Fremery, W. de; Buckland, M.K.: Copy theory (2022)
0.00
0.0010591936 = product of:
0.01482871 = sum of:
0.01482871 = weight(_text_:information in 487) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01482871 = score(doc=487,freq=12.0), product of:
0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.029633347 = queryNorm
0.2850541 = fieldWeight in 487, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=487)
0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
- Abstract
- In information science, writing, printing, telecommunication, and digital computing have been central concerns because of their ability to distribute information. Overlooked is the obvious fact that these technologies fashion copies, and the theorizing of copies has been neglected. We may think a copy is the same as what it copies, but no two objects can really be the same. "The same" means similar enough as an acceptable substitute for some purpose. The differences between usefully similar things are also often important, in forensic analysis, for example, or inferential processes. Status as a copy is only one form of relationship between objects, but copies are so integral to information science that they demand a theory. Indeed, theorizing copies provides a basis for a more complete and unified view of information science.
- Source
- Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 73(2022) no.3, S.407-418
- Theme
- Information
