Search (97 results, page 1 of 5)

  • × theme_ss:"Normdateien"
  1. Russell, B.M.; Spillane, J.L.: Using the Web for name authority work (2001) 0.02
    0.02221542 = product of:
      0.04443084 = sum of:
        0.037399065 = product of:
          0.07479813 = sum of:
            0.07479813 = weight(_text_:web in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07479813 = score(doc=167,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007031777 = product of:
          0.035158884 = sum of:
            0.035158884 = weight(_text_:22 in 167) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035158884 = score(doc=167,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 167, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=167)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    While many catalogers are using the Web to find the information they need to perform authority work quickly and accurately, the full potential of the Web to assist catalogers in name authority work has yet to be realized. The ever-growing nature of the Web means that available information for creating personal name, corporate name, and other types of headings will increase. In this article, we examine ways in which simple and effective Web searching can save catalogers time and money in the process of authority work. In addition, questions involving evaluating authority information found on the Web are explored.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Danowski, P.: Authority files and Web 2.0 : Wikipedia and the PND. An Example (2007) 0.02
    0.021184567 = product of:
      0.042369135 = sum of:
        0.021811578 = product of:
          0.043623157 = sum of:
            0.043623157 = weight(_text_:web in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043623157 = score(doc=1291,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.020557558 = product of:
          0.051393896 = sum of:
            0.026280407 = weight(_text_:28 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026280407 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
            0.025113491 = weight(_text_:22 in 1291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025113491 = score(doc=1291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 1291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1291)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    More and more users index everything on their own in the web 2.0. There are services for links, videos, pictures, books, encyclopaedic articles and scientific articles. All these services are library independent. But must that really be? Can't libraries help with their experience and tools to make user indexing better? On the experience of a project from German language Wikipedia together with the German person authority files (Personen Namen Datei - PND) located at German National Library (Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) I would like to show what is possible. How users can and will use the authority files, if we let them. We will take a look how the project worked and what we can learn for future projects. Conclusions - Authority files can have a role in the web 2.0 - there must be an open interface/ service for retrieval - everything that is indexed on the net with authority files can be easy integrated in a federated search - O'Reilly: You have to found ways that your data get more important that more it will be used
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
    Date
    14. 1.2008 14:38:28
    Object
    Web 2.0
  3. Jantz, R.C.: ¬An approach to managing vocabulary for databases on the Web (1999) 0.02
    0.016543357 = product of:
      0.033086713 = sum of:
        0.024676984 = product of:
          0.04935397 = sum of:
            0.04935397 = weight(_text_:web in 5354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04935397 = score(doc=5354,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.4079388 = fieldWeight in 5354, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5354)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.00840973 = product of:
          0.042048648 = sum of:
            0.042048648 = weight(_text_:28 in 5354) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042048648 = score(doc=5354,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 5354, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5354)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper proposes an approach for managing vocabulary for reference databases on the Web. The approach is directed at domain specific databases in which much of the referenced material remains in non-digital form. A combination of interactive and manual processes are outlined along with a proposed implementation approach. For this limited class of databases, it is suggested that the approach can significantly improve vocabulary management with relatively low costs in manual effort.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 28(1999) no.3, S.55-65
  4. Sandner, M.: Neues aus der Kommission für Sacherschließung : Das neue Tool "NSW online" (2011) 0.02
    0.016233094 = product of:
      0.064932376 = sum of:
