035478037 = weight(_text_:29 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035478037 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.035158884 = weight(_text_:22 in 3494) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035158884 = score(doc=3494,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3494, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3494)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Pages
- S.22-36
- Source
- Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
-
Mai, J.E.: Classification of the Web : challenges and inquiries (2004)
0.02
0.021654127 = product of:
0.043308254 = sum of:
0.034898523 = product of:
0.06979705 = sum of:
0.06979705 = weight(_text_:web in 3075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06979705 = score(doc=3075,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.5769126 = fieldWeight in 3075, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3075)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.00840973 = product of:
0.042048648 = sum of:
0.042048648 = weight(_text_:28 in 3075) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042048648 = score(doc=3075,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 3075, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3075)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper discusses the challenges faced by investigations into the classification of the Web and outlines inquiries that are needed to use principles for bibliographic classification to construct classifications of the Web. This paper suggests that the classification of the Web meets challenges that call for inquiries into the theoretical foundation of bibliographic classification theory.
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
-
Cordeiro, M.I.; Slavic, A.: Data models for knowledge organization tools : evolution and perspectives (2003)
0.02
0.018932719 = product of:
0.037865438 = sum of:
0.013086946 = product of:
0.026173891 = sum of:
0.026173891 = weight(_text_:web in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026173891 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.024778493 = product of:
0.061946232 = sum of:
0.031536486 = weight(_text_:28 in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031536486 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
0.030409746 = weight(_text_:29 in 2632) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030409746 = score(doc=2632,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2632, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2632)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper focuses on the need for knowledge organization (KO) tools, such as library classifications, thesauri and subject heading systems, to be fully disclosed and available in the open network environment. The authors look at the place and value of traditional library knowledge organization tools in relation to the technical environment and expectations of the Semantic Web. Future requirements in this context are explored, stressing the need for KO systems to support semantic interoperability. In order to be fully shareable KO tools need to be reframed and reshaped in terms of conceptual and data models. The authors suggest that some useful approaches to this already exist in methodological and technical developments within the fields of ontology modelling and lexicographic and terminological data interchange.
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
29. 8.2004 9:26:23
-
Bosch, M.: Ontologies, different reasoning strategies, different logics, different kinds of knowledge representation : working together (2006)
0.02
0.016901825 = product of:
0.03380365 = sum of:
0.026445134 = product of:
0.052890267 = sum of:
0.052890267 = weight(_text_:web in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.052890267 = score(doc=166,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.007358514 = product of:
0.03679257 = sum of:
0.03679257 = weight(_text_:28 in 166) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03679257 = score(doc=166,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 166, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=166)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The recent experiences in the building, maintenance and reuse of ontologies has shown that the most efficient approach is the collaborative one. However, communication between collaborators such as IT professionals, librarians, web designers and subject matter experts is difficult and time consuming. This is because there are different reasoning strategies, different logics and different kinds of knowledge representation in the applications of Semantic Web. This article intends to be a reference scheme. It uses concise and simple explanations that can be used in common by specialists of different backgrounds working together in an application of Semantic Web.
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
-
Campbell, G.: ¬A queer eye for the faceted guy : how a universal classification principle can be applied to a distinct subculture (2004)
0.01
0.014428744 = product of:
0.028857488 = sum of:
0.012338492 = product of:
0.024676984 = sum of:
0.024676984 = weight(_text_:web in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024676984 = score(doc=2639,freq=4.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.016518995 = product of:
0.041297488 = sum of:
0.021024324 = weight(_text_:28 in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021024324 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.15831517 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
0.020273164 = weight(_text_:29 in 2639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020273164 = score(doc=2639,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2639, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2639)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Content
- 1. Introduction The title of this paper is taken from a TV show which has gained considerable popularity in North America: A Queer Eye for the Straight Guy, in which a group of gay men subject a helpless straight male to a complete fashion makeover. In facet analysis, this would probably be seen as an "operation upon" something, and the Bliss Bibliographic Classification would place it roughly two-thirds of the way along its facet order, after "types" and "materials," but before "space" and "time." But the link between gay communities and facet analysis extends beyond the facetious title. As Web-based information resources for gay and lesbian users continue to grow, Web sites that cater to, or at least refrain from discriminating against gay and lesbian users are faced with a daunting challenge when trying to organize these diverse resources in a way that facilitates congenial browsing. And principles of faceted classification, with their emphasis an clear and consistent principles of subdivision and their care in defining the order of subdivisions, offer an important opportunity to use time-honoured classification principles to serve the growing needs of these communities. If faceted organization schemes are to work, however, we need to know more about gay and lesbian users, and how they categorize themselves and their information sources. This paper presents the results of an effort to learn more.
