-
Bookstein, A.: Informetric distributions : I. Unified overview (1990)
0.03
0.025665602 = product of:
0.10266241 = sum of:
0.10266241 = product of:
0.1539936 = sum of:
0.077344686 = weight(_text_:29 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.077344686 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.07664892 = weight(_text_:22 in 6902) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07664892 = score(doc=6902,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6902, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6902)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 7.2006 18:55:29
-
Lawrence, S.: Online or Invisible? (2001)
0.02
0.023206295 = product of:
0.09282518 = sum of:
0.09282518 = sum of:
0.04934673 = weight(_text_:online in 1063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04934673 = score(doc=1063,freq=18.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 1063, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1063)
0.04347845 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 1063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04347845 = score(doc=1063,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.21806103 = fieldWeight in 1063, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1063)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Articles freely available online are more highly cited. For greater impact and faster scientific progress, authors and publishers should aim to make research easy to access.
- Content
- The volume of scientific literature typically far exceeds the ability of scientists to identify and utilize all relevant information in their research. Improvements to the accessibility of scientific literature, allowing scientists to locate more relevant research within a given time, have the potential to dramatically improve communication and progress in science. With the web, scientists now have very convenient access to an increasing amount of literature that previously required trips to the library, inter-library loan delays, or substantial effort in locating the source. Evidence shows that usage increases when access is more convenient, and maximizing the usage of the scientific record benefits all of society. Although availability varies greatly by discipline, over a million research articles are freely available on the web. Some journals and conferences provide free access online, others allow authors to post articles on the web, and others allow authors to purchase the right to post their articles on the web. In this article we investigate the impact of free online availability by analyzing citation rates. We do not discuss methods of creating free online availability, such as time-delayed release or publication/membership/conference charges. Online availability of an article may not be expected to greatly improve access and impact by itself. For example, efficient means of locating articles via web search engines or specialized search services is required, and a substantial percentage of the literature needs to be indexed by these search services before it is worthwhile for many scientists to use them. Computer science is a forerunner in web availability -- a substantial percentage of the literature is online and available through search engines such as Google (google.com), or specialized services such as ResearchIndex (researchindex.org). Even so, the greatest impact of the online availability of computer science literature is likely yet to come, because comprehensive search services and more powerful search methods have only become available recently. We analyzed 119,924 conference articles in computer science and related disciplines, obtained from DBLP (dblp.uni-trier.de). In computer science, conference articles are typically formal publications and are often more prestigious than journal articles, with acceptance rates at some conferences below 10%. Citation counts and online availability were estimated using ResearchIndex. The analysis excludes self-citations, where a citation is considered to be a self-citation if one or more of the citing and cited authors match.
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Maflahi, N.; Thelwall, M.: How quickly do publications get read? : the evolution of mendeley reader counts for new articles (2018)
0.02
0.020856475 = product of:
0.0834259 = sum of:
0.0834259 = sum of:
0.029077841 = weight(_text_:online in 4015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.029077841 = score(doc=4015,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.23710167 = fieldWeight in 4015, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4015)
0.054348063 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 4015) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054348063 = score(doc=4015,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27257627 = fieldWeight in 4015, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4015)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Abstract
- Within science, citation counts are widely used to estimate research impact but publication delays mean that they are not useful for recent research. This gap can be filled by Mendeley reader counts, which are valuable early impact indicators for academic articles because they appear before citations and correlate strongly with them. Nevertheless, it is not known how Mendeley readership counts accumulate within the year of publication, and so it is unclear how soon they can be used. In response, this paper reports a longitudinal weekly study of the Mendeley readers of articles in 6 library and information science journals from 2016. The results suggest that Mendeley readers accrue from when articles are first available online and continue to steadily build. For journals with large publication delays, articles can already have substantial numbers of readers by their publication date. Thus, Mendeley reader counts may even be useful as early impact indicators for articles before they have been officially published in a journal issue. If field normalized indicators are needed, then these can be generated when journal issues are published using the online first date.
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Walters, W.H.; Linvill, A.C.: Bibliographic index coverage of open-access journals in six subject areas (2011)
0.02
0.01814945 = product of:
0.0362989 = sum of:
0.027174031 = product of:
0.054348063 = sum of:
0.054348063 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054348063 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27257627 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009124871 = product of:
0.027374614 = sum of:
0.027374614 = weight(_text_:22 in 4635) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027374614 = score(doc=4635,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4635, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4635)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- We investigate the extent to which open-access (OA) journals and articles in biology, computer science, economics, history, medicine, and psychology are indexed in each of 11 bibliographic databases. We also look for variations in index coverage by journal subject, journal size, publisher type, publisher size, date of first OA issue, region of publication, language of publication, publication fee, and citation impact factor. Two databases, Biological Abstracts and PubMed, provide very good coverage of the OA journal literature, indexing 60 to 63% of all OA articles in their disciplines. Five databases provide moderately good coverage (22-41%), and four provide relatively poor coverage (0-12%). OA articles in biology journals, English-only journals, high-impact journals, and journals that charge publication fees of $1,000 or more are especially likely to be indexed. Conversely, articles from OA publishers in Africa, Asia, or Central/South America are especially unlikely to be indexed. Four of the 11 databases index commercially published articles at a substantially higher rate than articles published by universities, scholarly societies, nonprofit publishers, or governments. Finally, three databases-EBSCO Academic Search Complete, ProQuest Research Library, and Wilson OmniFile-provide less comprehensive coverage of OA articles than of articles in comparable subscription journals.
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Moed, H.F.; Halevi, G.: On full text download and citation distributions in scientific-scholarly journals (2016)
0.02
0.01814945 = product of:
0.0362989 = sum of:
0.027174031 = product of:
0.054348063 = sum of:
0.054348063 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054348063 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27257627 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009124871 = product of:
0.027374614 = sum of:
0.027374614 = weight(_text_:22 in 2646) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027374614 = score(doc=2646,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2646, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2646)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2016 14:11:17
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Ortega, J.L.: ¬The presence of academic journals on Twitter and its relationship with dissemination (tweets) and research impact (citations) (2017)
0.02
0.01814945 = product of:
0.0362989 = sum of:
0.027174031 = product of:
0.054348063 = sum of:
0.054348063 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054348063 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27257627 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009124871 = product of:
0.027374614 = sum of:
0.027374614 = weight(_text_:22 in 4410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027374614 = score(doc=4410,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4410, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4410)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Sotudeh, H.; Horri, A.: ¬The citation performance of open access journals : a disciplinary investigation of citation distribution models (2007)
0.02
0.01630442 = product of:
0.06521768 = sum of:
0.06521768 = product of:
0.13043536 = sum of:
0.13043536 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 4479) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.13043536 = score(doc=4479,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.6541831 = fieldWeight in 4479, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4479)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005)
0.02
0.015590616 = product of:
0.031181231 = sum of:
0.01644891 = product of:
0.03289782 = sum of:
0.03289782 = weight(_text_:online in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03289782 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.014732323 = product of:
0.044196967 = sum of:
0.044196967 = weight(_text_:29 in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044196967 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- It has been shown (Lawrence, S. (2001). Online or invisible? Nature, 411, 521) that journal articles which have been posted without charge on the internet are more heavily cited than those which have not been. Using data from the NASA Astrophysics Data System (ads.harvard.edu) and from the ArXiv e-print archive at Cornell University (arXiv.org) we examine the causes of this effect.
- Date
- 27.12.2007 17:16:29
-
Ohly, P.: Dimensions of globality : a bibliometric analysis (2016)
0.01
0.014666058 = product of:
0.058664232 = sum of:
0.058664232 = product of:
0.08799635 = sum of:
0.044196967 = weight(_text_:29 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.044196967 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.04379938 = weight(_text_:22 in 4942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04379938 = score(doc=4942,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4942, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4942)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2019 11:22:31
- Source
- Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society : proceedings of the Fourteenth International ISKO Conference 27-29 September 2016, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil / organized by International Society for Knowledge Organization (ISKO), ISKO-Brazil, São Paulo State University ; edited by José Augusto Chaves Guimarães, Suellen Oliveira Milani, Vera Dodebei
-
Costas, R.; Perianes-Rodríguez, A.; Ruiz-Castillo, J.: On the quest for currencies of science : field "exchange rates" for citations and Mendeley readership (2017)
0.01
0.014519561 = product of:
0.029039122 = sum of:
0.021739226 = product of:
0.04347845 = sum of:
0.04347845 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04347845 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.21806103 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.0072998973 = product of:
0.02189969 = sum of:
0.02189969 = weight(_text_:22 in 4051) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02189969 = score(doc=4051,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 4051, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=4051)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
-
Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009)
0.01
0.013911052 = product of:
0.027822103 = sum of:
0.0123366825 = product of:
0.024673365 = sum of:
0.024673365 = weight(_text_:online in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024673365 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.015485421 = product of:
0.046456262 = sum of:
0.046456262 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.046456262 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This article challenges recent research (Evans, 2008) reporting that the concentration of cited scientific literature increases with the online availability of articles and journals. Using Thomson Reuters' Web of Science, the present article analyses changes in the concentration of citations received (2- and 5-year citation windows) by papers published between 1900 and 2005. Three measures of concentration are used: the percentage of papers that received at least one citation (cited papers); the percentage of papers needed to account for 20%, 50%, and 80% of the citations; and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI). These measures are used for four broad disciplines: natural sciences and engineering, medical fields, social sciences, and the humanities. All these measures converge and show that, contrary to what was reported by Evans, the dispersion of citations is actually increasing.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 19:22:35
-
Neth, M.: Citation analysis and the Web (1998)
0.01
0.012832801 = product of:
0.051331203 = sum of:
0.051331203 = product of:
0.0769968 = sum of:
0.038672343 = weight(_text_:29 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038672343 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.03832446 = weight(_text_:22 in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03832446 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 1.1999 16:22:37
- Source
- Art documentation. 17(1998) no.1, S.29-33
-
Burrell, Q.L.: Predicting future citation behavior (2003)
0.01
0.012832801 = product of:
0.051331203 = sum of:
0.051331203 = product of:
0.0769968 = sum of:
0.038672343 = weight(_text_:29 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038672343 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.03832446 = weight(_text_:22 in 3837) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03832446 = score(doc=3837,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 3837, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3837)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 29. 3.2003 19:22:48
-
Tonta, Y.: Scholarly communication and the use of networked information sources (1996)
0.01
0.011643264 = product of:
0.023286529 = sum of:
0.0123366825 = product of:
0.024673365 = sum of:
0.024673365 = weight(_text_:online in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.024673365 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.010949845 = product of:
0.032849535 = sum of:
0.032849535 = weight(_text_:22 in 6389) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032849535 = score(doc=6389,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 6389, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6389)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- Examines the use of networked information sources in scholarly communication. Networked information sources are defined broadly to cover: documents and images stored on electronic network hosts; data files; newsgroups; listservs; online information services and electronic periodicals. Reports results of a survey to determine how heavily, if at all, networked information sources are cited in scholarly printed periodicals published in 1993 and 1994. 27 printed periodicals, representing a wide range of subjects and the most influential periodicals in their fields, were identified through the Science Citation Index and Social Science Citation Index Journal Citation Reports. 97 articles were selected for further review and references, footnotes and bibliographies were checked for references to networked information sources. Only 2 articles were found to contain such references. Concludes that, although networked information sources facilitate scholars' work to a great extent during the research process, scholars have yet to incorporate such sources in the bibliographies of their published articles
- Source
- IFLA journal. 22(1996) no.3, S.240-245
-
Haycock, L.A.: Citation analysis of education dissertations for collection development (2004)
0.01
0.010999544 = product of:
0.043998174 = sum of:
0.043998174 = product of:
0.06599726 = sum of:
0.033147726 = weight(_text_:29 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033147726 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
0.032849535 = weight(_text_:22 in 135) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032849535 = score(doc=135,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 135, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=135)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 10. 9.2000 17:38:22
17.12.2006 19:44:29
-
Huang, M.-H.; Huang, W.-T.; Chang, C.-C.; Chen, D. Z.; Lin, C.-P.: The greater scattering phenomenon beyond Bradford's law in patent citation (2014)
0.01
0.010999544 = product of:
0.043998174 = sum of:
0.043998174 = product of:
0.06599726 = sum of:
0.033147726 = weight(_text_:29 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.033147726 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.032849535 = weight(_text_:22 in 1352) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032849535 = score(doc=1352,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 1352, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1352)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Date
- 22. 8.2014 17:11:29
-
Leydesdorff, L.; Bornmann, L.: How fractional counting of citations affects the impact factor : normalization in terms of differences in citation potentials among fields of science (2011)
0.01
0.00970272 = product of:
0.01940544 = sum of:
0.010280568 = product of:
0.020561136 = sum of:
0.020561136 = weight(_text_:online in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020561136 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009124871 = product of:
0.027374614 = sum of:
0.027374614 = weight(_text_:22 in 4186) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027374614 = score(doc=4186,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4186, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4186)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- The Impact Factors (IFs) of the Institute for Scientific Information suffer from a number of drawbacks, among them the statistics-Why should one use the mean and not the median?-and the incomparability among fields of science because of systematic differences in citation behavior among fields. Can these drawbacks be counteracted by fractionally counting citation weights instead of using whole numbers in the numerators? (a) Fractional citation counts are normalized in terms of the citing sources and thus would take into account differences in citation behavior among fields of science. (b) Differences in the resulting distributions can be tested statistically for their significance at different levels of aggregation. (c) Fractional counting can be generalized to any document set including journals or groups of journals, and thus the significance of differences among both small and large sets can be tested. A list of fractionally counted IFs for 2008 is available online at http:www.leydesdorff.net/weighted_if/weighted_if.xls The between-group variance among the 13 fields of science identified in the U.S. Science and Engineering Indicators is no longer statistically significant after this normalization. Although citation behavior differs largely between disciplines, the reflection of these differences in fractionally counted citation distributions can not be used as a reliable instrument for the classification.
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 12:51:07
-
Wang, S.; Ma, Y.; Mao, J.; Bai, Y.; Liang, Z.; Li, G.: Quantifying scientific breakthroughs by a novel disruption indicator based on knowledge entities : On the rise of scrape-and-report scholarship in online reviews research (2023)
0.01
0.00970272 = product of:
0.01940544 = sum of:
0.010280568 = product of:
0.020561136 = sum of:
0.020561136 = weight(_text_:online in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020561136 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009124871 = product of:
0.027374614 = sum of:
0.027374614 = weight(_text_:22 in 882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027374614 = score(doc=882,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 882, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=882)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Date
- 22. 1.2023 18:37:33
-
Asubiaro, T.V.; Onaolapo, S.: ¬A comparative study of the coverage of African journals in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef (2023)
0.01
0.00970272 = product of:
0.01940544 = sum of:
0.010280568 = product of:
0.020561136 = sum of:
0.020561136 = weight(_text_:online in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020561136 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.16765618 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.009124871 = product of:
0.027374614 = sum of:
0.027374614 = weight(_text_:22 in 992) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.027374614 = score(doc=992,freq=2.0), product of:
0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 992, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=992)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(2/4)
- Abstract
- This is the first study that evaluated the coverage of journals from Africa in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef. A list of active journals published in each of the 55 African countries was compiled from Ulrich's periodicals directory and African Journals Online (AJOL) website. Journal master lists for Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef were searched for the African journals. A total of 2,229 unique active African journals were identified from Ulrich (N = 2,117, 95.0%) and AJOL (N = 243, 10.9%) after removing duplicates. The volume of African journals in Web of Science and Scopus databases is 7.4% (N = 166) and 7.8% (N = 174), respectively, compared to the 45.6% (N = 1,017) covered in CrossRef. While making up only 17.% of all the African journals, South African journals had the best coverage in the two most authoritative databases, accounting for 73.5% and 62.1% of all the African journals in Web of Science and Scopus, respectively. In contrast, Nigeria published 44.5% of all the African journals. The distribution of the African journals is biased in favor of Medical, Life and Health Sciences and Humanities and the Arts in the three databases. The low representation of African journals in CrossRef, a free indexing infrastructure that could be harnessed for building an African-centric research indexing database, is concerning.
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 14:09:06
-
Zhao, D.: Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science : a comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals (2005)
0.01
0.009510912 = product of:
0.038043648 = sum of:
0.038043648 = product of:
0.076087296 = sum of:
0.076087296 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.076087296 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.040409453 = queryNorm
0.38160682 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
- Theme
- Elektronisches Publizieren