        0.064932376 = sum of:
          0.021592362 = weight(_text_:web in 4529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021592362 = score(doc=4529,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03707166 = queryNorm
              0.17847323 = fieldWeight in 4529, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4529)
          0.043340016 = weight(_text_:seiten in 4529) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.043340016 = score(doc=4529,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20383513 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03707166 = queryNorm
              0.2126229 = fieldWeight in 4529, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
                0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=4529)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    "Die "Liste der fachlichen Nachschlagewerke zu den Normdateien" (NSW-Liste) stellt mit ihren derzeit rund 1.660 Einträgen ein verbindliches Arbeitsinstrument für die tägliche Praxis in der kooperativen Normdaten-pflege des deutschsprachigen Raumes, speziell für die Terminologiearbeit in der bibliothekarischen Sacherschließung dar. In jedem Normdatensatz der Schlagwortnormdatei (SWD) werden für den Nachweis und die Begründung der Ansetzungs- und Verweisungsformen eines Deskriptors im Feld "Quelle" Referenzwerke aus der so genannten Prioritätenliste (Rangfolge der Nachschlagewerke), darüber hinaus aus der gesamten NSW-Liste, festgehalten und normiert abgekürzt. In gedruckter Form erscheint diese von der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek (DNB) regelmäßig aktualisierte Liste jährlich mit einem Änderungsdienst (Änderungen, Neuauflagen; Neuaufnahmen) und steht seit einigen Jahren auch elektronisch abrufbar bereit. Dennoch ist sie "in die Jahre" gekommen. Eine verbesserte Form dieser Liste war ein langjähriges Desiderat für die Neuansetzungspraxis in der SWD. Erst eine Projektarbeit im Rahmen des ULG bot 2008/2009 in Wien die Gelegenheit, solch einem elektronischen Hilfsmittel entscheidend näher zu kommen. Das Projektergebnis war praxistauglich und wurde 2010 von der UB Wien in ein Content Management System (CMS) eingebettet. Zahlreiche Tests und funktionelle Anpassungen sowie eine genaue Durchsicht des Grunddatenbestandes und aller Links in den Katalog des Pilotverbundes (OBV) waren noch nötig, und auch die erste Aktualisierung nach der Druckausgabe 2010 führten wir durch, bevor wir im Herbst 2010 der Fachöffentlichkeit eine Beta-Version vorstellen konnten. Seither steht die Suche im NSW-Tool als Alternative zur Benützung der Druckausgabe allen frei zur Verfügung: http://www.univie.ac.at/nsw/. Sämtliche SWD-Kooperationspartner-Redaktionen und die Lokalen Redaktionen (ÖSWD-LRs) des Österreichischen Bibliothekenverbundes (OBV) können über das Web-Frontend von "NSW online" ihre Wünsche an die Redaktion der NSW-Liste (Fachabteilung SE, DNB) direkt im Tool deponieren (Korrekturanträge sowie Vorschläge zur Aufnahme fehlender oder neuer Nachschlagewerke) und frei im Internet zugängliche Volltexte zu den bereits in der Liste vorhandenen Titeln verlinken (Erstanmeldung über den Webmaster: via Hilfe-Seite im Tool).
    Nur die Verbundbibliotheken des OBV können überdies ihre zu den Nachschlagewerken passenden Bestände in Aleph hinzufügen, ggf. selbst via Web-Frontend im Tool einen Link zum eigenen Verbundkatalog neu anlegen, und insbesondere ihre lokal verfügbaren elektronischen Volltexte anbinden3. Im Backend werden neue Datensätze angelegt, vorhandene Einträge korrigiert, redaktionelle Kommentare platziert und Korrekturanträge abgeschöpft sowie Neuauflagen für die richtige Anzeige und Verknüpfung, etwa mit der Rangfolgeliste, zu ihrem "Anker-Datensatz" umgelenkt. Außerdem werden hier HTML-Seiten wie Hilfetext, Rangfolgeliste u. ä. gepflegt. - Zum Administrationsinterface haben nur der Webmaster der UB Wien, die SWD-Zentralredaktion des OBV sowie die Fachabteilung SE der DNB Zugang. (Nicht nur) Sacherschließerinnen können das Tool mit all seinen Vorteilen nutzen und dennoch in gewohnter Weise vorgehen, wenn sie nach Quellen für ihre Neuansetzungen suchen wollen und darin recherchieren müssen, denn die Struktur des Tools folgt dem Aufbau der Druckfassung. Es empfiehlt sich, im jeweiligen Bibliothekssystem für SWD und PND zum Feld Quelle einen Hypertextlink im Erfassungsmodul anzubringen. Die Normdateiarbeit ist komplex und anspruchsvoll. Die Einhaltung der für alle Neuansetzungen verbindlichen Rangfolge wird mit dem Tool und seiner praxisorientierten Aufbereitung ganz entscheidend erleichtert, was von Beginn an zu einer hohen Qualität jedes Normdatensatzes verhilft. Den größten Zeitgewinn in der täglichen Praxis bringt der sofortige Zugriff auf verlinkte Volltexte. - Angesichts des zunehmenden multilateralen Datentausches bei gleichzeitiger dramatischer Verknappung personeller Ressourcen trotz eines erheblichen Anstiegs des inhaltlich zu erschließenden Literaturaufkommens wird dies im Workflow des vor kurzem eingeführten Online-Redaktionsverfahrens (ONR) für Normdateien der wohl nachhaltigste Effekt von "NSW online" sein."
  5. Ilik, V.: Cataloger makeover : creating non-MARC name authorities (2015) 0.01
    0.014475438 = product of:
      0.028950876 = sum of:
        0.021592362 = product of:
          0.043184724 = sum of:
            0.043184724 = weight(_text_:web in 1884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043184724 = score(doc=1884,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 1884, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1884)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007358514 = product of:
          0.03679257 = sum of:
            0.03679257 = weight(_text_:28 in 1884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03679257 = score(doc=1884,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 1884, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1884)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article shares a vision of the enterprise of cataloging and the role of catalogers and metadata librarians in the twenty-first century. The revolutionary opportunities now presented by Semantic Web technologies liberate catalogers from their historically analog-based static world, re-conceptualize it, and transform it into a world of high dimensionality and fluidity. By presenting illustrative examples of innovative metadata creation and manipulation, such as non-MARC name authority records, we seek to contribute to the libraries' mission with innovative projects that enable discovery, development, communication, learning, and creativity, and hold promise to exceed users' expectations.
    Content
    Beitrag in einem Themenheft: Reshaping the Library Catalog: Selected Papers from the International Conference FSR2014 (Rome, February 27-28, 2014).
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  6. Wolverton, R.E.: Becoming an authority on authority control : an annotated bibliography of resources (2006) 0.01
    0.01431207 = product of:
      0.02862414 = sum of:
        0.021592362 = product of:
          0.043184724 = sum of:
            0.043184724 = weight(_text_:web in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.043184724 = score(doc=120,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.35694647 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007031777 = product of:
          0.035158884 = sum of:
            0.035158884 = weight(_text_:22 in 120) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035158884 = score(doc=120,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 120, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=120)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Authority control has long been an important part of the cataloging process. However, few studies have been conducted examining how librarians learn about it. Research conducted to date suggests that many librarians learn about authority control on the job rather than in formal classes. To offer an introduction to authority control information for librarians, an annotated bibliography is provided. It includes monographs, articles and papers, electronic discussion groups, Web sites related to professional conferences, additional Web sites related to authority control, and training offered through the Name Authority Cooperative Program and the Subject Authority Cooperative Program. A summary of possible future trends in authority control is also provided.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  7. Franci, L.; Lucarelli, A.; Motta, M.; Rolle, M.: ¬The Nuovo Soggettario Thesaurus : structural features and Web application projects (2011) 0.01
    0.012929495 = product of:
      0.02585899 = sum of:
        0.017449262 = product of:
          0.034898523 = sum of:
            0.034898523 = weight(_text_:web in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.034898523 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.2884563 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.00840973 = product of:
          0.042048648 = sum of:
            0.042048648 = weight(_text_:28 in 1808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.042048648 = score(doc=1808,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.31663033 = fieldWeight in 1808, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1808)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    25. 6.2015 19:46:28
  8. Leth, P.: Subject access - the Swedish approach (2007) 0.01
    0.012334535 = product of:
      0.04933814 = sum of:
        0.04933814 = product of:
          0.123345345 = sum of:
            0.06307297 = weight(_text_:28 in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06307297 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.4749455 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
            0.060272373 = weight(_text_:22 in 131) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060272373 = score(doc=131,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 131, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=131)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
    Date
    14. 1.2008 14:38:28
  9. Hengel, C.: Mapping name authorities : the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF) (2007) 0.01
    0.012334535 = product of:
      0.04933814 = sum of:
        0.04933814 = product of:
          0.123345345 = sum of:
            0.06307297 = weight(_text_:28 in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06307297 = score(doc=1266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.4749455 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
            0.060272373 = weight(_text_:22 in 1266) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060272373 = score(doc=1266,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1266, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1266)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
    Date
    14. 1.2008 14:38:28
  10. Goossens, P.: Authority control : trends and challenges (2007) 0.01
    0.012334535 = product of:
      0.04933814 = sum of:
        0.04933814 = product of:
          0.123345345 = sum of:
            0.06307297 = weight(_text_:28 in 1290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06307297 = score(doc=1290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.4749455 = fieldWeight in 1290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1290)
            0.060272373 = weight(_text_:22 in 1290) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.060272373 = score(doc=1290,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 1290, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1290)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Vortrag anlässlich des Workshops: "Extending the multilingual capacity of The European Library in the EDL project Stockholm, Swedish National Library, 22-23 November 2007".
    Date
    14. 1.2008 14:38:28
  11. Tillett, B.B.: Complementarity of perspectives for resource descriptions (2015) 0.01
    0.011978836 = product of:
      0.023957672 = sum of:
        0.01888938 = product of:
          0.03777876 = sum of:
            0.03777876 = weight(_text_:web in 2288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03777876 = score(doc=2288,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 2288, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2288)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005068291 = product of:
          0.025341455 = sum of:
            0.025341455 = weight(_text_:29 in 2288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025341455 = score(doc=2288,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 2288, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2288)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliographic data is used to describe resources held in the collections of libraries, archives and museums. That data is mostly available on the Web today and mostly as linked data. Also on the Web are the controlled vocabulary systems of name authority files, like the Virtual International Authority File (VIAF), classification systems, and subject terms. These systems offer their own linked data to potentially help users find the information they want - whether at their local library or anywhere in the world that is willing to make their resources available. We have found it beneficial to merge authority data for names on a global level, as the entities are relatively clear. That is not true for subject concepts and terminology that have categorisation systems developed according to varying principles and schemes and are in multiple languages. Rather than requiring everyone in the world to use the same categorisation/classification system in the same language, we know that the Web offers us the opportunity to add descriptors assigned around the world using multiple systems from multiple perspectives to identify our resources. Those descriptors add value to refine searches, help users worldwide and share globally what each library does locally.
    Source
    Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
  12. Scheven, E.: ¬Die neue Thesaurusnorm ISO 25964 und die GND (2017) 0.01
    0.0111818565 = product of:
      0.022363713 = sum of:
        0.015268105 = product of:
          0.03053621 = sum of:
            0.03053621 = weight(_text_:web in 3505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03053621 = score(doc=3505,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 3505, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3505)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0070956075 = product of:
          0.035478037 = sum of:
            0.035478037 = weight(_text_:29 in 3505) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035478037 = score(doc=3505,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3505, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3505)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Source
    Theorie, Semantik und Organisation von Wissen: Proceedings der 13. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und dem 13. Internationalen Symposium der Informationswissenschaft der Higher Education Association for Information Science (HI) Potsdam (19.-20.03.2013): 'Theory, Information and Organization of Knowledge' / Proceedings der 14. Tagung der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) und Natural Language & Information Systems (NLDB) Passau (16.06.2015): 'Lexical Resources for Knowledge Organization' / Proceedings des Workshops der Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) auf der SEMANTICS Leipzig (1.09.2014): 'Knowledge Organization and Semantic Web' / Proceedings des Workshops der Polnischen und Deutschen Sektion der Internationalen Gesellschaft für Wissensorganisation (ISKO) Cottbus (29.-30.09.2011): 'Economics of Knowledge Production and Organization'. Hrsg. von W. Babik, H.P. Ohly u. K. Weber
  13. Hickey, T.B.; Toves, J.; O'Neill, E.T.: NACO normalization : a detailed examination of the authority file comparison rules (2006) 0.01
    0.011149941 = product of:
      0.022299882 = sum of:
        0.015268105 = product of:
          0.03053621 = sum of:
            0.03053621 = weight(_text_:web in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03053621 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.25239927 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007031777 = product of:
          0.035158884 = sum of:
            0.035158884 = weight(_text_:22 in 5760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035158884 = score(doc=5760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5760)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Normalization rules are essential for interoperability between bibliographic systems. In the process of working with Name Authority Cooperative Program (NACO) authority files to match records with Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) and developing the Faceted Application of Subject Terminology (FAST) subject heading schema, the authors found inconsistencies in independently created NACO normalization implementations. Investigating these, the authors found ambiguities in the NACO standard that need resolution, and came to conclusions on how the procedure could be simplified with little impact on matching headings. To encourage others to test their software for compliance with the current rules, the authors have established a Web site that has test files and interactive services showing their current implementation.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  14. Altenhöner, R; Hengel, C.; Jahns, Y.; Junger, U.; Mahnke, C.; Oehlschläger, S.; Werner, C.: Weltkongress Bibliothek und Information, 74. IFLA-Generalkonferenz in Quebec, Kanada : Aus den Veranstaltungen der Division IV Bibliographic Control, der Core Activities ICADS und UNIMARC sowie der Information Technology Section (2008) 0.01
    0.010465736 = product of:
      0.041862942 = sum of:
        0.041862942 = sum of:
          0.010905789 = weight(_text_:web in 2317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.010905789 = score(doc=2317,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03707166 = queryNorm
              0.09014259 = fieldWeight in 2317, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2317)
          0.030957155 = weight(_text_:seiten in 2317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.030957155 = score(doc=2317,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.20383513 = queryWeight, product of:
                5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03707166 = queryNorm
              0.1518735 = fieldWeight in 2317, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
                0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=2317)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Classification and Indexing Section (Sektion Klassifikation und Indexierung) Deutsches Mitglied im Ständigen Ausschuss der Sektion: Yvonne Jahns (2005-2009; Deutsche Nationalbibliothek) Die Sektion, die sich als Forum für den internationalen Austausch über Methoden der Inhaltserschließung und die Bedeutung des sachlichen Zugangs zu Dokumenten und Wissen versteht, wartete in Quebec mit einem interessanten Vortragprogramm auf. Drei Präsentationen näherten sich dem Thema "Classification and indexing without language borders" von unterschiedlichen Seiten. Anila Angjeli von der Bibliotheque nationale de France (BnF) präsentierte Arbeiten aus dem Projekt STITCH", das sich mit semantischen Suchen in unterschiedlich erschlossenen Beständen von Kulturerbeinstitutionen beschäftigt. Die verwendeten Thesauri und Klassifikationen wurden mittels SKOS in ein vergleichbares Format überführt und stehen so als Semantic-Web-Anwendung zur Recherche bereit. Die Funktionsweise erläuterte Anila Angjeli sehr bildreich durch Beispiel-suchen nach mittelalterlichen Handschriften der BnF und der Königlichen Bibliothek der Niederlande. Vivien Petras vom GESIS Informationszentrum Sozialwissenschaften, Bonn, sprach über die Vielzahl der intellektuell erstellten Crosskonkordanzen zwischen Thesauri in den Sozialwissenschaften. Sie stellte dabei die Evaluierung der KOMOHE-Projektergebnisse vor und konnte die Verbesserung der Suchergebnisse anschaulich machen, die man durch Hinzuziehen der Konkordanzen in der Recherche über heterogen erschlossene Bestände erreicht. Schließlich präsentierte Michael Kreyche von der Kent State University, Ohio/USA, seinen eindrucksvollen jahrelangen Einsatz für die Zugänglichkeit englisch-spanischer Schlagwörter. Im Projekt Icsh-es.org gelang es, viele Vorarbeiten von amerikanischen und spanischen Bibliotheken zusammenzutragen, um eine Datenbank spanischer Entsprechungen der Library of Congress Subject Headings aufzubauen. Diese soll Indexierern helfen und natürlich den vielen spanisch-sprachigen Bibliotheksbenutzern in den USA zugute kommen. Spanisch ist nicht nur eine der meistgesprochenen Sprachen der Welt, sondern aufgrund der zahlreichen Einwanderer in die USA für die Bibliotheksarbeit von großer Wichtigkeit.
  15. Kasprzik, A.; Kett, J.: Vorschläge für eine Weiterentwicklung der Sacherschließung und Schritte zur fortgesetzten strukturellen Aufwertung der GND (2018) 0.01
    0.010245703 = product of:
      0.020491406 = sum of:
        0.015423114 = product of:
          0.030846229 = sum of:
            0.030846229 = weight(_text_:web in 4599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030846229 = score(doc=4599,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.25496176 = fieldWeight in 4599, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4599)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005068291 = product of:
          0.025341455 = sum of:
            0.025341455 = weight(_text_:29 in 4599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025341455 = score(doc=4599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4599)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Aufgrund der fortgesetzten Publikationsflut stellt sich immer dringender die Frage, wie die Schwellen für die Titel- und Normdatenpflege gesenkt werden können - sowohl für die intellektuelle als auch die automatisierte Sacherschließung. Zu einer Verbesserung der Daten- und Arbeitsqualität in der Sacherschließung kann beigetragen werden a) durch eine flexible Visualisierung der Gemeinsamen Normdatei (GND) und anderer Wissensorganisationssysteme, so dass deren Graphstruktur intuitiv erfassbar wird, und b) durch eine investigative Analyse ihrer aktuellen Struktur und die Entwicklung angepasster automatisierter Methoden zur Ermittlung und Korrektur fehlerhafter Muster. Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB) prüft im Rahmen des GND-Entwicklungsprogramms 2017-2021, welche Bedingungen für eine fruchtbare community-getriebene Open-Source-Entwicklung entsprechender Werkzeuge gegeben sein müssen. Weiteres Potential steckt in einem langfristigen Übergang zu einer Darstellung von Titel- und Normdaten in Beschreibungssprachen im Sinne des Semantic Web (RDF; OWL, SKOS). So profitiert die GND von der Interoperabilität mit anderen kontrollierten Vokabularen und von einer erleichterten Interaktion mit anderen Fach-Communities und kann umgekehrt auch außerhalb des Bibliothekswesens zu einem noch attraktiveren Wissensorganisationssystem werden. Darüber hinaus bieten die Ansätze aus dem Semantic Web die Möglichkeit, stärker formalisierte, strukturierende Satellitenvokabulare rund um die GND zu entwickeln. Daraus ergeben sich nicht zuletzt auch neue Perspektiven für die automatisierte Sacherschließung. Es wäre lohnend, näher auszuloten, wie und inwieweit semantisch-logische Verfahren den bestehenden Methodenmix bereichern können.
    Date
    13.12.2018 13:29:07
  16. Rotenberg, E.; Kushmerick, A.: ¬The author challenge : identification of self in the scholarly literature (2011) 0.01
    0.009697122 = product of:
      0.019394243 = sum of:
        0.013086946 = product of:
          0.026173891 = sum of:
            0.026173891 = weight(_text_:web in 1332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026173891 = score(doc=1332,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 1332, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1332)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0063072974 = product of:
          0.031536486 = sum of:
            0.031536486 = weight(_text_:28 in 1332) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031536486 = score(doc=1332,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.23747274 = fieldWeight in 1332, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1332)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Considering the expansion of research output across the globe, along with the growing demand for quantitative tracking of research outcomes by government authorities and research institutions, the challenges of author identity are increasing. In recent years, a number of initiatives to help solve the author "name game" have been launched from all areas of the scholarly information market space. This article introduces the various author identification tools and services Thomson Reuters provides, including Distinct Author Sets and ResearcherID-which reflect a combination of automated clustering and author participation-as well as the use of other data types, such as grants and patents, to expand the universe of author identification. Industry-wide initiatives such as the Open Researcher and Contributor ID (ORCID) are also described. Future author-related developments in ResearcherID and Thomson Reuters Web of Knowledge are also included.
    Date
    28. 8.2015 16:54:01
  17. O'Neill, E.T.; Bennett, R.; Kammerer, K.: Using authorities to improve subject searches (2012) 0.01
    0.009584447 = product of:
      0.019168895 = sum of:
        0.013086946 = product of:
          0.026173891 = sum of:
            0.026173891 = weight(_text_:web in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026173891 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0060819495 = product of:
          0.030409746 = sum of:
            0.030409746 = weight(_text_:29 in 310) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030409746 = score(doc=310,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 310, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=310)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    29. 5.2015 20:57:41
    Source
    Beyond libraries - subject metadata in the digital environment and semantic web. IFLA Satellite Post-Conference, 17-18 August 2012, Tallinn
  18. Vukadin, A.: Development of a classification-oriented authority control : the experience of the National and University Library in Zagreb (2015) 0.01
    0.009584447 = product of:
      0.019168895 = sum of:
        0.013086946 = product of:
          0.026173891 = sum of:
            0.026173891 = weight(_text_:web in 2296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.026173891 = score(doc=2296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2296)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0060819495 = product of:
          0.030409746 = sum of:
            0.030409746 = weight(_text_:29 in 2296) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030409746 = score(doc=2296,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2296, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2296)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The paper presents experiences and challenges encountered during the planning and creation of the Universal Decimal Classification (UDC) authority database in the National and University Library in Zagreb, Croatia. The project started in 2014 with the objective of facilitating classification data management, improving the indexing consistency at the institutional level and the machine readability of data for eventual sharing and re-use in the Web environment. The paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of UDC, which is an analytico-synthetic classification scheme tending towards a more faceted structure, in regard to various aspects of authority control. This discussion represents the referential framework for the project. It determines the choice of elements to be included in the authority file, e.g. distinguishing between syntagmatic and paradigmatic combinations of subjects. It also determines the future lines of development, e.g. interlinking with the subject headings authority file in order to provide searching by verbal expressions.
    Source
    Classification and authority control: expanding resource discovery: proceedings of the International UDC Seminar 2015, 29-30 October 2015, Lisbon, Portugal. Eds.: Slavic, A. u. M.I. Cordeiro
  19. Niesner, S.: ¬Die Nutzung bibliothekarischer Normdaten im Web am Beispiel von VIAF und Wikipedia (2015) 0.01
    0.009253869 = product of:
      0.037015475 = sum of:
        0.037015475 = product of:
          0.07403095 = sum of:
            0.07403095 = weight(_text_:web in 1763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07403095 = score(doc=1763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.6119082 = fieldWeight in 1763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Bibliothekarische Normdaten für Personen lassen sich im Web sinnvoll einsetzen.
  20. Geißelmann, F.: Codes in Bibliothekskatalogen : Bericht über die Arbeitsgruppe Codes (2000) 0.01
    0.008756006 = product of:
      0.035024025 = sum of:
        0.035024025 = product of:
          0.07004805 = sum of:
            0.07004805 = weight(_text_:seiten in 5545) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07004805 = score(doc=5545,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20383513 = queryWeight, product of:
                  5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.34365052 = fieldWeight in 5545, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  5.4984083 = idf(docFreq=491, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5545)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Die Arbeitsgruppe Codes wurde von der Konferenz für Regelwerksfragen 1997 eingesetzt. Sie wird ihre Arbeit im ersten Halbjahr 2000 beenden. Bei einem Bericht über den Stand der Arbeiten kann kein Gesamtüberblick über die Probleme gegeben werden, da das Thema aus zu vielen Details besteht - acht Regelwerksparagraphen und dem Entwurf zu sechs Anlagen mit zusammen 40 Seiten; dazu kommen sieben Seiten Entwurf für Änderungen in MAB. Vielmehr soll hier auf die Grundsätze eingegangen werden, die der Arbeit zugrunde lagen. Zunächst eine Vorbemerkung: Das Thema Codes ist sicherlich ein ungeliebtes Thema. Die Zahl der Kollegen, die sich damit befassen wollen, ist nicht sehr groß und bei Spezialfragen bekommt man oft nur mit großer Mühe eine Antwort, auch ggf. von Einrichtungen, deren genuine Aufgabe gerade die Stellungnahme zu solchen Themen ist. Andere geben Entwürfe im Verbund sehr schnell weiter - in der Hoffnung bei irgend welchen Kollegen Kenntnisse zu den Entwürfen zu finden. Woher kommt diese Skepsis der Bibliothekare'? Zum einen sicherlich aus dem Zweifel, ob der postulierte Hauptzweck, dem Benutzer zusätzliche Möglichkeiten im Retrieval anzubieten, wirklich erreicht werden wird. Unsere OPACs haben noch zahlreiche andere Defizite - wann wird also die Suche mit Codes tatsächlich beim Benutzer ankommen'? Ein zweiter Punkt ist, dass es sich z.T. um sehr spezielle Materien handelt, die für eine eigene Stellungnahme Einarbeitung verlangen, also durchaus einen erheblichen Arbeitsaufwand. Zum dritten handelt es sich um eine sehr trockene Materie, so trocken, wie die Deutsche Bibliotheksstatistik. Jedermann hält deren Ergebnisse für dringend notwendig, wenn er eine zahlenmäßige Untermauerung von irgendwelchen Entscheidungen oder Argumentationen sucht. Die Beantwortung ist aber weder angenehm noch wird sie vermutlich unter den deutschen Bibliotheken auch nur einigermaßen gleichmäßig gehandhabt. Trotzdem ist die Statistik unvermeidlich und müsste durchaus noch differenzierter sein

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 67
  • d 27
  • a 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 86
  • el 12
  • b 2
  • m 2
  • r 1
  • s 1
  • More… Less…