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
29. 8.2004 10:25:18
-
Lin, W.-Y.C.: ¬The concept and applications of faceted classifications (2006)
0.01
0.012742789 = product of:
0.025485579 = sum of:
0.017449262 = product of:
0.034898523 = sum of:
0.034898523 = weight(_text_:web in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034898523 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.008036317 = product of:
0.040181585 = sum of:
0.040181585 = weight(_text_:22 in 5083) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040181585 = score(doc=5083,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 5083, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5083)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The concept of faceted classification has its long history and importance in the human civilization. Recently, more and more consumer Web sites adopt the idea of facet analysis to organize and display their products or services. The aim of this article is to review the origin and develpment of faceted classification, as well as its concepts, essence, advantage and limitation. Further, the applications of faceted classification in various domians have been explored.
- Date
- 27. 5.2007 22:19:35
-
Putkey, T.: Using SKOS to express faceted classification on the Semantic Web (2011)
0.01
0.011856867 = product of:
0.023713734 = sum of:
0.019508868 = product of:
0.039017737 = sum of:
0.039017737 = weight(_text_:web in 311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039017737 = score(doc=311,freq=10.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.32250395 = fieldWeight in 311, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=311)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.004204865 = product of:
0.021024324 = sum of:
0.021024324 = weight(_text_:28 in 311) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021024324 = score(doc=311,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.15831517 = fieldWeight in 311, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=311)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This paper looks at Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) to investigate how a faceted classification can be expressed in RDF and shared on the Semantic Web. Statement of the Problem Faceted classification outlines facets as well as subfacets and facet values. Hierarchical relationships and associative relationships are established in a faceted classification. RDF is used to describe how a specific URI has a relationship to a facet value. Not only does RDF decompose "information into pieces," but by incorporating facet values RDF also given the URI the hierarchical and associative relationships expressed in the faceted classification. Combining faceted classification and RDF creates more knowledge than if the two stood alone. An application understands the subjectpredicate-object relationship in RDF and can display hierarchical and associative relationships based on the object (facet) value. This paper continues to investigate if the above idea is indeed useful, used, and applicable. If so, how can a faceted classification be expressed in RDF? What would this expression look like? Literature Review This paper used the same articles as the paper A Survey of Faceted Classification: History, Uses, Drawbacks and the Semantic Web (Putkey, 2010). In that paper, appropriate resources were discovered by searching in various databases for "faceted classification" and "faceted search," either in the descriptor or title fields. Citations were also followed to find more articles as well as searching the Internet for the same terms. To retrieve the documents about RDF, searches combined "faceted classification" and "RDF, " looking for these words in either the descriptor or title.
Methodology Based on information from research papers, more research was done on SKOS and examples of SKOS and shared faceted classifications in the Semantic Web and about SKOS and how to express SKOS in RDF/XML. Once confident with these ideas, the author used a faceted taxonomy created in a Vocabulary Design class and encoded it using SKOS. Instead of writing RDF in a program such as Notepad, a thesaurus tool was used to create the taxonomy according to SKOS standards and then export the thesaurus in RDF/XML format. These processes and tools are then analyzed. Results The initial statement of the problem was simply an extension of the survey paper done earlier in this class. To continue on with the research, more research was done into SKOS - a standard for expressing thesauri, taxonomies and faceted classifications so they can be shared on the semantic web.
