Search (116 results, page 1 of 6)

  • × theme_ss:"Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus"
  1. Brühl, B.: Thesauri und Klassifikationen : Naturwissenschaften - Technik - Wirtschaft (2005) 0.06 
    0.060265157 = product of:
  0.120530315 = sum of:
    0.11651216 = sum of:
      0.017449262 = weight(_text_:web in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.017449262 = score(doc=3487,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03707166 = queryNorm
          0.14422815 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
      0.0990629 = weight(_text_:seiten in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.0990629 = score(doc=3487,freq=8.0), product of:
          0.20383513 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03707166 = queryNorm
          0.4859952 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
            2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
              8.0 = termFreq=8.0
            5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
    0.0040181587 = product of:
      0.020090792 = sum of:
        0.020090792 = weight(_text_:22 in 3487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020090792 = score(doc=3487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 3487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3487)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Information: Wissenschaft & Praxis 56(2005) H.5/6, S.337 (W. Ratzek): "Bettina Brühl legt mit "Thesauri und Klassifikationen" ein Fleißarbeit vor. Das Buch mit seiner Auswahl von über 150 Klassifikationen und Thesauri aus Naturwissenschaft, Technik, Wirtschaft und Patenwesen macht es zu einem brauchbaren Nachschlagewerk, zumal auch ein umfassender Index nach Sachgebieten, nach Datenbanken und nach Klassifikationen und Thesauri angeboten wird. Nach einer 13-seitigen Einführung (Kapitel 1 und 2) folgt mit dem 3. Kapitel die "Darstellung von Klassifikationen und Thesauri", im wesentlichen aus den Beschreibungen der Hersteller zusammengestellt. Hier werden Dokumentationssprachen der Fachgebiete - Naturwissenschaften (3.1) und deren Spezialisierungen wie zum Beispiel "Biowissenschaften und Biotechnologie", "Chemie" oder "Umwelt und Ökonomie", aber auch "Mathematik und Informatik" (?) auf 189 Seiten vorgestellt, - Technik mit zum Beispiel "Fachordnung Technik", "Subject Categories (INIS/ ETDE) mit 17 Seiten verhältnismäßig knapp abgehandelt, - Wirtschaft mit "Branchen-Codes", "Product-Codes", "Länder-Codes"",Fachklas-sifikationen" und "Thesauri" ausführlich auf 57 Seiten präsentiert, - Patente und Normen mit zum Beispiel "Europäische Patentklassifikation" oder "International Patent Classification" auf 33 Seiten umrissen. Jedes Teilgebiet wird mit einer kurzen Beschreibung eingeleitet. Danach folgen die jeweiligen Beschreibungen mit den Merkmalen: "Anschrift des Erstellers", "Themen-gebiet(e)", "Sprache", "Verfügbarkeit", "An-wendung" und "Ouelle(n)". "Das Buch wendet sich an alle Information Professionals, die Dokumentationssprachen aufbauen und nutzen" heißt es in der Verlagsinformation. Zwar ist es nicht notwendig, die informationswissenschaftlichen Aspekte der Klassifikationen und Thesauri abzuhandeln, aber ein Hinweis auf die Bedeutung der Information und Dokumentation und/oder der Informationswissenschaft wäre schon angebracht, um in der Welt der Informations- und Wissenswirtschaft zu demonstrieren, welchen Beitrag unsere Profession leistet. Andernfalls bleibt das Blickfeld eingeschränkt und der Anschluss an neuere Entwicklungen ausgeblendet. Dieser Anknüpfungspunkt wäre beispielsweise durch einen Exkurs über Topic Map/Semantic Web gegeben. Der Verlag liefert mit der Herausgabe die ses Kompendiums einen nützlichen ersten Baustein zu einem umfassenden Verzeichnis von Thesauri und Klassifikationen."
