Search (25 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Markey, K."
  1. Rieh, S.Y.; Kim, Y.-M.; Markey, K.: Amount of invested mental effort (AIME) in online searching (2012) 0.01
    0.012210803 = product of:
      0.056983747 = sum of:
        0.034870304 = weight(_text_:web in 2726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034870304 = score(doc=2726,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.36057037 = fieldWeight in 2726, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2726)
        0.0071344664 = weight(_text_:information in 2726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0071344664 = score(doc=2726,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.13714671 = fieldWeight in 2726, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2726)
        0.014978974 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2726) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014978974 = score(doc=2726,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.16710453 = fieldWeight in 2726, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2726)
      0.21428572 = coord(3/14)
    
    Abstract
    This research investigates how people's perceptions of information retrieval (IR) systems, their perceptions of search tasks, and their perceptions of self-efficacy influence the amount of invested mental effort (AIME) they put into using two different IR systems: a Web search engine and a library system. It also explores the impact of mental effort on an end user's search experience. To assess AIME in online searching, two experiments were conducted using these methods: Experiment 1 relied on self-reports and Experiment 2 employed the dual-task technique. In both experiments, data were collected through search transaction logs, a pre-search background questionnaire, a post-search questionnaire and an interview. Important findings are these: (1) subjects invested greater mental effort searching a library system than searching the Web; (2) subjects put little effort into Web searching because of their high sense of self-efficacy in their searching ability and their perception of the easiness of the Web; (3) subjects did not recognize that putting mental effort into searching was something needed to improve the search results; and (4) data collected from multiple sources proved to be effective for assessing mental effort in online searching.
    Source
    Information processing and management. 48(2012) no.6, S.1136-1150
  2. Cochrane, P.A.; Markey, K.: Preparing for the use of classification in online cataloging systems and in online catalogs (1985) 0.01
    0.008009522 = product of:
      0.05606665 = sum of:
        0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 2087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014125523 = score(doc=2087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 2087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2087)
        0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04194113 = score(doc=2087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 2087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2087)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 4(1985), S.107 -
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  3. Markey, K.: Twenty-five years of end-user searching : part 1: research findings (2007) 0.01
    0.00604503 = product of:
      0.042315207 = sum of:
        0.012357258 = weight(_text_:information in 5163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.012357258 = score(doc=5163,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.23754507 = fieldWeight in 5163, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5163)
        0.029957948 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029957948 = score(doc=5163,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 5163, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5163)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    This is the first part of a two-part article that reviews 25 years of published research findings on end-user searching in online information retrieval (IR) systems. In Part 1 (Markey, 2007), the author seeks to answer the following questions: What characterizes the queries that end users submit to online IR systems? What search features do people use? What features would enable them to improve on the retrievals they have in hand? What features are hardly ever used? What do end users do in response to the system's retrievals? Are end users satisfied with their online searches? Summarizing searches of online IR systems by the search features people use everyday makes information retrieval appear to be a very simplistic one-stop event. In Part 2, the author examines current models of the information retrieval process, demonstrating that information retrieval is much more complex and involves changes in cognition, feelings, and/or events during the information seeking process. She poses a host of new research questions that will further our understanding about end-user searching of online IR systems.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.8, S.1071-1081
  4. Markey, K.; Swanson, F.; Jenkins, A.; Jennings, B.J.; St. Jean, B.; Rosenberg, V.; Yao, X.; Frost, R.L.: Designing and testing a web-based board game for teaching information literacy skills and concepts (2008) 0.01
    0.0059255934 = product of:
      0.04147915 = sum of:
        0.03019857 = weight(_text_:web in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03019857 = score(doc=2609,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.09670874 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.3122631 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
        0.011280581 = weight(_text_:information in 2609) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011280581 = score(doc=2609,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 2609, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2609)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    Purpose - This paper seeks to focus on the design and testing of a web-based online board game for teaching undergraduate students information literacy skills and concepts. Design/methodology/approach - Project team members with expertise in game play, creative writing, programming, library research, graphic design and information seeking developed a web-based board game in which students used digital library resources to answer substantive questions on a scholarly topic. The project team hosted game play in a class of 75 undergraduate students. The instructor offered an extra-credit incentive to boost participation resulting in 49 students on 13 teams playing the game. Post-game focus group interviews revealed problematic features and redesign priorities. Findings - A total of six teams were successful meeting the criteria for the instructor's grade incentive achieving a 53.1 percent accuracy rate on their answers to substantive questions about the black death; 35.7 percent was the accuracy rate for the seven unsuccessful teams. Discussed in detail are needed improvements to problematic game features such as offline tasks, feedback, challenge functionality, and the game's black death theme. Originality/value - Information literacy games test what players already know. Because this project's successful teams answered substantive questions about the black death at accuracy rates 20 points higher than the estimated probability of guessing, students did the research during game play which demonstrates that games have merit for teaching students information literacy skills and concepts.