- Date
- 5.11.2011 18:28:25
-
Kwasnik, B.H.: ¬The role of classification in knowledge representation (1999)
0.01
0.009557092 = product of:
0.019114183 = sum of:
0.013086946 = product of:
0.026173891 = sum of:
0.026173891 = weight(_text_:web in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026173891 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0060272375 = product of:
0.030136187 = sum of:
0.030136187 = weight(_text_:22 in 2464) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030136187 = score(doc=2464,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2464, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2464)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- A fascinating, broad-ranging article about classification, knowledge, and how they relate. Hierarchies, trees, paradigms (a two-dimensional classification that can look something like a spreadsheet), and facets are covered, with descriptions of how they work and how they can be used for knowledge discovery and creation. Kwasnick outlines how to make a faceted classification: choose facets, develop facets, analyze entities using the facets, and make a citation order. Facets are useful for many reasons: they do not require complete knowledge of the entire body of material; they are hospitable, flexible, and expressive; they do not require a rigid background theory; they can mix theoretical structures and models; and they allow users to view things from many perspectives. Facets do have faults: it can be hard to pick the right ones; it is hard to show relations between them; and it is difficult to visualize them. The coverage of the other methods is equally thorough and there is much to consider for anyone putting a classification on the web.
- Source
- Library trends. 48(1999) no.1, S.22-47
-
Gnoli, C.: Metadata about what? : distinguishing between ontic, epistemic, and documental dimensions in knowledge organization (2012)
0.01
0.009169505 = product of:
0.01833901 = sum of:
0.010905789 = product of:
0.021811578 = sum of:
0.021811578 = weight(_text_:web in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021811578 = score(doc=323,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0074332207 = product of:
0.037166104 = sum of:
0.037166104 = weight(_text_:28 in 323) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037166104 = score(doc=323,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.2798643 = fieldWeight in 323, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=323)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The spread of many new media and formats is changing the scenario faced by knowledge organizers: as printed monographs are not the only standard form of knowledge carrier anymore, the traditional kind of knowledge organization (KO) systems based on academic disciplines is put into question. A sounder foundation can be provided by an analysis of the different dimensions concurring to form the content of any knowledge item-what Brian Vickery described as the steps "from the world to the classifier." The ultimate referents of documents are the phenomena of the real world, that can be ordered by ontology, the study of what exists. Phenomena coexist in subjects with the perspectives by which they are considered, pertaining to epistemology, and with the formal features of knowledge carriers, adding a further, pragmatic layer. All these dimensions can be accounted for in metadata, but are often done so in mixed ways, making indexes less rigorous and interoperable. For example, while facet analysis was originally developed for subject indexing, many "faceted" interfaces today mix subject facets with form facets, and schemes presented as "ontologies" for the "semantic Web" also code for non-semantic information. In bibliographic classifications, phenomena are often confused with the disciplines dealing with them, the latter being assumed to be the most useful starting point, for users will have either one or another perspective. A general citation order of dimensions- phenomena, perspective, carrier-is recommended, helping to concentrate most relevant information at the beginning of headings.
- Content
- Beitrag aus: Selected Papers from the 8th ISKO-France Conference, 27-28 June 2011, Lille, Université Charles-De-Gaulle Lille 3. Vgl.: http://www.ergon-verlag.de/isko_ko/downloads/ko_39_2012_4_d.pdf.
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
-
Frické, M.: Logic and the organization of information (2012)
0.01
0.008385185 = product of:
0.01677037 = sum of:
0.013222567 = product of:
0.026445134 = sum of:
0.026445134 = weight(_text_:web in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026445134 = score(doc=1782,freq=6.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.21858418 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0035478037 = product of:
0.017739018 = sum of:
0.017739018 = weight(_text_:29 in 1782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017739018 = score(doc=1782,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 1782, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1782)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Logic and the Organization of Information closely examines the historical and contemporary methodologies used to catalogue information objects-books, ebooks, journals, articles, web pages, images, emails, podcasts and more-in the digital era. This book provides an in-depth technical background for digital librarianship, and covers a broad range of theoretical and practical topics including: classification theory, topic annotation, automatic clustering, generalized synonymy and concept indexing, distributed libraries, semantic web ontologies and Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS). It also analyzes the challenges facing today's information architects, and outlines a series of techniques for overcoming them. Logic and the Organization of Information is intended for practitioners and professionals working at a design level as a reference book for digital librarianship. Advanced-level students, researchers and academics studying information science, library science, digital libraries and computer science will also find this book invaluable.