    Series
    Materialien zur Information und Dokumentation; Bd.22
  2. Cazan, C.: Medizinische Ontologien : das Ende des MeSH (2006) 0.02 
    0.019938614 = product of:
  0.07975446 = sum of:
    0.07975446 = sum of:
      0.03022301 = weight(_text_:web in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03022301 = score(doc=132,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03707166 = queryNorm
          0.24981049 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
      0.04953145 = weight(_text_:seiten in 132) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04953145 = score(doc=132,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.20383513 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03707166 = queryNorm
          0.2429976 = fieldWeight in 132, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=132)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Die Komplexizität medizinischer Fragestellungen und des medizinischen Informationsmanagements war seit den Anfängen der Informatik immer ein besonders wichtiges Thema. Trotz des Scheiterns der Künstlichen Intelligenz in den 80er Jahren des vorigen Jahrhunderts haben deren Kernideen Früchte getragen. Durch kongruente Entwicklung einer Reihe anderer Wissenschaftsdisziplinen und der exponentiellen Entwicklung im Bereich Computerhardware konnten die gestellten, hohen Anforderungen bei der medizinischen Informationssuche doch noch erfüllt werden. Die programmatische Forderung von Tim Berners-Lee betreffend "Semantic Web" im Jahr 2000 hat dem Thema Ontologien für maschinenlesbare Repositorien in Allgemein- und Fachsprache breitere Aufmerksamkeit gewonnen. Da in der Medizin (PubMed) mit dem von NLM schon vor 20 Jahren entwickelten Unified Medical Language System (UMLS) eine funktionierende Ontologie in Form eines semantischen Netzes in Betrieb ist, ist es auch für Medizinbibliothekare und Medizindokumentare hoch an der Zeit, sich damit zu beschäftigen. Ontologien können im Wesen, trotz der informatisch vernebelnden Terminologie, als Werkzeuge der Klassifikation verstanden werden. Hier sind von seiten der Bibliotheks- und Dokumentationswissenschaft wesentliche Beiträge möglich. Der vorliegende Bericht bietet einen Einstieg in das Thema, erklärt wesentliche Elemente des UMLS und schließt mit einer kommentierten Anmerkungs- und Literaturliste für die weitere Beschäftigung mit Ontologien.
    Content
    Dieser Aufsatz ist kein Abgesang auf MeSH (= Medical Subject Headings in Medline/PubMed), wie man/frau vielleicht vermuten könnte. Vielmehr wird - ohne informatiklastiges Fachchinesisch - an Hand des von der National Library of Medicine entwickelten Unified Medical Language System erklärt, worin die Anforderungen an Ontologien bestehen, die im Zusammenhang mit dem Semantic Web allerorten eingefordert und herbeigewünscht werden. Eine Lektüre für Einsteigerinnen, die zum Vertiefen der gewonnenen Begriffssicherheit an Hand der weiterführenden Literaturhinweise anregt. Da das UMLS hier vor allem als Beispiel verwendet wird, werden auch Bibliothekarlnnen, Dokumentarlnnen und Informationsspezialistinnen anderer Fachbereiche den Aufsatz mit Gewinn lesen - und erfahren, dass unser Fachwissen aus der Sacherschließung und der Verwendung und Mitgestaltung von Normdateien und Thesauri bei der Entwicklung von Ontologien gefragt ist! (Eveline Pipp, Universitätsbibliothek Innsbruck). - Die elektronische Version dieses Artikels ist verfügbar unter: http://www.egms.de/en/journals/mbi/2006-6/mbi000049.shtml.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  3. Keyser, P. de: Indexing : from thesauri to the Semantic Web (2012) 0.02 
    0.01904179 = product of:
  0.03808358 = sum of:
    0.032056343 = product of:
      0.064112686 = sum of:
        0.064112686 = weight(_text_:web in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.064112686 = score(doc=3197,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.5299281 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0060272375 = product of:
      0.030136187 = sum of:
        0.030136187 = weight(_text_:22 in 3197) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030136187 = score(doc=3197,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3197, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3197)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Indexing consists of both novel and more traditional techniques. Cutting-edge indexing techniques, such as automatic indexing, ontologies, and topic maps, were developed independently of older techniques such as thesauri, but it is now recognized that these older methods also hold expertise. Indexing describes various traditional and novel indexing techniques, giving information professionals and students of library and information sciences a broad and comprehensible introduction to indexing. This title consists of twelve chapters: an Introduction to subject readings and theasauri; Automatic indexing versus manual indexing; Techniques applied in automatic indexing of text material; Automatic indexing of images; The black art of indexing moving images; Automatic indexing of music; Taxonomies and ontologies; Metadata formats and indexing; Tagging; Topic maps; Indexing the web; and The Semantic Web.
