Search (345 results, page 1 of 18)

  • × theme_ss:"Semantic Web"
  1. Stojanovic, N.: Ontology-based Information Retrieval : methods and tools for cooperative query answering (2005) 0.17
    0.1735557 = sum of:
      0.039253086 = product of:
        0.11775925 = sum of:
          0.11775925 = weight(_text_:3a in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.11775925 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.31429395 = queryWeight, product of:
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03707166 = queryNorm
              0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11775925 = weight(_text_:2f in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.11775925 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.31429395 = queryWeight, product of:
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03707166 = queryNorm
          0.3746787 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            8.478011 = idf(docFreq=24, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
      0.012338492 = product of:
        0.024676984 = sum of:
          0.024676984 = weight(_text_:web in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.024676984 = score(doc=701,freq=4.0), product of:
              0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03707166 = queryNorm
              0.2039694 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                  4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.004204865 = product of:
        0.021024324 = sum of:
          0.021024324 = weight(_text_:28 in 701) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.021024324 = score(doc=701,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03707166 = queryNorm
              0.15831517 = fieldWeight in 701, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=701)
        0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    By the explosion of possibilities for a ubiquitous content production, the information overload problem reaches the level of complexity which cannot be managed by traditional modelling approaches anymore. Due to their pure syntactical nature traditional information retrieval approaches did not succeed in treating content itself (i.e. its meaning, and not its representation). This leads to a very low usefulness of the results of a retrieval process for a user's task at hand. In the last ten years ontologies have been emerged from an interesting conceptualisation paradigm to a very promising (semantic) modelling technology, especially in the context of the Semantic Web. From the information retrieval point of view, ontologies enable a machine-understandable form of content description, such that the retrieval process can be driven by the meaning of the content. However, the very ambiguous nature of the retrieval process in which a user, due to the unfamiliarity with the underlying repository and/or query syntax, just approximates his information need in a query, implies a necessity to include the user in the retrieval process more actively in order to close the gap between the meaning of the content and the meaning of a user's query (i.e. his information need). This thesis lays foundation for such an ontology-based interactive retrieval process, in which the retrieval system interacts with a user in order to conceptually interpret the meaning of his query, whereas the underlying domain ontology drives the conceptualisation process. In that way the retrieval process evolves from a query evaluation process into a highly interactive cooperation between a user and the retrieval system, in which the system tries to anticipate the user's information need and to deliver the relevant content proactively. Moreover, the notion of content relevance for a user's query evolves from a content dependent artefact to the multidimensional context-dependent structure, strongly influenced by the user's preferences. This cooperation process is realized as the so-called Librarian Agent Query Refinement Process. In order to clarify the impact of an ontology on the retrieval process (regarding its complexity and quality), a set of methods and tools for different levels of content and query formalisation is developed, ranging from pure ontology-based inferencing to keyword-based querying in which semantics automatically emerges from the results. Our evaluation studies have shown that the possibilities to conceptualize a user's information need in the right manner and to interpret the retrieval results accordingly are key issues for realizing much more meaningful information retrieval systems.
    Content
    Vgl.: http%3A%2F%2Fdigbib.ubka.uni-karlsruhe.de%2Fvolltexte%2Fdocuments%2F1627&ei=tAtYUYrBNoHKtQb3l4GYBw&usg=AFQjCNHeaxKkKU3-u54LWxMNYGXaaDLCGw&sig2=8WykXWQoDKjDSdGtAakH2Q&bvm=bv.44442042,d.Yms.
    Date
    31. 3.2013 15:20:28
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  2. Schneider, R.: Web 3.0 ante portas? : Integration von Social Web und Semantic Web (2008) 0.03
    0.034588095 = product of:
      0.06917619 = sum of:
        0.04039561 = product of:
          0.08079122 = sum of:
            0.08079122 = weight(_text_:web in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08079122 = score(doc=4184,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.6677857 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.02878058 = product of:
          0.07195145 = sum of:
            0.03679257 = weight(_text_:28 in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03679257 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
            0.035158884 = weight(_text_:22 in 4184) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035158884 = score(doc=4184,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4184, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4184)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Das Medium Internet ist im Wandel, und mit ihm ändern sich seine Publikations- und Rezeptionsbedingungen. Welche Chancen bieten die momentan parallel diskutierten Zukunftsentwürfe von Social Web und Semantic Web? Zur Beantwortung dieser Frage beschäftigt sich der Beitrag mit den Grundlagen beider Modelle unter den Aspekten Anwendungsbezug und Technologie, beleuchtet darüber hinaus jedoch auch deren Unzulänglichkeiten sowie den Mehrwert einer mediengerechten Kombination. Am Beispiel des grammatischen Online-Informationssystems grammis wird eine Strategie zur integrativen Nutzung der jeweiligen Stärken skizziert.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 10:38:28
    Source
    Kommunikation, Partizipation und Wirkungen im Social Web, Band 1. Hrsg.: A. Zerfaß u.a
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  3. Faaborg, A.; Lagoze, C.: Semantic browsing (2003) 0.03
    0.033089824 = product of:
      0.06617965 = sum of:
        0.037399065 = product of:
          0.07479813 = sum of:
            0.07479813 = weight(_text_:web in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07479813 = score(doc=1026,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.02878058 = product of:
          0.07195145 = sum of:
            0.03679257 = weight(_text_:28 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03679257 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
            0.035158884 = weight(_text_:22 in 1026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035158884 = score(doc=1026,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1026, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1026)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    We have created software applications that allow users to both author and use Semantic Web metadata. To create and use a layer of semantic content on top of the existing Web, we have (1) implemented a user interface that expedites the task of attributing metadata to resources on the Web, and (2) augmented a Web browser to leverage this semantic metadata to provide relevant information and tasks to the user. This project provides a framework for annotating and reorganizing existing files, pages, and sites on the Web that is similar to Vannevar Bushrsquos original concepts of trail blazing and associative indexing.
    Date
    16.11.2008 16:26:28
    Source
    Research and advanced technology for digital libraries : 7th European Conference, proceedings / ECDL 2003, Trondheim, Norway, August 17-22, 2003
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  4. Hollink, L.; Assem, M. van: Estimating the relevance of search results in the Culture-Web : a study of semantic distance measures (2010) 0.03
    0.031739607 = product of:
      0.063479215 = sum of:
        0.03926084 = product of:
          0.07852168 = sum of:
            0.07852168 = weight(_text_:web in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07852168 = score(doc=4649,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.64902663 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.024218373 = product of:
          0.060545933 = sum of:
            0.030409746 = weight(_text_:29 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030409746 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
            0.030136187 = weight(_text_:22 in 4649) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030136187 = score(doc=4649,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4649, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4649)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    More and more cultural heritage institutions publish their collections, vocabularies and metadata on the Web. The resulting Web of linked cultural data opens up exciting new possibilities for searching and browsing through these cultural heritage collections. We report on ongoing work in which we investigate the estimation of relevance in this Web of Culture. We study existing measures of semantic distance and how they apply to two use cases. The use cases relate to the structured, multilingual and multimodal nature of the Culture Web. We distinguish between measures using the Web, such as Google distance and PMI, and measures using the Linked Data Web, i.e. the semantic structure of metadata vocabularies. We perform a small study in which we compare these semantic distance measures to human judgements of relevance. Although it is too early to draw any definitive conclusions, the study provides new insights into the applicability of semantic distance measures to the Web of Culture, and clear starting points for further research.
    Date
    29. 7.2011 14:44:56
    26.12.2011 13:40:22
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  5. Malmsten, M.: Making a library catalogue part of the Semantic Web (2008) 0.03
    0.029395489 = product of:
      0.058790978 = sum of:
        0.03053621 = product of:
          0.06107242 = sum of:
            0.06107242 = weight(_text_:web in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06107242 = score(doc=2640,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.028254768 = product of:
          0.07063692 = sum of:
            0.035478037 = weight(_text_:29 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035478037 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
            0.035158884 = weight(_text_:22 in 2640) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035158884 = score(doc=2640,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2640, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2640)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Library catalogues contain an enormous amount of structured, high-quality data, however, this data is generally not made available to semantic web applications. In this paper we describe the tools and techniques used to make the Swedish Union Catalogue (LIBRIS) part of the Semantic Web and Linked Data. The focus is on links to and between resources and the mechanisms used to make data available, rather than perfect description of the individual resources. We also present a method of creating links between records of the same work.
    Date
    20. 2.2009 10:29:39
    Source
    Metadata for semantic and social applications : proceedings of the International Conference on Dublin Core and Metadata Applications, Berlin, 22 - 26 September 2008, DC 2008: Berlin, Germany / ed. by Jane Greenberg and Wolfgang Klas
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  6. Blumauer, A.; Pellegrini, T.: Semantic Web Revisited : Eine kurze Einführung in das Social Semantic Web (2009) 0.03
    0.028835176 = product of:
      0.05767035 = sum of:
        0.050638575 = product of:
          0.10127715 = sum of:
            0.10127715 = weight(_text_:web in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.10127715 = score(doc=4855,freq=22.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.8371137 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
                  4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
                    22.0 = termFreq=22.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007031777 = product of:
          0.035158884 = sum of:
            0.035158884 = weight(_text_:22 in 4855) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035158884 = score(doc=4855,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 4855, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4855)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Während in den vergangenen Monaten Themen wie Web 2.0 und Social Software ein erstaunliches Konjunkturhoch erlebt haben, vollzieht sich weitgehend abseits der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung eine technologische Komplementärinnovation. Die wachsende Adaption semantischer Technologien zu Zwecken der strukturierten Erschließung von "Web 2.0 Content", aber auch der Einsatz von Social Software zur kollaborativen Anreicherung von Web Content mit maschinenlesbaren Metadaten sind Ausdruck eines Trends in Richtung "Social Semantic Web". Bezeichnendes Merkmal dieser Entwicklung ist die voranschreitende Konvergenz zwischen Social Software und Semantic Web Technologien. Dieser Beitrag hat das Ziel ein allgemeines Bewusstsein und Verständnis dieser Entwicklung zu schaffen und nähert sich dem Phänomen aus einer nichttechnischen Perspektive.
    Object
    Web 2.0
    Pages
    S.3-22
    Source
    Social Semantic Web: Web 2.0, was nun? Hrsg.: A. Blumauer u. T. Pellegrini
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  7. Aslam, S.; Sonkar, S.K.: Semantic Web : an overview (2019) 0.03
    0.028731618 = product of:
      0.057463236 = sum of:
        0.04935397 = product of:
          0.09870794 = sum of:
            0.09870794 = weight(_text_:web in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09870794 = score(doc=54,freq=16.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.8158776 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                  4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
                    16.0 = termFreq=16.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008109266 = product of:
          0.040546328 = sum of:
            0.040546328 = weight(_text_:29 in 54) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040546328 = score(doc=54,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 54, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=54)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper presents the semantic web, web writing content, web technology, goals of semantic and obligation for the expansion of web 3.0. This paper also shows the different components of semantic web and such as HTTP, HTML, XML, XML Schema, URI, RDF, Taxonomy and OWL. To provide valuable information services semantic web execute the benefits of library functions and also to be the best use of library collection are mention here.
    Date
    10.12.2020 9:29:12
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  8. Best Practice Recipes for Publishing RDF Vocabularies (2008) 0.03
    0.027676687 = product of:
      0.055353373 = sum of:
        0.026445134 = product of:
          0.052890267 = sum of:
            0.052890267 = weight(_text_:web in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.052890267 = score(doc=4471,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.43716836 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.028908242 = product of:
          0.0722706 = sum of:
            0.03679257 = weight(_text_:28 in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03679257 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
            0.035478037 = weight(_text_:29 in 4471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035478037 = score(doc=4471,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 4471, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4471)
          0.4 = coord(2/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This document describes best practice recipes for publishing vocabularies or ontologies on the Web (in RDF Schema or OWL). The features of each recipe are described in detail, so that vocabulary designers may choose the recipe best suited to their needs. Each recipe introduces general principles and an example configuration for use with an Apache HTTP server (which may be adapted to other environments). The recipes are all designed to be consistent with the architecture of the Web as currently specified, although the associated example configurations have been kept intentionally simple.
    Date
    14. 8.2011 14:29:06
    Issue
    W3C Working Group Note 28 August 2008.
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  9. ¬The Semantic Web - ISWC 2010 : 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, Shanghai, China, November 7-11, 2010, Revised Selected Papers, Part 2. (2010) 0.03
    0.027522447 = product of:
      0.055044893 = sum of:
        0.049976602 = product of:
          0.099953204 = sum of:
            0.099953204 = weight(_text_:web in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.099953204 = score(doc=4706,freq=42.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.8261705 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
                  6.4807405 = tf(freq=42.0), with freq of:
                    42.0 = termFreq=42.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005068291 = product of:
          0.025341455 = sum of:
            0.025341455 = weight(_text_:29 in 4706) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.025341455 = score(doc=4706,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4706, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4706)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The two-volume set LNCS 6496 and 6497 constitutes the refereed proceedings of the 9th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2010, held in Shanghai, China, during November 7-11, 2010. Part I contains 51 papers out of 578 submissions to the research track. Part II contains 18 papers out of 66 submissions to the semantic Web in-use track, 6 papers out of 26 submissions to the doctoral consortium track, and also 4 invited talks. Each submitted paper were carefully reviewed. The International Semantic Web Conferences (ISWC) constitute the major international venue where the latest research results and technical innovations on all aspects of the Semantic Web are presented. ISWC brings together researchers, practitioners, and users from the areas of artificial intelligence, databases, social networks, distributed computing, Web engineering, information systems, natural language processing, soft computing, and human computer interaction to discuss the major challenges and proposed solutions, the success stories and failures, as well the visions that can advance research and drive innovation in the Semantic Web.
    Date
    29. 7.2011 14:44:56
    RSWK
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Subject
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Datenverwaltung / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Semantic Web / World Wide Web 2.0 / Kongress / Schanghai <2010>
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  10. Berners-Lee, T.; Hendler, J.; Lassila, O.: ¬The Semantic Web : a new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities (2001) 0.03
    0.02687987 = product of:
      0.05375974 = sum of:
        0.043623157 = product of:
          0.08724631 = sum of:
            0.08724631 = weight(_text_:web in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08724631 = score(doc=376,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.72114074 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010136582 = product of:
          0.05068291 = sum of:
            0.05068291 = weight(_text_:29 in 376) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.05068291 = score(doc=376,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 376, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=376)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Initialbeitrag zum sog. "Semantic Web". - Dt. Übersetzung: dt.: Mein Computer versteht mich. In: Spektrum der Wissenschaft, August 2001, S. 42-49
    Date
    31.12.1996 19:29:41
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  11. Aberer, K. et al.: ¬The Semantic Web : 6th International Semantic Web Conference, 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2007 + ASWC 2007, Busan, Korea, November 11-15, 2007 : proceedings (2007) 0.02
    0.024694571 = product of:
      0.049389143 = sum of:
        0.04533451 = product of:
          0.09066902 = sum of:
            0.09066902 = weight(_text_:web in 2477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.09066902 = score(doc=2477,freq=54.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.74943143 = fieldWeight in 2477, product of:
                  7.3484693 = tf(freq=54.0), with freq of:
                    54.0 = termFreq=54.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2477)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.004054633 = product of:
          0.020273164 = sum of:
            0.020273164 = weight(_text_:29 in 2477) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.020273164 = score(doc=2477,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.15546128 = fieldWeight in 2477, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=2477)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the joint 6th International Semantic Web Conference, ISWC 2007, and the 2nd Asian Semantic Web Conference, ASWC 2007, held in Busan, Korea, in November 2007. The 50 revised full academic papers and 12 revised application papers presented together with 5 Semantic Web Challenge papers and 12 selected doctoral consortium articles were carefully reviewed and selected from a total of 257 submitted papers to the academic track and 29 to the applications track. The papers address all current issues in the field of the semantic Web, ranging from theoretical and foundational aspects to various applied topics such as management of semantic Web data, ontologies, semantic Web architecture, social semantic Web, as well as applications of the semantic Web. Short descriptions of the top five winning applications submitted to the Semantic Web Challenge competition conclude the volume.
    LCSH
    Semantic Web / Congresses
    Web site development / Congresses
    RSWK
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Semantic Web / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Semantic Web / Metadatenmodell / Data Mining / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Subject
    Semantic Web / Congresses
    Web site development / Congresses
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Semantic Web / Wissensmanagement / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Semantic Web / Anwendungssystem / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Semantic Web / Metadatenmodell / Data Mining / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Pusan <2007> (BVB)
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  12. Padmavathi, T.; Krishnamurthy, M.: Semantic Web tools and techniques for knowledge organization : an overview (2017) 0.02
    0.02374561 = product of:
      0.04749122 = sum of:
        0.04039561 = product of:
          0.08079122 = sum of:
            0.08079122 = weight(_text_:web in 3618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08079122 = score(doc=3618,freq=14.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.6677857 = fieldWeight in 3618, product of:
                  3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
                    14.0 = termFreq=14.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3618)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0070956075 = product of:
          0.035478037 = sum of:
            0.035478037 = weight(_text_:29 in 3618) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.035478037 = score(doc=3618,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3618, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3618)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The enormous amount of information generated every day and spread across the web is diversified in nature far beyond human consumption. To overcome this difficulty, the transformation of current unstructured information into a structured form called a "Semantic Web" was proposed by Tim Berners-Lee in 1989 to enable computers to understand and interpret the information they store. The aim of the semantic web is the integration of heterogeneous and distributed data spread across the web for knowledge discovery. The core of sematic web technologies includes knowledge representation languages RDF and OWL, ontology editors and reasoning tools, and ontology query languages such as SPARQL have also been discussed.
    Date
    29. 9.2017 18:30:57
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  13. Matthews, B.M.: Integration via meaning : using the Semantic Web to deliver Web services (2002) 0.02
    0.023733255 = product of:
      0.04746651 = sum of:
        0.04138456 = product of:
          0.08276912 = sum of:
            0.08276912 = weight(_text_:web in 3609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08276912 = score(doc=3609,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.6841342 = fieldWeight in 3609, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3609)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0060819495 = product of:
          0.030409746 = sum of:
            0.030409746 = weight(_text_:29 in 3609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030409746 = score(doc=3609,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 3609, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3609)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    The major developments ofthe World-Wide Web (WWW) in the last two years have been Web Services and the Semantic Web. The former allows the construction of distributed systems across the WWW by providing a lightweight middleware architecture. The latter provides an infrastructure for accessing resources an the WWW via their relationships with respect to conceptual descriptions. In this paper, I shall review the progress undertaken in each of these two areas. Further, I shall argue that in order for the aims of both the Semantic Web and the Web Services activities to be successful, then the Web Service architecture needs to be augmented by concepts and tools of the Semantic Web. This infrastructure will allow resource discovery, brokering and access to be enabled in a standardised, integrated and interoperable manner. Finally, I survey the CLRC Information Technology R&D programme to show how it is contributing to the development of this future infrastructure.
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  14. ¬The Semantic Web : research and applications ; second European Semantic WebConference, ESWC 2005, Heraklion, Crete, Greece, May 29 - June 1, 2005 ; proceedings (2005) 0.02
    0.023733255 = product of:
      0.04746651 = sum of:
        0.04138456 = product of:
          0.08276912 = sum of:
            0.08276912 = weight(_text_:web in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08276912 = score(doc=439,freq=20.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.6841342 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
                  4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
                    20.0 = termFreq=20.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0060819495 = product of:
          0.030409746 = sum of:
            0.030409746 = weight(_text_:29 in 439) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030409746 = score(doc=439,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 439, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=439)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This book constitutes the refereed proceedings of the Second European Semantic Web Conference, ESWC 2005, heldin Heraklion, Crete, Greece in May/June 2005. The 48 revised full papers presented were carefully reviewed and selected from 148 submissions. The papers are organized in topical sections on semantic Web services, languages, ontologies, reasoning and querying, search and information retrieval, user and communities, natural language for the semantic Web, annotation tools, and semantic Web applications.
    RSWK
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
    Subject
    Semantic Web / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
    Semantic Web / Ontologie <Wissensverarbeitung> / Kongress / Iraklion <2005>
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  15. Tennis, J.T.: Scheme versioning in the Semantic Web (2006) 0.02
    0.0235635 = product of:
      0.047127 = sum of:
        0.039017737 = product of:
          0.078035474 = sum of:
            0.078035474 = weight(_text_:web in 4939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078035474 = score(doc=4939,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.6450079 = fieldWeight in 4939, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4939)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008109266 = product of:
          0.040546328 = sum of:
            0.040546328 = weight(_text_:29 in 4939) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040546328 = score(doc=4939,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4939, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4939)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This paper describes a conceptual framework and methodology for managing scheme versioning for the Semantic Web. The first part of the paper introduces the concept of vocabulary encoding schemes, distinguished from metadata schemas, and discusses the characteristics of changes in schemes. The paper then presents a proposal to use a value record-similar to a term record in thesaurus management techniques-to manage scheme versioning challenges for the Semantic Web. The conclusion identifies future research directions.
    Date
    23.12.2007 10:14:29
    Footnote
    Simultaneously published as Knitting the Semantic Web
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  16. Eckert, K.: SKOS: eine Sprache für die Übertragung von Thesauri ins Semantic Web (2011) 0.02
    0.023527026 = product of:
      0.047054052 = sum of:
        0.039017737 = product of:
          0.078035474 = sum of:
            0.078035474 = weight(_text_:web in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078035474 = score(doc=4331,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.6450079 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008036317 = product of:
          0.040181585 = sum of:
            0.040181585 = weight(_text_:22 in 4331) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040181585 = score(doc=4331,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4331, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4331)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Das Semantic Web - bzw. Linked Data - hat das Potenzial, die Verfügbarkeit von Daten und Wissen, sowie den Zugriff darauf zu revolutionieren. Einen großen Beitrag dazu können Wissensorganisationssysteme wie Thesauri leisten, die die Daten inhaltlich erschließen und strukturieren. Leider sind immer noch viele dieser Systeme lediglich in Buchform oder in speziellen Anwendungen verfügbar. Wie also lassen sie sich für das Semantic Web nutzen? Das Simple Knowledge Organization System (SKOS) bietet eine Möglichkeit, die Wissensorganisationssysteme in eine Form zu "übersetzen", die im Web zitiert und mit anderen Resourcen verknüpft werden kann.
    Date
    15. 3.2011 19:21:22
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  17. OWL Web Ontology Language Test Cases (2004) 0.02
    0.023527026 = product of:
      0.047054052 = sum of:
        0.039017737 = product of:
          0.078035474 = sum of:
            0.078035474 = weight(_text_:web in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.078035474 = score(doc=4685,freq=10.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.6450079 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                  3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                    10.0 = termFreq=10.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.008036317 = product of:
          0.040181585 = sum of:
            0.040181585 = weight(_text_:22 in 4685) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.040181585 = score(doc=4685,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4685, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4685)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This document contains and presents test cases for the Web Ontology Language (OWL) approved by the Web Ontology Working Group. Many of the test cases illustrate the correct usage of the Web Ontology Language (OWL), and the formal meaning of its constructs. Other test cases illustrate the resolution of issues considered by the Working Group. Conformance for OWL documents and OWL document checkers is specified.
    Date
    14. 8.2011 13:33:22
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  18. Spinning the Semantic Web : bringing the World Wide Web to its full potential (2003) 0.02
    0.023026204 = product of:
      0.046052407 = sum of:
        0.042504605 = product of:
          0.08500921 = sum of:
            0.08500921 = weight(_text_:web in 1981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08500921 = score(doc=1981,freq=62.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.70264983 = fieldWeight in 1981, product of:
                  7.8740077 = tf(freq=62.0), with freq of:
                    62.0 = termFreq=62.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1981)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0035478037 = product of:
          0.017739018 = sum of:
            0.017739018 = weight(_text_:29 in 1981) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017739018 = score(doc=1981,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13040651 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.13602862 = fieldWeight in 1981, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1981)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    As the World Wide Web continues to expand, it becomes increasingly difficult for users to obtain information efficiently. Because most search engines read format languages such as HTML or SGML, search results reflect formatting tags more than actual page content, which is expressed in natural language. Spinning the Semantic Web describes an exciting new type of hierarchy and standardization that will replace the current "Web of links" with a "Web of meaning." Using a flexible set of languages and tools, the Semantic Web will make all available information - display elements, metadata, services, images, and especially content - accessible. The result will be an immense repository of information accessible for a wide range of new applications. This first handbook for the Semantic Web covers, among other topics, software agents that can negotiate and collect information, markup languages that can tag many more types of information in a document, and knowledge systems that enable machines to read Web pages and determine their reliability. The truly interdisciplinary Semantic Web combines aspects of artificial intelligence, markup languages, natural language processing, information retrieval, knowledge representation, intelligent agents, and databases.
    Content
    Inhalt: Tim Bemers-Lee: The Original Dream - Re-enter Machines - Where Are We Now? - The World Wide Web Consortium - Where Is the Web Going Next? / Dieter Fensel, James Hendler, Henry Lieberman, and Wolfgang Wahlster: Why Is There a Need for the Semantic Web and What Will It Provide? - How the Semantic Web Will Be Possible / Jeff Heflin, James Hendler, and Sean Luke: SHOE: A Blueprint for the Semantic Web / Deborah L. McGuinness, Richard Fikes, Lynn Andrea Stein, and James Hendler: DAML-ONT: An Ontology Language for the Semantic Web / Michel Klein, Jeen Broekstra, Dieter Fensel, Frank van Harmelen, and Ian Horrocks: Ontologies and Schema Languages on the Web / Borys Omelayenko, Monica Crubezy, Dieter Fensel, Richard Benjamins, Bob Wielinga, Enrico Motta, Mark Musen, and Ying Ding: UPML: The Language and Tool Support for Making the Semantic Web Alive / Deborah L. McGuinness: Ontologies Come of Age / Jeen Broekstra, Arjohn Kampman, and Frank van Harmelen: Sesame: An Architecture for Storing and Querying RDF Data and Schema Information / Rob Jasper and Mike Uschold: Enabling Task-Centered Knowledge Support through Semantic Markup / Yolanda Gil: Knowledge Mobility: Semantics for the Web as a White Knight for Knowledge-Based Systems / Sanjeev Thacker, Amit Sheth, and Shuchi Patel: Complex Relationships for the Semantic Web / Alexander Maedche, Steffen Staab, Nenad Stojanovic, Rudi Studer, and York Sure: SEmantic portAL: The SEAL Approach / Ora Lassila and Mark Adler: Semantic Gadgets: Ubiquitous Computing Meets the Semantic Web / Christopher Frye, Mike Plusch, and Henry Lieberman: Static and Dynamic Semantics of the Web / Masahiro Hori: Semantic Annotation for Web Content Adaptation / Austin Tate, Jeff Dalton, John Levine, and Alex Nixon: Task-Achieving Agents on the World Wide Web
    Date
    29. 3.1996 18:16:49
    LCSH
    Semantic Web
    World Wide Web
    RSWK
    Semantic Web
    Subject
    Semantic Web
    Semantic Web
    World Wide Web
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  19. Slimani, T.: Semantic annotation : the mainstay of Semantic Web (2013) 0.02
    0.02237879 = product of:
      0.04475758 = sum of:
        0.037399065 = product of:
          0.07479813 = sum of:
            0.07479813 = weight(_text_:web in 4307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07479813 = score(doc=4307,freq=12.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.6182494 = fieldWeight in 4307, product of:
                  3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                    12.0 = termFreq=12.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4307)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.007358514 = product of:
          0.03679257 = sum of:
            0.03679257 = weight(_text_:28 in 4307) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03679257 = score(doc=4307,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.13280044 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.27705154 = fieldWeight in 4307, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4307)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Given that semantic Web realization is based on the critical mass of metadata accessibility and the representation of data with formal knowledge, it needs to generate metadata that is specific, easy to understand and well-defined. However, semantic annotation of the web documents is the successful way to make the Semantic Web vision a reality. This paper introduces the Semantic Web and its vision (stack layers) with regard to some concept definitions that helps the understanding of semantic annotation. Additionally, this paper introduces the semantic annotation categories, tools, domains and models.
    Date
    18.12.2013 20:28:13
    Theme
    Semantic Web
  20. Dextre Clarke, S.G.: Challenges and opportunities for KOS standards (2007) 0.02
    0.022299882 = product of:
      0.044599764 = sum of:
        0.03053621 = product of:
          0.06107242 = sum of:
            0.06107242 = weight(_text_:web in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.06107242 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12098375 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.50479853 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.014063554 = product of:
          0.07031777 = sum of:
            0.07031777 = weight(_text_:22 in 4643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07031777 = score(doc=4643,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12981863 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03707166 = queryNorm
                0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 4643, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4643)
          0.2 = coord(1/5)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    22. 9.2007 15:41:14
    Theme
    Semantic Web

Years

Languages

  • e 255
  • d 87
  • f 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 213
  • el 89
  • m 56
  • s 23
  • x 14
  • n 11
  • r 5
  • More… Less…

Subjects

Classifications