Search (63 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Citation indexing"
  1. Pao, M.L.: Term and citation retrieval : a field study (1993) 0.02
    0.015590616 = product of:
      0.031181231 = sum of:
        0.01644891 = product of:
          0.03289782 = sum of:
            0.03289782 = weight(_text_:online in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03289782 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.014732323 = product of:
          0.044196967 = sum of:
            0.044196967 = weight(_text_:29 in 3741) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044196967 = score(doc=3741,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3741, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3741)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    Investigates the relative efficacy of searching by terms and by citations in searches collected in health science libraries. In pilot and field studies the odds that overlap items retrieved would be relevant or partially relevant were greatly improved. In the field setting citation searching was able to add average of 24% recall to traditional subject retrieval. Attempts to identify distinguishing characteristics in queries which might benefit most from additional citation searches proved inclusive. Online access of citation databases has been hampered by their high cost
    Source
    Information processing and management. 29(1993) no.1, S.95-112
  2. Kurtz, M.J.; Eichhorn, G.; Accomazzi, A.; Grant, C.; Demleitner, M.; Henneken, E.; Murray, S.S.: ¬The effect of use and access on citations (2005) 0.02
    0.015590616 = product of:
      0.031181231 = sum of:
        0.01644891 = product of:
          0.03289782 = sum of:
            0.03289782 = weight(_text_:online in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03289782 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.014732323 = product of:
          0.044196967 = sum of:
            0.044196967 = weight(_text_:29 in 1064) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.044196967 = score(doc=1064,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1064, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1064)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    It has been shown (Lawrence, S. (2001). Online or invisible? Nature, 411, 521) that journal articles which have been posted without charge on the internet are more heavily cited than those which have not been. Using data from the NASA Astrophysics Data System (ads.harvard.edu) and from the ArXiv e-print archive at Cornell University (arXiv.org) we examine the causes of this effect.
    Date
    27.12.2007 17:16:29
  3. H-Index auch im Web of Science (2008) 0.01
    0.014198275 = product of:
      0.02839655 = sum of:
        0.017446704 = product of:
          0.03489341 = sum of:
            0.03489341 = weight(_text_:online in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03489341 = score(doc=590,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.284522 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.010949845 = product of:
          0.032849535 = sum of:
            0.032849535 = weight(_text_:22 in 590) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032849535 = score(doc=590,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 590, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=590)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Content
    "Zur Kurzmitteilung "Latest enhancements in Scopus: ... h-Index incorporated in Scopus" in den letzten Online-Mitteilungen (Online-Mitteilungen 92, S.31) ist zu korrigieren, dass der h-Index sehr wohl bereits im Web of Science enthalten ist. Allerdings findet man/frau diese Information nicht in der "cited ref search", sondern neben der Trefferliste einer Quick Search, General Search oder einer Suche über den Author Finder in der rechten Navigationsleiste unter dem Titel "Citation Report". Der "Citation Report" bietet für die in der jeweiligen Trefferliste angezeigten Arbeiten: - Die Gesamtzahl der Zitierungen aller Arbeiten in der Trefferliste - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten - Die Anzahl der Zitierungen der einzelnen Arbeiten, aufgeschlüsselt nach Publikationsjahr der zitierenden Arbeiten - Die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit dieser Arbeiten pro Jahr - Den h-Index (ein h-Index von x sagt aus, dass x Arbeiten der Trefferliste mehr als x-mal zitiert wurden; er ist gegenüber sehr hohen Zitierungen einzelner Arbeiten unempfindlicher als die mittlere Zitationshäufigkeit)."
    Date
    6. 4.2008 19:04:22
  4. Larivière, V.; Gingras, Y.; Archambault, E.: ¬The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007 (2009) 0.01
    0.013911052 = product of:
      0.027822103 = sum of:
        0.0123366825 = product of:
          0.024673365 = sum of:
            0.024673365 = weight(_text_:online in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024673365 = score(doc=2763,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.015485421 = product of:
          0.046456262 = sum of:
            0.046456262 = weight(_text_:22 in 2763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046456262 = score(doc=2763,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 2763, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2763)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article challenges recent research (Evans, 2008) reporting that the concentration of cited scientific literature increases with the online availability of articles and journals. Using Thomson Reuters' Web of Science, the present article analyses changes in the concentration of citations received (2- and 5-year citation windows) by papers published between 1900 and 2005. Three measures of concentration are used: the percentage of papers that received at least one citation (cited papers); the percentage of papers needed to account for 20%, 50%, and 80% of the citations; and the Herfindahl-Hirschman index (HHI). These measures are used for four broad disciplines: natural sciences and engineering, medical fields, social sciences, and the humanities. All these measures converge and show that, contrary to what was reported by Evans, the dispersion of citations is actually increasing.
    Date
    22. 3.2009 19:22:35
  5. Gorraiz, J.: "Web of Science" versus "Scopus" oder das aktuelle Dilemma der Bibliotheken (2006) 0.01
    0.011692963 = product of:
      0.023385925 = sum of:
        0.0123366825 = product of:
          0.024673365 = sum of:
            0.024673365 = weight(_text_:online in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024673365 = score(doc=5021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.011049243 = product of:
          0.033147726 = sum of:
            0.033147726 = weight(_text_:29 in 5021) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.033147726 = score(doc=5021,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5021, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5021)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    4. 6.2006 17:36:29
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2006, Nr.85, S.25-30 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 59(2006) H.1]
  6. Zhao, D.: Challenges of scholarly publications on the Web to the evaluation of science : a comparison of author visibility on the Web and in print journals (2005) 0.01
    0.009510912 = product of:
      0.038043648 = sum of:
        0.038043648 = product of:
          0.076087296 = sum of:
            0.076087296 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 1065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.076087296 = score(doc=1065,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.38160682 = fieldWeight in 1065, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1065)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Theme
    Elektronisches Publizieren
  7. Wildner, B.: Web of Science - Scopus : Auf der Suche nach Zitierungen (2006) 0.01
    0.007762176 = product of:
      0.015524352 = sum of:
        0.008224455 = product of:
          0.01644891 = sum of:
            0.01644891 = weight(_text_:online in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.01644891 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.13412495 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.0072998973 = product of:
          0.02189969 = sum of:
            0.02189969 = weight(_text_:22 in 5034) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.02189969 = score(doc=5034,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 5034, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5034)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(2/4)
    
    Date
    4. 6.2006 17:22:15
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2006, Nr.85, S.18-20 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 59(2006) H.1]
  8. Nicolaisen, J.: Citation analysis (2007) 0.01
    0.0072998973 = product of:
      0.029199589 = sum of:
        0.029199589 = product of:
          0.08759876 = sum of:
            0.08759876 = weight(_text_:22 in 6091) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08759876 = score(doc=6091,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6091, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6091)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    13. 7.2008 19:53:22
  9. Døsen, K.: One more reference on self-reference (1992) 0.01
    0.0072998973 = product of:
      0.029199589 = sum of:
        0.029199589 = product of:
          0.08759876 = sum of:
            0.08759876 = weight(_text_:22 in 4604) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.08759876 = score(doc=4604,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4604, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4604)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    7. 2.2005 14:10:22
  10. Hauffe, H.: Zitationsanalysen : Editoral (1999) 0.01
    0.007196398 = product of:
      0.028785592 = sum of:
        0.028785592 = product of:
          0.057571184 = sum of:
            0.057571184 = weight(_text_:online in 4378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.057571184 = score(doc=4378,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.46943733 = fieldWeight in 4378, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=4378)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 1999, Nr.65, S.3-6 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 52(1999) H.3/4]
  11. Van der Veer Martens, B.: Do citation systems represent theories of truth? (2001) 0.01
    0.006452258 = product of:
      0.025809033 = sum of:
        0.025809033 = product of:
          0.0774271 = sum of:
            0.0774271 = weight(_text_:22 in 3925) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0774271 = score(doc=3925,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.54716086 = fieldWeight in 3925, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3925)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 7.2006 15:22:28
  12. Williams, R.M.: ISI search network research front specialities (1983) 0.01
    0.0064453906 = product of:
      0.025781563 = sum of:
        0.025781563 = product of:
          0.077344686 = sum of:
            0.077344686 = weight(_text_:29 in 445) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077344686 = score(doc=445,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 445, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=445)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1982, Lübeck-Travemünde, 29.-30.9.1982: Fachinformation im Zeitalter der Informationsindustrie. Bearb.: H. Strohl-Goebel
  13. Remler, A.: Lässt sich wissenschaftliche Leistung messen? : Wer zitiert wird, liegt vorne - in den USA berechnet man Forschungsleistung nach einem Zitat-Index (2000) 0.01
    0.0064453906 = product of:
      0.025781563 = sum of:
        0.025781563 = product of:
          0.077344686 = sum of:
            0.077344686 = weight(_text_:29 in 5392) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.077344686 = score(doc=5392,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 5392, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5392)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    30.10.2000 17:47:29
  14. Cronin, B.; Weaver-Wozniak, S.: Online access to acknowledgements (1993) 0.01
    0.006232264 = product of:
      0.024929056 = sum of:
        0.024929056 = product of:
          0.049858112 = sum of:
            0.049858112 = weight(_text_:online in 7827) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049858112 = score(doc=7827,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.4065447 = fieldWeight in 7827, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7827)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Reviews the scale, range and consistency of acknowledgement behaviour, in citations, for a number of academic disciplines. The qualitative and quantitative evidence suggests a pervasive and consistent practice in which acknowledgements define a variety of social, cognitive and instrumental relationships between scholars and within and across disciplines. As such they may be used alongside other bibliometric indicators, such as citations, to map networks of influence. Considers the case for using acknowledgements data in the assessment of academic performance and proposes an online acknowledgement index to facilitate this process, perhaps as a logical extension of ISI's citation indexing products
    Source
    Proceedings of the 14th National Online Meeting 1993, New York, 4-6 May 1993. Ed.: M.E. Williams
  15. Nacke, O.: Zitatenanalyse im engeren Sinne (1980) 0.01
    0.0061683413 = product of:
      0.024673365 = sum of:
        0.024673365 = product of:
          0.04934673 = sum of:
            0.04934673 = weight(_text_:online in 399) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04934673 = score(doc=399,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 399, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=399)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  16. Nacke, O.: Fehlerquellen bei der Zitatenanalyse (1980) 0.01
    0.0061683413 = product of:
      0.024673365 = sum of:
        0.024673365 = product of:
          0.04934673 = sum of:
            0.04934673 = weight(_text_:online in 400) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04934673 = score(doc=400,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.40237486 = fieldWeight in 400, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=400)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Deutscher Dokumentartag 1979, Willingen/Hochsauerland, 1.-5.10.1979. Das IuD-Programm heute - Online-Benutzergruppe - Bibliometrie, Scientometrie - Terminologiearbeit - Datenschutz - Tariffragen, Berufsbilder - Informationsmarkt - Gesprächskreise. Bearb.: M. von der Laake u. H. Strohl-Goebel
  17. Gering, E.: ¬Die Analyse von Online-Datenbanken : ein Instrument für das Beobachten von Forschungsaktivitäten; dargestellt an einem Forschungsfeld der Festkörperphysik (1995) 0.01
    0.0058155684 = product of:
      0.023262274 = sum of:
        0.023262274 = product of:
          0.046524547 = sum of:
            0.046524547 = weight(_text_:online in 2660) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.046524547 = score(doc=2660,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.37936267 = fieldWeight in 2660, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2660)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    Sinnvolle forschungspolitische bzw. forschungsstrategische Entscheidungsprozesse bedürfen beim Wissenschafts- und Forschungsmanagement ausreichender Informationen hinsichtlich der Forschungsaktivitäten bestimmter Wissenschaftlergruppen, Institutionen bzw. Länder. Durch entsprechende Vergleichsuntersuchungen lassen sich u.a. auch thematische, länderweite bzw. zeitkritische Forschungsschwerpunkte herausarbeiten. Die folgende Arbeit skizziert die Möglichkeiten von Forschungsanalysen mittels Online-Datenbanken und verdeutlicht die spezifischen Möglichekeiten und Probleme am Beispiel von Arbeiten aus der Festkörperphysik
  18. Fröhlich, G.: ¬Das Messen des leicht Meßbaren : Output-Indikatoren, Impact-Maße: Artefakte der Szeintometrie? (1999) 0.01
    0.005140284 = product of:
      0.020561136 = sum of:
        0.020561136 = product of:
          0.041122273 = sum of:
            0.041122273 = weight(_text_:online in 4379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041122273 = score(doc=4379,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 4379, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4379)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 1999, Nr.65, S.7-21 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 52(1999) H.3/4]
  19. Hauffe, H.: ¬The role of citation analysis in the history and evaluation of science : Bericht über einen Vortrag von Eugene Garfield (Wien, 26. Mai 2004) (2004) 0.01
    0.005140284 = product of:
      0.020561136 = sum of:
        0.020561136 = product of:
          0.041122273 = sum of:
            0.041122273 = weight(_text_:online in 2492) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.041122273 = score(doc=2492,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 2492, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2492)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Online Mitteilungen. 2004, Nr.79, S.7-9 [=Mitteilungen VÖB 57(2004) H.2]
  20. Lindholm-Romantschuk, Y.: Scholarly book reviewing in the social sciences and humanities : the flow of ides within and among disciplines (1998) 0.00
    0.0046038507 = product of:
      0.018415403 = sum of:
        0.018415403 = product of:
          0.055246208 = sum of:
            0.055246208 = weight(_text_:29 in 4063) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.055246208 = score(doc=4063,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 4063, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4063)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    29. 3.1996 18:19:32

Languages

  • e 43
  • d 20

Types

  • a 59
  • el 4
  • m 2
  • r 1
  • More… Less…