    Date
    24. 8.2016 14:03:22
    RSWK
    Semantic Web
    Subject
    Semantic Web
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  4. Tavakolizadeh-Ravari, M.: Analysis of the long term dynamics in thesaurus developments and its consequences (2017) 0.01 
    0.014485295 = product of:
  0.02897059 = sum of:
    0.024765724 = product of:
      0.04953145 = sum of:
        0.04953145 = weight(_text_:seiten in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04953145 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20383513 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.2429976 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.004204865 = product of:
      0.021024324 = sum of:
        0.021024324 = weight(_text_:28 in 3081) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021024324 = score(doc=3081,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.15831517 = fieldWeight in 3081, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3081)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Die Arbeit analysiert die dynamische Entwicklung und den Gebrauch von Thesaurusbegriffen. Zusätzlich konzentriert sie sich auf die Faktoren, die die Zahl von Indexbegriffen pro Dokument oder Zeitschrift beeinflussen. Als Untersuchungsobjekt dienten der MeSH und die entsprechende Datenbank "MEDLINE". Die wichtigsten Konsequenzen sind: 1. Der MeSH-Thesaurus hat sich durch drei unterschiedliche Phasen jeweils logarithmisch entwickelt. Solch einen Thesaurus sollte folgenden Gleichung folgen: "T = 3.076,6 Ln (d) - 22.695 + 0,0039d" (T = Begriffe, Ln = natürlicher Logarithmus und d = Dokumente). Um solch einen Thesaurus zu konstruieren, muss man demnach etwa 1.600 Dokumente von unterschiedlichen Themen des Bereiches des Thesaurus haben. Die dynamische Entwicklung von Thesauri wie MeSH erfordert die Einführung eines neuen Begriffs pro Indexierung von 256 neuen Dokumenten. 2. Die Verteilung der Thesaurusbegriffe erbrachte drei Kategorien: starke, normale und selten verwendete Headings. Die letzte Gruppe ist in einer Testphase, während in der ersten und zweiten Kategorie die neu hinzukommenden Deskriptoren zu einem Thesauruswachstum führen. 3. Es gibt ein logarithmisches Verhältnis zwischen der Zahl von Index-Begriffen pro Aufsatz und dessen Seitenzahl für die Artikeln zwischen einer und einundzwanzig Seiten. 4. Zeitschriftenaufsätze, die in MEDLINE mit Abstracts erscheinen erhalten fast zwei Deskriptoren mehr. 5. Die Findablity der nicht-englisch sprachigen Dokumente in MEDLINE ist geringer als die englische Dokumente. 6. Aufsätze der Zeitschriften mit einem Impact Factor 0 bis fünfzehn erhalten nicht mehr Indexbegriffe als die der anderen von MEDINE erfassten Zeitschriften. 7. In einem Indexierungssystem haben unterschiedliche Zeitschriften mehr oder weniger Gewicht in ihrem Findability. Die Verteilung der Indexbegriffe pro Seite hat gezeigt, dass es bei MEDLINE drei Kategorien der Publikationen gibt. Außerdem gibt es wenige stark bevorzugten Zeitschriften."
    Date
    24. 8.2016 13:45:28
  5. Huckstorf, A.; Petras, V.: Mind the lexical gap : EuroVoc Building Block of the Semantic Web (2011) 0.01 
    0.0143746035 = product of:
  0.028749207 = sum of:
    0.022667257 = product of:
      0.045334514 = sum of:
        0.045334514 = weight(_text_:web in 2782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045334514 = score(doc=2782,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 2782, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2782)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0060819495 = product of:
      0.030409746 = sum of:
        0.030409746 = weight(_text_:29 in 2782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030409746 = score(doc=2782,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2782, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2782)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Ein Konferenzereignis der besonderen Art fand am 18. und 19. November 2010 in Luxemburg statt. Initiiert durch das Amt für Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen Union (http://publications.europa.eu) waren Bibliothekare und Information Professionals eingeladen, um über die Zukunft mehrsprachiger kontrollierter Vokabulare in Informationssystemen und insbesondere deren Beitrag zum Semantic Web zu diskutieren. Organisiert wurde die Konferenz durch das EuroVoc-Team, das den Thesaurus der Europäischen Union bearbeitet. Die letzte EuroVoc-Konferenz fand im Jahr 2006 statt. In der Zwischenzeit ist EuroVoc zu einem ontologie-basierten Thesaurusmanagementsystem übergegangen und hat systematisch begonnen, Semantic-Web-Technologien für die Bearbeitung und Repräsentation einzusetzen und sich mit anderen Vokabularen zu vernetzen. Ein produktiver Austausch fand mit den Produzenten anderer europäischer und internationaler Vokabulare (z.B. United Nations oder FAO) sowie Vertretern aus Projekten, die an Themen über automatische Indexierung (hier insbesondere parlamentarische und rechtliche Dokumente) sowie Interoperabilitiät zwischen Vokabularen arbeiten, statt.