  5. Markey, K.: Twenty-five years of end-user searching : part 2: future research directions (2007) 0.01
    0.005317847 = product of:
      0.037224926 = sum of:
        0.011280581 = weight(_text_:information in 443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011280581 = score(doc=443,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.21684799 = fieldWeight in 443, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=443)
        0.025944345 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.025944345 = score(doc=443,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.28943354 = fieldWeight in 443, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=443)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    This is the second part of a two-part article that examines 25 years of published research findings on end-user searching of online information retrieval (IR) systems. In Part 1, it was learned that people enter a few short search statements into online IR systems. Their searches do not resemble the systematic approach of expert searchers who use the full range of IR-system functionality. Part 2 picks up the discussion of research findings about end-user searching in the context of current information retrieval models. These models demonstrate that information retrieval is a complex event, involving changes in cognition, feelings, and/or events during the information seeking process. The author challenges IR researchers to design new studies of end-user searching, collecting data not only on system-feature use, but on multiple search sessions and controlling for variables such as domain knowledge expertise and expert system knowledge. Because future IR systems designers are likely to improve the functionality of online IR systems in response to answers to the new research questions posed here, the author concludes with advice to these designers about retaining the simplicity of online IR system interfaces.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.8, S.1123-1130
  6. Markey, K.: Searching and browsing the Dewey Decimal Classification in an online catalog (1987) 0.01
    0.00531243 = product of:
      0.03718701 = sum of:
        0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0060537956 = score(doc=384,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 384, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=384)
        0.031133216 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.031133216 = score(doc=384,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.34732026 = fieldWeight in 384, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=384)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    In the DDC Online Project, subject searching and browsing of DDC schedules and relative index were featured in an experimental online catalog. The effectiveness of this DDC in an online catalog was tested in online retrieval experiments at four participating libraries. These experiments provided data for analyses of subject searchers' use of a library classification in the information retrieval environment of an online catalog. Recommendations were provided for the enhancement of bibliographic records, online catalogs, and online cataloging systems with a library classification. In this paper, subject searchers' use of the subject outline search capability of the experimental online catalog is described. This capability was unique to the experimental online catalog and all other online catalogs, because it referred searchers to online displays of the classification schedules based on their entry of subject terms. Failure analyses of subject outline searches demonstrated its specific strenghts and weaknesses. Users' postsearch interview comments highlighted their experiences and their satisfaction with this search. Based on the failure analyses and users' interview comments, recommendations are provided for the improvement of the subject outline search in online catalogs.
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  7. Markey, K.: Class number searching in an experimental online catalog (1986) 0.00
    0.0034237658 = product of:
      0.047932718 = sum of:
        0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 109) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047932718 = score(doc=109,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 109, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=109)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  8. Markey, K.: Findings of the Dewey Decimal Classification on-line project (1986) 0.00
    0.0034237658 = product of:
      0.047932718 = sum of:
        0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 156) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047932718 = score(doc=156,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 156, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=156)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  9. Markey, K.: Subject searching in library catalogs : Before and after the introduction of online catalogs (1984) 0.00
    0.0034237658 = product of:
      0.047932718 = sum of:
        0.047932718 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2284) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.047932718 = score(doc=2284,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.5347345 = fieldWeight in 2284, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2284)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  10. Markey, K.: Dewey Decimal Classification online project: integration of a library schedule and index into the subject searching capabilities of an online catalog (1985) 0.00
    0.002995795 = product of:
      0.04194113 = sum of:
        0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04194113 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  11. Markey, K.; Atherton, P.; Newton, C.: ¬An analysis of controlled vocabulary and free text search statements in online searches (1980) 0.00
    0.002995795 = product of:
      0.04194113 = sum of:
        0.04194113 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1401) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04194113 = score(doc=1401,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.46789268 = fieldWeight in 1401, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1401)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  12. Markey, K.; Demeyer, A.N.: ¬The concept of common subject headings in subject outline searching (1989) 0.00
    0.0025678244 = product of:
      0.03594954 = sum of:
        0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 965) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03594954 = score(doc=965,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 965, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=965)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  13. Markey, K.: Alphabetical searching in an online catalog (1989) 0.00
    0.0021398535 = product of:
      0.029957948 = sum of:
        0.029957948 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 886) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029957948 = score(doc=886,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 886, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=886)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    An experimental online catalog was developed that provided searchers with several different subject searching strategies. Analyses of retrieval test data suggest that searchers expect alphabetical searches to provide lists of assigned subject headings conceptually related to their topics of interest. System designers can now respond to their expectation by incorporating LCSH-mr in online catalogs
  14. Markey, K.; Demeyer, A.N.: Dewey Decimal Classification online project: evaluation of a library schedule and index integrated into the subject searching capabilities of an online catalog : final report to the Council of Library Resources (1986) 0.00
    0.0021398535 = product of:
      0.029957948 = sum of:
        0.029957948 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 3472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029957948 = score(doc=3472,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.33420905 = fieldWeight in 3472, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3472)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Theme
    Klassifikationssysteme im Online-Retrieval
  15. Markey, K.: Levels of question formulation in negotiation of information need during the online presearch interview : a proposed model (1981) 0.00
    0.0014268934 = product of:
      0.019976506 = sum of:
        0.019976506 = weight(_text_:information in 3361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.019976506 = score(doc=3361,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.3840108 = fieldWeight in 3361, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3361)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 17(1981) no.5, S.215-225
  16. Markey, K.: Integrating the machine-readable LCSH into online catalogs (1988) 0.00
    0.0011531039 = product of:
      0.016143454 = sum of:
        0.016143454 = weight(_text_:information in 356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016143454 = score(doc=356,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 356, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=356)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 7(1988), S.299-312
  17. Markey, K.: Thus spoke the OPAC user (1983) 0.00
    0.0011531039 = product of:
      0.016143454 = sum of:
        0.016143454 = weight(_text_:information in 785) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.016143454 = score(doc=785,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.3103276 = fieldWeight in 785, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=785)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 2(1983), S.381-387
  18. Markey, K.: Thus spoke the OPAC user (1993) 0.00
    0.0010192095 = product of:
      0.014268933 = sum of:
        0.014268933 = weight(_text_:information in 5805) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014268933 = score(doc=5805,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.27429342 = fieldWeight in 5805, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5805)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Footnote
    Reprinted from: Information technology and libraries 2(1983) no.4, S.381-387
    Source
    Information technology and libraries. 12(1993) no.1, S.87-92
  19. Markey, K.: Online catalog access and subject authority information (1986) 0.00
    0.001008966 = product of:
      0.014125523 = sum of:
        0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 3882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014125523 = score(doc=3882,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 3882, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3882)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
  20. Markey, K.: Interindexer consistency tests : a literature review and report of a test of consistency in indexing visual materials (1984) 0.00
    0.001008966 = product of:
      0.014125523 = sum of:
        0.014125523 = weight(_text_:information in 5650) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014125523 = score(doc=5650,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.27153665 = fieldWeight in 5650, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5650)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Library and information science research. 6(1984), S.155-177