Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Greenberg, J."
  • × theme_ss:"Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval"
  1. Greenberg, J.: Optimal query expansion (QE) processing methods with semantically encoded structured thesaurus terminology (2001) 0.01
    0.0063587003 = product of:
      0.0445109 = sum of:
        0.00856136 = weight(_text_:information in 5750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00856136 = score(doc=5750,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.16457605 = fieldWeight in 5750, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5750)
        0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5750) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03594954 = score(doc=5750,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 5750, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5750)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    While researchers have explored the value of structured thesauri as controlled vocabularies for general information retrieval (IR) activities, they have not identified the optimal query expansion (QE) processing methods for taking advantage of the semantic encoding underlying the terminology in these tools. The study reported on in this article addresses this question, and examined whether QE via semantically encoded thesauri terminology is more effective in the automatic or interactive processing environment. The research found that, regardless of end-users' retrieval goals, synonyms and partial synonyms (SYNs) and narrower terms (NTs) are generally good candidates for automatic QE and that related (RTs) are better candidates for interactive QE. The study also examined end-users' selection of semantically encoded thesauri terms for interactive QE, and explored how retrieval goals and QE processes may be combined in future thesauri-supported IR systems
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.6, S.487-498
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval
  2. Greenberg, J.: Automatic query expansion via lexical-semantic relationships (2001) 0.00
    0.004427025 = product of:
      0.030989174 = sum of:
        0.0050448296 = weight(_text_:information in 5703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0050448296 = score(doc=5703,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 5703, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5703)
        0.025944345 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5703) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025944345 = score(doc=5703,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 5703, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5703)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Structured thesauri encode equivalent, hierarchical, and associative relationships and have been developed as indexing/retrieval tools. Despite the fact that these tools provide a rich semantic network of vocabulary terms, they are seldom employed for automatic query expansion (QE) activities. This article reports on an experiment that examined whether thesaurus terms, related to query in a specified semantic way (as synonyms and partial-synonyms (SYNs), narrower terms (NTs), related terms (RTs), and broader terms (BTs)), could be identified as having a more positive impact on retrieval effectiveness when added to a query through automatic QE. The research found that automatic QE via SYNs and NTs increased relative recall with a decline in precision that was not statistically significant, and that automatic QE via RTs and BTs increased relative recall with a decline in precision that was statistically significant. Recallbased and a precision-based ranking orders for automatic QE via semantically encoded thesauri terminology were identified. Mapping results found between enduser query terms and the ProQuest Controlled Vocabulary (1997) (the thesaurus used in this study) are reported, and future research foci related to the investigation are discussed
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 52(2001) no.5, S.402-415
    Theme
    Semantisches Umfeld in Indexierung u. Retrieval