    Date
    29. 3.2013 17:46:08
  6. Assem, M. van; Malaisé, V.; Miles, A.; Schreiber, G.: ¬A method to convert thesauri to SKOS (2006) 0.01 
    0.0143746035 = product of:
  0.028749207 = sum of:
    0.022667257 = product of:
      0.045334514 = sum of:
        0.045334514 = weight(_text_:web in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045334514 = score(doc=4642,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.37471575 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0060819495 = product of:
      0.030409746 = sum of:
        0.030409746 = weight(_text_:29 in 4642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030409746 = score(doc=4642,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4642, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4642)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Thesauri can be useful resources for indexing and retrieval on the Semantic Web, but often they are not published in RDF/OWL. To convert thesauri to RDF for use in Semantic Web applications and to ensure the quality and utility of the conversion a structured method is required. Moreover, if different thesauri are to be interoperable without complicated mappings, a standard schema for thesauri is required. This paper presents a method for conversion of thesauri to the SKOS RDF/OWL schema, which is a proposal for such a standard under development by W3Cs Semantic Web Best Practices Working Group. We apply the method to three thesauri: IPSV, GTAA and MeSH. With these case studies we evaluate our method and the applicability of SKOS for representing thesauri.
    Date
    29. 7.2011 14:44:56
  7. Kempf, A.O.: Thesauri (2023) 0.01 
    0.013134008 = product of:
  0.052536033 = sum of:
    0.052536033 = product of:
      0.105072066 = sum of:
        0.105072066 = weight(_text_:seiten in 782) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.105072066 = score(doc=782,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.20383513 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.51547575 = fieldWeight in 782, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=782)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    In der Informationswissenschaft stehen Thesauri für kontrollierte und strukturierte Vokabulare, in denen Begriffe, verstanden als geistige Einheiten, durch Bezeichnungen der natürlichen Sprache repräsentiert werden. Jedem Begriff werden eine Vorzugsbenennung, ein sog. Deskriptor, der bei der Inhaltserschließung als Schlagwort vergeben wird, und weitere bedeutungsgleiche oder -ähnliche Bezeichnungen, sog. Nicht-Deskriptoren, als Zugangsvokabular bzw. alternative Sucheinstiege zugewiesen. Dieser Art werden der Variabilität und der Mehrdeutigkeit natürlicher Sprache Rechnung getragen. Darüber hinaus werden zwischen Begriffen bzw. ihren Bezeichnungen spezifische, reziproke Relationen kenntlich gemacht (s. Abschnitt 1), die die Bedeutungsbeziehungen bzw. das "semantische Gefüge" zwischen den Begriffen aufzeigen. Diese Kernprinzipien dieser Wissensorganisationsmethode dienen sowohl auf Seiten der Inhaltserschließenden als auch auf Seiten der in einem Informationssystem Recherchierenden in unterschiedlicher Weise der Benutzerführung und Suchunterstützung. Als Grundlage für semantisches Retrieval etwa sorgen sie bei automatischer Erweiterung der Suchanfrage um die hinterlegten Nicht-Deskriptoren für eine erfolgreiche Suche weitgehend unabhängig vom konkreten Suchterm.
