Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  • × author_ss:"Zhang, Y."
  1. Zhang, Y.: ¬The effect of open access on citation impact : a comparison study based on Web citation analysis (2006) 0.01
    0.006793508 = product of:
      0.027174031 = sum of:
        0.027174031 = product of:
          0.054348063 = sum of:
            0.054348063 = weight(_text_:publizieren in 5071) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054348063 = score(doc=5071,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.19938663 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.27257627 = fieldWeight in 5071, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.934158 = idf(docFreq=864, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5071)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Theme
    Elektronisches Publizieren
  2. Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.: ¬A user-centered functional metadata evaluation of moving image collections (2008) 0.00
    0.0036347301 = product of:
      0.0145389205 = sum of:
        0.0145389205 = product of:
          0.029077841 = sum of:
            0.029077841 = weight(_text_:online in 1884) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029077841 = score(doc=1884,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.23710167 = fieldWeight in 1884, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1884)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    In this article, the authors report a series of evaluations of two metadata schemes developed for Moving Image Collections (MIC), an integrated online catalog of moving images. Through two online surveys and one experiment spanning various stages of metadata implementation, the MIC evaluation team explored a user-centered approach in which the four generic user tasks suggested by IFLA FRBR (International Association of Library Associations Functional Requirement for Bibliographic Records) were embedded in data collection and analyses. Diverse groups of users rated usefulness of individual metadata fields for finding, identifying, selecting, and obtaining moving images. The results demonstrate a consistency across these evaluations with respect to (a) identification of a set of useful metadata fields highly rated by target users for each of the FRBR generic tasks, and (b) indication of a significant interaction between MIC metadata fields and the FRBR generic tasks. The findings provide timely feedback for the MIC implementation specifically, and valuable suggestions to other similar metadata application settings in general. They also suggest the feasibility of using the four IFLA FRBR generic tasks as a framework for user-centered functional metadata evaluations.
  3. Zhang, Y.: ¬The influence of mental models on undergraduate students' searching behavior on the Web (2008) 0.00
    0.0030841706 = product of:
      0.0123366825 = sum of:
        0.0123366825 = product of:
          0.024673365 = sum of:
            0.024673365 = weight(_text_:online in 2097) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.024673365 = score(doc=2097,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.1226387 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.20118743 = fieldWeight in 2097, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.0349014 = idf(docFreq=5778, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2097)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    This article explores the effects of undergraduate students' mental models of the Web on their online searching behavior. Forty-four undergraduate students, mainly freshmen and sophomores, participated in the study. Subjects' mental models of the Web were treated as equally good styles and operationalized as drawings of their perceptions about the Web. Four types of mental models of the Web were identified based on the drawings and the associated descriptions: technical view, functional view, process view, and connection view. In the study, subjects were required to finish two search tasks. Searching behavior was measured from four aspects: navigation and performance, subjects' feelings about tasks and their own performances, query construction, and search patterns. The four mental model groups showed different navigation and querying behaviors, but the differences were not significant. Subjects' satisfaction with their own performances was found to be significantly correlated with the time to complete the task. The results also showed that the familiarity of the task to subjects had a major effect on their ways to start interaction, query construction, and search patterns.
  4. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.00
    0.0027374614 = product of:
      0.010949845 = sum of:
        0.010949845 = product of:
          0.032849535 = sum of:
            0.032849535 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.032849535 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.14150701 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.040409453 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11