Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × subject_ss:"Information science"
  1. Janich, P.: Was ist Information? : Kritik einer Legende (2006) 0.01
    0.008304101 = product of:
      0.07473691 = sum of:
        0.07473691 = weight(_text_:naturwissenschaften in 1639) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07473691 = score(doc=1639,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.18673773 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.4035826 = idf(docFreq=198, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029161446 = queryNorm
            0.4002239 = fieldWeight in 1639, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.4035826 = idf(docFreq=198, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1639)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Abstract
    Information ist ein allgegenwärtiger Begriff im Alltag, in den Wissenschaften und in der Philosophie. Heute wird er immer mehr von den Naturwissenschaften als ureigenster Gegenstand reklamiert: Er wird »naturalisiert«. Das Buch zeichnet den Weg nach, wie aus Physik und Mathematik Auffassungen entstehen, die über die Wissenschaftstheorie und die Sprachphilosophie zur Grundlage der Nachrichtentechnik und der Kybernetik werden, um schließlich bei der »Erbinformation« und anderen Naturgegenständen zu landen. So entsteht eine mißverstandene Form des Körper-Geist- Problems: Wie kommen technische Objekte, aber auch Moleküle im menschlichen Genom zu Eigenschaften, die ursprünglich der menschlichen Sprache vorbehalten waren? Dieses Buch korrigiert Mißverständnisse, weist heute übliche Ausdrucksweisen als (teilweise irrtümliche) Metaphern aus und rekonstruiert das menschliche Handeln und Sprechen als Grundlage von technischen und natürlichen Formen der Informationsverarbeitung.
    Content
    Inhalt: 1 Information und Legende 2 Erblasten - Wer hat die Naturwissenschaften naturalisiert? - Wer hat die Theorie formalisiert? - Wer hat die Kommunikation mechanisiert? 3 Dogmengeschichten - Semiotik (Zeichentheorie) - Kybernetik (Maschinentheorie) - Politik (Erfolgstheorie) - Die Pfade des Irrtums 4 Informationsbegriffe heute - Der Nachrichtenkomplex - Das Geschwätz der Moleküle und Neuronen - Das Geistlose in der Maschine 5 Methodische Reparaturen - Üblichkeiten und Zwecke als Investition - Für Reden verantwortlich - Kommunizieren und Informieren, terminologisch - Leistungsgleichheit und technische Imitation - Modelle des Natürlichen 6 Konsequenzen
  2. Warner, J.: Humanizing information technology (2004) 0.00
    0.0046188007 = product of:
      0.041569207 = sum of:
        0.041569207 = weight(_text_:revolution in 438) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041569207 = score(doc=438,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.17616124 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.0408955 = idf(docFreq=285, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029161446 = queryNorm
            0.23597248 = fieldWeight in 438, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              6.0408955 = idf(docFreq=285, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=438)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Footnote
    Like Daniel Bell, the author of The Coming of Post-Industrial Society (1973), who used aspects of Marx's thinking as the basis for his social forecasting models, Warner uses Marxist thought as a tool for social and historical analysis. Unlike Bell, Warner's approach to Marx tends to be doctrinaire. As a result, "An Information View of History" and "Origins of the Human Brain," two of the essays in which Warner sets out to establish the connections between information science and information technology, are less successful. Warner argues, "the classic source for an understanding of technology as a human construction is Marx," and that "a Marxian perspective an information technology could be of high marginal Utility," noting additionally that with the exception of Norbert Wiener and John Desmond Bernal, "there has only been a limited penetration of Marxism into information science" (p. 9). But Warner's efforts to persuade the reader that these views are cogent never go beyond academic protocol. Nor does his support for the assertion that the second half of the 19th century was the critical period for innovation and diffusion of modern information technologies. The closing essay, "Whither Information Science?" is particularly disappointing, in part, because the preface and opening chapters of the book promised more than was delivered at the end. Warner asserts that the theoretical framework supporting information science is negligible, and that the discipline is limited even further by the fact that many of its members do not recognize or understand the effects of such a limitation. However cogent the charges may be, none of this is news. But the essay fails most notably because Warner does not have any new directions to offer, save that information scientists should pay closer artention to what is going an in allied disciplines. Moreover, he does not seem to understand that at its heart the "information revolution" is not about the machines, but about the growing legions of men and women who can and do write programming code to exert control over and find new uses for these devices. Nor does he seem to understand that information science, in the grip of what he terms a "quasi-global crisis," suffers grievously because it is a community situated not at the center but rather an the periphery of this revolution."
  3. Bedford, D.: Knowledge architectures : structures and semantics (2021) 0.00
    5.853294E-4 = product of:
      0.0052679647 = sum of:
        0.0052679647 = product of:
          0.015803894 = sum of:
            0.015803894 = weight(_text_:22 in 566) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015803894 = score(doc=566,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.10211842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029161446 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 566, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=566)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Content
    Section 1 Context and purpose of knowledge architecture -- 1 Making the case for knowledge architecture -- 2 The landscape of knowledge assets -- 3 Knowledge architecture and design -- 4 Knowledge architecture reference model -- 5 Knowledge architecture segments -- Section 2 Designing for availability -- 6 Knowledge object modeling -- 7 Knowledge structures for encoding, formatting, and packaging -- 8 Functional architecture for identification and distinction -- 9 Functional architectures for knowledge asset disposition and destruction -- 10 Functional architecture designs for knowledge preservation and conservation -- Section 3 Designing for accessibility -- 11 Functional architectures for knowledge seeking and discovery -- 12 Functional architecture for knowledge search -- 13 Functional architecture for knowledge categorization -- 14 Functional architectures for indexing and keywording -- 15 Functional architecture for knowledge semantics -- 16 Functional architecture for knowledge abstraction and surrogation -- Section 4 Functional architectures to support knowledge consumption -- 17 Functional architecture for knowledge augmentation, derivation, and synthesis -- 18 Functional architecture to manage risk and harm -- 19 Functional architectures for knowledge authentication and provenance -- 20 Functional architectures for securing knowledge assets -- 21 Functional architectures for authorization and asset management -- Section 5 Pulling it all together - the big picture knowledge architecture -- 22 Functional architecture for knowledge metadata and metainformation -- 23 The whole knowledge architecture - pulling it all together
  4. Covert and overt : recollecting and connecting intelligence service and information science (2005) 0.00
    4.138904E-4 = product of:
      0.0037250137 = sum of:
        0.0037250137 = product of:
          0.011175041 = sum of:
            0.011175041 = weight(_text_:22 in 69) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011175041 = score(doc=69,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.10211842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029161446 = queryNorm
                0.109432176 = fieldWeight in 69, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=69)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.11111111 = coord(1/9)
    
    Classification
    327.12 22
    DDC
    327.12 22

Languages

Types