  8. Assem, M. van: Converting and integrating vocabularies for the Semantic Web (2010) 0.01 
    0.012712764 = product of:
  0.025425527 = sum of:
    0.021370895 = product of:
      0.04274179 = sum of:
        0.04274179 = weight(_text_:web in 4639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04274179 = score(doc=4639,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.35328537 = fieldWeight in 4639, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4639)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.004054633 = product of:
      0.020273164 = sum of:
        0.020273164 = weight(_text_:29 in 4639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020273164 = score(doc=4639,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 4639, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4639)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This thesis focuses on conversion of vocabularies for representation and integration of collections on the Semantic Web. A secondary focus is how to represent metadata schemas (RDF Schemas representing metadata element sets) such that they interoperate with vocabularies. The primary domain in which we operate is that of cultural heritage collections. The background worldview in which a solution is sought is that of the Semantic Web research paradigmwith its associated theories, methods, tools and use cases. In other words, we assume the SemanticWeb is in principle able to provide the context to realize interoperable collections. Interoperability is dependent on the interplay between representations and the applications that use them. We mean applications in the widest sense, such as "search" and "annotation". These applications or tasks are often present in software applications, such as the E-Culture application. It is therefore necessary that applications requirements on the vocabulary representation are met. This leads us to formulate the following problem statement: HOW CAN EXISTING VOCABULARIES BE MADE AVAILABLE TO SEMANTIC WEB APPLICATIONS?
    We refine the problem statement into three research questions. The first two focus on the problem of conversion of a vocabulary to a Semantic Web representation from its original format. Conversion of a vocabulary to a representation in a Semantic Web language is necessary to make the vocabulary available to SemanticWeb applications. In the last question we focus on integration of collection metadata schemas in a way that allows for vocabulary representations as produced by our methods. Academisch proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad Doctor aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Dutch Research School for Information and Knowledge Systems.
    Date
    29. 7.2011 14:44:56
  9. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhury, G.: Thesaurus-enhanced search interfaces (2002) 0.01 
    0.012389246 = product of:
  0.049556985 = sum of:
    0.049556985 = product of:
      0.123892464 = sum of:
        0.06307297 = weight(_text_:28 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06307297 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.4749455 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
        0.06081949 = weight(_text_:29 in 3807) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06081949 = score(doc=3807,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.46638384 = fieldWeight in 3807, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=3807)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    18. 5.2002 17:29:00
    Source
    Journal of information science. 28(2002) no.2, S.111-122
  10. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.; Chowdhurry, G.: Assessing the impact of user interaction with thesaural knowledge structures : a quantitative analysis framework (2003) 0.01 
    0.011856867 = product of:
  0.023713734 = sum of:
    0.019508868 = product of:
      0.039017737 = sum of:
        0.039017737 = weight(_text_:web in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.039017737 = score(doc=2766,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.32250395 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.004204865 = product of:
      0.021024324 = sum of:
        0.021024324 = weight(_text_:28 in 2766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021024324 = score(doc=2766,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.15831517 = fieldWeight in 2766, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2766)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Thesauri have been important information and knowledge organisation tools for more than three decades. The recent emergence and phenomenal growth of the World Wide Web has created new opportunities to introduce thesauri as information search and retrieval aids to end user communities. While the number of web-based and hypertextual thesauri continues to grow, few investigations have yet been carried out to evaluate how end-users, for whom all these efforts are ostensibly made, interact with and make use of thesauri for query building and expansion. The present paper reports a pilot study carried out to determine the extent to which a thesaurus-enhanced search interface to a web-based database aided end-users in their selection of search terms. The study also investigated the ways in which users interacted with the thesaurus structure, terms, and interface. Thesaurusbased searching and browsing behaviours adopted by users while interacting with the thesaurus-enhanced search interface were also examined. 1. Introduction The last decade has witnessed the emergence of a broad range of applications for knowledge structures in general and thesauri in particular. A number of researchers have predicted that thesauri will increasingly be used in retrieval rather than for indexing (Milstead, 1998; Aitchison et al., 1997) and that their application in information retrieval systems will become more diverse due to the growth of fulltext databases accessed over the Internet (Williamson, 2000). Some researchers have emphasised the need for tailoring the structure and content of thesauri as tools for end-user searching (Bates, 1986; Strong and Drott, 1986; Anderson and Rowley, 1991; Lopez-Huertas, 1997) while others have suggested thesaurus-enhanced user interfaces to support query formulation and expansion (Pollitt et.al., 1994; Jones et.al., 1995; Beaulieu, 1997). The recent phenomenal growth of the World Wide Web has created new opportunities to introduce thesauri as information search and retrieval aids to end user communities. While the number of web-based and hypertextual thesauri continues to grow, few investigations have been carried out to evaluate the ways in which end-users interact with and make use of online thesauri for query building and expansion. The work reported here expands an a pilot study (Shiri and Revie, 2001) carried out to investigate user - thesaurus interaction in the domains of biology and veterinary medicine.
