Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"McCulloch, E."
  • × theme_ss:"Semantische Interoperabilität"
  1. McCulloch, E.: Multiple terminologies : an obstacle to information retrieval (2004) 0.01
    0.00524566 = product of:
      0.036719617 = sum of:
        0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 2798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070627616 = score(doc=2798,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 2798, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2798)
        0.029656855 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2798) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029656855 = score(doc=2798,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2798, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2798)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    An issue currently at the forefront of digital library research is the prevalence of disparate terminologies and the associated limitations imposed on user searching. It is thought that semantic interoperability is achievable by improving the compatibility between terminologies and classification schemes, enabling users to search multiple resources simultaneously and improve retrieval effectiveness through the use of associated terms drawn from several schemes. This column considers the terminology issue before outlining various proposed methods of tackling it, with a particular focus on terminology mapping.
  2. McCulloch, E.; Shiri, A.; Nicholson, A.D.: Subject searching requirements : the HILT II experience (2004) 0.00
    0.00406575 = product of:
      0.028460251 = sum of:
        0.0104854815 = weight(_text_:information in 4758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0104854815 = score(doc=4758,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.20156369 = fieldWeight in 4758, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4758)
        0.01797477 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 4758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01797477 = score(doc=4758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 4758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4758)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The HILT Phase II project aimed to develop a pilot terminologies server with a view to improving cross-sectoral information retrieval. In order to inform this process, it was first necessary to examine how a representative group of users approached a range of information-related tasks. This paper focuses on exploratory interviews conducted to investigate the proposed ideal and actual strategies of a group of 30 users in relation to eight separate information tasks. In addition, users were asked to give examples of search terms they may employ and to describe how they would formulate search queries in each scenario. The interview process undertaken and the results compiled are outlined, and associated implications for the development of a pilot terminologies server are discussed.
  3. McCulloch, E.; Macgregor, G.: Analysis of equivalence mapping for terminology services (2008) 0.00
    4.32414E-4 = product of:
      0.0060537956 = sum of:
        0.0060537956 = weight(_text_:information in 550) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0060537956 = score(doc=550,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.116372846 = fieldWeight in 550, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=550)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Journal of information science. 34(2008) no.1, S.70-92