- Date
- 16. 3.2012 11:26:29
- Footnote
- Rez. in: J. Doc. 70(2014) no.4: "Books on the organization of information and knowledge, aimed at a library/information audience, tend to fall into two clear categories. Most are practical and pragmatic, explaining the "how" as much or more than the "why". Some are theoretical, in part or in whole, showing how the practice of classification, indexing, resource description and the like relates to philosophy, logic, and other foundational bases; the books by Langridge (1992) and by Svenonious (2000) are well-known examples this latter kind. To this category certainly belongs a recent book by Martin Frické (2012). The author takes the reader for an extended tour through a variety of aspects of information organization, including classification and taxonomy, alphabetical vocabularies and indexing, cataloguing and FRBR, and aspects of the semantic web. The emphasis throughout is on showing how practice is, or should be, underpinned by formal structures; there is a particular emphasis on first order predicate calculus. The advantages of a greater, and more explicit, use of symbolic logic is a recurring theme of the book. There is a particularly commendable historical dimension, often omitted in texts on this subject. It cannot be said that this book is entirely an easy read, although it is well written with a helpful index, and its arguments are generally well supported by clear and relevant examples. It is thorough and detailed, but thereby seems better geared to the needs of advanced students and researchers than to the practitioners who are suggested as a main market. For graduate students in library/information science and related disciplines, in particular, this will be a valuable resource. I would place it alongside Svenonious' book as the best insight into the theoretical "why" of information organization. It has evoked a good deal of interest, including a set of essay commentaries in Journal of Information Science (Gilchrist et al., 2013). Introducing these, Alan Gilchrist rightly says that Frické deserves a salute for making explicit the fundamental relationship between the ancient discipline of logic and modern information organization. If information science is to continue to develop, and make a contribution to the organization of the information environments of the future, then this book sets the groundwork for the kind of studies which will be needed." (D. Bawden)
-
Poli, R.: Framing information (2003)
0.01
0.008259498 = product of:
0.03303799 = sum of:
0.03303799 = product of:
0.082594976 = sum of:
0.042048648 = weight(_text_:28 in 2711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042048648 = score(doc=2711,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 2711, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2711)
0.040546328 = weight(_text_:29 in 2711) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040546328 = score(doc=2711,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 2711, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2711)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
11. 9.2004 15:29:04
-
Lorenz, B.: Zur Theorie und Terminologie der bibliothekarischen Klassifikation (2018)
0.01
0.008223023 = product of:
0.032892093 = sum of:
0.032892093 = product of:
0.08223023 = sum of:
0.042048648 = weight(_text_:28 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.042048648 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.040181585 = weight(_text_:22 in 4339) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040181585 = score(doc=4339,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4339, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4339)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 28. 9.2016 16:04:09
- Pages
- S.1-22
-
Tennis, J.T.: Never facets alone : the evolving thought and persistent problems in Ranganathan's theories of classification (2017)
0.01
0.008080935 = product of:
0.01616187 = sum of:
0.010905789 = product of:
0.021811578 = sum of:
0.021811578 = weight(_text_:web in 5800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021811578 = score(doc=5800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 5800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5800)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0052560815 = product of:
0.026280407 = sum of:
0.026280407 = weight(_text_:28 in 5800) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026280407 = score(doc=5800,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 5800, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5800)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Shiyali Ramamrita Ranganathan's theory of classification spans a number of works over a number of decades. And while he was devoted to solving many problems in the practice of librarianship, and is known as the father of library science in India (Garfield, 1984), his work in classification revolves around one central concern. His classification research addressed the problems that arose from introducing new ideas into a scheme for classification, while maintaining a meaningful hierarchical and systematically arranged order of classes. This is because hierarchical and systematically arranged classes are the defining characteristic of useful classification. To lose this order is to through the addition of new classes is to introduce confusion, if not chaos, and to move toward a useless classification - or at least one that requires complete revision. In the following chapter, I outline the stages, and the elements of those stages, in Ranganathan's thought on classification from 1926-1972, as well as posthumous work that continues his agenda. And while facets figure prominently in all of these stages; but for Ranganathan to achieve his goal, he must continually add to this central feature of his theory of classification. I will close this chapter with an outline of persistent problems that represent research fronts for the field. Chief among these are what to do about scheme change and the open question about the rigor of information modeling in light of semantic web developments.
- Date
- 28. 3.2020 11:10:41
-
Belayche, C.: ¬A propos de la classification de Dewey (1997)
0.01
0.008072792 = product of:
0.032291166 = sum of:
0.032291166 = product of:
0.08072791 = sum of:
0.040546328 = weight(_text_:29 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040546328 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.040181585 = weight(_text_:22 in 1171) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.040181585 = score(doc=1171,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1171, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1171)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 1.1996 16:50:24
- Source
- Bulletin d'informations de l'Association des Bibliothecaires Francais. 1997, no.175, S.22-23
-
Dimensions of knowledge : facets for knowledge organization (2017)
0.01
0.00798704 = product of:
0.01597408 = sum of:
0.010905789 = product of:
0.021811578 = sum of:
0.021811578 = weight(_text_:web in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021811578 = score(doc=4154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.005068291 = product of:
0.025341455 = sum of:
0.025341455 = weight(_text_:29 in 4154) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025341455 = score(doc=4154,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4154, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4154)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The identification and contextual definition of concepts is the core of knowledge organization. The full expression of comprehension is accomplished through the use of an extension device called the facet. A facet is a category of dimensional characteristics that cross the hierarchical array of concepts to provide extension, or breadth, to the contexts in which they are discovered or expressed in knowledge organization systems. The use of the facet in knowledge organization has a rich history arising in the mid-nineteenth century. As it has matured through more than a century of application, the notion of the facet in knowledge organization has taken on a variety of meanings, from that of simple categories used in web search engines to the more sophisticated idea of intersecting dimensions of knowledge. This book describes the state of the art of the understanding of facets in knowledge organization today.
- Date
- 17. 2.2018 19:11:29
-
Fripp, D.: Using linked data to classify web documents (2010)
0.01
0.0076340525 = product of:
0.03053621 = sum of:
0.03053621 = product of:
0.06107242 = sum of:
0.06107242 = weight(_text_:web in 4172) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.06107242 = score(doc=4172,freq=8.0), product of:
0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 4172, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4172)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to find a relationship between traditional faceted classification schemes and semantic web document annotators, particularly in the linked data environment. Design/methodology/approach - A consideration of the conceptual ideas behind faceted classification and linked data architecture is made. Analysis of selected web documents is performed using Calais' Semantic Proxy to support the considerations. Findings - Technical language aside, the principles of both approaches are very similar. Modern classification techniques have the potential to automatically generate metadata to drive more precise information recall by including a semantic layer. Originality/value - Linked data have not been explicitly considered in this context before in the published literature.
- Theme
- Semantic Web
-
Furner, J.; Dunbar, A.W.: ¬The treatment of topics relating to people of mixed race in bibliographic classification schemes : a critical race-theoretic approach (2004)
0.01
0.0072270604 = product of:
0.028908242 = sum of:
0.028908242 = product of:
0.0722706 = sum of:
0.03679257 = weight(_text_:28 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03679257 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.035478037 = weight(_text_:29 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035478037 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
29. 8.2004 10:38:42
-
Zhonghong, W.; Chaudhry, A.S.; Khoo, C.: Potential and prospects of taxonomies for content organization (2006)
0.01
0.0072270604 = product of:
0.028908242 = sum of:
0.028908242 = product of:
0.0722706 = sum of:
0.03679257 = weight(_text_:28 in 169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03679257 = score(doc=169,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 169, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=169)
0.035478037 = weight(_text_:29 in 169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035478037 = score(doc=169,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 169, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=169)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
11. 3.2007 14:20:29
-
Slavic, A.; Cordeiro, M.I.: Core requirements for automation of analytico-synthetic classifications (2004)
0.01
0.006194623 = product of:
0.024778493 = sum of:
0.024778493 = product of:
0.061946232 = sum of:
0.031536486 = weight(_text_:28 in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031536486 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
0.030409746 = weight(_text_:29 in 2651) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030409746 = score(doc=2651,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2651, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2651)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
29. 8.2004 14:20:40
-
Gnoli, C.: Naturalism vs pragmatism in knowledge organization (2004)
0.01
0.006194623 = product of:
0.024778493 = sum of:
0.024778493 = product of:
0.061946232 = sum of:
0.031536486 = weight(_text_:28 in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031536486 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
0.030409746 = weight(_text_:29 in 2663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030409746 = score(doc=2663,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.03707166 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2663, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2663)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 6. 1.1997 18:30:28
29. 8.2004 17:33:13