    Date
    6. 1.1997 18:30:28
  11. Assem, M. van; Menken, M.R.; Schreiber, G.; Wielemaker, J.; Wielinga, B.: ¬A method for converting thesauri to RDF/OWL (2004) 0.01 
    0.0111818565 = product of:
  0.022363713 = sum of:
    0.015268105 = product of:
      0.03053621 = sum of:
        0.03053621 = weight(_text_:web in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03053621 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0070956075 = product of:
      0.035478037 = sum of:
        0.035478037 = weight(_text_:29 in 4644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035478037 = score(doc=4644,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4644, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4644)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    29. 7.2011 14:44:56
    Source
    Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC'04). Eds. D. Plexousakis and F. van Harmelen
  12. Scheven, E.: ¬Die neue Thesaurusnorm ISO 25964 und die GND (2017) 0.01 
    0.0111818565 = product of:
  0.022363713 = sum of:
    0.015268105 = product of:
      0.03053621 = sum of:
        0.03053621 = weight(_text_:web in 3505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03053621 = score(doc=3505,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 3505, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3505)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0070956075 = product of:
      0.035478037 = sum of:
        0.035478037 = weight(_text_:29 in 3505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035478037 = score(doc=3505,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3505, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3505)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  13. Broughton, V.: Essential thesaurus construction (2006) 0.01 
    0.010937164 = product of:
  0.043748654 = sum of:
    0.043748654 = sum of:
      0.008724631 = weight(_text_:web in 2924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.008724631 = score(doc=2924,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03707166 = queryNorm
          0.07211407 = fieldWeight in 2924, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2924)
      0.035024025 = weight(_text_:seiten in 2924) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.035024025 = score(doc=2924,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.20383513 = queryWeight, product of:
            5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03707166 = queryNorm
          0.17182526 = fieldWeight in 2924, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
            0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2924)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Mitt. VÖB 60(2007) H.1, S.98-101 (O. Oberhauser): "Die Autorin von Essential thesaurus construction (and essential taxonomy construction, so der implizite Untertitel, vgl. S. 1) ist durch ihre Lehrtätigkeit an der bekannten School of Library, Archive and Information Studies des University College London und durch ihre bisherigen Publikationen auf den Gebieten (Facetten-)Klassifikation und Thesaurus fachlich einschlägig ausgewiesen. Nach Essential classification liegt nun ihr Thesaurus-Lehrbuch vor, mit rund 200 Seiten Text und knapp 100 Seiten Anhang ein handliches Werk, das seine Genese zum Grossteil dem Lehrbetrieb verdankt, wie auch dem kurzen Einleitungskapitel zu entnehmen ist. Das Buch ist der Schule von Jean Aitchison et al. verpflichtet und wendet sich an "the indexer" im weitesten Sinn, d.h. an alle Personen, die ein strukturiertes, kontrolliertes Fachvokabular für die Zwecke der sachlichen Erschliessung und Suche erstellen wollen bzw. müssen. Es möchte dieser Zielgruppe das nötige methodische Rüstzeug für eine solche Aufgabe vermitteln, was einschliesslich der Einleitung und der Schlussbemerkungen in zwanzig Kapiteln geschieht - eine ansprechende Strukturierung, die ein wohldosiertes Durcharbeiten möglich macht. Zu letzterem tragen auch die von der Autorin immer wieder gestellten Übungsaufgaben bei (Lösungen jeweils am Kapitelende). Zu Beginn der Darstellung wird der "information retrieval thesaurus" von dem (zumindest im angelsächsischen Raum) weit öfter mit dem Thesaurusbegriff assoziierten "reference thesaurus" abgegrenzt, einem nach begrifflicher Ähnlichkeit angeordneten Synonymenwörterbuch, das gerne als Mittel zur stilistischen Verbesserung beim Abfassen von (wissenschaftlichen) Arbeiten verwendet wird. Ohne noch ins Detail zu gehen, werden optische Erscheinungsform und Anwendungsgebiete von Thesauren vorgestellt, der Thesaurus als postkoordinierte Indexierungssprache erläutert und seine Nähe zu facettierten Klassifikationssystemen erwähnt. In der Folge stellt Broughton die systematisch organisierten Systeme (Klassifikation/ Taxonomie, Begriffs-/Themendiagramme, Ontologien) den alphabetisch angeordneten, wortbasierten (Schlagwortlisten, thesaurusartige Schlagwortsysteme und Thesauren im eigentlichen Sinn) gegenüber, was dem Leser weitere Einordnungshilfen schafft. Die Anwendungsmöglichkeiten von Thesauren als Mittel der Erschliessung (auch als Quelle für Metadatenangaben bei elektronischen bzw. Web-Dokumenten) und der Recherche (Suchformulierung, Anfrageerweiterung, Browsing und Navigieren) kommen ebenso zur Sprache wie die bei der Verwendung natürlichsprachiger Indexierungssysteme auftretenden Probleme. Mit Beispielen wird ausdrücklich auf die mehr oder weniger starke fachliche Spezialisierung der meisten dieser Vokabularien hingewiesen, wobei auch Informationsquellen über Thesauren (z.B. www.taxonomywarehouse.com) sowie Thesauren für nicht-textuelle Ressourcen kurz angerissen werden.
  14. Dupuis, P.; Lapointe, J.: Developpement d'un outil documentaire à Hydro-Quebec : le Thesaurus HQ (1997) 0.01 
    0.008223023 = product of:
  0.032892093 = sum of:
    0.032892093 = product of:
      0.08223023 = sum of:
        0.042048648 = weight(_text_:28 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042048648 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
        0.040181585 = weight(_text_:22 in 3173) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040181585 = score(doc=3173,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3173, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3173)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    28. 2.1999 20:59:52
    Source
    Argus. 26(1997) no.3, S.16-22
  15. Martínez-González, M.M.; Alvite-Díez, M.L.: Thesauri and Semantic Web : discussion of the evolution of thesauri toward their integration with the Semantic Web (2019) 0.01 
    0.008179341 = product of:
  0.032717366 = sum of:
    0.032717366 = product of:
      0.06543473 = sum of:
        0.06543473 = weight(_text_:web in 5997) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06543473 = score(doc=5997,freq=18.0), product of:
            0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.5408555 = fieldWeight in 5997, product of:
              4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                18.0 = termFreq=18.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5997)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Thesauri are Knowledge Organization Systems (KOS), that arise from the consensus of wide communities. They have been in use for many years and are regularly updated. Whereas in the past thesauri were designed for information professionals for indexing and searching, today there is a demand for conceptual vocabularies that enable inferencing by machines. The development of the Semantic Web has brought a new opportunity for thesauri, but thesauri also face the challenge of proving that they add value to it. The evolution of thesauri toward their integration with the Semantic Web is examined. Elements and structures in the thesaurus standard, ISO 25964, and SKOS (Simple Knowledge Organization System), the Semantic Web standard for representing KOS, are reviewed and compared. Moreover, the integrity rules of thesauri are contrasted with the axioms of SKOS. How SKOS has been applied to represent some real thesauri is taken into account. Three thesauri are chosen for this aim: AGROVOC, EuroVoc and the UNESCO Thesaurus. Based on the results of this comparison and analysis, the benefits that Semantic Web technologies offer to thesauri, how thesauri can contribute to the Semantic Web, and the challenges that would help to improve their integration with the Semantic Web are discussed.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  16. Dalmau, M.; Floyd, R.; Jiao, D.; Riley, J.: Integrating thesaurus relationships into search and browse in an online photograph collection (2005) 0.01 
    0.008080935 = product of:
  0.01616187 = sum of:
    0.010905789 = product of:
      0.021811578 = sum of:
        0.021811578 = weight(_text_:web in 2583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021811578 = score(doc=2583,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.18028519 = fieldWeight in 2583, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2583)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0052560815 = product of:
      0.026280407 = sum of:
        0.026280407 = weight(_text_:28 in 2583) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.026280407 = score(doc=2583,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 2583, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2583)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Purpose - Seeks to share with digital library practitioners the development process of an online image collection that integrates the syndetic structure of a controlled vocabulary to improve end-user search and browse functionality. Design/methodology/approach - Surveys controlled vocabulary structures and their utility for catalogers and end-users. Reviews research literature and usability findings that informed the specifications for integration of the controlled vocabulary structure into search and browse functionality. Discusses database functions facilitating query expansion using a controlled vocabulary structure, and web application handling of user queries and results display. Concludes with a discussion of open-source alternatives and reuse of database and application components in other environments. Findings - Affirms that structured forms of browse and search can be successfully integrated into digital collections to significantly improve the user's discovery experience. Establishes ways in which the technologies used in implementing enhanced search and browse functionality can be abstracted to work in other digital collection environments. Originality/value - Significant amounts of research on integrating thesauri structures into search and browse functionalities exist, but examples of online resources that have implemented this approach are few in comparison. The online image collection surveyed in this paper can serve as a model to other designers of digital library resources for integrating controlled vocabularies and metadata structures into more dynamic search and browse functionality for end-users.
    Date
    31.12.2008 20:16:28
  17. Johnson, E.H.: Distributed thesaurus Web services (2004) 0.01 
    0.007315826 = product of:
  0.029263305 = sum of:
    0.029263305 = product of:
      0.05852661 = sum of:
        0.05852661 = weight(_text_:web in 4863) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.05852661 = score(doc=4863,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.48375595 = fieldWeight in 4863, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4863)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The World Wide Web and the use of HTML-based information displays has greatly increased access to online information sources, but at the same time limits the ways in which they can be used. By the same token, Web-based indexing and search engines give us access to the full text of online documents, but make it difficult to access them in any kind of organized, systematic way. For years before the advent of the Internet, lexicographers built weIl-structured subject thesauri to organize large collections of documents. These have since been converted into electronic form and even put online, but in ways that are largely uncoordinated and not useful for searching. This paper describes some of the ways in which XML-based Web services could be used to coordinate subject thesauri and other online vocabulary sources to create a "Thesauro-Web" that could be used by both searchers and indexers to improve subject access an the Internet.
  18. Boteram, F.: Semantische Relationen in Dokumentationssprachen : vom Thesaurus zum semantischen Netz (2010) 0.01 
    0.007063692 = product of:
  0.028254768 = sum of:
    0.028254768 = product of:
      0.07063692 = sum of:
        0.035478037 = weight(_text_:29 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035478037 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
        0.035158884 = weight(_text_:22 in 4792) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035158884 = score(doc=4792,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4792, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4792)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    2. 3.2013 12:29:05
    Source
    Wissensspeicher in digitalen Räumen: Nachhaltigkeit - Verfügbarkeit - semantische Interoperabilität. Proceedings der 11. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation, Konstanz, 20. bis 22. Februar 2008. Hrsg.: J. Sieglerschmidt u. H.P.Ohly
  19. Shiri, A.A.; Revie, C.: Thesauri on the Web : current developments and trends (2000) 0.01 
    0.0066112834 = product of:
  0.026445134 = sum of:
    0.026445134 = product of:
      0.052890267 = sum of:
        0.052890267 = weight(_text_:web in 2558) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052890267 = score(doc=2558,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 2558, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2558)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This article provides an overview of recent developments relating to the application of thesauri in information organisation and retrieval on the World Wide Web. It describes some recent thesaurus projects undertaken to facilitate resource description and discovery and access to wide-ranging information resources on the Internet. Types of thesauri available on the Web, thesauri integrated in databases and information retrieval systems, and multiple-thesaurus systems for cross-database searching are also discussed. Collective efforts and events in addressing the standardisation and novel applications of thesauri are briefly reviewed.
  20. Quick Guide to Publishing a Thesaurus on the Semantic Web (2008) 0.01 
    0.0066112834 = product of:
  0.026445134 = sum of:
    0.026445134 = product of:
      0.052890267 = sum of:
        0.052890267 = weight(_text_:web in 4656) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.052890267 = score(doc=4656,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03707166 = queryNorm
            0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 4656, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4656)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    This document describes in brief how to express the content and structure of a thesaurus, and metadata about a thesaurus, in RDF. Using RDF allows data to be linked to and/or merged with other RDF data by semantic web applications. The Semantic Web, which is based on the Resource Description Framework (RDF), provides a common framework that allows data to be shared and reused across application, enterprise, and community boundaries.

Authors

Years

Languages

Types

  • a 92
  • el 16
  • m 10
  • x 4
  • ? 1
  • b 1
  • n 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications