Search (61 results, page 1 of 4)

  • × theme_ss:"Register"
  1. Mauer, P.: Embedded indexing : pros and cons for the indexer (2000) 0.02 
    0.022806687 = product of:
  0.11403343 = sum of:
    0.11403343 = product of:
      0.19005571 = sum of:
        0.065090485 = weight(_text_:28 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065090485 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.5541031 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
        0.06276492 = weight(_text_:29 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06276492 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.115352415 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
        0.062200308 = weight(_text_:22 in 488) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062200308 = score(doc=488,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11483241 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 488, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=488)
      0.6 = coord(3/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 4.2002 9:29:38
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.27-28
  2. Crystal, D.: Quote index unquote (2000) 0.01 
    0.011638017 = product of:
  0.058190085 = sum of:
    0.058190085 = product of:
      0.14547521 = sum of:
        0.07438913 = weight(_text_:28 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07438913 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.63326067 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
        0.07108607 = weight(_text_:22 in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07108607 = score(doc=487,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11483241 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 4.2002 9:28:41
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.14-20
  3. Fugmann, R.: ¬Das Buchregister : Methodische Grundlagen und praktische Anwendung (2006) 0.01 
    0.010922807 = product of:
  0.054614034 = sum of:
    0.054614034 = weight(_text_:ludwig in 665) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.054614034 = score(doc=665,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2546328 = queryWeight, product of:
          7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
          0.032792117 = queryNorm
        0.21448153 = fieldWeight in 665, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          7.7650614 = idf(docFreq=50, maxDocs=44218)
          0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=665)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    6. In diesem Buch wird in den Kapiteln 2 bis 5 ein Grundkursus zur Theorie der Inhaltserschließung angeboten, wobei die Möglichkeiten und Grenzen von natursprachiger und indexsprachiger Ausdrucksweise geklärt werden, sowie auch der Unterschied zwischen Ausdruck und Begriff, zwischen den Recherchetypen von Erinnerung und Entdeckung, zwischen den Indexierungstypen von Zuteilung und Extraktion und auch der Unterschied zwischen Register und Konkordanz. Auf einer solchen Grundlage kann der Indexer besser den Nutzen der einzelnen Indexierungswerkzeuge abschätzen, sowie auch die nachteiligen Folgen, welche durch den Verzicht auf das eine oder das andere dieser Werkzeuge zwangsläufig eintreten. In der Literatur ist zwar der Standpunkt anzutreffen, dass "allzu viel Theorie" zu vermeiden sei, weil sie doch so "grau" sei. Aber wir schließen uns lieber dem Standpunkt des Physikers Ludwig Boltzmann an: "Nichts ist praktischer als Theorie", wenn eine solche Theorie das Beobachtbare erklären und das Zukünftige voraussagen kann. 7. Im Kapitel 7 werden die Bestandteile des Schlagwort-Registers in Gestalt von Schlagwort und Fundstelle, Untereintrag und Verweisung abgehandelt und das Zusammenfügen dieser Komponenten zum Register der herkömmlichen indikativen Art. Dieser Registertyp ist gekennzeichnet durch seine Beschränkungen bezüglich der Inanspruchnahme von Platz für den Druck und durch seine Beschränkungen bezüglich des Aufwandes an Zeit und Geld zu seiner Erstellung. Es werden die hiermit zwangläufig verbundenen Mängel dargelegt. 8. Im Kapitel 8 wird die Überwindung dieser Mängel durch die Einführung von reichlichen und ausführlichen Untereinträgen gezeigt. Das Register nimmt hierdurch einen ausgesprochen informativen Charakter an. Zugleich werden auf diesem Weg auch Wesen und Nutzen eines systematischen Registers dargelegt, welches zusätzlich zum herkömmlichen alphabetischen Register vorgelegt wird. 9. Die Möglichkeit zu alledem eröffnet sich dadurch, dass eine hochentwickelte Software eingesetzt wird und dass ein außergewöhnlicher Arbeitsaufwand aufseiten des Indexers nicht gescheut wird, verbunden mit entsprechend hohen Kosten. Dieser Aufwand ist erforderlich für die Formulierung von zahlreichen und ausführlichen Untereinträgen, zum Aufbau eines systematischen, thesaurusgestützten Schlagwort-Vokabulars und für eine besonders sorgfältige Indexierung. 10. Dieses Modell eines kompletten informativen Registers ist als eine Art Werkzeugkasten zu verstehen, aus welchem man diejenigen gedanklichen und technischen Werkzeuge auswählen und miteinander kombinieren kann, welche der jeweils herrschenden Bedarfslage am besten angemessen sind. Man wird von diesen Werkzeugen besonders dann ausgiebig Gebrauch machen, wenn hohe Anforderungen an die Treffsicherheit und Leichtigkeit der Recherche gestellt werden, Anforderungen, welche mit einem Register der herkömmlichen indikativen Art nicht erfüllbar sind. Der hohe Aufwand für ein gutes Register ist natürlich nur dann gerechtfertigt, wenn aufseiten der Leser auch wirklich Bedarf zum Nachschlagen besteht. Man wird kein Register für ein Buch anlegen, welches nur zur Unterhaltung und Erbauung gelesen und dann für alle Zeiten beiseite gelegt wird.
  4. Davis, M.: Building a global legal index : a work in progress (2001) 0.01 
    0.010183263 = product of:
  0.050916314 = sum of:
    0.050916314 = product of:
      0.12729079 = sum of:
        0.065090485 = weight(_text_:28 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065090485 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.5541031 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
        0.062200308 = weight(_text_:22 in 6443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062200308 = score(doc=6443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11483241 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 6443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=6443)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    28. 3.2002 10:12:14
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.123-127
  5. Anderson, C.R.: Indexing with a computer : past and present (2000) 0.01 
    0.010183263 = product of:
  0.050916314 = sum of:
    0.050916314 = product of:
      0.12729079 = sum of:
        0.065090485 = weight(_text_:28 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065090485 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.5541031 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
        0.062200308 = weight(_text_:22 in 489) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062200308 = score(doc=489,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11483241 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 489, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=489)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    21. 4.2002 9:30:28
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.23-24
  6. Weinberg, B.H.: Book indexes in France : medieval specimens and modern practices (2000) 0.01 
    0.009997218 = product of:
  0.04998609 = sum of:
    0.04998609 = product of:
      0.12496523 = sum of:
        0.06276492 = weight(_text_:29 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06276492 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.115352415 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.5441145 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
        0.062200308 = weight(_text_:22 in 486) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.062200308 = score(doc=486,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11483241 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.5416616 = fieldWeight in 486, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=486)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 4.2002 19:29:54
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.2-13
  7. Lathrop, L.: ¬An indexer's guide to the Internet (1999) 0.01 
    0.008728512 = product of:
  0.04364256 = sum of:
    0.04364256 = product of:
      0.10910639 = sum of:
        0.055791844 = weight(_text_:28 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.055791844 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.4749455 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
        0.053314548 = weight(_text_:22 in 485) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.053314548 = score(doc=485,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11483241 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 485, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=485)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    20. 4.2002 19:28:02
    Footnote
    Rez. in: Indexer 22(2000) no.1, S.51 (R. Davis)
  8. Wheatley, A.: ¬A manual on printed subject indexes : report to the British Library Research and Development Department on Project SI/G/243 (1978) 0.01 
    0.007306024 = product of:
  0.03653012 = sum of:
    0.03653012 = product of:
      0.0913253 = sum of:
        0.046493206 = weight(_text_:28 in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.046493206 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.39578792 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
        0.044832088 = weight(_text_:29 in 571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.044832088 = score(doc=571,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.115352415 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.38865322 = fieldWeight in 571, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=571)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    28. 5.2007 19:29:37
  9. Crawley, J.; Adams, C.: InfoAccess Project : comparing print, CD-ROM, and inhouse indexes (1991) 0.01 
    0.005712697 = product of:
  0.028563483 = sum of:
    0.028563483 = product of:
      0.071408704 = sum of:
        0.03586567 = weight(_text_:29 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03586567 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.115352415 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
        0.035543036 = weight(_text_:22 in 4824) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035543036 = score(doc=4824,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11483241 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 4824, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4824)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    Describes the InfoAccess Project at the Univ of Saskatchewan Libraries which compared searching of manual and automated indexes by 22 undergraduate psychology students to determine their searching preferences by ranking 'Psychological abstracts' in 3 formats: print, CD-ROM and a locally mounted tape service called InfoAccess. Their satisfaction regarding the physical environment, equipment, and instructional aids was also recorded. Users preferred to search with CD-ROM, but found InfoAccess to be an acceptable alternative
    Source
    Canadian journal of information science. 16(1991) no.1, S.29-41
  10. Hodge, G.M.: Automated support to indexing (1992) 0.00 
    0.004998609 = product of:
  0.024993045 = sum of:
    0.024993045 = product of:
      0.062482614 = sum of:
        0.03138246 = weight(_text_:29 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03138246 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.115352415 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
        0.031100154 = weight(_text_:22 in 7288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031100154 = score(doc=7288,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11483241 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 7288, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=7288)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIS 44(1993) no.2, S.119-121 (B.H. Weinberg); International cataloguing and bibliographic control 22(1993) no.2, S.34 (E. Svenonius); Information processing and management 29(1993) no.4, S.528-531 (L.L.Hill)
  11. Miksa, F.: ¬The DDC Relative Index (2006) 0.00 
    0.0036368798 = product of:
  0.0181844 = sum of:
    0.0181844 = product of:
      0.045461 = sum of:
        0.023246603 = weight(_text_:28 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023246603 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.19789396 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
        0.022214396 = weight(_text_:22 in 5775) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.022214396 = score(doc=5775,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11483241 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 5775, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5775)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Abstract
    The "Relative Index" of the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) is investigated over the span of its lifetime in 22 editions of the DDC as to its character as a concept indexing system, its provision of conceptual contexts for the terms it lists, and the way in which the index intersects with special tables of categories used in the system. Striking features of the index that are discussed include how the locater function of an index is expressed in it, its practice of including concepts that have not been given specific notational locations in the system, its two methods of providing conceptual contexts for indexed terms (by means of the notation of the system and by the insertion of enhancement terms that portray conceptual context), and how the index has intersected with three types of special tables of categories in the system. Critical issues raised include the indexing of constructed or synthesized complex concepts, inconsistencies in how enhancement terms are portrayed and the absence of them in some instances, the problem of equating conceptual context with disciplinary context, and problems associated with not indexing one type of special table. Summary and conclusions are extended to problems that arise in studying the index.
    Date
    28. 9.2008 19:17:06
  12. Kàrolyi, Z.: ¬Das Schlagwortregister der Bibliographien (1984) 0.00 
    0.0029755651 = product of:
  0.014877826 = sum of:
    0.014877826 = product of:
      0.07438913 = sum of:
        0.07438913 = weight(_text_:28 in 37) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07438913 = score(doc=37,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.63326067 = fieldWeight in 37, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=37)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Footnote
    RSWK: S.28-32
  13. Henninger, M.: What makes a good Web index? (1999) 0.00 
    0.0029755651 = product of:
  0.014877826 = sum of:
    0.014877826 = product of:
      0.07438913 = sum of:
        0.07438913 = weight(_text_:28 in 484) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07438913 = score(doc=484,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.63326067 = fieldWeight in 484, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=484)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    27. 8.2005 13:28:32
  14. Bernier, C.L.: Subject indexes (1980) 0.00 
    0.0028692535 = product of:
  0.014346267 = sum of:
    0.014346267 = product of:
      0.07173134 = sum of:
        0.07173134 = weight(_text_:29 in 89) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07173134 = score(doc=89,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.115352415 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 89, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=89)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.29
  15. Roberts, C.: HyperIndex : new indexing software for the Mac (1996) 0.00 
    0.0028692535 = product of:
  0.014346267 = sum of:
    0.014346267 = product of:
      0.07173134 = sum of:
        0.07173134 = weight(_text_:29 in 6808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07173134 = score(doc=6808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.115352415 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.6218451 = fieldWeight in 6808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6808)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Keywords. 4(1996) nos.3/4, S.29-31
  16. Ross, J.: ¬The impact of technology on indexing (2000) 0.00 
    0.002843443 = product of:
  0.014217215 = sum of:
    0.014217215 = product of:
      0.07108607 = sum of:
        0.07108607 = weight(_text_:22 in 263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07108607 = score(doc=263,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11483241 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 263, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=263)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2000) no.1, S.25-26
  17. Walker, A.: Indexing commonplace books : John Locke's method (2001) 0.00 
    0.002843443 = product of:
  0.014217215 = sum of:
    0.014217215 = product of:
      0.07108607 = sum of:
        0.07108607 = weight(_text_:22 in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07108607 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11483241 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.14-18
  18. Matthews, D.: Indexing published letters (2001) 0.00 
    0.002843443 = product of:
  0.014217215 = sum of:
    0.014217215 = product of:
      0.07108607 = sum of:
        0.07108607 = weight(_text_:22 in 4160) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07108607 = score(doc=4160,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.11483241 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 4160, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4160)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Indexer. 22(2001) no.3, S.135-141
  19. Craven, T.C.: NEPHIS: a nested phrase indexing system (1977) 0.00 
    0.0026036194 = product of:
  0.013018097 = sum of:
    0.013018097 = product of:
      0.065090485 = sum of:
        0.065090485 = weight(_text_:28 in 1333) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065090485 = score(doc=1333,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.5541031 = fieldWeight in 1333, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1333)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 28(1977), S.107-114
  20. ISO 999:1996: Guidelines for the content, organization and presentation of indexes (1996) 0.00 
    0.0026036194 = product of:
  0.013018097 = sum of:
    0.013018097 = product of:
      0.065090485 = sum of:
        0.065090485 = weight(_text_:28 in 868) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.065090485 = score(doc=868,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.117469996 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.032792117 = queryNorm
            0.5541031 = fieldWeight in 868, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5822632 = idf(docFreq=3342, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=868)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
    Date
    28. 5.1999 16:36:35

Authors

Years

Languages

  • e 57
  • d 4
  • More… Less…

Types

  • a 48
  • m 11
  • n 1
  • r 1
  • More… Less…

Themes

Subjects

Classifications