Search (139 results, page 1 of 7)

  • × theme_ss:"Katalogfragen allgemein"
  1. Bragg, D.P.; Zhu, L.: Shelflist in an online environment : experience at Washington State University Libraries (2006) 0.02 
    0.024072895 = product of:
  0.04814579 = sum of:
    0.035255007 = product of:
      0.070510015 = sum of:
        0.070510015 = weight(_text_:online in 3319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.070510015 = score(doc=3319,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.574941 = fieldWeight in 3319, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3319)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.012890781 = product of:
      0.038672343 = sum of:
        0.038672343 = weight(_text_:29 in 3319) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038672343 = score(doc=3319,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 3319, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3319)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Since 1980, most of the functions of the card catalog have been gradually incorporated into the online catalog. In contrast, the traditional shelflist has fallen into obscurity as retrospective conversion projects have been completed. Most of the functions of the traditional shelflist have been incorporated into the online catalog; nevertheless, the online catalog still does not provide all the functions that the traditional shelflist used to perform. This paper introduces how Washington State University Libraries set up an online history file to incorporate some of the functions of the traditional shelflist into their online catalog.
    Date
    29. 9.2008 16:39:03
  2. Jochum, U.: ¬Eine Theorie der Verweisung (1998) 0.02 
    0.022146529 = product of:
  0.088586114 = sum of:
    0.088586114 = product of:
      0.13287917 = sum of:
        0.07812993 = weight(_text_:29 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07812993 = score(doc=2268,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.5496386 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
        0.054749228 = weight(_text_:22 in 2268) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054749228 = score(doc=2268,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2268, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2268)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    23.10.1996 17:26:29
    12.12.1998 12:00:29
    Source
    Bibliothek: Forschung und Praxis. 22(1998) H.2, S.235-243
  3. Oberhauser, O.: Teil 2: Ergebnisse der Befragung : Web-Umfrage zur Benutzung von Card-Image Online-Katalogen (2002) 0.02 
    0.01948827 = product of:
  0.03897654 = sum of:
    0.020561136 = product of:
      0.041122273 = sum of:
        0.041122273 = weight(_text_:online in 983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041122273 = score(doc=983,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.33531237 = fieldWeight in 983, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=983)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.018415403 = product of:
      0.055246208 = sum of:
        0.055246208 = weight(_text_:29 in 983) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055246208 = score(doc=983,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 983, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=983)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    29. 9.2002 14:56:21
  4. Lee, H.-L.; Clyde, J.: Users' perspectives of the "Collection" and the online catalogue (2004) 0.02 
    0.019317452 = product of:
  0.038634904 = sum of:
    0.027585663 = product of:
      0.055171326 = sum of:
        0.055171326 = weight(_text_:online in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055171326 = score(doc=2654,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.4498688 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.011049243 = product of:
      0.033147726 = sum of:
        0.033147726 = weight(_text_:29 in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033147726 = score(doc=2654,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The paper reports an a study that examined the parameters provided in the online catalogue of a university library for defining its collection and subcollections that would facilitate information seeking. Taking a user-centered approach, the study asked two questions: (1) Does the online catalogue provide a useful collection structure for the users? (2) Are there any parameters that are considered useful by the users for structuring the collection absent from the online catalogue? The online catalogue was found to adequately provide only a few of the user collection and subcollection parameters, including user privilege and document type. However, it lacked most of the important parameters required by the users, including catalogue representation of the entire collection and disciplinary categories for defining subject subcollections.
    Date
    29. 8.2004 15:09:11
  5. Schneider, R.: OPACs, Benutzer und das Web (2009) 0.02 
    0.018931035 = product of:
  0.03786207 = sum of:
    0.023262274 = product of:
      0.046524547 = sum of:
        0.046524547 = weight(_text_:online in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046524547 = score(doc=2905,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.37936267 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.0145997945 = product of:
      0.04379938 = sum of:
        0.04379938 = weight(_text_:22 in 2905) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04379938 = score(doc=2905,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 2905, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2905)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Der Artikel betrachtet anhand einer Studie zum Benutzerverhalten bei der Online-Katalogrecherche den gegenwärtigen Stellenwert und das zukünftige Potential der Web-OPACs. Dabei werden zunächst die Ergebnisse einer quantitativen Logfile-Analyse sowie qualitativer Benutzertests erörtert, bevor aktuelle Entwicklungen der Webtechnologie, die unter den Schlagworten Web 2.0 und Web 3.0 propagiert werden, im Zusammenhang mit der Online-Recherche und der Entwicklung neuartiger Suchverfahren kurz diskutiert werden.
    Date
    22. 2.2009 18:50:43
  6. Gödert, W.: Inhaltliche Erschließung mehrbändiger Werke : oder eine Notiz zu der Frage, was wir als bibliographische Identität betrachten wollen? (1994) 0.02 
    0.018332575 = product of:
  0.0733303 = sum of:
    0.0733303 = product of:
      0.10999544 = sum of:
        0.055246208 = weight(_text_:29 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055246208 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
        0.054749228 = weight(_text_:22 in 2411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054749228 = score(doc=2411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 2411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2411)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    20. 4.2020 20:22:29
  7. Hänger, C.; Kaldenberg, B.; Pfeffer, M.: Präsentation von E-Books mit Primo (2010) 0.02 
    0.0179922 = product of:
  0.0719688 = sum of:
    0.0719688 = sum of:
      0.02849035 = weight(_text_:online in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.02849035 = score(doc=3687,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
            0.040409453 = queryNorm
          0.23231125 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
      0.04347845 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 3687) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04347845 = score(doc=3687,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
            0.040409453 = queryNorm
          0.21806103 = fieldWeight in 3687, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3687)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Man versetze sich für einen kurzen Augenblick in ein Wohnheimzimmer einer Studentin, die eine Hausarbeit in Politologie zum Thema "Der Sozialstaat in der öffentlichen Wahrnehmung der Bundesrepublik Deutschland von 1990 bis 2010" schreibt. Es ist zwei Uhr nachts, die Universitätsbibliothek hat geschlossen und die Studentin muss bis spätestens 14 Uhr am gleichen Tag die Arbeit einreichen. Verzweifelt sucht sie im Online-Katalog nach weiterer Literatur, um die Forschungsdiskussion in den Fußnoten weiter zu differenzieren. Sie findet auch die entsprechenden gedruckten Publikationen, auf die sie leider nicht zugreifen kann, da die Bibliothek geschlossen hat. Dabei hat "ihre" Universitätsbibliothek E-Books lizenziert, die sie allerdings nicht gefunden hat, da die E-Books nicht im Online-Katalog erfasst, sondern nur auf der Homepage der Einrichtung verlinkt sind. Bei der Rückgabe der Arbeit erfährt die Studentin, dass sie eine bessere Note erhalten hätte, wenn sie nur die Forschungsdiskussion differenziert dargestellt hätte. Eine vollständige Einbindung der lizenzierten E-Books im Online-Katalog ist der Wunsch vieler Bibliotheken. Insbesondere mit der vermehrten Verfügbarkeit konsortial oder national lizenzierter Sammlungen und Pakete ist das Angebot zusehends unübersichtlicher geworden und die bisherige Praxis, elektronische Dokumente parallel zu den gedruckten Exemplaren manuell formal und inhaltlich zu erschließen, stößt an organisatorische und ressourcenbedingte Grenzen. Einer direkten maschinellen Verarbeitung steht das Problem entgegen, dass die bibliografischen Metadaten der E-Books häufig im Format MARC 21 geliefert werden, die lokalen Bibliothekssysteme in der Regel aber mit den Formaten MAB2 und Pica arbeiten und Daten in anderen Formaten nicht verarbeiten können. Ein Lösungsansatz besteht darin, die bibliografischen Metadaten an zentraler Stelle zu konvertieren und zu harmonisieren und den Bibliotheken im Format MAB2 zur Verfügung zu stellen. Dieser Ansatz ist allerdings nur für statische E-BookSammlungen praktizierbar und durch den Aufwand der Konversion in "saubere" MAB2-Daten mit einem deutlichen zeitlichen Verzug verbunden.
    Theme
    Elektronisches Publizieren
  8. Vogt, G.; Meyer, A.: ¬Die Hochschulbibliographie der Technischen Universität Ilmenau (2006) 0.02 
    0.01668518 = product of:
  0.06674072 = sum of:
    0.06674072 = sum of:
      0.023262274 = weight(_text_:online in 5031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.023262274 = score(doc=5031,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
            0.040409453 = queryNorm
          0.18968134 = fieldWeight in 5031, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5031)
      0.04347845 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 5031) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04347845 = score(doc=5031,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
            0.040409453 = queryNorm
          0.21806103 = fieldWeight in 5031, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
            0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5031)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    1. Historie Von 1953 bis 1989 wurden an der Hochschulbibliothek Ilmenau die Veröffentlichungen der Angehörigen der damaligen Technischen Hochschule Ilmenau in gedruckten Bibliographien herausgegeben.' In diesen Bibliographien waren auch Diplomarbeiten verzeichnet. In den Jahren 1990 bis 2005 wurden zwar keine Bibliographien mehrveröffentlicht, aber das Vorhaben als solches nicht aufgegeben. So wurde in diesen Jahren versucht, neben Ilmenauer Dissertationen und Habilitationen die monographischen Veröffentlichungen aus der Universität so vollständig wie möglich zu sammeln. Die Metadaten dieser Publikationen wurden im damaligen Allegro-Katalog mit einem lokalen Suchkriterium versehen. Damit stand 2005, zu Beginn des Aufbaus der elektronischen Hochschulbibliographie, schon ein Datenbestand von 3.569 Titeln zur Verfügung. 2. Wiedereinführung einer Hochschulbibliographie Wie alle Hochschulbibliotheken möchte auch die Universitätsbibliothek (UB) Ilmenau ihre Dienstleistungen nicht nur auf die Bereitstellung von gedruckten und elektronischen Publikationen beschränken. Die UB versteht sich als zentraler Ansprechpartner für alles, was in der Universität mit Literatur und Publizieren zusammenhängt. So ist es folgerichtig, dass die UB auch die Verzeichnung von Literatur in der Universität bündelt. Sie möchte wieder einen Überblick über die Veröffentlichungen aus der Universität erhalten, um entsprechend beschaffen und um Auskünfte über das Publikationsverhalten an der Universität geben zu können. Bisher wurde von der Verwaltung, von jeder Fakultät und von jedem Fachgebiet eine gedruckte oder elektronische Liste mit den jeweiligen Veröffentlichungen geführt. Diese waren uneinheitlich aufgebaut und nur schwer für eine zusammenfassende Veröffentlichung oder übergreifende Recherche einzusetzen.
    3. Entscheidung für die Integration in den lokalen Katalog Die UB Ilmenau betreibt ein eigenes Lokales Bibliothekssystem im Rahmen des Gemeinsamen Bibliotheksverbundes (GBV). Die Hochschulbibliographie ist Teil des lokalen Kataloges und damit wiederum Teil des GBV-Verbundkataloges. Für eine solche Lösung spricht einiges: 1. Alle Literaturdaten, seien es Monographien oder unselbstständig erschienene Beiträge, gedruckt oder elektronisch, werden in einem System, dem Ilmenauer Katalog, geführt und gepflegt. 2. Ohne weiteren Mitteleinsatz wird ein bereits funktionierendes und allgemein anerkanntes Katalogsystem genutzt, welches von den Mitarbeitern der UB ohne zusätzlichen Schulungsaufwand betreut werden kann und vom GBV zentral gepflegt wird. 3. Mittlerweile werden in Bibliotheken nicht nur eigene Bestände, sondern auch physisch nicht vorliegende Dokumente verzeichnet. So werden z.B. OnlineZeitschriften, Online-Datenbanken oder Online-Dissertationen in lokalen Katalogen verzeichnet, obwohl der Zugriff über einen externen Diensteanbieter erfolgt. Damit ist der Schritt, auch Publikationen von Universitätsangehörigen, die zum Teil nicht gedruckt oder elektronisch in der Bibliothek vorhanden sind, in Kataloge aufzunehmen, folgerichtig. 4. Die Hochschulbibliographie wird durch das Setzen des genormten Schlagwortes "ilm" in den betreffenden Titeldaten als Auszug aus dem Katalog erzeugt. Damit konnte die Bibliographie sofort realisiert werden. 5. Die Bibliographie bietet die gleichen Funktionalitäten wie der Katalog: Bei den Publikationen, welche die UB im Bestand hat, sind die zugehörige Signatur, Angaben zur Ausleihbarkeit und zum Ausleihstatus und/oder ein Link zum elektronischen Volltext angegeben. 6. Gleichzeitig sind alle Daten (auch unselbständige Literatur) im Katalog, im Verbundkatalog sowie in weiteren überregionalen Datenbanken, die den Verbundkatalog als Datenbasis nutzen, zu finden.
  9. Mönnich, M.; Dierolf, U.: 20 Jahre Karlsruher virtueller Katalog (KVK) (2016) 0.02 
    0.015590616 = product of:
  0.031181231 = sum of:
    0.01644891 = product of:
      0.03289782 = sum of:
        0.03289782 = weight(_text_:online in 3190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03289782 = score(doc=3190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.2682499 = fieldWeight in 3190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3190)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.014732323 = product of:
      0.044196967 = sum of:
        0.044196967 = weight(_text_:29 in 3190) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044196967 = score(doc=3190,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3190, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3190)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Date
    24.10.2016 19:29:10
    Source
    B.I.T. Online. 19(2016) H.5, S.402-412
  10. Hilberer, T.: Numerus currens und iPod : die Organisation von Information mittels Metadaten und die Aufgabe der Bibliotheken im digitalen Zeitalter oder Die Kraft der digitalen Ordnung (2011) 0.02 
    0.01550257 = product of:
  0.06201028 = sum of:
    0.06201028 = product of:
      0.09301542 = sum of:
        0.054690957 = weight(_text_:29 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.054690957 = score(doc=162,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.38474706 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
        0.03832446 = weight(_text_:22 in 162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03832446 = score(doc=162,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 162, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=162)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 5.2012 13:58:08
    29. 5.2012 14:10:37
    Source
    ¬Die Kraft der digitalen Unordnung: 32. Arbeits- und Fortbildungstagung der ASpB e. V., Sektion 5 im Deutschen Bibliotheksverband, 22.-25. September 2009 in der Universität Karlsruhe. Hrsg: Jadwiga Warmbrunn u.a
  11. Visintin, G.: Passaggi (1998) 0.01 
    0.014666058 = product of:
  0.058664232 = sum of:
    0.058664232 = product of:
      0.08799635 = sum of:
        0.044196967 = weight(_text_:29 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044196967 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
        0.04379938 = weight(_text_:22 in 3053) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04379938 = score(doc=3053,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3053, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3053)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 1.1996 17:18:10
    22. 2.1999 20:40:57
  12. LeBlanc, J.; Kurth, M.: ¬An operational model for library metadata maintenance (2008) 0.01 
    0.013911052 = product of:
  0.027822103 = sum of:
    0.0123366825 = product of:
      0.024673365 = sum of:
        0.024673365 = weight(_text_:online in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024673365 = score(doc=101,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.015485421 = product of:
      0.046456262 = sum of:
        0.046456262 = weight(_text_:22 in 101) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046456262 = score(doc=101,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.32829654 = fieldWeight in 101, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=101)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Libraries pay considerable attention to the creation, preservation, and transformation of descriptive metadata in both MARC and non-MARC formats. Little evidence suggests that they devote as much time, energy, and financial resources to the ongoing maintenance of non-MARC metadata, especially with regard to updating and editing existing descriptive content, as they do to maintenance of such information in the MARC-based online public access catalog. In this paper, the authors introduce a model, derived loosely from J. A. Zachman's framework for information systems architecture, with which libraries can identify and inventory components of catalog or metadata maintenance and plan interdepartmental, even interinstitutional, workflows. The model draws on the notion that the expertise and skills that have long been the hallmark for the maintenance of libraries' catalog data can and should be parlayed towards metadata maintenance in a broader set of information delivery systems.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
    19. 6.2010 19:22:28
  13. Erdei, K.: Kein Umzug für Zettel : Die digitalisierten Kataloge im Neubau der UB Kiel (2001) 0.01 
    0.013583808 = product of:
  0.027167616 = sum of:
    0.014392796 = product of:
      0.028785592 = sum of:
        0.028785592 = weight(_text_:online in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028785592 = score(doc=5777,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.01277482 = product of:
      0.03832446 = sum of:
        0.03832446 = weight(_text_:22 in 5777) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03832446 = score(doc=5777,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5777, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5777)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Wie bereits vor einiger Zeit im BIBLIOTHEKDIENST berichtet, wurde der Neubau der UB Kiel am 1. Dezember 2000 fertiggestellt. Der Umzug der ca. 100 Mitarbeiter und über 1 Million Bücher dauerte vier Monate. Bis auf drei Schließungstage wurde der normale Betrieb auch während dieser Zeit vollständig aufrechterhalten - eine logistische Herausforderung, verbunden mit einem wesentlich erhöhten Arbeitsaufwand. Eine Ausnahme gab es dennoch: die Zettelkataloge. Sie konnten wir getrost stehen lassen bzw. - pietätlos ausgedrückt - entsorgen. Pünktlich zum realen Umzug war auch die retrospektive Konversion abgeschlossen: Die Benutzerkataloge sind allesamt digitalisiert und bilden jetzt einen alles umfassenden Online-Katalog der Zentralbibliothek. Den ursprünglich für die Zettelkataloge vorgesehenen Platz nehmen nun zusätzliche Benutzercomputer für die Katalogrecherche und Bestellung ein
    Date
    28. 4.2001 16:49:22
  14. Randall, N.B.: Spelling errors in the database : shadow or substance? (1999) 0.01 
    0.013583808 = product of:
  0.027167616 = sum of:
    0.014392796 = product of:
      0.028785592 = sum of:
        0.028785592 = weight(_text_:online in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028785592 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.01277482 = product of:
      0.03832446 = sum of:
        0.03832446 = weight(_text_:22 in 106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03832446 = score(doc=106,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 106, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=106)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Describes the results of research to determine the extent of spelling errors in the State University of New York at Albany's online catalogue, whether these errors seriously affect users' access to library materials and what effect spelling errors will have on the group database planned for the State University of New York (SUNY). Using standard database tests, the catalogues of the four SUNY University Centers (Albany, Binghamton, Buffalo and Stony Brook) were studied. In addition, two comparison catalogues were studied: the New York State Library's Excelsior and California University's Melvyl. Results show that misspellings are unavoidable due to the way that most catalogues were built. These errors, however, are rarely an impediment to retrieval. Concludes with suggested ways to find and correct misspellings without expensive large scale efforts
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  15. Morgan, E.L.: Possible solutions for incorporating digital information mediums into traditional library cataloging services (1996) 0.01 
    0.013583808 = product of:
  0.027167616 = sum of:
    0.014392796 = product of:
      0.028785592 = sum of:
        0.028785592 = weight(_text_:online in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028785592 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.01277482 = product of:
      0.03832446 = sum of:
        0.03832446 = weight(_text_:22 in 600) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03832446 = score(doc=600,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 600, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=600)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    This article first compares and contrasts the essential, fundamental differences between traditional and digital information mediums. It then reexamines the role of the online public access catalog (OPAC), refines the definition of library's catalog, and advocates the addition of Internet resources within the OPAC. Next, the article describes the building of the Alex Catalog, a catalog of Internet resources in the in the form of MARC records. Finally, this article outlines a process of integrating the futher inclusion of other Internet resources into OPACs as well as some of the obstacles such a process manifests.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.143-170
  16. McMillan, G.: Electronic theses and dissertations : merging perspectives (1996) 0.01 
    0.013583808 = product of:
  0.027167616 = sum of:
    0.014392796 = product of:
      0.028785592 = sum of:
        0.028785592 = weight(_text_:online in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028785592 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.23471867 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.01277482 = product of:
      0.03832446 = sum of:
        0.03832446 = weight(_text_:22 in 601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03832446 = score(doc=601,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 601, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=601)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Theses and dissertations as electronic files transferred from the student author to the Graduate School to the Library may well be the first major source of electronic texts that many libraries encounter. To prepare for this potential influx of electronic texts, an ad hoc task force considered work flow and cataloging guidelines. The author suggests expanding current theses cataloging and taking advantage of online information prepared by authors so that the bibliographic records provide OPACS with much more valuable information than does traditional theses cataloging. This should not require a lot of extra work.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 22(1996) nos.3/4, S.105-125
  17. Bowman, J.H.: ¬The catalog as barrier to retrieval : Part 1: hyphens and ampersands in titles (2000) 0.01 
    0.012832801 = product of:
  0.051331203 = sum of:
    0.051331203 = product of:
      0.0769968 = sum of:
        0.038672343 = weight(_text_:29 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038672343 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
        0.03832446 = weight(_text_:22 in 5365) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03832446 = score(doc=5365,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 5365, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5365)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    An Internet survey of 38 different OPAC systems, at eighty different libraries, was undertaken to investigate the effect on retrieval of the presence of the hyphen or the ampersand in titles. Title and Keyword searches were performed. In Title search, 22 of the systems treat the hyphen as equivalent to a space, while in Keyword the number is 16. The other systems treat it in various different ways (even including the equivalent of NOT), which means that results of searching multiple catalogs are very inconsistent. The ampersand may be ignored, treated as a special character, or treated as "and," again with very inconsistent results. Various recommendations are made with a view to improving consistency of performance.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.4, S.39-59
  18. Theimer, S.: ¬A cataloger's resolution to become more creative : how and why (2012) 0.01 
    0.012832801 = product of:
  0.051331203 = sum of:
    0.051331203 = product of:
      0.0769968 = sum of:
        0.038672343 = weight(_text_:29 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038672343 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
        0.03832446 = weight(_text_:22 in 1934) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03832446 = score(doc=1934,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 1934, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1934)
      0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Date
    29. 5.2015 11:08:22
  19. Rijk Spanhoff, E. de: Principle issues : catalog paradigms, old and new (2002) 0.01 
    0.011692963 = product of:
  0.023385925 = sum of:
    0.0123366825 = product of:
      0.024673365 = sum of:
        0.024673365 = weight(_text_:online in 5481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.024673365 = score(doc=5481,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 5481, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5481)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.011049243 = product of:
      0.033147726 = sum of:
        0.033147726 = weight(_text_:29 in 5481) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033147726 = score(doc=5481,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14214782 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5481, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5481)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Recent attempts to assess the adequacy of AACR as a descriptive cataloging code for the online environment have focused attention on cataloging principles. This paper looks at some old and new attempts to isolate the fundamental principles underlying AACR. It considers catalog objectives, principles, and rules and looks at how these relate to one another. It analyzes the relationship of these principles and rules to the final product, the library catalog, pointing out differences (in this regard) between catalogs that are paper-based and those that are electronic. Finally, it comments on the present effort of the Joint Steering Committee for Revision of AACR to formulate a statement of principles to be included in a new introduction to AACR.
    Date
    29. 7.2006 19:35:37
  20. Jaffe, L.: ¬The future of the online catalog : who decides? (1991) 0.01 
    0.011631137 = product of:
  0.046524547 = sum of:
    0.046524547 = product of:
      0.093049094 = sum of:
        0.093049094 = weight(_text_:online in 3878) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.093049094 = score(doc=3878,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.040409453 = queryNorm
            0.75872535 = fieldWeight in 3878, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=3878)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Online. 15(1991) no.1, S.7-9

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 89
  • d 44
  • f 2
  • i 1
  • sp 1
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 124
  • el 9
  • m 5
  • b 3
  • s 3
  • x 3
  • r 2
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications